dnrg is only looking to produce 20 to 50 mw not 5000 like in your pictures

could you please tell us what this means. ty

the two clowns that threw him out also have a big problem. You see, if there was fraud, as they claimed, they have no legal authority to forgive that crime and by letting sand keep those shares they are binding partners to that crime and I am asking for the SEC to conduct a full investigation and make a report to the peeps.

something sticks here. Why let Sand keep all the shares. Must have violated sec rules. Did he sell restricted shares or what. I don't think it is over yet.

Could you please list the damage that Bob has done to the Co. ty

I think we should all email D. Trump and ask him to make market makers outlawed if he becomes President.

OK you belive its made up, but I'm telling you it's a done deal. You should remember that this is the administration's pet baby and dnrg is gov approved and no one else.

the majority leader has put it in the bill to be voted on after they come back from recess.

I don't know exactly when, but I am sure GE wants this company very bad and when that happens, I know I will have shares because when it is announced, it will be to late to buy. Remember the import and export bank is approved.

I can tell you what the problem is. The sec rules for mm'ers is they can not cause a movement of more than 8% but if you look at the spread that nite has it breakes the rules.

answer is YES. It was by the company before Inan Hobjob (as we called him) became CEO. It was called the bulldozer but what it is called now we don't know. It was in the K10 that they are still selling the old product, so wait till Q10 and you will know.

If the board would take note. The blocking and run down of the stock started when mm wdco showed up and the bashers started. This is their method of operation to have paid basher's,. We control a large amount of the os. If we hold tight they can't get enough shares to control the stock. I am holding with 7.5% of os.

So any idea what G. Randall & Son's in Pa are doing.

BINGO

One thing to remember is the new company has all the rights to frontier beverage energy drinks and distribution is already in place and once they give the go with new products it should be in the public hands within 3 weeks.

Fillings could come anytime, key wording ON OR BEFORE JUNE 10

I was here pre r/s and keep my post r/s shares to remind me to check this every week. When it started moving again I got more shares ,big time, at .004 and would make a nice profit at .05 but I have not taken any, have no stops or sells orders in and no MM'er is going to get any of the shares I have until the stock hits $1.25. The float we have now will be the same a yr from now so hold your shares. We can make the MM'ers hurt.

Scottrade told me the broker has to pay a fee to deal in fbec stocks so I opened an account, online with Etrade,called my bank and had them wire funds to my new Etrade acct all same day.

yes I know all that. been here a long time but again no product just talk and thanks to those replied with list of brokers.

that's true, I have bought but small amount. that's what I mean by be careful.

well be careful, I was in FBEC before r/s of 1/1000. Lots of hype but no products.

I would but Scottrade has a restriction on fbec, what other brokers alow buying fbec.

yes that was the filling that ecig needed to ask for the r/s vote. If you note, no date was ever set and it would be public record if one was set, I can't find one listed with FINRA, If you can, please let the board know.

other financing take place. long term for ecig

this is a short term note that was completed on 3/13. The lender wanted assurance that a r/s could be done, if need be, by 3/24 if note was still valued on that date. If this is not the case, why wait until 3/24 why not 3/13. I will say this again no R/S on or before 3/24.

Yes word for word, please read the very first para of covenants and agreements, section 4 and you will then understand that the r/s will not happen.

You forgot let others know that the r/s will only happen by Mar 24th if the warrant is outstanding on that date. It could be paid off by other financing that may be taking place.

I have not voted yet. I will vote a deff no to the rs and thinking a yes to the as increase with 20m prefered and here is my thinking. I am long since nov 14 but with only 100,000 shares. if rs gets a yes, they will have 270m shares to sell or to give to management if they do 10:1. They could give themselves total control with these shares thus not needing share holder permission to do what they want but my share count goes to 10k if a 10:1 is used. My funds are 200k if it goes to $20 which would be the same if it was to go to $2 without a rs. If I give them a yes on as increase they have 50m shares to work with but of that 20m will be preffered. Thus they could do what ever they want again. So if I vote that way I'm scred again. the best way as I can tell is to not vote at all and see what the out come is.

you asked a number of questions and I will respond. q 1 not important. q 2,3,4 no answer as management has not given any figures for the stock holders to see. q 5, it almost impossible but would tell everyone who created this problem. you do know that management can give back their shares that were given to them and that would give the co. some a/s. as many as if the 350m was approved. thanks for your honest opinion as to some ones ability. just maybe you have those figures and would pass them onto everyone on this for more discussion.

If you tust the new management so much why don't they tell you how many votes each preferred share carries.

you my friend are correct. I know what goes on under the late night lights in the management office. Why come out with 600m as and 100:1 rs and then a few minutes later correct those figures. because no one in their right mind would go for them. so lets give them something they will go for.

from a tired retired ceo, the management has not specified what voting rights the preferred shares have, why? if you give them the power that they seek you WILL see a penney stock before your eyes. preferred shares are not like class a or common shares they must be given what voting shares they contain. They are hoping to get voting majority and then you will see the 600m as they asked for and the rs of 100:1 they want. with this they can feather their own nest and screw the common share holders. do not give this control to management unless you truly want cheap shares and a true penney stock. If the earnings are what people say they are then they need neither. vote no to both.