Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Toxic loans courtesy of salerno
21 days
Certainly not so far
Salerno is trying to pull this off on a shoe string
He just got pregnant
If he doesn't deliver a healthy baby in 9 months..
He and his company will be stillborn
If the debt has been taken care of, as several of you assert, then why does that action - for lack of a better word - not show up in any of the filings?
If they ever hit
Reliable filings
The difference between promise/potential and execution is almost always a stock trading near or at zero
27 days
Pretty obvious. DYODD
Time will tell - 32 days
Clearly, if you read its quarterly financial filings and do the numbers and consider the number of shares paid out in lieu of cash to vendors and consultants each quarter, ecsl continues to be operating free cash flow negative
Mgmt has expected many events in the past
Do not expect anywhere near 60mm igmb shares to be distributed to ecsl non insider shareholders
Blast off postponed
Or aborted
Shouldn't be a surprise
A meaningful portion of those shares will have to be sold to fund working capital needs
Not good enough
Great expectations
Wishing and hoping
Not a chance
Igmb's stock will round trip yet again
Definitely not
Based upon what?
Yet in reality...
It won't be
yo means nothing given history
Proof
Poof
Recall the famous words spoken at the 1980 winter games
"Do you believe in miracles?"
Well, the newest rumor is that igmb deal will close soon, imminently, when Ron heads south from the great white north. Believe at your peril
When was that transaction completed, and at what price was ecsl's stock?
Hopium, without substantive contract or quarterly revenue run rate at least 5x current
In terms of truth or fiction, it matters a lot in the overall scheme of things
Fwiw...
http://www.vehicleservicepros.com/directory/chemicals/vehicle-additives/article/12103412/can-additives-really-increase-mpg-for-heavy-duty-trucking?
Can additives really increase mpg for heavy duty trucking?
Some EPA-registered additives have not only been shown to boost mpg by more than 10 percent, but also reduce overall emissions by over 21 percent under highway conditions.
DEL WILLIAMS AUGUST 15, 2015
The EPA is expected to propose regulation requiring an increase in Class 8 truck fuel economy up to 40 percent by 2027 compared to 2010 levels, while cutting greenhouse gas emissions. A typical tractor-trailer averaging 5 to 6 mpg of diesel today would need to average 9 mpg under such rules, which would continue the EPA’s regulation of heavy duty truck fuel economy that began in 2011.
Since the variable cost of fuel is usually one of the highest controllable fleet costs, reducing it has been a top concern for many trucking companies, made more urgent with EPA fuel economy requirements. Though previous gains in Class 8 mileage came largely from using more efficient tires or equipment, a new promising approach is to improve mileage with fuel additives.
While many in the trucking industry are justifiably skeptical of unsupported claims for fuel additives, some EPA-registered additives have not only been shown to boost mpg by more than 10 percent, but also reduce overall emissions by over 21 percent under highway conditions.
For instance, one EPA registered fuel additive, called Dynamo Cetane Booster by CyberFuels (www.cyberfuelsinc.com), a subsidiary of EncounterCare Solutions, has been tested by both trucking companies in the field and by an independent, third-party, EPA certified laboratory. This diesel fuel additive has been proven to comply with the federal low sulfur content requirements for use in diesel motor vehicles and non-road engines, contains no petroleum, and increases cetane by 8 points when added to regular diesel at fill up.
When John David Holmes, owner of JD Holmes Trucking based in Georgia, tested Dynamo Cetane Booster, his main concern was improving mileage and lowering fuel cost.
“There’s a lot of talk among truckers about EPA regulations, but most of us are more concerned with saving money on expenses and improving truck performance,” says Holmes.
In the past, Holmes had tried other additives but didn’t see a change, so he decided to road test the EPA registered fuel additive.
Holmes ran comparative mileage tests in 11 semi tractor-trailers, ranging from a 1998 C-15 Caterpillar 625hp engine to 2012 15x15 Cummings, including Peterbuilt 289hp and 387hp Cummings engines. These road tests were conducted over 12 weeks between April and June 2014, with fuel and mileage data gathered from the trucks’ onboard computers.
“As soon as I received the first shipment I added it to all 11 trucks in my fleet as a test,” says Holmes. “The first thing we noticed was that there was no smoke coming out of the trucks. More importantly, there was an almost immediate 10 percent increase in miles per gallon, plus a boost in power."
During testing, each truck drove between 15,720-16,575 miles on average, with 195,480 total miles for all trucks.
“The average savings realized per truck tank at fill up was $128.71, and each truck saved an average of $0.32 per mile, which really adds up over time,” says Holmes.
According to Holmes, the savings was significant if you consider that total average savings per truck per 100,000 miles equates to $14,244.57, and the total savings for all 11 trucks per 100,000 miles would be $156,690.25.
“I can’t afford not to use Dynamo now that I know how it can increase mpg and performance,” says Holmes.
With the EPA targeting greenhouse gas emissions in Class 8 trucks and regulation like the California Air Resources Board’s restricting particulate matter, emission control is also vital for trucking fleets to handle. Toward this end, some EPA registered fuel additives are proving their worth.
For instance, Olson Ecologic Engine Testing Laboratories, an EPA certified laboratory headquartered in Fullerton, Calif., has independently tested and certified the results of Dynamo Cetane Booster for exhaust emissions.
Tests for reduction in Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) were conducted on both heavy-duty Caterpillar engines as well as smaller F250 Ford diesel engines. The results show a 20 percent reduction in DPM under highway conditions.
For both long haul and short haul truckers, some EPA registered fuel additives are holding down maintenance costs, and have even reduced the frequency of regen. CyberFuels’ cetane boosting additive, for instance, cleans dirty injectors, prevents injector sticking in engines, and contains diesel lubricator for maximum fuel lubrication to protect pumps and injectors from accelerated wear.
Reduced DPM, such as the fuel additive provides, can help to prevent clogged DPF filters. This can minimize the potential of soot backing up into the engine, causing damage to the VGT actuator, turbo, fuel injectors, and EGR solenoid. It could also help to minimize the amount of unburned fuel injected in the exhaust system as part of the regeneration cycle, which might otherwise go into the crankcase contaminating the engine oil.
“Not only am I saving a ton of money from the fuel cost, I saved even more in maintenance costs. In the last five months using Dynamo my costs were only $9,800 compared to an average five-month cost of $16,200 before using Dynamo.” concludes Holmes.
https://www.dandb.com/businessdirectory/j.d.holmestruckingllc-bronson-fl-826684.html
J.d. Holmes Trucking, Llc was founded in 2007, and is located at 4453 Ne 77th Ave in Bronson. Additional information is available at or by contacting James D Horan at (352) 221-1003.
Nothing I found gives me cause to disagree. To wit...
Re: Hopeful8 post# 40124
Post #40272
Holmes did exist, but may be out of business after multiple warnings...
https://www.freightconnect.com/carrier/54c9a77f9dc5d72465359889
Hard to tell what is real ... Or not ...
https://www.dandb.com/businessdirectory/j.d.holmestruckingllc-bronson-fl-826684.html
Filing status: inactive
https://www.bizapedia.com/fl/jd-holmes-trucking-llc.html
Only JD Holmes I've heard of is the golfer and the former porn meat
Holmes did exist, but may be out of business after multiple warnings...
https://www.freightconnect.com/carrier/54c9a77f9dc5d72465359889
Hard to tell what is real ... Or not ...
https://www.dandb.com/businessdirectory/j.d.holmestruckingllc-bronson-fl-826684.html
Filing status: inactive
https://www.bizapedia.com/fl/jd-holmes-trucking-llc.html
Only JD Holmes I've heard of is the golfer and the former porn meat
Wise not to get sucked in before audited numbers back up notions of significant progress. Revs up past quarter for first time in quite awhile, but nowhere near enough to justify market cap or silly notions of valuations between $650mm-$1.3bil.
No history of grasp of timing of events. In fact any day now is just another opinion
With minimal revenues for past three years
But you won't. I'll take the under
Not to mention serious cash burn mode
Not even close
Facts are rare. Opinions are many. Timing is elusive. The end is near
Hmmm.....
"the iGambit" ... Sloppy
Two pairs of same last names ... Red flags
Well, why don't we discount back using a 15% annual discount rate that 'very long term time horizon' and see what the abacus derives. It sure doesn't get the market cap to...
$205mm ... 'Blasting past the old highs'
$650mm ... $10/sh
$975mm ... $15/sh
$1.3bil ... $20/sh
Into / out of thin air.
I can't tell you how many times I've seen 'potential' vaporize into thin air.
$650mm mkt cap. Care to explain the metrics that would lead to making that size mkt cap reasonable?
Don't forget DD