Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Interesting: I'll take a closer look in this one.
Why so fast? Any r/m could take up to a year. But I like the enthousiasm...
I hope you’ll be right..
An r/s would be very healthy at the right time . I’ll take a 1:100 .
I was thinking that already. Thanks!
Another R/S?
Nice story.
This story is about Global Internet of People, Inc.
They submitted this doc on October 1, 2019.
They visited company’s.
One of them was Panshi in 2017.
This is the only time the speculated merge-in company is mentioned.
So your story isn’t about Panshi , but about Global Internet of People, Inc.
Quote:
“Study Tours
Beginning in 2016, we started organizing study tours for our Members, and offered five, seven, and ten study tours in 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively. We offered 4 study tours during the first six months ended June 30, 2019. Our study tours are designed to provide trainings on real world business skills for entrepreneurs and executives. Each study tour generally lasts two days, in which a day and a half are dedicated to classroom style lecturing and discussions, while the remaining half day is spent on visiting the headquarters or facilities of successful enterprises. All participants are responsible for their own food, traveling and living accommodations throughout the study tours.
Below are some of our study tours given in the past:
Dates Location (City) Number of Participants (approximate) Enterprise Visited
June 22-24, 2019 Hangzhou 182 Wahaha Group
August 24 – 26, 2018 Quanzhou 300 361 Degrees International Limited
July 13 – 15, 2018 Taiyuan 400 Fenjiu Group
May 25 – 27, 2018 Ningbo 520 Sunny Optical Technology (Group) Co., Ltd. and Ningbo Shanshan Co., Ltd.
December 9 – 11, 2017 Guangzhou 450 Changlu Group
October 27 – 29, 2017 Hangzhou 450
Zhejiang Panshi Information Technology Co., Ltd. and Zhejiang Xizihangkong Industry Co., Ltd.
November 26 – 27, 2016 Shanghai 400 Ningbo Shanshan Co., Ltd.
July 31 – August 1, 2016 Zunyi 200 Kweichow Moutai Group
62
“
Good luck doing DD.
Source?
Yes, this additional info wasn’t there earlier this week.
They announced pharmazon before, now they changed to e-sports. Do you think the pharmazon thing is cancelled now?
Thanks! Learned something new today :)
Same CEO as here?
So do you think this will be in 2021? Because they announced the launch will be in 2021 or 2022 ..
$BIMO We are now licensing call centers and lead generators as subscription agents in each country. Every E-sports subscription obtained in a particular country by the call center will receive an ongoing month commission. This is a way to generate huge income on a monthly basis. pic.twitter.com/tptsza8ZLR
— Adijas (@AdijasStocks) December 5, 2019
Is that always the case? So it isn’t possible the payment will be done at a later moment.
Yes, settlement.
Why Will the Numbers of the Amazon settlement be in the Q4 filings? I didn’t read anything about that.
I just like the potential of the speculative/suspected r/m here. I can’t predict stocks, Maybe people with the ability to read charts can tell you their expectations.
I liked the difference in the first paragraphs “November” versus “The end of 2019” (Google translate).
I don’t know what you mean by that ASIC: never looked into that ticker.
Interesting find:
http://caifuhao.eastmoney.com/news/20191203121718894811690
Compare this article with:
https://xueqiu.com/1968708087/134620455
The dream could still be come true, I like the speculation about this potential company coming in...
Source: Law360.com
Law360 (December 2, 2019, 5:20 PM EST) -- Facing separate patent lawsuits, Apple and Amazon have each lost their bids to have the cases moved from the Eastern District of Texas, with the district’s chief judge in both instances finding California would not be a more convenient place to litigate.
Judge Rodney Gilstrap entered a pair of orders Wednesday denying requests from Apple and Amazon to have their respective lawsuits transferred from East Texas to the Northern District of California. The judge said neither company had shown California was “clearly more convenient.”
The case against Amazon was brought in April by a company called Vocalife, which has alleged that Amazon’s Echo smart speakers infringe a patent covering a microphone system. Vocalife has an office in Plano, and its president is one of the patent’s inventors.
That same month, Apple was hit with a lawsuit accusing it of infringing a Quest NetTech patent on credit card technology with its Apple Pay service. NetTech’s headquarters are across the street from the federal courthouse in Marshall.
In each case, Judge Gilstrap considered the relative ease of access to documents and evidence.
With respect to Amazon, the judge said much of the retailer’s evidence was at its headquarters in Seattle, meaning that whether the case was tried in Texas or in California, the company would be required to transport certain documents.
“It is not entirely clear that moving (largely electronic) documents from Seattle to San Francisco is more convenient than moving documents from Seattle to this district,” Judge Gilstrap wrote.
While Apple is based in Cupertino, Calif., just outside of San Jose, the judge said this didn’t tip the scales far in the iPhone maker’s favor. He noted that in today’s digital world large amounts of documents can be delivered “with the click of a mouse.”
“No one seriously doubts that Apple’s relevant documents are digitized and readily deliverable by electronic means,” wrote the judge, adding there was no indication that relevant witnesses would be unwilling or unavailable to travel to East Texas.
The judge in each case also pointed out that the time to trial for patent suits is typically shorter in the Eastern District of Texas than in Northern California, which he said weighed against transferring the cases. The judge also took into account both plaintiffs’ ties to Texas.
“Having analyzed the factors, the court finds that Amazon has failed to meet its significant burden to show that the Northern District of California is clearly more convenient than the Eastern District of Texas,” the judge wrote, while making similar findings with respect to Apple.
Alfred Fabricant of Brown Rudnick LLP, who represents both Vocalife and NetTech, said the court’s rulings correctly captured the analysis of the factors that are taken into account in the context of a motion to transfer.
He noted, in particular, Judge Gilstrap’s comments regarding electronic document production.
“I hope the law will move in that direction more strongly, where the courts acknowledge the fact that electronic discovery is the way things take place and people are no longer going to look at documents in some warehouse in some city,” he said.
Attorneys for Apple and Amazon could not immediately be reached for comment.
Apple is represented by Claudia Frost, Travis Jensen and Tyler Miller of Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, and by Melissa Smith of Gillam & Smith LLP.
Amazon is represented by Joseph Re, Colin Heideman, Jeremy Anapol, Joseph Cianfrani and Kendall Loebbaka of Knobbe Martens, and by Jennifer Doan and Kyle Akin of Haltom & Doan.
NetTech is represented by Alfred Fabricant, Vincent Rubino, Lawrence Drucker and Peter Lambrianakos of Brown Rudnick LLP, and by Justin Truelove of Truelove Law Firm.
Vocalife is represented by Alfred Fabricant, Alessandra Messing, Justine Park, Lawrence Drucker and Vincent Rubino of Brown Rudnick LLP, and by Jennifer Truelove and Samuel Baxter of McKool Smith PC.
The cases are Vocalife LLC v. Amazon.com Inc. et al., case number 19-cv-00123, and Quest NetTech Corp. v. Apple Inc., case number 19-cv-00118, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
--Editing by John Campbell.
Read more at: https://www.law360.com/retail/articles/1224394/gilstrap-refuses-to-send-apple-amazon-ip-cases-to-calif-?copied=1
Nice find, thanks for sharing!
Thanks! Where did you learned chart reading? Can you tell me some websites you use?
building on Baidu maps: https://map.baidu.com/search/%E6%9D%AD%E5%B7%9E%E5%B8%82%E6%8B%B1%E5%A2%85%E5%8C%BA%E9%A6%99%E5%9B%AD%E8%B7%AF45/@13371787,3525890,21z,87t,-50h#panoid=09025200121709101524391851F&panotype=street&heading=68.54&pitch=0.16&l=21&tn=B_NORMAL_MAP&sc=0&newmap=1&shareurl=1&pid=09025200121709101524391851F
I still don't believe this will merge in, but worth the gamble.
It's interesting something is happening with the domains.
I guess we'll see something soon then...
about a panshi IPO is the only thing I can find in the Chinese public media the following.
I don't see any relation to SBES. I don't think "SaaS" and "SpiritS" may be a connection. I could be wrong, of course.
https://xueqiu.com/1968708087/134620455
So do you really believe this will merge into this shell?
https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/panshi#section-overview
Thank you!
How many 30-day extensions are allowed? Regarding the case https://www.pacermonitor.com/case/24468815/Semcon_IP_Inc_v_Amazoncom,_Inc
If you lookup the domain with http://whois.sc/sbescorporate.com then you'll find out the name of the registrant on top.
Then use a reverse whois lookup at this site https://viewdns.info/reversewhois/?q=IRENE+BLACK and you'll find interesting domain names and another sbes domainname, that one is now linking to the mina group website, so something is connected. Maybe that's the one they'll use first OR they'll register a new one... Everything is possible.
This post is speculative.
What company?
No, it's extended by 30 days. https://www.pacermonitor.com/case/24468815/Semcon_IP_Inc_v_Amazoncom,_Inc
Doing good, I took a starter position last week. I can't pm (not a member).
Hi chart-people: are there any chart-fundamentals for this "dump-day"?
Something is updated at NVSOS. Does someone see some changes?
Maybe it's also known as Valtek: https://twn.mingluji.com/zh-hant/node/13063
Ok. Thanks!
It looks like a different company. This one is in China, not Taiwan.
https://www.gigalight.com/contact.html