Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
very cool find. . . .
. . . it does prove that the private AMDL, inc is still active, and that the patent is not owned by the voided radient . . . still, this does fit fine in my scenario, with only 4 years left to wait out the lenders . . . Charter didn't take on the liability for the chance to sell kits or CIT . . . a "plan to reorganize" in 2022 is his goal, jmo . . .
you could be right . . . i guess it depends on each individual . . . consult a tax lawyer for the answer . . .
hold them until 2022 . . . seriously . . . if the NY plaintiffs do not refile their claims, the stock goes debt free . . . forget DR70, it's off patent and free to use for all . . . but the shell is controlled by Charter, who can round them up, RS, and reissue new shares as a shell company . . . a longshot, but enough of a chance that i wouldn't surrender the shares for a tax loss . . . jmo
why not, when you can RS them 5B:1, and issue 4.999B new shares . . . so says the company charter . . . and we can't dismiss JT's point outright . . . someone owns 5B shares, and did not file the SEC docs . . . an easy oversight for a foreign entity . . . there is no way of knowing if UNI owns shares . . . the UNI sales figures might be lost in translation, but the revenue has nothing to do with the void Radient company . . . it's UNI's money, not RXPCs, and Charter would take anything volunteered based on the expired agreement with McC anyway . . .
yes, far fatched, yes epic, but the NY judgement has only 4+ years to go, and the CA debts are now clear . . . the voided stock shall be unburdoned by 2021, and the CEO has the right to round up outstanding shares, files, and have another go at it . . . i doubt UNI, but it is possible, and Charter knows the law . . . he controls a 5 bil shell . . . and besides, i wanted to be the 30,000th post . . .
i shall draw no conclusions . . . UNI wants to go public . . . UNI sells DR-70 . . . Charter is selling DR-70 . . . the voided RXPC shares are controlled by Charter . . . Charter owns no shares . . . a connection between Charter and UNI, other than they're both in China would go a long way to connect the dots . . .
Charter owns no shares, just the printing press . . . he can round up the OS, R/S 10,000:1, and print a big fat shelf . . .
i think i can explain the recent confusion regarding the new website usacsl.com . . . this is a DIFFERENT COMPANY . . . the site is registered to Dennis Charter, who is likely the CEO . . . the reason some folks are confused is because the address, product, r&d, and sales pitch are IDENTICAL to those of the former company, Radient . . . this is easily explained, being that DC is the FORMER CEO of radient, and had the right to take ANYTHiNG HE WANTED when he left his position there . . . the former RXPC is a dead company, void in DE . . . along with the shares of course . . . i think the new site went up because the last bill in CA was around september, '12, and the 4 year statute of limitations are up . . . there is still hope, in 2021, the void shares will no longer have a judgement against them . . . the BOD could revive them, and round up the shares not surrendered . . . halfway there . . . patience . . .
occupant might work . . .
. . . seriously, if it's not a legal mailing address it doesn't matter to whom . . . if anyone was even connected to the former RXPC (such as ADI) they would hide from everyone anyway . . .
both mac and charter claimed they were still able to manufacture there . . . it could be true . . .
not necessarily . . . but likely . . .
sometimes a company will not have a usable address to avoid process servers and bill collectors . . .
this could be one of those times . . .
radient's INSURANCE COMPANY chose to settle . . .
radient was insured, it wasn't a corporate decision to settle . . . then mac quit . . . then the shell went delisted and void, the shelf was emptied, the debts were incurred, the IP was transferred, and the CIK and CUSIP were abandoned
that is a dirty worthless voided shell, UNCLEAN . . .
yes, UNI wants to go public . . . they would need sales first, and then they would IPO, or do what e-well did . . .
keep checking delaware if you want . . .
why would anyone license DR70? . . .
it's off patent anyway . . . all it takes is the knowledge of how to make it, which seems to be spreading . . .
QTXB has it . . . courtesy of GCDx, a public corp
UNI has it, along with their world partners, a private corp
AMDL diagnostics inc has it, a private corp
and
radient HAD it, before they went void in 2014 . . .
i didn't know gartner stiffed radient back in 2010 . . . interesting read, thanks . . .
i hope there are no shareholders who think WG is going to give any money to former RXPC shareholders . . . why should he? . . . he sold off-patent IP, nice job . . . i bet that 50k is already spent . . .
AON, the name radient pharmaceuticals corporation is available again . . . i gues whoever sprung for the last 75. didn't want to do it again . . .
Name Available
The name 'radient pharmaceuticals CORPORATION' is available.
The cost for this reservation is $ 75.00.
Do you want to reserve this name?
so it seems WG sold his LC test . . . finally someone has earned a payday selling DR70, unless his test is different IP . . . personally i think it's the DR70 he bought from mac back in the day, and flipped it . . . nice job . . .
does anyone here remember when RXPC shareholders used to earn money selling DR70? . . . WG most likely received shares of QTXB, but his shares are public, and GCDx shall be absorbed . . . THIS DEAL HAS NO RELATION TO RXPC, sans the off-patent IP . . .
it appears we have achieved consensus . . .
with a month and a half to go in 2015, the lack of ANY radient news all year has told the story . . .
my condolences to the holdouts.
the private corporation is VOID.
the 11/2/10 agreement with provista has now expired.
radient news ended when the company went void.
hopefully, the company is void, shares revoked, and the remaining assets have been transferred to ADI, run by another aussie, Bill White . . . this CUSIP is long gone . . .
QUESTION: does anyone here own shares of . . .
provista?
AMDL diagnostics inc.?
GCDx?
UNI?
eWell?
it is easy to find out . . . just check your CIK# or your cusip/private reggi on your share certificates . . . thanks in advance . . .
and, bankruptcies are not free . . . they are good to protect assets, but radient didn't have any . . . why bother filing?
ADI owns all trademarks and IP . . . that was the point of the transfer . . . to get the assets out of the debt burdened RXPC, and into the clean ADI for possible public offering . . . ADI is ALL aussies, until someone can show evidence to the contrary . . .
will White use the eWell model for ADI to go public? . . . i haven't seen any word of a ticker, broker, or form 210 yet, but i still believe mac can pull it off . . . dancin' dougie waltzes again . . . and White can do the same for the ADI shares . . .
reminder: this CUSIP is not involved in ANYTHING , , ,
it is covered by CMS . . . this was the USPTF, for recommendation guidelines . . . the fix was in, the money was stolen . . . the public comment period will expose the incompetence of the appointed board . . . peers cheat for profit . . . meanwhile 50k per year are still needlessly dying . . . for the love of profit, how disgusting . . .
OUCH, anyone want to lend me some money?
luckily i didn't own much anyway . . . i say the USPTF was bought and paid for, 33% short . . . i would also like to thank the USPTF for using us as the first company under the new confusing as hell rating system, good job . . . i'm hoping for a whipsaw, but expecting a CA . . . and 50K per year are still needlessly dying, BRAVO USPTF . . .
AMDL shares from 2003 were renamed RPC . . .
then RXPC, then delisted . . . wrong company . . . ADI is AMDL DIAGNOSTICS INC, private shares, likely on a shelf, under the control of White . . . if they go public, true believers can invest . . .
speaking of which . . . eWell is to the best of my knowledge approved by the SEC, but will a broker file a form 210? . . . if 'da wolf can find the new ticker that would be great . . . if GCDx or provista does merge into eWell's shell, why would anyone think the RXPC shares would be involved? . . . eWell is public, radient is void . . .
the point of the merger is to go public, right all?
it means the name is locked out . . .
. . . so no one else can use it, that's all . . . it's just a name reservation, NO COMPANY FILING . . . it was available for over a year, but i think the aussies got smart and locked it up . . . who knows, maybe they will use it, and maybe they will do the filings . . . i always said, "why throw away a 5B share shell"? . . .
some folks think a name res means the company was reinstated . . . that may be true, but the shares have not . . . a simple edgar search will prove this . . . still REVOKED, no filings since . . .
oct '15, still no evidence of reinstatement . . .
the shares are REVOKED . . . public or private . . . if the shares were to be reinstated privately, (pre form 211), they would have to file with the SEC . . . NO FILINGS, no reinstatement . . .
a name reservation means nothing . . .
GCDx has their own shareholders, not radient shares.
UNI has their own shareholders, not radient shares.
provista has their own shareholders, not radient shares.
eWell has their own shareholders, not radient shares.
ADI has their own shareholders, not radient shares.
radient had their own shareholders, still void.
welcome to the real world, mister mister . . .
he forgot to sign it.
that LOI expired 3/31/2011 . . . no updated agreement was ever signed . . . now it's 2015 . . . if you search the provista site you will find NOTHING about DR70 or radient . . . you will find a complete pipeline will full disclosure about the IP and cancers they are working on . . . no lung, no DR70, nada . . . not a word . . . same thing for the clinical trials, no DR70 . . . nothing to see here, move along . . .
ONLY a FORM 211 filing is PERTINENT . . .
. . . until they file a form 211, the SHARES WILL NEVER TRADE . . . unless this happens,
NOTHING ELSE MATTERS . . .
and so we agree, ADI is privately held . . .
so who are the shareholders? . . . what is the PPN? . . .
i guarantee you the CUSIP numbers held by the former shareholders are DIFFERENT shares . . . the PRIVATE radient owns the PRIVATE ADI, likely the shares are sitting on a shelf . . . no one here owns them . . . the radient BOD can do what they want with them . . . the last thing they would want is to pay out to the former shareholders . . . this is why no one is bothering to revive the revoked shares . . .
the status quo is doing fine for all parties except the former shareholders and lenders . . .
one more thing, the LOI from 2010 had a 90 day clause, it's been longer than 90 days, more like 1400 days since the agreement expired . . . just wanted to point that out . . .
does anyone know the cusip for ADI?
or a CIK#, thanks in advance . . .
check out the link in DC's latest post . . .
you haven't lived until you've seen the "megaphone man" . . .
GS, i say the new scam is just beginning . . .
i fully expect ADI to make a go of it . . . why not?, they received all of the property for free . . . you can't deny that the off-patent action has increased . . . publicity follows . . . White is going to run the show . . . FL foreign entity . . .
of course we agree that things like the name radient, the CIK# for radient, and the cusips for radient are long gone . . . no debt and no shareholders . . .
thanks GS,
i would bet White made a deal with the landlord to leave the signs up in the front office, just to keep an occupied look to the building . . . maybe 100 bucks a months for sign postage . . . the amdl inc must have been lying around from 2008 . . .
they must have thought you were a collection agent, lol . . . thanks for the update . . .
there is no interest in the shell, GLOBALLY . . .
there is no interest in the radient shell in florida or the 49 other states, nor in any other country on the planet . . .
if there were a majority shareholder, something would have happened by now . . . it's well over a year . . . filing in DE but not with the SEC is just silly . . . it accomplishes NOTHING . . . no one should care about what happens on a state by state corporate level . . . in order for the shares to be relisted, they must file with the SEC . . . THEY HAVEN'T . . . until this changes, the shares are DOA . . .
i have no doubt whatsoever that numerous parties (not provista) will try to sell DR70 . . . the amount of DD has exploded since it went off patent . . . so what?, who cares? . . . the shares are what are relevant here, no filing, no CIK#, no cusip, NO MONEY . . . check your trading account for verification . . .
after a year plus, rome was visibly under construction . . .
well it was reserved . . .
but why . . . i think it's to lock out anyone who would want to blur the future . . . some made the leap to GOOD STANDING, but there is no evidence to back up this claim . . . no SEC filings have been recorded since revocation, that is the only FACT available . . . why file in DE and not with the SEC? . . . it makes no sense . . .
all of the DR70 hype is under the UNI agreement . . . it's irrelevant . . . 100K per year cap, paid to ADI . . .
. . . still no sign of radient's CIK#, or cusips . . . still DOA . . .
a shell is born (i think) . . .
mac filed a notice of effectiveness for e-well . . . i think that means the S1 was approved, and he is ready to file a form 210 . . . i've never seen a shell go public without an underwriter, dancin' dougie is a genius, imo . . .
now back to the show . . .
so all we know is the name is unavailable, this will include all radient pharmaceuticals, any suffix . . .
what we don't know!!!
can the name be in good standing without filing the past years?
if yes, then why didn't they file the SAME docs with the SEC?
if no, it's just a name res, likely by the aussie BOD to lock out any scavengers, just like the FAILED trademarks . . .