Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes I am. I talked to you before on multiple occasions
I wish for the moderator to remove my name from the intro page as the information about me is non factual
And wrong
Hello.
To whom it may concern.
18 months ago, Angela Collette has filed custodianship of this company, unbeknownst to me.
I have sought to come to an agreement with Collete. Collette had sold this entity to Harry Zhang. His name is searchable under drone services in WYOMING now.
I called Harry Zhang and he is aware of the custodial action and is dismissive of my previous presidency as well as Joel Bredow's presidency.
There has been numerous calls about the company and directed to my home phone number. All i can say is that it was court ordered to give custody to Collette.
The debt by Villotis and the other debts are still diarized and in my possession, passed on from Bredow to me.
The new president is either unaware or unwilling to communicate with me about the preferred share and the debts. I am assuming that if he does not hear about it, he will use a particular article statute in Universal Commercial Code to write it off. If this is the case, then that would not be correct and accurate to use a legal opinion to write it off.
That is all i can say about the circumstance. Collette issued a cease and desist 1 year ago when I inquired about how she wants to proceed and now that verbal TRO is over so hence why I write to this board now.
Thank You.
Richard Tang
Hello.
To whom it may concern.
18 months ago, Angela Collette has filed custodianship of this company, unbeknownst to me.
I have sought to come to an agreement with Collete. Collette had sold this entity to Harry Zhang. His name is searchable under drone services in WYOMING now.
I called Harry Zhang and he is aware of the custodial action and is dismissive of my previous presidency as well as Joel Bredow's presidency.
There has been numerous calls about the company and directed to my home phone number. All i can say is that it was court ordered to give custody to Collette.
The debt by Villotis and the other debts are still diarized and in my possession, passed on from Bredow to me.
The new president is either unaware or unwilling to communicate with me about the preferred share and the debts. I am assuming that if he does not hear about it, he will use a particular article statute in Universal Commercial Code to write it off. If this is the case, then that would not be correct and accurate to use a legal opinion to write it off.
That is all i can say about the circumstance. Collette issued a cease and desist 1 year ago when I inquired about how she wants to proceed and now that verbal TRO is over so hence why I write to this board now.
Thank You.
Richard Tang
It would be great if there was a case for Rajkaran.
To moderator, if it is possible can you disassociate me and Ron Hughes from Miller?
OILY/SPLM/CSOC are verifiable not hijacked. If you look at all of the filings dating back to 2011 for CSOC and OILY it is very evident that they are not hijacks.
YHDT was once called Razor Resources, a mining company, and roles of responsibility succeeded to Talbot.
DSUS was a partnership with Joel Bredow and Myself, but PV Enterprises burdened the company, with debt by Peter Villotis. Angela Collette has performed a custodianship and taken it away from us and is now with Harry Zhang and had secured the control. DSUS will have a name change, and I do not condone this action as it was a force majeur against Bredow and myself.
ATAR and AHII are resigned from Ed Minnema and Anthony Sarvucci and have good credentials. These are always and had been expert market and are not meant for trading. They are designated as a SPAC (special purpose acquisition company) and so there is no float nor will it trade to retail. These have no harm to the public.
I truly wish that before these statements are put on a permanent board intro, that they are verified and you can call me. My number is everywhere.
My suffering has gone too long and the defamation has caused me to lose business and I cannot even apply to OTCIQ because they look at these boards. I cannot have a position on a company that i rightfully control.
Please if there is conscience, update the intro page and disassociate me and Ron Hughes from the absconding of shells by other wrongdoers.
thank you.
Hello. My name is Richard Tang. I was a director of Caduceus Software Systems Corp (CSOC), and for a brief moment an active director of Bell Buckle Holdings.
I recently posted on the BLLB forum but it was delete on the grounds of "off topic". additionally I posted this on the Fake Press Releases board in ihub and hope that it reaches the moderators. This is my 3rd posting. Thank you for reading this.
This message from me to the community is for information and for facts that I know, and do not represent the current administration of Bell Buckle Holdings.
My statements I state here, will be submitted to relevant offices that deal with Whistleblowing and to aid in a case that was recently reported on CNBC.com.
CNBC.com has issued a press release on Andre Jaberian in relation to BLLB. There was a case and i cite it here: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mnd.195108/gov.uscourts.mnd.195108.1.0.pdf
I concur and believe that the statements in the PDF are accurate. Andre Jaberian had listed Ron Hughes and myself as officers on August 29th 2018. A conversation occurred where Jaberian and Miller talked to us on the phone, and expressed interest in granting authority and control of BLLB to us. The reasoning is because their business plans best suited my talents and not theirs, as they stated. Upon a meeting of the minds, we collectively agreed to be on as officers.
The departing officer (Jaberian) had resigned, and assigned us those roles. This seemed fine at the time.
Soon thereafter, an 8K filing was issued unbeknownst to myself and Ron Hughes, and nothing spectacular or sensational had happened.
The company had later been downgraded to a Caveat Emptor, and there was no known reason or a reason given to us by OTCIQ. However we noticed volume spikes and were guessing that it could be CE'd to protect investor interest due to swings on the trade prices.
The chain of control was established, granted and vetted by the TA, where the previous officer (prior to Jaberian) to us was correct, and that Jaberian's tenure was null and void. Jaberian had not or did not pass vetting so the Transfer Agent did not allow them to see or alter the TA shareholder list. With our backgrounds, Hughes and I obtained the control and were able to pass and maintain the list.
No shares have been issued to anybody during our tenure.
When I did not have motivation to continue maintaining BLLB, I had interviewed Nathan Nowak and Kim Halvorson. It was my decision to grant Ms. Halvorson the continued control as she had interviewed well. She had a very good resume and I believe that after 18 months of searching for a CEO of BLLB she would be a good fit and is competent. Today she is doing a good job, and I hope that this case will allow her to submit a review of removing the Caveat Emptor. I haven't talked to her about that, but I think that is a process she is contemplating.
Looking back, in retrospect, I lament on whether I was "duped" to be a sacrificial officer and victim to a pump and dump of BLLB. I haven't the proof to see whether Jaberian/Miller had done anything wrong to me, so I had simply thought that my negative association with myself and BLLB and defamation (if you call it defaming due to association) that it was simply bad timing and bad luck.
However now that this Indictment has been read out to me (please note to all, that as you know from CSOC, I am a legally blind person, if that matters), that I now beleive that BLLB was hurt by the actions of Jaberian.
The positives from this ordeal is that, BLLB has proper vetted control approved by the TA, and Jaberian is dismissed as not even being part of the company so no stock options or warrants were ever given to him and no notes were issued. Also, the TA approved the transition to me and from myself to Halvorson.
The fallout is that soon after the CE came up, Hughes and my name were smeared on IHUB and it resulted in me, losing the ability to successfully apply for OTCIQ anymore. So if you had recognized me in CSOC, I am a positive and honest person that tells the audience what is happening with CSOC. However, the BLLB caused so many questions that OTCIQ surveillance denies me of operating a company. This is very tragic for me financially and makes me upset that the smear posts on ihub actually do affect the decision of OTCIQ.
If anybody is available to connect with OTCIQ or have revisions to the posts that defame myself and demonize me as a hijacker, It would be appreciated so that I can once again resume as an officer of a company and successfully apply for OTCIQ. I really do feel that Jaberian and company had tainted my name via BLLB.
This message is from me, Richard Tang, and I speak for myself, and not anyone else, and i have not coordinated any messaging with anybody. There is no ulterior motive other than to give my conclusive analysis of events based upon the facts laid in the court case, issued and published yesterday.
Sincerely,
Richard Tang
Hello. My name is Richard Tang. I was a director of Caduceus Software Systems Corp (CSOC), and for a brief moment an active director of Bell Buckle Holdings.
This message from me to the community is for information and for facts that I know, and do not represent the current administration of Bell Buckle Holdings.
My statements I state here, will be submitted to relevant offices that deal with Whistleblowing and to aid in a case that was recently reported on CNBC.com.
CNBC.com has issued a press release on Andre Jaberian in relation to BLLB. There was a case and i cite it here: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mnd.195108/gov.uscourts.mnd.195108.1.0.pdf
I concur and believe that the statements in the PDF are accurate. Andre Jaberian had listed Ron Hughes and myself as officers on August 29th 2018. A conversation occurred where Jaberian and Miller talked to us on the phone, and expressed interest in granting authority and control of BLLB to us. The reasoning is because their business plans best suited my talents and not theirs, as they stated. Upon a meeting of the minds, we collectively agreed to be on as officers.
The departing officer (Jaberian) had resigned, and assigned us those roles. This seemed fine at the time.
Soon thereafter, an 8K filing was issued unbeknownst to myself and Ron Hughes, and nothing spectacular or sensational had happened.
The company had later been downgraded to a Caveat Emptor, and there was no known reason or a reason given to us by OTCIQ. However we noticed volume spikes and were guessing that it could be CE'd to protect investor interest due to swings on the trade prices.
The chain of control was established, granted and vetted by the TA, where the previous officer (prior to Jaberian) to us was correct, and that Jaberian's tenure was null and void. Jaberian had not or did not pass vetting so the Transfer Agent did not allow them to see or alter the TA shareholder list. With our backgrounds, Hughes and I obtained the control and were able to pass and maintain the list.
No shares have been issued to anybody during our tenure.
When I did not have motivation to continue maintaining BLLB, I had interviewed Nathan Nowak and Kim Halvorson. It was my decision to grant Ms. Halvorson the continued control as she had interviewed well. She had a very good resume and I believe that after 18 months of searching for a CEO of BLLB she would be a good fit and is competent. Today she is doing a good job, and I hope that this case will allow her to submit a review of removing the Caveat Emptor. I haven't talked to her about that, but I think that is a process she is contemplating.
Looking back, in retrospect, I lament on whether I was "duped" to be a sacrificial officer and victim to a pump and dump of BLLB. I haven't the proof to see whether Jaberian/Miller had done anything wrong to me, so I had simply thought that my negative association with myself and BLLB and defamation (if you call it defaming due to association) that it was simply bad timing and bad luck.
However now that this Indictment has been read out to me (please note to all, that as you know from CSOC, I am a legally blind person, if that matters), that I now beleive that BLLB was hurt by the actions of Jaberian.
The positives from this ordeal is that, BLLB has proper vetted control approved by the TA, and Jaberian is dismissed as not even being part of the company so no stock options or warrants were ever given to him and no notes were issued. Also, the TA approved the transition to me and from myself to Halvorson.
The fallout is that soon after the CE came up, Hughes and my name were smeared on IHUB and it resulted in me, losing the ability to successfully apply for OTCIQ anymore. So if you had recognized me in CSOC, I am a positive and honest person that tells the audience what is happening with CSOC. However, the BLLB caused so many questions that OTCIQ surveillance denies me of operating a company. This is very tragic for me financially and makes me upset that the smear posts on ihub actually do affect the decision of OTCIQ.
If anybody is available to connect with OTCIQ or have revisions to the posts that defame myself and demonize me as a hijacker, It would be appreciated so that I can once again resume as an officer of a company and successfully apply for OTCIQ. I really do feel that Jaberian and company had tainted my name via BLLB.
This message is from me, Richard Tang, and I speak for myself, and not anyone else, and i have not coordinated any messaging with anybody. There is no ulterior motive other than to give my conclusive analysis of events based upon the facts laid in the court case, issued and published yesterday.
Sincerely,
Richard Tang
Hello.
Updates and clarification.
I would like to clarify to all that is interested. That CSOC is a Wyoming corporation. The important note is that the common shares' authorized is at 850,000,000.
If the common class was unlimited, it will say so. But we have made quite firm that there is a capped limit.
Also, I was wondering if you might know of the website https://otcmarketresearch.com
It states false notes about me and my actions of false filings. I can attest that I had not done any hijacks or wrong or false filings.
On another note, some news:
The fake news automation code is progressing. We have developed a NodeJS automation to find keywords that filter some headlines/titles of news, and if it passes, it will tag it into a database. It is similar to a spam filter for email, but for headlines.
The goal of this automation is to aggregate a compilation of known-good-source and proper headlines that hopefully are less sensational and biased.
The work is still going on, and we have downloaded a dictionary of words and sensitive combined phrases that filter bad keywords. It is not perfect because it has taken some good articles and tagged them as inappropriate. But we are hoping it will self learn.
We are wanting to partner with companies that have an interest in blockchain development. We wish to have a ERC20 token donated to us, so we are announcing that we wish to have an angel investor or a tech company develop a token for us. And each block will represent an accepted news article that we deem safe and not fake news. This in essence is the blockchain for a "truth coin" concept.
I hope this little update gives you an idea of our current pace and our sincerity towards making a viable product.
I would also like to re-iterate that we are NOT associated with CEN. The agreement that we had with them in 2018 is dead and did not affect our share structure. No issuances to them.
Thank you very much.
Richard
Hello.
Updates and clarification.
I would like to clarify to all that is interested. That CSOC is a Wyoming corporation. The important note is that the common shares' authorized is at 850,000,000.
If the common class was unlimited, it will say so. But we have made quite firm that there is a capped limit.
Also, I was wondering if you might know of the website https://otcmarketresearch.com
It states false notes about me and my actions of false filings. I can attest that I had not done any hijacks or wrong or false filings.
On another note, some news:
The fake news automation code is progressing. We have developed a NodeJS automation to find keywords that filter some headlines/titles of news, and if it passes, it will tag it into a database. It is similar to a spam filter for email, but for headlines.
The goal of this automation is to aggregate a compilation of known-good-source and proper headlines that hopefully are less sensational and biased.
The work is still going on, and we have downloaded a dictionary of words and sensitive combined phrases that filter bad keywords. It is not perfect because it has taken some good articles and tagged them as inappropriate. But we are hoping it will self learn.
We are wanting to partner with companies that have an interest in blockchain development. We wish to have a ERC20 token donated to us, so we are announcing that we wish to have an angel investor or a tech company develop a token for us. And each block will represent an accepted news article that we deem safe and not fake news. This in essence is the blockchain for a "truth coin" concept.
I hope this little update gives you an idea of our current pace and our sincerity towards making a viable product.
I would also like to re-iterate that we are NOT associated with CEN. The agreement that we had with them in 2018 is dead and did not affect our share structure. No issuances to them.
Thank you very much.
Richard
Hi there,
I want to be gracious and reply and answer some things. Please note that if you require the perspective from me, that you will not bash my answer. Here it goes:
to MANOFTHEPEOPLE, thanks for investigating. However, there are some contexts.
Sino American Oil was filed originally with Ronald Hughes, and Sentry Petroleum is the original SB2 filed company. Sino American Oil is a spin out. So Ronald Hughes is rightfully associated with both.
He stepped down from both and I was appointed.
BLLB - was administered by A S. Jaberian. The filings were from Simmons and Jaberian. Jaberian reached out to Ronald Hughes and wanted me to file. However, there is much verification to be done so that is why it has not yet become pink current. There is much to be sorted out by Hughes and the AP of BLLB.
I do not know anything about Miller and ECMH and etc. He is his own self and directs things on his own and no correspondence has happened. In fact, at one point Miller was a critic of me in CSOC.
W.r.t. the tweets, @CSOCusa was hacked and the tweets were removed because some of them had javascript injection. You can verify with twitter around June/July 2019 where Twitter can suspended some accounts and had recommended to remove dubious comments, and unfortunately, it deletes the corresponding original tweets. Then this had happened, I had made a new splash background and it said "reconstructing in progress" with pictures of umbrellas, symbolizing that it is being worked on. I had re-uploaded the logo back in October/November to denote that the tweets and the communication will be back to normal thereafter.
With the utmost cantor, and with the most sincerest levels of respect, to MANOFTHEPEOPLE and the other critics, I think that I am being very open and transparent with how I conduct the communications.
When there is mention of "dilution kang". According to urbandictionbary, i can only find what tang could mean... a reference to black slavery, or someone with low credit score. How can there be dilution? Nothing has been deposited by anybody in years. Also there is a BC Cease Trade Order which is Canad-wide pursuant to NI 51-102. The TA is always verified and the numbers are the same.
I do not know where the dilution story has sprouted from but I have never bought or sold any CSOC from the open market ever. Once cannot even place a trade in Canada at all. Or any Canadian citizen from anywhere in the world can do so.
I hope you are able to digest this and be ok with it all. Peace be with you.
Hello. I wrote a press release. It isn't propagated too far. But here is a cut and paste of it as follows. Thanks:
Caduceus Software Systems (ticker symbol CSOC), listed on the OTCMarkets.com, has recently filed for a patent. It is Submitted to the Canadian IP Office. The patent relates to new application of Blockchain technology which is useful for everyday life. The patent explains a mechanism and process that uses blockchain technology to significantly reduce fake news #fakenews around the world, and also reward those that make real news #realnews -- whether it be community or national or international news -- with cryptocurrency tokens. The intentional of making this cryptocurrency, is to create an ecosystem ( forward looking). CSOC plans on owning the ecosystem, and wants to be a player in #realnews . The ecosystem hopes (forward looking) to make revenue by sending out news on RSS and Internet dissemination. CSOC hopes (forward looking) to sell its real news and pictures and media that it gets from its users. Classic news dissemination services are Bloomberg, Reuters, and media disseminators are YouTube, CBS, CNN, Getty images.
Research done by CSOC members, Richard & Anna Tang, and Erwin, have found that cryptocurrency is not backed by anything tangible. What is meant by "tangible" is that tokens and coins are generally created by high powered machines that consume lots of electricity, just for the sake of making a new block in the blockchain. It isn't "backed" by "usefulness". CSOC plans (forward-looking) to use its Real News coins in a different way -- wear people need to earn coins by submitted real news and real media. This aims to give the tokens some worth and usefulness for the world.
CSOC wants to start this process manually first. It wants to create an email to receive real news, online forms to accept media and real news, and online forms to identify fake news, and a voting system. This is a "huge" undertaking, whether it is streamlined by cryptocurrency blockchain, or manually. It wants to have a huge repository of useful news, so it aims to become a news source itself. It could look like a "real-time" wikipedia of facts and news events, but we do not know how it will unfold.
We at CSOC are calling upon the public for infrastructure help, technical expertise, and online storage companies to help us, and we will share our concept and plans in place, and share our revenues with anyone that can help us achieve this goal. For now please email info@caduceussoftware.net if you can help.
As you (the audience) can see from this news release, we are very open to ask for help and open to share in our potential revenues. Being a new and reputable news source is a serious matter, and we do not wish to have extreme opinionated news so that it is deemed "ultra-right wing" or "extreme-left-wing" or partisan. This is a worldwide effort to create the best news for the world.
There will be news updates (forward-looking), that will explain our progress and plan to those we select as proper helpers and long-term supporters and developers.
CSOC thanks the general audience and its shareholders for being patient with us. We do not issue news until our intent and plans can be executable and is something that we can "tackle".
Richard Tang
President, Caduceus Software Systems Corp.
About The Company
Caduceus Software Systems Corp is an innovation company. It develops software, software design assets and technical expertise to its clients. The term, Caduceus, is an ancient symbol of good business/commerce.
It has projects in technology currently, and has strategic alliances with the open source community.
Forward Looking Statements
Some information in this document constitutes forward-looking statements or statements which may be deemed or construed to be forward-looking statements, such as the closing of the share exchange agreement. The words "wishes", "aspires", "plan", "forecast", "anticipates", "estimate", "project", "intend", "expect", "should", "believe", and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve, and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause the Company's actual results, performance (financial or operating) or achievements to differ from the future results, performance (financial or operating) or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements attributable to Caduceus Software Systems Corp., herein are expressly qualified in their entirety by the above-mentioned cautionary statement. Caduceus Software Systems Corp., disclaims any obligation to update forward-looking statements contained in this estimate, except as may be required by law.
For information of our latest news, and our trending posts:
Our preferred social media outlet is Twitter:
Twitter.com/CSOCusa or @CSOCusa
www.caduceussoftware.net
info@caduceussoftware.net
www.twitter.com/CSOCusa
Richard Tang
Caduceus Software Systems
Hello.
Happy New Year. This is Richard Tang, President of CSOC.
We didn't bother renewing OTCMarkets.com access, so that is why I did not post any news through that forum. I have begun to like Twitter and perhaps, if there isn't any bad experiences with Ihub, I will use Ihub to post.
This can't be considered a public news release because it isn't on an official news dissemination service.
If you haven't discovered already, I, on behalf of Caduceus Software Systems, had filed for patent with the Canadian IP Office. Until it is approved, it would be foolish to divulge the description and verbose detail of it. But I would not go through the process of filing a minimum of 30+ pages and diagrams and system architectural pictures for something insignificant.
CSOC, as you know, had been a previous name called Bosco Holdings. Under Bosco, we filed a patent to make fish lures that actually encouraged floating towards fish, which aimed to make fishing faster and more productive.
CSOC emerged from Bosco back in 2008, where it had filed a patent in Indiana and British Columbia, which it was very successful in doing so, to create the Caduceus MMR Electronic Health Records (EHR) system. The important patent in this system was a fast retrievable alert system for doctors to pull medicine data on their patient to alert them of any potential allergies or bad interactions with drugs the patient would fall ill to. It is used as a safety mechanism to not prescribe life threatening drugs to patients.
This year we have filed a different type of patent. It is not just an Intellectual property patent, but aims to be a system and procedural patent.
I hope that this will increase the ability to either sell or license this patent, or implement it and garner revenues for the company, or whatever that generates positive influence on the stock.
The Company is employed by three people that care about the company, which is Me, Erwin, and my wife, Anna. We haven't nor plan to touch our equity in the company.
The patent, in my opinion, is pretty good and touches a lot of industries so I think it should gain interest in a lot of industries which will compel influencers to work with us. fingers cross.
Well That is all I have to say for now. I only get 1 post a day, so I hope this was worthwhile for you to read.
Best Wishes,
Richard.
Hello. This is Richard Tang.
I would like to say that the merger with CEN biotech is OFF.
There is a difference in opinion on accounting practices.
So I say with sincerity, thank you for your continued support and nice emails to me.
And the silver lining is that there is no reverse split anymore.
I am back to being allowed to tweet because during the merger, I had to be in a quiet period. That is over now.
So I am open to any proposals to make the company profitable.
Also note, that we will not be paying for the $6000 yearly subscription to OTCMarkets, so CSOC will be stop sign come December or January. This doesn't really matter because nobody insider will or have or intend to sell and deposit any stock.
So the stop sign isn't really meaningful.
Thanks for your continued support, and I am sorry that I was non communicable. I'll tweet some updates despite the OTCMarkets delinquency come December.
Sincerely,
Richard Tang
President, Caduceus Software Systems
info@caduceussoftware.net
Hello.
I created the csoc account many years ago. I wrote a post that put in in this "The Jailhouse" because I asked for a cease and desist of a IHUB member who threatened my family's life if I did not perform a PR on CSOC.
To Janice Shell: your research is accurate. Angela Collette was removed as there is either a clerical error that she was on the Annual list for a period of 7 hours yesterday, or it was done maliciously. It doesn't matter as Collette had no authority or signing authority to perform the Annual List.
To: BmoeSki: I tend to agree that nobody should invest in stock that has no material event. I certainly wouldn't. unless it is an official filing and reflected in the Quarterly filings. That is a very prudent and pragmatic approach which is good.
To Huggy Bear: Well. I cannot assert that it is complete garbage. But I do not think anybody should invest in any stock that has no updated filings or any material events issued by the SEC/Edgar system. If the company is benign and there are superficial rumours (like reinstatement, which is not spectacular) then I would agree definitely.
To nodummy: it is 75% accurate but here are the corrections:
- There isn't a relationship between M.Miller and myself. I run a news service called www.newswire.world and had him as a customer for Press Release dissemination for the stock symbol MEDH. There has been sparce interaction with him.
- I have good ties and relationship with Ronald Hughes. R. Hughes was the original president of $OILY and $SPLM. They have been relinquished to me as he is no longer performing active duties for this sector and I have been appointed the directorship of $OILY and $SPLM.
- $CSOC I have been with the company as a programer since the very beginning, writing code for the EHR system. The company president, A. Dannikov left and D. Gidden was president. He has retired and appointed me president as I was the biggest debt holder and largest investor of CSOC.
- $BLLB - Ronald Hughes was asked to revive the company by a person named A Jaberian. It was a communication originally instigated by A. Jaberian. Ronald asked if I can perform the administrative work if necessary for it, and so I am associated as a hired - work-basis - administrator.
- $DSUS - this is by appointment by Joel Bredow, previous CEO to help fix debt problems.
My main useful role is an administrator. I respond to emails, most of them are solicited Deals. I do not deposit any stock, or have been active at all in depositing or promoting them. These are very benign companies.
The only statement that I can say about the companies: they are and always being administered. whether or not you see a filing, there is some progress made to make it better. Be it 1 2 or 10 years, they are always being worked on.
I know of no association of the other stock symbols. The only association was by customer / client of issuing a Press Release under my news service www.newswire.world, which the vetting is done by www.newswire.com. I have not been active in Newswire.world due to eyesight problems for the past 2 years, which is an irrelevant fact.
Thank you.
Richard
info@dsus.co
info@caduceussoftware.net
Notice to DSUS shareholders:
This is Richard Tang.
The company was in the process of being reinstated. This is a fact.
During the process, there was a time lapse of 48 hours. I had undergone surgery during this time period. Between this time lapse, an attempt to file a illegitimate unapproved annual list was submitted with the name Angela Collette.
The lawyer had not sent any notification to myself, the registered agent, nor a petition to the Nevada State courts. This was a malicious act attempting to take over the company.
The company is reinstated. The annual list has been corrected by SilverFlume, and the SEC/Edgar has been informed. The CIK, Edgar, and Finra are all informed of the right filings and disregard the fake state-level amendment. A Fraudulent form was filed to petition to investigate this Angela Collette as she is involved in also.. symbol LDSR. I have submitted another legal opinion to re-assert and confirm the proper activities of Drone Services.
if there are any questions please email me at info@dsus.co
This message is also approved by the previous CEO, Joel Bredow, who I have confirmed that he did not have any knowledge of this wrong amended annual list.
Thank you very much.
Richard Tang