Some thoughts on how the judge may look at this situation. Who is the gold digger in this case? Who is looking to make the easy bucks? (both parties) It appears to me that PTSC has been in pursuit of this patent claim for quite sometime now. Ex. The Fish court case. Didn't Moore just sort of come out of the woodwork with his legal team (Intel backed I would say) and rush into a licensing agreement(good move in my opinion) with Intel to beat PTSC and Fish to the punch? This case is about the letter of the law yes. But, doesn't it appear PTSC was following the legal path until they were side tracked by the actions of Moore and company...
Anyone else think that Moore is really the gold digger? He seems to lack nearly everything(memory, documents, previous efforts to license the tech) with the exception of a crack pot legal team.