Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Somebody needs to file the Annual List in Nevada to get the Corporation current. The Corporation is in default.
Currier last did that in November 2022.
I agree, the fact that the Chairman of the BOD keeps lending money to this company is a bullish sign.
True, he got that money dumping BIEL shares in the old conversion model, but he doesn't HAVE to lend that money back to the company. They COULD do one or more reverse splits do more dilution. I don't know why they haven't done a R/S yet since Andy's death -- Andy had some strange aversion to a R/S but Staelin is savvy.
That's the big mystery, IMO. Why no R/S yet? 25 billion O/S is absurd for anything but a Shell scam and BIEL this is not a Shell scam. Funding the company with Staelin's small loans is not going to change much. Do a big R/S, do a private placement, hire some marketing person, and take a chance marketing the thing on the web.
This management simply has no vision and no ambition. Sitting around waiting for their OEM Partners to make them rich was a stupid idea.
Give a dozen ex-athletes a couple of ActiPatches for free, ask them to try it, then see if they'll pitch the thing. All the large ex-athletes have bad knees now. Especially football players. Pay Joe Montana to strap an Actipatch on each ailing knee. I remember some commercials years ago where he pitched some tennis shoes -- he'd pitch the ActiPatch, especially if it worked for him.
Probably can't talk Oprah into it. Pity.
I'm tired of pointing out all the negatives here. It's boring because nothing changes. I'm going to sit back trying to buy at .0001 (LOL me and rest of the 400-million BID at .0001) and maybe some day there will be a catalyst. Have a great summer.
I am happy to see, and admit, that I was wrong.
I offer you proof and you reject it.
You're not quoting otcmarkets.com -- you're quoting your incorrect beliefs. The deadline for the Annual is end of April for Pink Limited. If they don't file the OTCmarkets proprietary "Notice of Late Filing" today then OTCmarkets can switch them to Expert Market tomorrow. Your automatic "grace period" is a thing of fiction.
Ask the three main pumpers who led you here. You know, the three whose posts you keep reading to make yourself feel better.
I own this stock and I'll hold through Expert Market if it goes there because it will be hard to buy when it comes OFF Expert Market, and of course it will. I just hate misinformation and bullshit, both of which you are offering.
It's not called a "grace period," it's called an "Extension," and they have to request it.
Notice that your main three pumpers are not refuting me.
I can find a dozen Pink Limited companies that filed that Notice of Late Filing. You think they didn't have to file that Notice. You think YOU know more about OTC reporting than the management of all those companies.
BIEL
PSGR
MVNT
do I need to keep listing them? simple Google search.
They have 16 months from their LAST annual filing and that expires today.
Cite the rule on otcmarkets.com that says there's a special rule for Pink Limited that automatically gives them a 15-day grace period for their annual report without filing the form "Notice of Late Filing" that OTCmarkets uses for all their alternative reporting tiers.
I gave you a link to the Notice of Late Filing that OTCmarkets uses for Alternative Reporting. I'm not talking about NT12b-25
Click the link. Here it is again.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/296046/content#:~:text=Alternative%20Reporting%20companies%20on%20the,to%20qualify%20for%20the%20extension.
And here's a link to a Pink Limited ticker that just filed one for their annual report. They didn't realize that OTCmarkets changed the rule for Pink Limited and extended the deadline for the annual report until April 30 -- they thought the deadline was still March 31 -- but it's proof that I am right.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/396042/content
"Why speak if you don’t know what you’re talking about? "
OTCmarkets wouldn't "request" anything of the sort from a publicly traded company.
IGPK said they changed the name back, and they believed that THEN OTCmarkets would grant them OTCIQ access immediately. Clearly they were wrong. didn't happen.
Read it again, literally. Don't INFER that OTCmarkets requested anything if it's not explicitly stated as such.
www.igpk.org
What, no smart-ass answer?
Have you just realized that they have to file a Notice of Late Filing to get your "2 week grace period or so" extension?
Now you're hoping that otcmarkets is not paying attention to this shell and won't see the missing annual filing tomorrow. Might be true. Might not. They don't always act immediately. But sometimes they do. Chinese shell changing their name twice in six weeks in their state of incorporation? Roll of the dice.
I don't think they get a 2-week "grace period" (extension) unless they file a Notice of Late Filing by the end of today.
Thanks for the non-answer.
they only get a 2-week grace period if they file a Notice of Late Filing.
Which they cannot do without OTCIQ access.
how long has the website been down?
http://www.katexploration.com
I see that Klok hasn't filed anything since 11/30 with Nevada, the state of incorporation.
It's going to Expert Market tomorrow if they don't get OTCIQ access today and upload the annual report.
Who's going to hold through that? Could be months. Might be a big payday at the end, but it's hard to bury money in the ground like that.
Saying "they have the data" without citing the data is simply BS.
Par for your course.
But fine, keep up the facade "every day until January 1, 2025." Hopefully, Ilfeld will publish his opioid study before then, and hopefully the CMS will accept it, and hopefully some doctors will prescribe RecoveryRx in 2025 to some Medicare patients. That's a lot of "hopefully," but I realize that's all you have, so, pump on. Smith some words.
Yes, MANIPULATED data results. P=.002 is manipulated. Of course the authors know. And the CMS will see it.
And YOU know. You must. I don't care whether you admit it or not.
"Bloviating." When wrong, smith a word or two -- it'll certainly fool SOMEONE.
And you can keep this up "everyday from now till January 1, 2025" but the wind's out of your sail.
BTW to which trial do you refer when you reference "200 patient clinical trial?" Not Ilfeld's Pilot Study, I hope, because they stopped after 120 participants.
What's the success rate for medical device companies with no patents?
You brought it up.
75% failure rate. So much better.
What's the failure rate for medical device start-ups with no patents?
Again, congratulations on Sirius XM.
Don't believe me, an anonymous board poster. And nobody should believe you either, an anonymous board poster and self-proclaimed wordsmith.
Anyone who doesn't understand or believe what I'm saying about protocols and the data manipulation of discarding outliers should do some DD of their own. By all means, don't take MY word for it.
Regarding the VAS score: do some DD on how much importance the CMS places on VAS scores when determining whether or not to reimburse under the NOPAIN Act. (I can save you some time though -- the answer is "none.")
You seem angry. Perhaps you should take a break and go to your happy wordsmithing place. Smith some words.
Do the BUYS and SELLS really matter when a stock closes at .0002?
Ask Toohot the conductor, who said:
"Remember when you could buy at .0006"
"Remember when you could buy at .0005"
"Remember when you could buy at .0004"
"Remember when you could buy at .0003"
"Remember when you could buy at .0002"
I don't know whether he also said that about .0001 -- pretty hard to buy at .0001 although it's possible because I bought some at .0001 last week. I'm a reluctant shareholder now. Go BIEL. woo hoo.
I used to think the bagholders would provide a rock-bottom support level at .0006 but that crumbled when Whelan the CEO decided not to bother maintaining a Pink Current status. Pink Limited is good enough for Whelan's Warriors.
JGD insults me every time he replies to one of my posts, and he never offers me a counter argument or anything of substance, and anyone can verify that by simply looking at ANY reply of his to one of my posts.
But when I point that out, I'M the one who's "way out of line."
LOL, right.
Stan Lee wants you to stop using the phrase "'Nuff said." He coined that for Marvel Comics in 1961 in Fantastic Four #19. He says you're using it wrong.
https://www.cbr.com/marvel-comics-stan-lee-fantastic-four-nuff-said/#:~:text=In%20Fantastic%20Four%20%2319%2C%20Lee,say%20%22%27Nuff%20said.%22
Seriously? Read what you just quoted.
You never offer anything but insults to a conversation.
You hurt your own case by doing this. And you don't even realize it.
THEY DON'T have published data for OPIOID use.
If you disagree, cite the data published in a journal that proves a reduction in opioid use.
You can't because it does not exist.
The Rawe study doesn't work for the reason I just explained. Their big survey doesn't prove a reduction in opioids.
The only published date they have for reduced pain meds is for non-opioid analgesics.
Apparently the Usual Pumpers don't follow companies that have suffered setbacks and DON'T bounce back.
The vast majority of companies that suffer setbacks, especially in the biotech arena, do NOT bounce back. 19 of 20 biotechs fail.
But that is great news about Sirius XM.
The problem is the word "pilot," not the word "study." Pilot studies don't have endpoints. This one had "Aims" (bolding emphasis mine)
You think there are "huge sells?"
Avg volume is 25,000 per day. That's about $2500 per day. But there are "huge sells?" News flash: there isn't huge ANYTHING here. This stock is WAY under the radar.
You keep issuing ridiculous challenges -- so here's a challenge for you. You are so bearish on this stock -- SHORT IT. I STRONGLY urge you to short the heck out of this stock. Borrow money. Take out a second mortgage. Please. Short it hard.
If you don't short it, you're full of shit. End of story.
I'm holding with the insiders who own half of the O/S. There's only 56 million shares outstanding so let the weak hands sell their $2500 worth of stock every day until they're out. Fine with me. Take it lower and I'll keep accumulating through 2024.
When the US clinical trials are done, and when the results are good, and when they submit the FDA application, and when the Luviva Scan gets approved by the FDA... there's four catalysts that will each cause a PPS spike. It's delayed until 2025 now but it's all going to happen. Yes, we have to listen to you whine and complain and stamp your feet and shake your fists for that entire time, and we'll have to listen to the pseudo-lawyer complain about how he's been lied to and cheated and abused by those mean businessmen, but having to listen to whiners and complainers is part of the price of gambling on OTC stocks.
And gambling is what we're doing here. If you don't have the stomach (or the finances) for gambling you are in the wrong place.
Yes that cancer treatment is looking strong (leading up to the news, anyway) and I know you are also invested in that. But my OTHER cancer diagnostic had its catalyst delayed nine months. That PPS is going to suffer this year. The saving grace is that the O/S is under 60 million and insiders own about half of the stock. It's still going to be painful to watch that paint dry for the next nine months.
In BIELworld, I think Ilfeld will announce results of his opioid pilot study soon, and that is an important catalyst for BIEL because they have no other clinical proof that their device reduces opioid use. BIEL investors are pinning their hopes and dreams on the NOPAIN Act but at this moment BIEL is on the sidelines looking in.
And on FB the band plays on. The newest pumper thinks BIEL should increase the price of the ActiPatch to $99, contrary to the Law of Supply and Demand, the most basic tenet of every economist everywhere. Ahhh but what do economists know. This new pumper also thinks BIEL should sue the maker of the Assisi Loop and take over that market, and also offered to lend the company money if they would manipulate the share price for him. Gotta love the energy, I guess.
LOL so you think I own counterfeit shares?
News flash for you -- I'll buy more at .0001 if the MM's will sell them to me. And then I'll flip them for a profit. And I'll make money doing this and I'll laugh all the way to the bank.
And the BIEL longs will call me a dirty nasty flipper and you'll wail and gnash your teeth about poor little abused BIEL and those evil MM's.
And I won't care.
The only way I can lose money here is if I hold this hot potato too long and get surprised by the Reverse Split announcement that we all know is coming. There will be a stampede for the door as, what's your favorite saying, "anyone with half a brain" tries to sell at .0001.
That's the game here -- don't get caught holding the bag when they announce the R/S. Don't be one of the half-wits who hold BIEL too long with those "strong hands."
Such a shame that MM's abuse only BIEL.
No other OTC stock gets manipulated by Market Makers -- it's just BIEL. Poor abused manipulated little BIEL. It's so unfair.
Incidentally I bought some BIEL at .0001 during that shocking Market Maker Abuse this week, so for the first time since 2020 I once again own BIEL stock. I guess that means I can now call Kelly Whelan and suffer her abuse.
And to think that if the MM's didn't illegally sell me stock at .0001, I wouldn't be a shareholder! Funny, that stock didn't materialize out of thin air -- SOMEBODY sold it...... hard to reconcile the FACT that I bought this stock at .0001 with your story of MM's selling stock they don't have.
You present GIUL as a savvy legal expert who was wronged by Shenghou.
But how savvy is GIUL, considering that:
* GIUL signed that contract without reading it.
* GIUL initially sued Faupel and Blumberg for 10 counts, but the court threw out six of those before the case went to court.
* When the case went to court, the judge then threw out GIUL's conspiracy claims, leaving only three counts remaining.
https://masslawyersweekly.com/files/2024/03/09-024-24.pdf
I understand that this is common in law -- throw a bunch of spaghetti against a wall and see what sticks -- but getting seven out of 10 counts thrown out doesn't give me much confidence in GIUL.
And the trial changed from a jury trial to a Directed trial -- at whose request was that done, GIUL or Shenghou?
Regardless -- Guided Therapeutics is not a party to the case and so there are no claims in the case against Guided Therapeutics. I have no doubt that if GIUL loses the remaining three counts, GIUL will throw more spaghetti against the wall and bring more lawsuits, but this forum is a poor place to whine and complain about how poorly GIUL was treated and abused. A savvy legal expert would find a better way to air grievances.
bullshit. GIUL won't have grounds to sue Guided Therapeutics if defendants don't pay.
Guided Therapeutics can't be held liable for the actions of Shenghou, not back then, not now.
And to think - if GIUL had just read the contract before signing it.... who signs a contract without reading it? I'm not a lawyer but I know enough to read a contract before signing it.
And now GIUL is accusing BOTH Blumberg and Faupel of perjury? What is the purpose of making those accusations here? Seems malicious and libelous. I wonder what the judge will say about THIS.
All the things you complain about were things that you knew when you invested. Seems malicious and unethical to complain about them now, many years later, considering that the current lawsuit names Blumberg and Faupel as defendants but does not name Guided Therapeutics as a defendant.
But that's just my opinion. The judge might see it differently. Best of luck.
Tell it to the judge.
Does the judge know you're bashing GTHP on a stock message board while you wait for his decision?
Aren't you worried that this will influence the judge's decision? Seems unethical and malicious.
If I were Faupel or Blumberg I'd bring this bashing to the court's attention.
Name change filing is updated on SilverFlume.
Dated 4/19/2024
Thanks for your valuable input.
The company said "We filed with the state of Nevada" in this quote, but that refers to the filing on 3/15/2024. That name change was processed in Nevada. The company is now officially called "JFH DIGITAL E-COMMERCE CORP" in Nevada.
"They are using expedite [sic] service" to change the name back to Integrated Cannabis? And that takes 24 hours?
Eventually, this company will end up as JFH Digital, I'm sure. But short-term red flags:
(1) They announced they were changing their name back LAST WEDNESDAY. Where is this "expedited service" that "maximum takes 24 hours?"
(2) They are not rescinding their previous name change -- they are filing for a new name change. Two name changes in a five-week period. That is supposed to make FINRA happy?
(3) After they change the name back to Integrated Cannabis, they're going to file an annual report for JFH Digital? And that will make otcmarkets and FINRA happy?
If they don't get OTCIQ access by April 30 and file that annual report -- nine days from now -- this ticker is probably going to Expert Market. Considering the red flags above, this thing could stay Expert Market for a while. #2 in particular seems troubling. The company apparently thinks they can tell FINRA "never mind, there was no name change," but there WAS a name change. Lying to FINRA doesn't seem like a good strategy.