Bell Buckle Holdings (BLLB)

[mkt_predictor]

Interesting you would share that post because that poster Richard Tang clearly thought highly of Kim Halvorson at the time he wrote it.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164507040

When I did not have motivation to continue maintaining BLLB, I had interviewed Nathan Nowak and Kim Halvorson. It was my decision to grant Ms. Halvorson the continued control as she had interviewed well. She had a very good resume and I believe that after 18 months of searching for a CEO of BLLB she would be a good fit and is competent. Today she is doing a good job, and I hope that this case will allow her to submit a review of removing the Caveat Emptor. I haven't talked to her about that, but I think that is a process she is contemplating.

So let me get this straight. This other Andre Jaberian guy is the bad guy in all of this. Richard Tang exposes him and he is eventually gone and removed from BLLB. Richard Tang brings in Kim Halvorson, who he thinks is the right person for the job, and low and behold this ticker eventually gets the caveat emptor removed? Wow. That other poster here really seems to have a completely different view of her, but it's clear as day per the post you linked that she was really the good guy (girl) here. Thanks for sharing!

So question....if Richard Tang was a good guy, and he in turn passed it on to another good guy (girl) Kim Halvorson, how is it now that BLLB is crooked again with current management??? I'm failing to see how you make that jump considering the bad guys seemed to have been removed a while back. Please enlighten me.