Evidence Based Investments
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
And that's not at all what implied consent is lmaoooo
Yikes.
English isn't THAT hard lol.
Sheesh.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Never make crap up.
Cite sources and provide testimonials of industry professionals.
I simply report their findings and never make any conclusions of my own other that calculating the probability and stating if an outcome seems likely or unlikely imo.
Never make crap up like some determining that "MLS" is obsolete, or Sigma Labs customers aren't interested in their software anymore, or that the Industry will continue without Sigma
I would never make such rash determinations with absolutely no industry knowledge or the backing of professionals who agree.
I would state that Sigma Labs has continued to prove the exact opposite based on continued AM acceptance, increased contracts and patents, increased standards activity, patent improvement, and international AM companies interested in collaborating or incorporating Sigma Labs technology in their processes.
That's based on factual evidence and industry professionals testimonials and statements.
To each their own.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Never said at any particular price point.
At a fair valuation, the statement remains true.
It's up to the individual to determine that price point based on their due diligence.
I'm not responsible for anyone's decision to buy or sell at any PPS, nor do I advise anyone to do so, unlike "back to $2" guidance and recommendations.
To each their own.
Due Diligence profits :)
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Negative. Sigma Labs provides the ability for investors to profit.
Investors can hold a core holding of shares.
Upon a PPS pop, they can sell shares to profit.
Investors can then purchase more shares after the pop returns to normal levels, to increase core holding and enhance their investment.
These are not traders, they are competent investors making money and increasing share count with profits.
Or doing whatever they want with their profits.
It's a free country and nowhere in the investing handbook does it say you must never sell shares for profit.
In fact, that's the main goal.
To each their own
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Sigma Labs continued progress increasing shareholder equity, market presence, product advancement and patent protection, have all allowed for any competent investor to make tremendous profits.
Continued contracts with the largest players in the industry including space exploration like Honeywell, DARPA and Aerojet Rocketdyne show very promising possibilities in the near term.
Space is very prosperous right now, and the competing companies are always looking for the most efficient way to produce high end parts.
As they remain ahead of the standards, it is only a matter of time before the regulations demand more stringent processes.
Sigma Labs allows companies like these to prove their entire process from every layer of the build to finished product.
Such a technology continues to prove to be very valuable for OEMs and end users alike.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Gtla.
Trading what?
Who?
What evidence is there to prove this?
Investors make money when the PPS increases.
Everyone here is an "investor"
Everyone had an opportunity to make good money on every big move on Sigma Labs news.
Sigma Labs continues to increase shareholder equity .
Ie, a good investment.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Really? Bc any investor in from recent lows could have easily doubled their money at a minimum.
Investors with shares in excess of 2-3 years...that's not trading.
Investing.
Also, semantics don't matter here.
Making money does.
Only people not doing that are doing something wrong.
Sigma Labs is an excellent investment for any one competent enough to understand basic math.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
And still results in profits for investors and continued funding and advancement of the product and the company.
Not sure what the gripe is.
Fully funding the company with minimal dilution,
Providing profits to all competent investors,
Advancing patents, the technology, continued standards acceptance and activity...
All according to plan and in line with the business model, which hasn't changed.
Successful and thriving.
To each their own.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Like the wave of contracts over the last 2 years with multiple multi-billion dollar operations, OEMs, and arguably the largest AM software company in the world?
Yeah, due diligence pointed to that, and it happened.
Due Diligence pointed to Sigma Labs increasing value to shareholders by increasing shareholder equity, and it happened.
Due Diligence pointed to a ROI at Sigma Labs at a 50 million dollar valuation, for most investors unless bagholding from buying at a ridiculous price by their own choice and investing decision.
Almost all made money...big money..
Only a few got left behind on their own accord
To each their own.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Like the ones Sigma Labs currently holds contracts with and continues to expand relationships and capabilities?
Yeah...predicted and correct and directly correlated to the increase in shareholder equity and PPS over the years, which directly resulted in over 100k in profit.
Thanks for the reminder :). Always good to remember winning over and over again
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta
Right... Honeywell never performed a multi-year study with DARPA utilizing Sigma Labs PR3D for aerospace....oh wait...
They did.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta
Name 5 public companies in AM operating 30 years ago and doing at least 5 million in sales in AM.
It can't be done.
Ie. The industry is not 30 years old.
It's 10 at best. With software being the youngest sector.
Nice try tho.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta
Right.. thats why the biggest players in the industry have invested and built factories with tens to hundreds of millions of dollars invested in factories, personnel, and AM technologies.
Every dollar will see a ROI.
So when companies like GE, Honeywell, Siemens etc, post about building factories costing upwards of 10-20 million per location, expect they will run those facilities until a profit is attained.
AM is just beginning, and the profits will be seen for the foreseeable future in bigger and bigger numbers.
Mass production is just beginning.
And many of the factories will have
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Right...bc that's what "best-in-class" technologies mean lol.
Just a cool science project...
Just ask other companies that receive "best in class" awards in their respective fields if they think it's a cool science project, or if their technology resulted in profit.
If Sigma wasn't made for profit, it'd still be sitting in a lab in Los Alamos.
Try to keep up, there's more money to make here
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Disposable part?
I would hardly call a performance part made to last for tens of thousands of operating hours, a "disposable" part.
The cost of inspection and maintenance already accounts for normal wear and tear on critical parts.
If a part fails inspection, AM or not, it would need to be removed, repaired, or replaced.
Obviously the companies using AM parts are aware of this, and have already crunched the numbers on the cost to use these types of parts.
The only way AM parts would be a waste, is if they didn't hold up as long as their casted counterparts, which all available studies have showed they are often stronger and more efficient than casted parts.
Luckily, there's technologies like Printrite3D to ensure the part is printed to spec, and therefore highly unlikely to fail or wear faster than expected.
Thanks for pointing out yet another reason Sigma Labs technologies will continue to lead the industry in IPQA software.
PR3D will be a mainstay in the AM mass production of high end parts, and a necessity for those printing critical parts.
Can't wait for the next OEM or mass production contract.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Yikes, more make believe words lol.
Not sure what that hyphen is doing in there...almost as useful as the one using it lmaooo
Not at all here or anywhere.
To each their own
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Right. The fact that it is true, makes it true. Lol
Only a few bag holders left here.
Most have become profitable investors with simple due diligence and knowledgeable investing strategies.
Clear who the minority is....
To each their own
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Over 100k in profits (after taxes) and a slew of other profitable investors who utilized Due Diligence to strategize their investment, easily totalling more than my individual efforts would beg to differ.
Not sure where these make believe batting numbers are coming from, but it's clear one results in profits and one results in bag holding anger and slander.
Clear where each stands with Sigma Labs.
To each their own.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Lol. The extremely high number of shares traded on that day is a fact that it occurred.
It is a fact that during the LD micro presentation question session, a representative from an investment firm made a statement about the impressive number of shares traded by a microcap with a small float.
Not forward looking, true statements regarding true events.
When's that "back to $2" gunna hit? Been a year now... Big yikes.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
When speaking on the number of shares traded on a specific date, it is not forward looking.
It is simply a fact.
Look at number of shares traded on Lockheed pop day.
Proof is in the pudding...not speculation.
Simple facts.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
What's MLS?
Yikes.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Ok. Clearly knowing more than the industry professionals still using and planning to use DMLS and DED for the foreseeable future is a blessing.
Pass on this info to the companies spening billions being spent currently producing and advancing these "obsolete" technologies .
Apparently they are unaware.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Stated on ld micro presentation.
Done posting all my DD for things that are easily accessible.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Watchers don't make the volume hit as high as it did on Lockheed news.
Big Money does.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Higher PPS is GOOD for investors.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
It was hard for anyone to buy shares at the original PPS the day of the news.
Interest in the stock forced the price upwards, making shares at a lower price hard to attain, forcing people to buy higher and higher.
Not false.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
It was stated on the LD micro presentation.
Watch it.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Tell that to the +300% change in a day from a single contract announcement.
Even the institutionals were shocked that Sigma Labs traded so many shares in one day.
There's a lotta big players watching this and actively interested in investing.
Microcaps don't often trade as many shares as Sigma Labs does on a small news event.
Allows for great gains for investors.
With small float, shares will be hard to attain on another news event like the last one.
Good opportunity for investors to profit yet again
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta
And licensing and buyouts and offices in another country are king,
However, in Sigma Labs position currently, cash, allows for the ability to continue development of their product and acquire those things to aid in the continuance of increasing shareholder equity.
In order to receive the biggest ROI on their technology, it is in the best interest of the company and it's shareholders to first grow to near the highest microcap levels. A buyout from a valuation of $300 million, would be much more valuable that a buyout or merger from the current $50 million.
To do this, as said, the more cash the better as they continue development and increase personnel and physical assets.
The increase in patent activity is a great example of this.
The expansion to UK and Germany is another great example of this.
The employee increase in the last 2 quarters is a great example of this.
The increase in contracts over the last year is a great example of this.
As it's easier to raise millions with minimal dilution, as opposed to magically signing 10x more contracts in a quarter than the company usually does, I'd say the cash raise is a more reasonable idea, especially with the current market activity and feds money drop lately, imo
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Great timing to secure capital for future contracts as employee numbers and assets continue to grow.
Cash is king right now across the entire market as the recent Covid downturn stopped almost everything.
Expansion and building cash while the government and Feds are dumping trillions over the past year is a great move.
Sigma Labs continues to position themselves for current and future growth as they expand with the industry.
Excited for the next contract announcements, hopefully a nice multi-unit as projected.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Definitely.
Sigma continues forward, while the downward spiraling and reeling continues.
So many misses and continued misguidance.
Super funny the more defensive and incorrect the guesses get.
Especially the making up of words and definitions to defend an incorrect agenda.
AM industry continues to stress importance of IPQA and properly fund development.
Sigma Labs holds the key :)
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Well most investors and the company as a whole have continued to profit off of everything Sigma has done so far.
Only a select few special ones who haven't, to my understanding.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
If that's all they do, why invest and post on a blog for hours every day?
Seems like a big waste of time and money.
Perfected by some here, obviously
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta
Right, bc that's how a company makes good business connections and ventures...no collaboration, no partnerships, no joint sales... especially for a technology company trying to avoid high headcounts.
Sigma has described their business strategy, and it's working fine.
Maybe slide them ideas for a consultant job. Guaranteed they're not interested in backwards thinking.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Actually, SpaceX engineers are looking to be able to print in the way that Sigma Labs Printrite3D allows for ,
"Working with the development team, Space X engineers also work to implement in-process monitoring systems and coordinate with materials and process for qualification of new processes with the future goal of eliminating inspection practices where applicable (proof, dimensional, visual, and NDE)."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.3dprintingmedia.network/elon-musk-wants-you-to-help-create-more-3d-printed-parts-for-his-rockets/amp/
Next customers?
Makes sense since Aerojet Rocketdyne is already a customer alongside Honeywell.
Space exploration companies already see the value :)
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
It's a fact so I will keep believing it lol.
Ask a broker to buy an index...then ask what companies stock were just purchased.
They'll list companies stock.
Not 1 share of index lmao.
Ie, stocks control the index movement.
Index doesn't move without buying and selling of stocks within it.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Wrong.
The index price does not affect the stock price of companies within it.
There are stocks that increase, and some that decrease.
The index moves with the majority movement of individual stocks.
Index doesn't control anything, stocks control the index.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
Correct.
An index doesn't affect the PPS of any stock.
An individual company doesn't affect the price of an index.
Great work here, in my opinion.
Good education for those who need the help.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
How can one company in an index affect the index price?
Answer : only by 1/2000 or the approximate sum of the total market cap or total shares in the index. Aka, one company won't noticably affect an entire index.
Can an index move without the companies within it being bought or sold?
Answer : no, it can't.
Only in make believe land do lies and made up definitions become reality, in my opinion.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.
So if more shares are bought of an individual stock, the price of the index increases, and if more shares are sold of an individual stock, the price decreases .
Kinda like exactly what was said from the getgo, individual stocks affect index. Lol thanks.
Index is moved by the value of the individual stocks listed in it.
Wow.
Sigma Inside
Do DD
Glta.