Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
our last 3 presidents have admitted to smoking weed (insert biased political joke), so I'd say it didn't hinder them all that much reaching their position in life.
haha, are you complaining about a persons ability to start a publicly traded company from nothing? you know, like apple, google, or amazon? I know you don't like mcig and all, but that seems like a bit much.
the 1 cent value is for tax reporting purposes, the perceived 'value' of the stock by shareholders is what we'll likely see drop in mcig's pps, though I do believe it'll come back to it's original price after several months.
sounds like a usps problem and not mcig, genius...
I hope not, that would currently be illegal.
please post another ecig with the same color, shape, and size.
I hope this post stays up for more than 10 minutes.
130k shares since January. everytime a massive bashing effort has occurred (like now), it was always preceding big news and a rising PPS. the first 10-q back in the spring, where mcig reported it's first profit and vitacig, came after lots of bashing with all the same empty criticisms. if you are convinced by the manipulators here that the company is a scam and it's all a hoax, then you deserve to lose all of your money and should sell. see you all in a couple years when this is in the dollar+ range.
I would expect them to be handed out to people on the street as it's a brand new product....
the quote was attributed to the author, and mahatma Gandhi appears to be a commonly accepted western spelling. care to elaborate on your 2 claims of plagiarism and misspelling?
I started dipping tobacco at 19 when I was in college and only quit 6 months ago after doing it for 10 years. I tried the nicotine gum, lozenges, patches, everything. what got me to quit were sunflower seeds. for a tobacco user, quitting isn't about getting my daily allowance of vitamins (lol) or weening yourself off nicotine, it's having a habit that's less dangerous (i.e. not cancer-causing) than your tobacco habit. it's psychological. when I want a dip I throw in some ranch sunflower seeds and I'm good. that's the market vitacig is going for (cigarette users), and it's a big market.
PS. health insurance rates are HUGE if you have previously documented tobacco use, and the only way to drop your rates with a lot of companies is to do a blood test proving there's no nicotine in your body, which means if you use nicotine cessation products, you'll still be a 'user' to the companies, which is where a product like this has even more marketability. I know this from my own experience. tobacco users know this also.
despite your exaggeration, I understand your point. however, vitamin water is targeted towards everyone, whereas vitacigs are targeted towards a smaller audience: smokers looking for a healthier alternative in today's health-conscious culture, where it appears (via social media and news reports, at least) to be gaining some traction. we won't be able to tell until sales reports are released next month, and more accurately, this winter. is vitacig aiming for a smaller audience than something like vitamin water? obviously yes. but your claim that you are looking to get nutrients by using a vitacig is, frankly, laughable. that's not what the product is designed for, and not the kind of people looking to use it. it's kind of weird to see people trying so hard to beat this moot point.
no, because products already exist (and do very well) that include the word vitamin, or health, or whatever, and put out the 'healthy image' and yet are not, like vitamin water. most candies today even claim to have certain vitamin levels so that health-conscious parents will buy them. so the precedent has already been set to put a modicum of vitamins in a product and then sell them. if anything, the fact that vitacig is getting this much attention is probably a good thing, as it indicates more people are taking notice.
it's probably not so much one big investor dumping as it is all the little people like us on this board, and they are probably dumping because confidence has dwindled after waiting on the divy for so long. also, people probably expected immediate financials, instead of waiting all spring and summer for an older 10-k and it probably eroded a lot of patience.
can you quote your source there? the part about linkhorst claiming you get your daily dose of vitamins? i don't recall anyone actually claiming that...
haha, ok. there's not much to say in the face of non-sequitur, except that when the 10-q comes out it will prove that celebrity endorsing helped sales.
I do occasionally enjoy connecting straight-line dots:
• 10-q for 3rd quarter ends January 31st, reflects $85,000 in sales.
• DJ Swivel signed February 6th.
• CNBC interview with Jane Wells April 7th (not a 'paid endorser' per se, but still a public figure and endorsed the product)
• 10-k for year ends April 30, reports $543,000 for mcig, vitacig, and vapolution.
I am all for fair and accurate discussion, so please point out anything I'm missing. bam and rick ross were both signed in June, so the 10-q in September will reveal if they are, in fact, hurting sales, as previously alleged.
the s-1 and s-1a have been filed multiple times, with the SEC kicking back fewer corrections each time (standard procedure), with the most recent s-1a filing on the 25th. what's your basis for your claim that the divy will "never happen?" The SECs Edgar system says otherwise and I'd love to see the due diligence there.
additionally, the implication that mcig and vitacig's celebrity endorsers are actually hurting sales is an interesting one, and if true would be ground-breaking. sales have increased since the celebrity endorsements, so I'd like to see data correlation that suggests otherwise....
why is the market cap considerably lower here than the *other* MJ ecig company that I'll probly get my account banned for referring to? this company has made more revenue and is more actively putting products in stores, anyone have a honest answer here instead of the typical, "according to my magic chart-reading ability, I predict $1 soon..." I'd expect this to be higher by now.
what huge media attention?
you got me...
this stock seems to have the right things going for it: good revs, expanding products and sales, why is the market cap not higher?
name one company that pulls in over 60 mil annually and has a market cap less than 115 mil...
it amazes me that people can read this and still convince themselves that they've made a sound investment. I'd rather give my money to a bum on the sidewalk and ask him not to buy drugs with it.
lol, how many times have people heard the phrases "X company will..." or "X company is going to..." the real question here is how long until the SEC halts this pos and everyone realizes they lost their life savings?