Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
StockAlphaDave...recall the case that went to SCOUS in which "ROBERT" nearly lost it over how the boards were superceding appellate actions ... his reactions I believe are sited in that decision...I can't find it... would be good to post... was about a year ago... perhaps that why we're seeing moderate changes... he as we know legislation isn't going to happen until if at all after the election....as a result & if my premise is accurate justices will be appointed that my take into account of the nature of patents...to inspire innovation not suppress it.
Factors that I believe will work for Wddd
1. Contingency representation provides Wddd all the time necessary the above to work itself out.
2. Roberts is pissed & wants the board curbed.
3. Objectively speaking if the election goes to the dems the court will change Roberts knows this. If the Senate .....changes majority positions many vacant judicial appointments will be FILLED..this is of huge importance.
4. The down side as compared to the up side fortunately when I bought several large positions @ .075,@.085&.095 so I really don't care how long it takes the up side it tremendous the down side not comparatively not much.
5. Latches apply here? If so starting when?
6. Punitive apply? How much?
7. Other awards I'm unaware of?
MakingGains...shorting now not a good idea...no announcement today as anticipated...but see Vrng24 pacer post as of this morning....now anticipate announcement poss thu AH or fri am...we've touched 4.05 & will blow through that easily... once past the 5.00 mark institutions will take interest...analysts will take interest...real evaluation of value occure ....& the pps will be recognized....they will take into account the 10:1 reverse split...legal history....& the steps taken to diversify....and analysis of each of the holdings.....not to mention what Lang has been working on for the past year.
Idea for patient longs that have been here for the past4 + years do some DD here on ihub...read the company description & the background of there representation in depth Wddd let's discuss there.
Hope this moves like Fh did today. Expect though we'll have to await the calander of events.This is an inexpensive buy... minimal downside to potential upside? Still a gamble but holding a 9&a2 (legal firm success rate)need to draw a 10
Announcements to come AH? Monday between 930-1030? Perhaps,in any event moving toward real value.
case didn't just go away, Fh will sub letter 2day perhaps will inc settlement.if no setmnt then schedule proceedings 4 trial.what say u jjseabrook.Pps should be going up w this deadline n setlmnt(y did insiders buy)jury trial longer but best 4 higher award.They setld
As per https://mobile.twitter.com/FORMHoldings24/status/786208244951769089/photo/1
But perhaps there not releasing $$ amt. so as not to influence other cases or negociations, present & future.
True that could support the notion of a low number. Conversely, non disclosure agreement might work to the advantage of the opposition in as much if it's a high figure corporately they aren't embarrassed before there shareholders/ industry.... thy can take less heat when other high settlements/award are revealed. It's easer to get lost in a crowd of high figures.
See ihub go to tools drop down data tools then trades ....there were 3 trades
FYI Reminder timeline. Needs to be adjusted for bungee.anybody?
BOSTON, MA--(Marketwired - Sep 17, 2015) - Judge Denise Casper of The U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts has issued the Joint Pretrial Schedule for the Worlds Inc. (OTCQB: WDDD) v. Activision Blizzard Inc. et al patent infringement lawsuit with the following dates:
1. Fact discovery to be completed by 2/1/16.
2. Opening expert reports by 3/1/16.
3. Rebuttal expert reports by 4/1/16.
4. Expert discovery to be completed by 4/22/16.
5. Dispositive/Daubert Motions to be filed by 5/20/16.
6. Opposition to Dispositive/Daubert Motions to be filed by 6/20/16.
7. Reply ISO Dispositive/Daubert Motions to be filed by 7/11/16.
8. Hearing on Dispositive/Daubert Motions set for 7/20/16 at 2:00PM.
9. Initial Pretrial Conference set for 9/29/16 at 2:00PM.
The order to schedule these dates leading to trial follows the Markman ruling favorable to Worlds Inc. that was issued in June 2015.
Bungie Petitions
J ustia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts.
https://dockets.justia.com/docket/massachusetts/madce/1:2012cv10576/143034/
4:00pmfri 3:1 buyers to sellers must increase it next week to 6:1 then let the news continue that ratio
I POSTED THIS THE OTHER DAY .....guess it wasn't read re implied patterns... As per the past several days...where are your: heads... All kinds on Hints : re: insider legal trades.. After 4 yrs being here , new-bees this past week each day there have been easy tradable days .... Study the charts... Reed all you can re:"G" zte at freefourims24 or the past Vrng 24 free forums.com......maybe the Problem is u don't have the Bucks.. U trade in 100's of shares... NOTE ur getting ripped offed by ur trading platform ( commission s). Back off, don't trade, sit and hold .. Make the bigs create the demand......... A higher price for our shares
Iiroauois Capitol?
Let's get this done.
Richard K. Abbe. ( over the past several days Rich has bought + -- 215000 shares)
› Co-Founder, Principal, Managing Partner & Co-Chief Investment Officer, Iroquois Capital Management LLC
› Co-Founder & Former Chief Investment Officer, Vertical Ventures LLC
› Former Senior Managing Director & Member of the Board of Directors, Gruntal & Company
› Founder Partner, Hampshire Securities
› Current Member of Investment Committee, Hobart and William Smith College’s Endowment Fund
He's either our hero or not, prefer the former w/o basis beyond what's stated above.
That's personal funds not Iroquois Capital Management, if correct, his buy is more than just another it brings greater credibility.
Bruce & Andy also participated but the real winner is Cliff...he bought many shares in gloom times.
Cliffs winning Rich you gonna take that. Bruce Andy what say you? Gonna lets these guys whoop you? :)
Push it above 2.72 lets get over the hump be heroes.
I POSTED THIS THE OTHER DAY .....guess it wasn't read re implied patterns... As per the past several days...where are your: heads... All kinds on Hints : re: insider legal trades.. After 4 yrs being here , new-bees this past week each day there have been easy tradable days .... Study the charts... Reed all you can re:"G" zte at freefourims24 or the past Vrng 24 free forums.com......maybe the Problem is u don't have the Bucks.. U trade in 100's of shares... NOTE ur getting ripped offed by ur trading platform ( commission s). Back off, don't trade, sit and hold .. Make the bigs create the demand......... A higher price for our shares
Iiroauois Capitol?
Let's get this done.
Richard K. Abbe. ( over the past several days Rich has bought + -- 215000 shares)
› Co-Founder, Principal, Managing Partner & Co-Chief Investment Officer, Iroquois Capital Management LLC
› Co-Founder & Former Chief Investment Officer, Vertical Ventures LLC
› Former Senior Managing Director & Member of the Board of Directors, Gruntal & Company
› Founder Partner, Hampshire Securities
› Current Member of Investment Committee, Hobart and William Smith College’s Endowment Fund
He's either our hero or not, prefer the former w/o basis beyond what's stated above.
That's personal funds not Iroquois Capital Management, if correct, his buy is more than just another it brings greater credibility.
Bruce & Andy also participated but the real winner is Cliff...he bought many shares in gloom times.
Cliffs winning Rich you gonna take that. Bruce Andy what say you? Gonna lets these guys whoop you? :)
Push it above 2.72 lets get over the hump be heroes.
You found the pattern.was easy this week as the expected news+ insider buys deminished the doubt.
Richard K. Abbe. ( over the past several days Rich has bought + -- 215000 shares)
› Co-Founder, Principal, Managing Partner & Co-Chief Investment Officer, Iroquois Capital Management LLC
› Co-Founder & Former Chief Investment Officer, Vertical Ventures LLC
› Former Senior Managing Director & Member of the Board of Directors, Gruntal & Company
› Founder Partner, Hampshire Securities
› Current Member of Investment Committee, Hobart and William Smith College’s Endowment Fund
He's either our hero or not, prefer the former w/o basis beyond what's stated above.
That's personal funds not Iroquois Capital Management, if correct, his buy is more than just another it brings greater credibility.
Bruce & Andy also participated but the real winner is Cliff...he bought many shares in gloom times.
Cliffs winning Rich you gonna take that. Bruce Andy what say you? Gonna lets these guys whoop you? :)
Push it above 2.72 lets get over the hump be heroes.
Here we go again. Two times in a given day.. GREAT!...sound like a pump NOT! Been here two long....will wait for a couple of cents further down... Then repeat this mornings action. .20-.25. Why? With all the insider purchases (very unusual) what a tell.
There it was.SWEET. Let's do that again!!!
The price at 2.50-2.55 is a gift. Anyone who has watched Fh for the past 4yrs will recognize this opportunity in llight of the insider buying. Believe it's retrenched, looking for .25cent upside then bounce prior the anticipated good news.
StockAlphaDave. ATVI's legal team (as per their seemingly lack of experience, not addressing points/issues = being miss handled) are not equal to legal teams that handled G & zte. In addition to legal abilities they had the right contacts,and skillfully applied dirty tricks.
Stockalphadave. Perhaps I've missed something in both the "G" & zte case your point was so as both had more sophisticated legal teams that deal with these cases large scale cases & Numbers. ATVI's
legal team don't seem to be the sharpest knives in the kitchen....a thought.
I joking. Flew out of philly last weekend....spoke with a manager at one of the three locations there....traffic there varies on an annual basis however they average 70 clients daily,additionally they also products for sale,no numbers on that.....when on your trip ask for management ask about average daily client count...I had no time when leaving Louisville to do the same.
I joking. Flew out of philly last weekend....spoke with a manager at one of the three locations there....traffic there varies on an annual basis however they average 70 clients daily,additionally they also products for sale,no numbers on that.....when on your trip ask for management ask about average daily client count...I had no time when leaving Louisville to do the same.
Recall in last 12months a case brought to SCOTUS ( don't recall the case name) Roberts was livid about how the PAtent board was operating.... Was the AG report / investigation instigated by Roberts. Roberts has indicated the Board is usurping the appelets authority.Perhaps someone will remember the case to which I speak.
On another note see Vrng V's Google at formholdings24 ( formally vrng24) for insite as to the legal process.g
StockAlpaDave....having trouble posting but wanted to get the word out recommending all those in Wddd review the Vrng v goolgle case on formholdings 24 (vrng24) he has the full case history + supplementary articals, law. This will take MUCH DD but most valuable as Wddd case is very similar. Note the time line we are looking at the read how it went with Vringo. We do have top notc legal team and the court (SCOTUS) forcing changes at the boards is our advantage but you may find a dec-February end is premature to predict.
Rain do you they're coming to the end of there selling?
Any legal minds out there? Please interpret.
Thought you might be interested in this. I've skimmed it but unsure if it has any impact on FH or wddd. Recall, Casper handled wddd case.
Scholar Alert: [ "summary judgment" patents denise casper advisement ]; Dist. Court, D. Massachusetts
SOPHOS INC. v. RPOST HOLDINGS, INC.
Dist. Court, D. Massachusetts, 2016
... at 2354-57 (affirming summary judgment because the claims did not transform the abstract idea
into a patent-eligible ... [6] That the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") denied petitions to
institute covered business method patent reviews of the '389 and '913 patents tends to ...
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6437430048688218470&hl=en&lr=lang_en&as_sdt=4,147&as_vis=1&oi=scholaralrt
Any legal minds out there? Please interpret.
Thought you might be interested in this. I've skimmed it but unsure if it has any impact on FH or wddd. Recall, Casper handled wddd case.
Scholar Alert: [ "summary judgment" patents denise casper advisement ]; Dist. Court, D. Massachusetts
SOPHOS INC. v. RPOST HOLDINGS, INC.
Dist. Court, D. Massachusetts, 2016
... at 2354-57 (affirming summary judgment because the claims did not transform the abstract idea
into a patent-eligible ... [6] That the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") denied petitions to
institute covered business method patent reviews of the '389 and '913 patents tends to ...
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6437430048688218470&hl=en&lr=lang_en&as_sdt=4,147&as_vis=1&oi=scholaralrt
Rain what do you think? We all post a bid at .092 and let it ride... a take it or leave it... in numbers(retail) with no organized collision yet with market discussion as though we were in the butcher shop back in the day(that's a long way back, wasn't there) perhaps we'll send the signal GAME OVER!(Perhaps not,if there is some wet eared kid running the show, as I suspect, suggestion kid better talk to management as you got a tiger on your til.... fess up know your superior's will give you more respect than if you screw this up) Collectively we CAN do this! So, they will recognize the signal,and know it's better too sell while they still have the chance and get the hell out of here & break even!
Rain got it!Open your eye...don't buy... keep the heat on... we want this for .092..DONE! SKIP THE B.S. They"ll Get out at least even, if not O' Well!
Whoops should be this one it's Lexus nexus
http://tinyurl.com/j7tcbe7
A reminder
Thought you'd be interested
This is an up date on the trends now occurring in the patent legal field should be informative
Free CLE Webinar
Patent Prosecution Industry – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
Please join us for a CLE* webinar presentation focused on the Patent Prosecution Industry – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow.
In this hour, we will be covering past changes, prosecution today and the direction it is headed in the future.
Thursday, May 26 at 1pm ET
Topics to be covered will include:
Legislation that has changed patent prosecution
Historical patent filing trends
The impact of changes in the USPTO
Today’s patent prosecution landscape
The future of patent prosecution
http://tinyurl.com/j7t...
DD on Cuozzo
Issue in Cuozzo: (1) Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, in IPR proceedings, the Board may construe claims in an issued patent according to their broadest reasonable interpretation rather than their plain and ordinary meaning, and, (2) Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, even if the Board exceeds its statutory authority in instituting an IPR proceeding, the Board’s decision whether to institute an IPR proceeding is judicially unreviewable.
A live webcast will be available at http://www.pijip.org/apr-25-supreme-court-series-kirtsaeng-v-john-wiley-sons-and-cuozzo-speed-techonologies-llc-v-lee at the start of the program.
Prof. Michael Carroll, American University Washington College of Law (Moderator)
Panel for Cuozzo (co-sponsored by the Federal Circuit Bar Association):
Prof. Jonas Anderson, American University Washington College of Law (Panelist)
Adjunct Prof. James Toupin, American University Washington College of Law (Panelist, Invited)
Jeffrey Wall, Counsel for Petitioner
Eric Citron, Counsel for Intellectual Ventures Management, LLC, in Support of Petitioner
Greg Rapawy, Counsel for Dell et al., in Support of Respondent K
This is an up date on the trends now occurring in the patent legal field should be informative
Free CLE Webinar
Patent Prosecution Industry – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
Please join us for a CLE* webinar presentation focused on the Patent Prosecution Industry – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow.
In this hour, we will be covering past changes, prosecution today and the direction it is headed in the future.
Thursday, May 26 at 1pm ET
Topics to be covered will include:
Legislation that has changed patent prosecution
Historical patent filing trends
The impact of changes in the USPTO
Today’s patent prosecution landscape
The future of patent prosecution
http://go.reedtech.com/cle-webinar-patent-prosecution?utm_campaign=IP%20-%20Webinar%20-%20Patent%20Prosecution%20-%20May%202016&utm_medium=ad&utm_source=IPW
This is an up date on the trends now occurring in the patent legal field should be informative
Free CLE Webinar
Patent Prosecution Industry – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
Please join us for a CLE* webinar presentation focused on the Patent Prosecution Industry – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow.
In this hour, we will be covering past changes, prosecution today and the direction it is headed in the future.
Thursday, May 26 at 1pm ET
Topics to be covered will include:
Legislation that has changed patent prosecution
Historical patent filing trends
The impact of changes in the USPTO
Today’s patent prosecution landscape
The future of patent prosecution
http://go.reedtech.com/cle-webinar-patent-prosecution?utm_campaign=IP%20-%20Webinar%20-%20Patent%20Prosecution%20-%20May%202016&utm_medium=ad&utm_source=IPW
Rain your most recent detailed post was the best and most appreciated. You mentioned....
.
"d. My estimate is that there is still 8-10 million shares to be sold. The math is easy. If we take the 327k as at March 31, 2016, and estimate that dollar value equals approximately 32-35 million shares converted (at 0.01-0.012), then we subtract the 24 mil shares traded since March 31, 2016 (and clearly not ALL the selling was the convert holder), then there is AT LEAST 8-11 mil shares left, maybe more depending on when they started selling and how much they have sold off since March 31st.s"
Have you considered the converter received those shares at a 45% discount.... Nearly at half price. Wouldn't that have to be taken into consideration when calculating when the converter will stop selling? Won't the converter have retrieved there principal + a little profit then sit on the rest of the shares and see how the June events (SCOTUS) play out.if these assumptions are correct, the question then is at what point will the converter stop selling? Specifically what volume would the converter have to sell? Gestimating that would identify the guesstimated date.
Rain. This may have been addressed & I missed it. Is it possable that whom ever is converting will continue to convert until they withdraw all there invested principal & maybe a little profit then stop selling? If so, the next question, knowing the amt of the float how much would they have to sell to achieve a return of principal+ a little profit? Caculating that , if my supposition is correct, the end point could be caculated. Thus, one could predict price stabalization & perhaps an increase ( ignoring other factors i.e. Favorable litigation news directly effecting Wddd or similar list litagants)
Rain. This may have been addressed & I missed it. Is it possable that whom ever is converting will continue to convert until they withdraw all there invested principal & maybe a little profit then stop selling? If so, the next question, knowing the amt of the float how much would they have to sell to achieve a return of principal+ a little profit? Caculating that , if my supposition is correct, the end point could be caculated. Thus, one could predict price stabalization & perhaps an increase ( ignoring other factors i.e. Favorable litigation news directly effecting Wddd or similar list litagants)
Here's another for those interested ip spec's
http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2016/05/13/federal-circuit-says-software-patent-claims-not-abstract-are-patent-eligible/id=69147/
For those interested in patent investment......A MUST READ READ
http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidpridham/2016/05/12/a-world-without-patents-2/?ref=yfp#70aee36d40ae
Whoops... Got on site late and after reading the above...so good I didn't bother to review today's posts before I added this link. Whatever... This is real good news.
For those interested in patent investment......A MUST READ READ
http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidpridham/2016/05/12/a-world-without-patents-2/?ref=yfp#70aee36d40ae
Rain this would be huge ......
"V" didn't initially go for latches but as it went through the appeal hearing & due to google dirty deeds as recognized by judge Johnson it became apperant Jackson would have acted favorably if "V" asked for it during the hearing when the $ award amts would have been corrected. You may recall the jury used an 8 digest caculator it was obvious a 0 had to be added to there numbers. All died due to a govt agency & that's what Robert's is NOW picking up on. Only wish it were possable for the suprems to reopen the writ of centori "V" put before them. Many the can as this situation is so unpresented in as much a burocratic board is assuming responsiblies of the courts. Overs and the court will put an end to this.