You do a little digging and the truth always emerges...,

Just another company owned by Sam and crew...

You should just go and see...

http://prutus.com/

oh, wait...., it's not up anymore...

Go to:

https://ccmspa.pinellascounty.org/PublicAccess/default.aspx

Select "All Case Records Search"

Type 'Talari" into the last name box of the party and click "Search"

Case Number: 19-006682-CI

There's a new lawsuit against Sam...

And the hits just keep coming...

Prutus.com is unreachable as well.

I guess they're pinning their hopes on sunken treasure...

galleonquest.com


https://latoken.com/exchange/ETH-SEA?utm_source=logo&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=[LA]_[Trading]_[Crypto]_[ETH-SEA]_[OUT]_[GALLEONQUEST]_[Website]_[Logo]


It's not lookin' too good though...

The website for this stock is gone as well...

They lost http://www.futurelandcorp.com awhile ago.

Now http://www.futlcorp.com is no longer up.

Infrax website for sale...

Any takers?

https://www.godaddy.com/domainsearch/find?checkAvail=1&tmskey=&domainToCheck=infraxinc.com

$1,317.00 +$17.99/yr

What's that like 6.5 million shares... (@.0002)

A drop in the well!

I have been suitably corrected and chastised and shall take my punishment as is warranted.

Now, for something a little lighter in the spirit of words with multiple uses:

Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.

Gotta call you out on that remark:

They're not recidivist, self enriching, share selling schemers.


They're recidivous, self enriching, share selling schemers.
Or:
They're scheming, self enriching, share selling recidivists.

Recidivist is a noun, not an adjective.


I gotta be impartial on these threads , y'know?

While doing the lookup on that case file (Once I saw it, I already knew the particulars), I came across another one for Lockwood Technologies for unpaid rent of 21K at the old address.

Guess the shareholders aren't the only ones getting stuck.

Apotheca Biosciences (PCFP) Introduces ProMED, Our Newest Flagship Product Line -- Company Begins Rolling Out its Sleep Aid & Opioid Replacement Formulations

That was on Jan 15th..., sound familiar?

promedcbd.com - owned by Sam Talari. (no site yet)

ProMED Biosciences will ship...
Company expects...
ProMED Biosciences will be...

No website at the url listed.
No twitter account as listed.

They do have a facebook page, so yea that they have enough time in their busy schedule to do that..., but they can't be bothered to put the press release on it.

What they really wanted was to get out some news (we've incorporated, yay!) to boost share prices.

When you let a site registry lapse you have a grace period before auction where you can reclaim a site, but it's a higher cost to do so as opposed to just registering a new site.

I'm betting they were just too cheap to spend the money to get it back after letting the registry lapse.

I don't think they had the new site at all.

The creation date was 2019-03-19.

I'm starting to think they let the registry lapse and were too inept (or poor) to take steps to get it back.


My suspicion is based on their past management performances.

And they're still too dumb to change the link on their facebook page...

I like how they announce a new website address on Facebook, but neglect to update the website link on the Facebook page they made the announcement on.

This is the kind of simple stupidity that this company's management has shown time and again.

The fact they switched website URL's is telling as well.

I originally thought through their general ineptitude they let the address lapse and it was snapped up on them, but considering the date the site info was updated, I'm now suspecting they sold the address and used (some of) the money to put the website back up at a new address.

Makes sense to do so, 'cuz when you're in the share selling business you've got to keep up appearances.

And the Galleon Quest website is now offline...

Half the GETX site is back up...

https://www.nuvus.io/

And half isn't...

https://ico.nuvus.io/


I guess there's no point in putting back the page where you 'purchase' tokens, 'cause no one is doing that...

The site for the GETX coins is gone...

https://www.nuvus.io/
https://ico.nuvus.io/

If that's true, then the PRUTUS landing page is broken. (What a surprise!)

P.S. They still have spelling errors, bad links, unfinished pages, and a big security hole on the site.

(Some may not be aware.)

Still, since the GETX tokens aren't actually worth anything, that shouldn't be too big a worry...

The easiest way to keep tabs on the value of the contract is this page.
https://etherscan.io/address/0x934e1ac0d36f80c4adde54d12d59b1263b12592f


As you can see, the total value of the contract sits at $4,283.54

All those token generated mean nothing if they have nothing of value attached to them.

Sure looks it.(Not.)

https://prutus.com

GETX/USD 0.00 0.00000000

Volume (24H) 0.00000000 BTC ˜ 0.00 USD

I just noticed that all the funds(ETH) were drained out of the NUVUS contract account. (97.748063736027763 ETH)

It happened 10 days ago.

So, for all those people who bought the GETX tokens..., your money has now finished vanishing... (It started when the price of ETH tanked, but at least the Ether was still there)

Galleon Quest still has its funds..., but at the current rate of Ether, it has a total value of $4800...

The volume of trades on the landing page is 000000000...

I'd say they've at least turned on something, as the landing page now takes between 15 to 20 seconds to load.

I bet that's gonna scale well when/if they get any actual trading on the site...

Looks like you were right.

The bid is now .0002

I'm thinking you might not see anything at all.
They filed the 10K for last year because they hadn't been deregistered at that time.

If the account(contract) doesn't 'hold' any ETH, then why does the contract currently have 97 ETH that it received through transactions early on in the process?

https://etherscan.io/tx/0xf7f2666a045d83c9fed0557fbcdd822322b6d826bdc8dc950ec2e9f8ef88be20

Here's a transaction on the contract where tokens were purchased, and ETH was transferred to the account.

https://etherscan.io/tx/0xf7f2666a045d83c9fed0557fbcdd822322b6d826bdc8dc950ec2e9f8ef88be20


I'm afraid we're gonna end up agreeing to disagree.

You can tell everyone that management say's they are getting all this money from these transactions and when people ask for proof you can tell them to just have faith.


I will be telling everyone that management is receiving nothing from these token generations and I will point to the contract information showing that.

Again, we are in agreement that you can transfer tokens with no value added to the contract..., just a small amount of ETH for the transaction fee.

You seem to be missing that GetX is built upon an Ethereum network contract, which was outlined by a white paper when it was first announced.

The contract stated that if THE CONTRACT didn't reach a certain value, the contract would be dissolved and everyone would get their money returned to them.

The value needed for the contract was never reached, but no one got their money back.

I believe the reason is the contract value got decimated by the fall of the value of ETH.

Now, to pay people back, they would need to come up with $70K.


Where is your proof that they are taking in money for the generated tokens?

Because management says so?

Like I said,it would be easy enough to put the money into the contract were it is supposed to be anyway, and show everyone the amazing amount of funding they have accrued.

Instead, the NUVUS contract wallows at less that $21K.

It's as simple as that.

I'm glad we can agree on something like this, as you are 100% correct in your statement.

The problem is, there was no value added to the contract in order to receive the tokens, meaning they they were not paid for as far as the contract is concerned.

I have speculated before that management could be simply taking money for the generated tokens and not putting it into the contract, but doing that would be utterly stupid which is why I have not given it any credence.

Until the contract has a treasury to handle cashing out GetX tokens back to ETH as desired, the tokens in the contract are worthless, so why wouldn't you take the money you got for the tokens (allegedly) and put it into the contract?

Putting the money(ETH) into the contract would:
1. Bring the value of the tokens up.
2. Give confidence to people to buy the tokens that they have some security of getting their money back from the venture
3. Shut people like me up who say the tokens are basically worthless.

The only reason not to do it is because there's no actual money received to do it with.

Fixed it for ya...

And to correct a mistake on my part in my explanation:
The number is 100,000,000 tokens, not $100,000,000

That number on the GQ landing page hasn't changed in 6 months.
It's not actually tied to anything as far as I can tell.

Here is the link to the GQ contract:
https://etherscan.io/token/0x77e47930f8934873da4886a3790768ccbc450379

Here is the page with the totals:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x934e1ac0d36f80c4adde54d12d59b1263b12592f

I'm glad we can agree on something like this, as you are 100% correct in your statement.

The problem is, there was no value added to the contract in order to receive the tokens, meaning they they were not paid for as far as the contract is concerned.

I have speculated before that management could be simply taking money for the generated tokens and not putting it into the contract, but doing that would be utterly stupid which is why I have not given it any credence.

Until the contract has a treasury to handle cashing out GetX tokens back to ETH as desired, the tokens in the contract are worthless, so why wouldn't you take the money you got for the tokens (allegedly) and put it into the contract?

Putting the money(ETH) into the contract would:
1. Bring the value of the tokens up.
2. Give confidence to people to buy the tokens that they have some security of getting their money back from the venture
3. Shut people like me up who say the tokens are basically worthless.

The only reason not to do it is because there's no actual money received to do it with.

The $100,000,000 is comprised of a number of transactions over the last 3 days..., you can see them by going to : https://etherscan.io/token/0x3364fb62274ad4659bc5162a9ba4b84c73784f58

For each transaction you can see the value of it by looking at its data.

Look at them yourself, they all show a value of $0

When they first opened the ICO they had a number of real purchases, such as this one: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x76bf95aaa933fe72111c23de37d8f542624e836ccf7572938dabc5528f82712f

You can see the value of the ETH used to get the tokens on this transaction.

That means they actually paid into the contract for the tokens they got.

At one point, the value of the contract was above $90K.

Sadly, the price of ETH tanked, and took the contract value with it.

Now it sits at $21K.

The Etherscan site (which you started with when quoting your figures) shows the actual numbers of the contract. (it has no agenda)

This is the data from the 5,000,000 transaction.
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x29ec813b301c3dbf2c71ecddd3bdb6303c1711a7ec2c886aae2073a9b85a79d8

Please note how much Ether(ETH(MONEY)) was used to receive the tokens.

TxHash:0x29ec813b301c3dbf2c71ecddd3bdb6303c1711a7ec2c886aae2073a9b85a79d8 TxReceipt Status:Success
Block Height:6662774 (5951 Block Confirmations)TimeStamp:23 hrs 23 mins ago (Nov-07-2018 10:44:01 PM +UTC)
From:0x934e1ac0d36f80c4adde54d12d59b1263b12592f
To:Contract 0xdd873aa0e8c11bf6890469d624f693a09619cbef
Tokens Transfered:
From 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
To 0xc39452e8fbbef0957349f27d05630f3d2402619f
for 4,614,615.199999999231 GETX

Value:0 Ether ($0.00)

Gas Limit: 300000
Gas Used By Transaction:61423 (20.47%)
Gas Price:0.00000003 Ether (30 Gwei)
Actual Tx Cost/Fee:0.00184269 Ether ($0.39)
Nonce & {Position}:155 | {10}

Here's the link for the 5,000,000 token transaction:
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x29ec813b301c3dbf2c71ecddd3bdb6303c1711a7ec2c886aae2073a9b85a79d8

You'll notice there's no value to the transaction.

Without an Ether value attached to a transaction, it's worthless..., you might as well be handing out monopoly money as those GETX tokens...

The site (https://www.nuvus.io) has no figures on it.

Do you have a link?

I see no transactions with an ETH value attached within the last few months, and the contract value is still wallowing at $21K.
https://etherscan.io/address/0x52500acce0916aaaaab9c8362fd9aa05f9f592a0

I do see that tokens have been generated(NOT sold) over the last two days, but they have no value(ETH) in relation to the contract.

By the by, wasn't the contract for GETX supposed to have been concluded months ago?

So, is PRUTUS finally open for business?

The place looks a bit..., barren...

Did they get a banking partner?


(Hint) It's not 'The World’s Largest and Most Advanced Cryptocurrency Trading Platform' if you can't actually trade on it...

So, you're saying that website for the OTC Markets is fake?

https://www.otcmarkets.com/

Could you give us a link to what you believe to be the real website for the OTC markets then?

um, it looks like the stop sign is right here...

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/IFXY/overview