Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Tothe, thanks for that and I agree with your opinion regarding the "OTC". However, I don't think a statement simply saying "we're not a shell" is acceptable. The super 8k includes an annual audit. The other post here was referring to an OTC company that issued one. I would also add the super 8k rules are a bit confusing, at least to me.
Cheers
My chart says we closed at .015 today so once again we are in a FART pattern heading for a POOP, but your chart is indeed prettier than mine.
Not sure if you intended to post that here, but the interesting thing is you said a "super 8k" was issued within 30 days of their RM.
Super 8k's are used for things like "removing a SHELL RISK", or a ticker change, & stuff like that. Wow...
Yeah, only 2 more months.
WWJKD?
Like other charts, my charts are also excellent at predicting past stock performance. The following is a recap analysis:
As we know, a BARF signal appeared beginning in early August when the PPS started to decline from .062 on 8-8, and continued into late October teetering around .02 cents.
At this point, a YAWN indicator flashed. Since the PPS basically did nothing and hovered at the 2 cent level for 2 months, the YAWN was confirmed thru November 28. On 11-29, it appeared a POOP formation may take hold due to sequential hefty declines.
Some chartists believe a POOP wave may have formed, or to a lesser degree a FART, fortunately, the POOP could not be completed and appears to have reversed and we are currently back at YAWN range. We'll need to wait a few weeks to see where we go from here.
We do know right now, the BAR is open, but that typically changes around 2:00AM, or due to VOLUME.
As a reminder to those in Chuck's DIY charts class, if the PPS goes "UP", draw an ascending line proportionate to "how much" it went up. Conversely, if the PPS goes "DOWN", draw your line "descending" in a proportionate manner. Remember to use as many colors as possible and lots of acronyms!
Based on the chart, looking at forward predictions of what could happen and general wisdom, remember:
Man who go thru airport turnstile sideways, going to Bangkok.
I already started loading the plethora of variables into my proprietary algorithm which now includes exponential smoothing routines. Once it starts, the program will likely need to run all weekend. I should have an updated chart available Monday, maybe sooner?
Until then, have a good weekend...
Everyone should just shut up and be like Melvin! Let's say nothing (like Melvin), do nothing (like Melvin), and just wait for the 750 Million Dollar Pipedream to flow. C'mon people!
Sign me up!
Hitting the Mega Millions jackpot on Friday and the the Powerball jackpot on Saturday is "doable" too. But a 10% gain 90 consecutive trades in a row, 10%, no losses, would be quite the accomplishment.
If you started with $1,000 & had a 10% gain that you reinvested, 90 times IN A ROW, you'd end up with $5.3 MILLION DOLLARS! Seriously?
I would consider 90 successful consecutive trades more "optimistic" than "realistic".
...90 days compounded at 3% would be more a realistic target price, right?
Cheers
I'd sign up for a 4.3% "guaranteed gain" per week in a heartbeat. But based on the actual trades, commission & crappy volume, it would be impossible. Remember, people bought around the .0144 level and sold around .0138.
You're also assuming a 4ish % weekly gain is a "trend" that will continue. Maybe for the past month or so, but we know where the PPS was a few months earlier...
Good afternoon. I happen to be excellent at analyzing charts so I got this:
GDVM "opened" Monday 1/22 at .0138 cents per share
GDVM "closed" Friday 1/26 at .0144 cents per share
This means GDVM went "up" by .0006 cents per share for the "week"
(insert squiggly lines & stuff here)
The Chuck Indicator translation says the stock didn't do dick.
Total volume for the week was about 1.58 million.
This translates to nobody gives a shit about GDVM right now.
Have a great week, glad I could help & I'll check back with an updated chart next week.
You mean the "attempted RM". The clock hasn't started yet...
Think like George Costanza, "it's a stock about nothing"...
Yeah, it's like a loved one is run over by a truck. You get a call that they're on life support in the ICU, you rush to the hospital and ask the doctor "how's he doing?"
The doctor says "his cholesterol numbers are pretty good" and then walks away...
Here too. The wind is really blowing & the ocean is nasty from the storm in SC. what are you looking at?
Busy weekend, tried to PM you but I'm blocked & buzzed right now. I'll get back to you...
Fair enough, peace...
Thank you for a reasonable reply. The reason for my lengthy post and obvious frustration comes from posts that imply Cisco gold is "imminent", like any day now. And then others take it as "fact" or "official news" like the original post I replied to that said "great news to see that Cisco gold is not far away".
And again, you repeated "they have met the requirements..." with a slight twist. So I need to repeat "they obviously have not met all the requirements". Kind of like someone who wants to be a pilot who passed all the written tests, has never been in an airplane for the hands on tests, and says "hey, I'm gonna be a pilot"! Maybe...
I disagree with your assumption the denial is based on revenue or sales as well. Melvin told us what the issue was:
Our final internal review of the Cisco gold partnership revealed that achieving this partnership level is not something that can be accomplished without the necessary automation to handle the workload that is sure to accompany it.
Remember, it took 9 MONTHS for him to figure this out! How is this possible? This doesn't bother you even a bit? And now they need to design, test, & implement a new, automated system where he gave a 7 to 10 month target from November 30.
I'm not saying they won't get there, but IMO it is not a "given" and almost certainly not "imminent".
Because I'm a shareholder with an opinion, not a very positive one right now. Why wouldn't I be here?
PS I don't have a girlfriend, been happily married for 43-plus years and I noticed your post is about "me" and nothing to dispute the facts of my post.
There's something to be said about people who jump to personal attacks. Sometimes the aggressive person is the one struggling? For now, I'll just take it as an opportunity to further explain the situation.
Isn't it obvious that the specializations they hold are nowhere close enough to achieve "gold status"? It should be clear that more, likely much more is needed for this level.
I don't agree with your "6 Month" comment so here's a timeline.
On Feb 27, 2023 Melvin Tweeted the following:
VeeMost has met all the requirements for Cisco Gold Certification and we have just applied for the certification. We will keep you informed.
.
.
#veemost #cisco #gold_certification
9:31 AM · Feb 27, 2023
·
40.8K Views
*
On November 30th 2023, 276 DAYS LATER, (A FULL 9 MONTHS), we got an update:
Update on Cisco Gold Certification
Our final internal review of the Cisco gold partnership revealed that achieving this partnership level is not something that can be accomplished without the necessary automation to handle the workload that is sure to accompany it. Therefore, we set a goal to ensure we have the people, processes, and tools needed to leverage this partner status successfully. Our target date for completing the Cisco gold partnership process is Q3 2024.
So basically it took Melvin 9 F'in months to figure out post-it notes and "manual" procedures weren't going to cut it so they'll start from scratch and create an automated system? Repeat: He thought they met all the requirements on Feb 27, 2023!
As for the "new target date RANGE" of Q3 2024, July 1st is 7 FULL MONTHS from the 11/30/23 and September 30 is 10 FULL MONTHS.
I would think people would understand why some have lost confidence in Melvin's ability to get this or just about anything else accomplished, but let's assume he succeeds by mid Q3, 8/15/24. That would be just under a YEAR & 1/2 from when he first said "we have met all the requirements"! WTF
So lifetime? Yeah, in the IT world/public company arena it sure can be. Another fun analogy would be from the first "we meet everything" date of 2/27 to the 11/30 update (9 months), a couple could have made a baby! But wait, there's more! And then from the 11/30 update to 8/31/24 (well within the Q3 target) ANOTHER BABY could be made and born!
So I'm comfortable saying "Cisco gold soon" is a bit misleading, maybe even "pump-ish"?
"NO", they haven't met the requirements. If they did, they would be gold and Q3 2024 is a lifetime away.
This is not "new", they've had these certifications for at least a year. In fact, they expire in a few weeks (Jan 24th). "Yes", these are very good but definitely not "gold". I'm not holding my breath for "if" they achieve gold, but I'm sure Melvin will keep us updated (sarcasm).
Great news? May I ask where you get your "news" from? Also not sure what Cisco Gold "not far away" means, unless you mean like Elon Musk is "not far away" from colonizing Mars?
JK died for us. Many of us speak to him through the spirit world. Jesus Khrist will save us, and GDVM, you just need to believe. Remember our prayer:
No Dillution
No Dillution
No Dillution
No Dillution...
I'm not worried at all about dillution. First, Melvin would need to figure out how to do it, then he would actually need to accomplish it!
Thanks, exactly why I said mid April...
Next report is the annual which will likely be mid-April so you need to double your "sideways" time...
Why not blame climate change too?
Tothe, there is confusion in your numbers. $835,331 was Q3 Revenue, not profit. Which is down significantly from Q2 revenue of $2,383,912 which was down from Q1 revenue of $2,760,524.
VeeMost had a net "loss" of $16,369 in Q3. But yes, $5,979,767 revenue for the 9 months ending September 30 & net income of $1,626,192 is good.
The back to back revenue decline and CISCO Gold nowhere in sight should explain the PPS...
Did you really say this as if it's odd?
For every large purchase there's a large sale to match.
LOL
Believe me, I know. Same China post over a YEAR now...
Regarding the same post you have made for OVER ONE YEAR NOW, do you know if the Chinese guy in China driving the Tesla made in China had Chinese food in the car? Eating with chopsticks while driving could have been the problem?
Melvin's tweet TEN MONTHS AGO stating VeeMost has "met all the requirements for CISCO Gold".
*
VeeMost Technologies
@veemost
VeeMost has met all the requirements for Cisco Gold Certification and we have just applied for the certification. We will keep you informed.
.
.
.
#veemost #cisco #gold_certification
9:31 AM · Feb 27, 2023
·
40.8K Views
*
Yeah, yeah, yeah...
He meant to say "then we are all fucked". The fun part though is of course Melvin didn't tell us "why" he thinks it should have been approved or "why" it was denied! This way we all get to continue guessing what the problem is!
I thought a stock "correction" meant the PPS is correcting back to where it's supposed to be? How much lower before everything is corrected?
Chinese proverb:
It is good for girl to meet boy in park,
But it is better for boy to park meat in girl...
I previously noted this & I'm confident the answer is "no". Kind of like telling the cop who pulls you over, "no, I haven't had any alcohol", after he says "I smell alcohol, have you had anything to drink tonight"?
I assume you are saying "1/2 of a quarter" for Q1 based on a post here and not the actual Q1 report? The actual Q1 report also states "for the 3 months ending...". It also discloses the revenue up to Feb 19th ($818k). So the $2.7 mil is a full quarter.
I realize mid-February was the RM, but GDVM acquired VeeMost along with it's cash, AP, AR, etc. so it's "their revenue".
Like I said, read the headings. Q2 & Q3 figures are "YTD".