Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
As I understand it, current management would be gone yes but it's not like they would just vacate the shell and run away, leaving no one new in control, as pdgood thinks. If a merger happens, usually that involves a new company along with its management coming into the shell and taking control. This is called a reverse merger. This is vastly different than what pdgood is alluding to. He seems to think current BLLB management would just leave the shell completely and it would somehow magically get controlled again by whoever that rotatory company is. How does that happen? It would require some agency intervening and reassigning control to the rotary company. Sorry, but that just doesn't seem likely. Not now after all this time.
You live in a fantasy world. As much as I would love for this to see .01 or higher, I don't see how your plan comes to fruition. You do realize you have current BLLB management stating they are in final discussions with a merger company right? Are you saying that the SEC or some other agency is going to step in at the last minute and put the kybosh on that if it does happen? I just don't see that happening. I think the world has moved on and for better or worse current BLLB management are in control and will determine the fate of this stock and where it goes from here. Not some pipe dream you're pitching. We shall see, but my money is betting on a merger getting consummated here that results in a change of control and new management being brought in, along with a new business. Then this stock will get valued based on the merits of those various things.
Notice how he couldn’t provide any link to his claims of an active and open investigation with anyone currently in BLLB management. Nada. Zilch. The dude is still living in the past. All he has are outdated links that are years old. Sad.
So nothing you can share for an active case? Come on. Dumb it down for me. Just give me a link? Stop cutting and pasting crap. Just give me something concrete that shows an active case. 2024 bro.
This link is from 2021! Got anything that shows an active investigation with anyone in current management??? I didn’t think so. All you have shown to date is old and outdated info from a group that is no longer involved here.
Sooo…nothing open and pending on current BLLB management. Got it. Thank you!
Usually means we’re close
I can feel it all the way up in my plums lol
SEC investigation and case r ACTIVE bro.
Got a link you can share proving that? I didn’t think so.
That icon has since been removed by Ihub FYI. Try clearing your cache and you'll see it is no longer there. It still remains to be seen what, if anything, will come into this ticker. But you already knew that ;)
.0035 is the major breakout point. Breaks that and .01+ is in the cards.
Ihub admin replied to me saying they’ll look into it and that it’s probably pulling in that logo incorrectly. So bizarre.
Definitely weird. Could be outdated info getting comingled together for some reason given the close resemblance of names.
Also, Ihub doesn't put logos next to the company ticker so there is something quirky going on with why that logo is showing up at all. The fact it doesn't on the desktop version as well sorta confirms my suspicion.
Weird. So I see it when I look at this board from my phone (using mobile view) but it's just the standard blue icon when looking from a desktop. I let the admin mods know so I'm guessing they'll fix it shortly. I did a quick spot check of other tickers I follow on my phone and all of them had the standard blue icon (no icon for the businesses they are in). Given that, I am assuming this is something quirky with ihub that will get corrected shortly.
Yeah, just seeing the blue standard icon. Maybe some quirky going on with ihub.
I don't see any icon and that isn't our website btw. We are Bell Buckle Holdings. Not a store.
Our domain is www.bellbuckleholdings.com
Volume starting to come in again
Thought so but seems the dumpers are back at it again, clogging the ask up again. This needs to break and hold .002 area for it to get any legs to run higher.
Cleared out a bunch of overhang sub .002 Now it needs more sustained buying to start chewing through what’s left between .002 and .003 area. If it can break .0035, could see a bigger move.
I would happy with .01 too, and could care less about how we get there. Whether through pdgood's approach or with current management in place. Makes zero difference to me.
Out with the old, in with the new. Merger news soon IMO.
It’s the pink sheets, dude. You’re acting as if this is some NASDAQ stock. Gimme me a break. You’re really losing credibility here with each post. It’s becoming very more and more clear what your motive is with each post.
You know the answer to that. Come on. The 2023 year end filings haven’t been submitted yet.
Remains to be seen what they’re merging in but again I don’t think MMG is involved any longer. Have you seen MMG or Miro post anything mentioning BLLB on Twitter in recent weeks since that public falling out? I haven’t.
Given that he doesn't appear in any filings since a couple of years ago, it stands to reason that he is no longer involved. Again, you should refer to OTC Markets for the latest information on their securities counsel. Their profile is Pink Current which means that is the latest and greatest per OTC markets who vets their information.
There is something we can actually agree on. I don't think that MMG group is involved any longer. I say that because there were a few Twitter posts a few weeks ago where MMG was saying BLLB wasn't responding to them anymore and BLLB even addressed the issue on their account pretty much saying they were wanting to get the best deal for shareholders and implying that is why they weren't responding/working with MMG. I don't know about this lawyer guy but he seems to have been involved with prior management and he isn't listed anywhere on the company OTC profile. Here is who they have listed now.
Securities Counsel
Donald R. Keer, P.E., Esq
PA
Fair enough. Let's see what materializes over the coming weeks.
As far as your questions below. Considering they just announced there will be a change in control and new management coming onboard, I first don't see a point in continuing to hash things out from previous management that is no longer involved. As far as current management, well it would seem they are about to be on their way out and/or will have a much reduced role moving forward assuming the merger gets done. Furthermore, these stocks are always about what the future holds, so I am willing to give them a little more time and room to lay that out.
If you're so convinced there is nothing happening and that this stock isn't going to go anywhere, why do you continue to spend time and energy posting here? You've made your position here very clear. Why the need to continue posting on something you apparently have no vested interest in? Or do you? ;)
Sounds like they're close with a new merger candidate. The good news is I think this a bottom has finally been put in on this latest downtrend we've been in since December. We'll need more details on the new company before I think we see any real sort of buying volume, but I could see this start to slowly trend up beginning next week into the closing date whenever they announce it. Long story short, I think things are looking up from here. We shall see.
Interesting you would share that post because that poster Richard Tang clearly thought highly of Kim Halvorson at the time he wrote it.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164507040
When I did not have motivation to continue maintaining BLLB, I had interviewed Nathan Nowak and Kim Halvorson. It was my decision to grant Ms. Halvorson the continued control as she had interviewed well. She had a very good resume and I believe that after 18 months of searching for a CEO of BLLB she would be a good fit and is competent. Today she is doing a good job, and I hope that this case will allow her to submit a review of removing the Caveat Emptor. I haven't talked to her about that, but I think that is a process she is contemplating.
So let me get this straight. This other Andre Jaberian guy is the bad guy in all of this. Richard Tang exposes him and he is eventually gone and removed from BLLB. Richard Tang brings in Kim Halvorson, who he thinks is the right person for the job, and low and behold this ticker eventually gets the caveat emptor removed? Wow. That other poster here really seems to have a completely different view of her, but it's clear as day per the post you linked that she was really the good guy (girl) here. Thanks for sharing!
So question....if Richard Tang was a good guy, and he in turn passed it on to another good guy (girl) Kim Halvorson, how is it now that BLLB is crooked again with current management??? I'm failing to see how you make that jump considering the bad guys seemed to have been removed a while back. Please enlighten me.
Still here and holding my shares. Just nothing worth discussing here yet until the company puts out some new information.
I for one am very pleased to see BLLB is no longer in bed with them (MMG). Makes me feel more confident about something legitimate making its way into this ticker. May take a bit more time, but in the end I think it will be worth it. We shall see.
You serious? I would be willing to bet they’ve been hitting the market all this week. You have dilutive market makers like BLAS and INTL on the ask plus OTCN has been an active seller as of late. Thankfully the issuance wasn’t hundreds of millions but yeah this wasn’t a positive thing and I bet this hits fresh lows this coming week now that the numbers have been updated.
No idea. Ask the company.
I never said that. I’m just saying in the short term, there’s nothing positive going on to warrant a move here. Quite the opposite. I think this trends lower until they can line up a new merger deal. That could take months.
Oh, and one more. 3. They announced they would reduce the A/S a few months back and never followed through on it. Now we know why. Dilution.
Yes, at least for now. And here are two biggest reasons. 1. No merger and we could be months away from something materializing at this point (if at all) and 2. they announced to expect another round of dilution. In OTC land, those are two very big reasons that drive a stock lower.
Until we get more info on either of these, my sentiment is pretty negative (in case you couldn't tell).
I feel you. My average is at higher prices too and it sucks to see this now trending back down. Still holding out hope that something happens down the road but it seems that timeline is now longer than I had originally hoped for. Such is the OTC. Nothing ever goes according to schedule.
We should see something updated soon on OTC markets. It's not a matter of guessing at this point. The company came out and announced there would be dilution coming on the Twitter account. So not a matter of if, but when. INTL and BLAS were obvious signs for me though when they started showing up this week. I knew something was up. Now we wait to see how bad the dilution is.
Seriously. Theyre just making things worse with every tweet at this point. No one wants to hear about how they might, could, possibly, almost…get a merger done and don’t over promise and under deliver. Period.
Sorry to hear that. Maybe they pull their act together later this year but in the short term I don’t think things look good here, at least not anymore. Waiting to see just how much dilution they issue. OTC markets should get updated soon. Dilutive MMs like BLAS and INTL are already signaling selling on level 2, so the transfer agent will have to update the numbers soon.