Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Janice Shell
Good. Now I have your attention.
Tell us what happened with:
----------------------------------
U.S. District Court
Middle District of Florida (Tampa)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 99-CV-1387
Hitsgalore.Com, Inc. v. Shell, et al
Filed: 06/14/99
Assigned to: Judge Richard A. Lazzara
Jury demand: Plaintiff
Demand: $20,000,000
Nature of Suit: 320
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction: Diversity
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
HITSGALORE.COM, INC., a
Florida corporation
plaintiff
Janice Shell
Before we start having our conversation,
I need you to clear up a question.
Exactly which one of the bewlow "Federal Lawsuits" pertain to you individually?
Just curious
-----------------------------------------------
U.S. District Court
Middle District of Florida (Tampa)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 99-CV-1387
Hitsgalore.Com, Inc. v. Shell, et al
Filed: 06/14/99
Assigned to: Judge Richard A. Lazzara
Jury demand: Plaintiff
Demand: $20,000,000
Nature of Suit: 320
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction: Diversity
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
HITSGALORE.COM, INC., a
Florida corporation
plaintiff
v.
JANICE SHELL
defendant
JOHN DOE, No. 1
aka
Paul Kersey
defendant
JOHN DOE, No. 2
aka
Mayor
defendant
JOHN DOE, No. 3
aka
Mr. Pink
EAJ
defendant
JOHN DOE, No. 4
aka
Mshater
defendant
JOEL COMM
aka
Mayor
defendant
DANIEL LOEB
aka
Mr. Pink
defendant
DANIEL MCNEESE
EAJ
aka
Mshater
defendant
----------------------------------------------------
U.S. District Court
U.S. District for the Northern District of California (S.F.)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 99-CV-1987
Business Wire v. Mitchell, et al
Filed: 04/26/99
Assigned to: Judge Charles A. Legge
Jury demand: Defendant
Demand: $0,000
Nature of Suit: 840
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
BUSINESS WIRE, a California corporation
Plaintiff
v.
JEFFREY S. MITCHELL
defendant
WILLIAM ULRICH
defendant
JANICE SHELL
defendant
--------------------------------------------------------
United States District Court
Nevada
SHELL, JANICE nvdc
2:2000cv00158
(I can not access this one)
-------------------------------------
United States District Court
Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:02-mc-00100-PBT
2:02-mc-00100-PBT
MARCHESE v. DOBRY
PETRESE B. TUCKER, presiding
Date filed: 04/12/2002
RICHARD MARCHESE
Plaintiff
vs
JANICE SHELL
(Movant)
GARY DOBRY
(Defendant
---------------------------------
U.S. District Court
Northern District of Illinois (Chicago)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 02-CV-2963
Marvin v. Shell, et al
Filed: 04/25/02
Assigned to: Hon. Blanche M. Manning
Jury demand: Both
Demand: $0,000
Nature of Suit: 320
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction: Diversity
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
JAY MARVIN
plaintiff
v.
JANICE SHELL, aka Janice 456
defendant
JOHN DOE, I
aka
Scion
defendant
JOHN DOE, II
aka
Salemshexny
defendant
JANICE SHELL
counter-claimant
v.
JAY MARVIN
counter-defendant
United States District Court
District of Massachusetts (Boston)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:02-mc-10020-DPW
1:02-mc-10020-DPW Marchese v. Dobry
Douglas P. Woodlock, presiding
Date filed: 01/22/2002
Richard M. Marchese
Paintiff
vs
Gary Dobry
(Defendant)
Jason Nelbert
Movant
Janice Shell
Movant
John Doe
(Interested Party) aka Salemshex
John Doe
(Interested Party) aka Sublime
John Doe
(Interested Party) aka Scion
John Doe
(Interested Party) aka Felonthecanvas
John Doe
(Interested Party) aka Howard Wulff
John Doe
(Interested Party) aka Yardslave
-------------------------------------------
Tenessee Eastern Bankruptcy Court
01-34689 In re:
Bruce E. Shell and Janice W. Shell
Case type: bk
Chapter: 7 Asset: n Vol: v
Judge: Richard Stair Jr.
cket Information and Related Transactions for 01-34689 Document 6-1
Filed: 01/11/02 Document: 6 - 1
Last Updated:
Order Discharging Debtor Janice W. Shell, Debtor Bruce E. Shell.
---------------------------------------------
janice shell
Re: That's probably a mistake in the PR, which, after all, was released by UCAD and not CMKX.
-------------------------------------
The PR was released by CMKM.
Press Release Source: CMKM Diamonds, Inc.
CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Announces Dividend to Shareholders of Record Date and Option Agreement
Sunday July 18, 4:47 am ET
Here is the link
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/040718/185046_1.html
Can anyone give an update as to Melvin on PalTalk - tia - eom
elvis - Thank You - I am 50 posts behind - eom
Here is what PinkSheet states about UCAD
I e-mailed PinkSheet and this is what I received
------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004
To: info@pinksheets.com
Subject: Hello - There is a question about CMKM Diamonds.
I just reviewed the company profile for CMKM Diamonds, Inc.
On your site the company information of CMKM (CMKX.PK) state that the UCAD dividend as follows:
Dividends:
Amount: Div: 0.0000155 restricted sh US Canadian Minerals, Inc. for each sh held
Pay Date: 2004-09-24
Record Date: 2004-08-20
My question was:
The "Date of Record" was PR'd by CMKM.
However, the "Pay Date" and "Dividend Ratio Date" has not been PR'd by CMKM.
From where did this information come from?
tia
--------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: Hello - There is a question about CMKM Diamonds.
Date: 8/4/2004 10:20:27 AM Pacific Standard Time
From: info@pinksheets.com
To:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Pink Sheets picks it up from Nasdaq:
http://www.otcbb.com/asp/dividend.asp?sym_id=CMKX&dDate=08/20/2004&sDateType=Record_date
Liz Heese
Issuer Services
Pink Sheets, LLC
212-896-4426
-------------------------------------------------
Two avenues to look at on OTCBB and PinkSheet.
You can either agree with OTCBB and PinkSheet
Or
You can either consider OTCBB and PinkSheet tried an estimate of what could be.
--------------------------------------------------------
Per OTCBB and PinkSheet
Dividends:
Amount: Div: 0.0000155 restricted sh US Canadian Minerals, Inc. for each sh held
Pay Date: 2004-09-24
Record Date: 2004-08-20
X = Number of UCAD stock dividends = 7,500,000
Y = Dividend Ratio = 64,516 = One (1) share of UCAD for every 64,516 shares of CMKM
Z = Outstanding shares of CMKM
(X) / (Y) = Z
(7,500,000) / (64,516) = 483,870,967,500 shares of CMKM outstanding.
---------------------------------------------------
CMKM Press Release
Casavant Mining Kimberlite International Announces That the Company Has Officially Retired 16.5 Billion Shares Back to the Treasury
12/17/2003 3:17:06 PM
LAS VEGAS, Dec 17, 2003 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via Comtex/ -- Casavant Mining Kimberlite International (Pink Sheets: CMKM) announced today that the company has officially retired 16,520,477,200 shares of CMKM stock back to the Treasury.
Urban Casavant, President of CMKM stated, "This is a huge step to create greater shareholder value by reducing the amount of shares issued of CMKM by over 16.5 billion shares. We also plan to retire more shares back to the treasury as soon as all necessary paper work is completed."
A = Authorized Shares = 500,000,000,000
B = Shares Retired = 16,520,477,200
C = Outstanding shares of CMKM
(A) – (B) = C
(500,000,000,000) – (16,520,477,200) = 483,479,522,800 shares of CMKM outstanding.
------------------------------------------------------------------
483,870,967,500 = OTCBB and PinkSheet calculation.
483,479,522,800 = Authorized Shares less Retired Shares
Kimberlite
I saw the link on Pink Sheets.
I just called Edwrads & Angeles to reconfirm the information.
I was told to call back later on today.
In addition, I e-mailed Roger Glenn the to web site links.
I asked Roger to confirm the information.
In addition, I informed Roger that the web sites say the information came from Edwards and Angel.
I also asked Roger that if such information is true, when will there be an official CMKM PR stating this to the shareholders.
I believe we will find out what is going on very quickly.
Moni
.
There is a question about the Pay Date.
09/24/2004
Your information comes from the "OTCBB" site.
08/20/2004
This comes from the CMKM PR.
Moni
Please read this link.
There is much information on Ex-Date
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/02/110802.asp
Attention Everyone - Re: OTCBB dividend posting.
Looks like that "otcbb" company estimated the payable date.
In addition to estimating the "Dividend Ratio."
Whereas, that would be the worst case scenario.
Everyone, do us all a favor.
Contact your Broker and ask them what the "Pay Date" and "Dividend Ratio" is?
Post your reply back and we could discuss this further.
I did - Ameritrade has received no "Official" information from CMKM.
////////////////
Remember one thing when you call your broker.
If the "OTCBB" website knows what the "Pay Date" and "Dividend Ratio" is,
then surely your Broker will have the same information!
Reconfirm this with your Broker.
Let us know if your Broker has received the "Official" dividend information from CMKM.
////////////////
In addition:
If Roger Glenn (E&A)issued the dividend information to "OTCBB," wouldn't Roger also send the dividend information to our Brokers?
Casprs1
Re: Pedro.... here's the link to the pay date. Looks like 9/24
----------------------------------------------------
Looks like that "otcbb" company estimated the payable date.
In addition to estimating the "Dividend Ratio."
Do us all a favor.
Contact your Broker and ask them what the "Pay Date" and "Dividend Ratio" is?
Post your reply back and we could discuss this further.
Remember one thing when you call your broker.
If the "OTCBB" website knows what the "Pay Date" and "Dividend Ratio" is,
then surely your Broker will have the same information!
Reconfirm this with your Broker.
Let me know if your Broker has received the "Official" dividend information from CMKM.
tia
UCAD stock dividend to be paid on August 20th.
I have read a lot of people stating what date they believed the UCAD stock dividend would be paid.
The following is some information that should be considered.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lets first look at what information needs to be disclosed when a cash and/or stock dividend is issued
///////////////
The Important Dates of a Dividend
There are four major dates in the process of a company paying dividends:
Declaration date – This is the date on which the board of directors announces to shareholders and the market as a whole that the company will pay a dividend.
Ex-date or Ex-dividend date – On (or after) this date the security trades without its dividend. If you buy a dividend paying stock one day before the ex-dividend you will still get the dividend, but if you buy on the ex-dividend date, you won't get the dividend. Conversely, if you want to sell a stock and still receive a dividend that has been declared you need to sell on (or after) the ex-dividend day. The ex-date is the second business day before the date of record………. Ex-dividend dates are used to make sure dividend checks go to the right people. In today's market, settlement of stocks is a T+3 process, which means that when you buy a stock, it takes three days from the transaction date (T) for the change to be entered into the company's record books. As mentioned, if you are not in the company's record books on the date of record, you won't receive the dividend payment. To ensure that you are in the record books, you need to buy the stock at least three days before the date of record, which also happens to be the day before the ex-dividend date.
Date of record – This is the date on which the company looks at its records to see who the shareholders of the company are. An investor must be listed as a "holder of record" to ensure the right of a dividend payout.
Date of payment (payable date) – This is the date the company mails out the dividend to the holder of record. This date is generally a week or more after the date of record so that the company has sufficient time to ensure that it accurately pays all those who are entitled.
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/02/110802.asp
Amount of Dividend - Dividends may be in the form of cash, stock, or property. Most secure and stable companies offer dividends to their stockholders. Their share prices might not move all that much, but the dividend attempts to make up for this.
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/dividend.asp
Dividend Payout Ratio - The percentage of earnings paid to shareholders in dividends.
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/dividendpayoutratio.asp
///////////////
With the above information we can establish the criteria.
1. Declaration date =
2. Ex-date or Ex-dividend date =
3. Date of record =
4. Date of payment (payable date) =
5. Amount of Dividend =
6. Dividend Payout Ratio =
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sunday, July 18th, we received the PR declaring the UCAD dividend.
Pay attention to what is highlighted in BOLD.
////////////////
CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Announces Dividend to Shareholders of Record Date and Option Agreement
Sunday July 18, 4:47 am ET
DENVER--(BUSINESS WIRE)--July 18, 2004--CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (Pink Sheets:CMKX - News) is pleased to have reached a purchase agreement with U.S. Canadian Minerals, Inc. (OTC BB:UCAD - News) to which U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. will be purchasing 5% of all mineral claims held by CMKM Diamonds, Inc. in exchange for 7.5 million shares of UCAD. CMKM Diamonds, Inc. will later issue these shares to all shareholders of record on August 20, 2004.
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/040718/185046_1.html
///////////////
So what information has been disclosed with the July 18th PR?
1. Declaration date = Sunday July 18, 4:47 am ET
2. Ex-date or Ex-dividend date = August 18, 2004
3. Date of record = August 20, 2004
4. Date of payment (payable date) =
5. Amount of Dividend = Stock Dividend - One (1) share of UCAD
6. Dividend Payout Ratio =
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sunday, July 26th, we received the PR declaring that a 60%, undivided interest in 500,000 acres……..in Nevada Minerals.
This PR disclosed additional information pertaining to the UCAD Stock Dividend.
Pay attention to the second paragraph that is highlighted in BOLD.
///////////////
CMKM Diamonds Inc. Acquires Additional Interests in Saskatchewan
Monday July 26, 7:57 pm ET
LAS VEGAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--July 26, 2004--CMKM Diamonds Inc. (Pink Sheets: CMKX - News) announced today that it has agreed to acquire a 60%, undivided interest in 500,000 acres of potential Kimberlite mineral property in Saskatchewan, Canada. The property is currently owned by Nevada Minerals Inc., a private company unrelated to CMKM. The property is being developed by a joint venture between Nevada Minerals Inc. and U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. CMKM will acquire the interest in the property in exchange for 75 billion shares of restricted Rule 144 stock of CMKM. In order to reduce the dilution to CMKM's shareholders as a result of this transaction, Urban Casavant, CMKM's CEO, has agreed to contribute 40 billion shares owned by himself in exchange for an agreement from CMKM stating that Casavant will be paid only if the acquired property actually yields a profit. According to the agreement, Casavant will be paid one-half of the net proceeds from any mining on the property, after paying all associated expenses, up to a maximum aggregate total of US$62 million. CMKM will issue 35 billion new shares of the company to Nevada Minerals Inc. to complete the transaction.
As announced earlier, U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. recently issued 7.5 million shares of the company's stock to CMKM in exchange for certain mineral rights. Those shares have been issued to CMKM and will be distributed to shareholders of record of CMKM on Aug. 20, 2004. Due to Casavant's share contribution to the property acquisition by CMKM occurring prior to the Aug. 20, 2004, date, Casavant will not receive this or any subsequent dividend.
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/040726/266016_1.html
///////////////
So what information has been disclosed with the July 26th PR?
1. Declaration date = Sunday July 18, 4:47 am ET
2. Ex-date or Ex-dividend date = August 18, 2004
3. Date of record = August 20, 2004
4. Date of payment (payable date) = August 20, 2004
5. Amount of dividend = Stock Dividend - One (1) share of UCAD
6. Dividend Payout Ratio =
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The only area missing is Number 6: Dividend Payout Ratio
A “Dividend Payout Ratio” is calculated by:
(Number of CMKM O/S shares) divided by (Number of UCAD dividend shares) = Dividend Payout Ratio
(X) / (7,500,000) = Dividend Payout Ratio
Thus the final outcome will be: One (1) share of UCAD for every (???) shares of CMKM.
In order for our Brokers to issue the UCAD Dividend on August 20th, the Brokers need the “Dividend Payout Ratio” by August 20th.
Therefore, CMKM will issue the “Dividend Payout Ratio” to all brokers before August 20th.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Once the “Dividend Payout Ratio” is disclosed – WE WILL KNOW the Outstanding Shares of CMKM
As stated above, the algebraic formula for determining the “Dividend Payout Ratio,” whereas:
X = Number of CMKM O/S Shares
Y = Number of UCAD Dividend Shares 7,500,000
Z = Dividend Payout Ratio
The algebraic formula for determining the “Dividend Payout Ratio” is:
X / Y = Z
Let’s factor for “Y”
Y [(X / Y) = Z]
Therefore, the algebraic formula for CMKM O/S shares can be calculated by:
X = (Z) (Y)
X = (Z) (7,500,000)
Once we know the Dividend Payout Ratio (Z), we plug in the value for “Z” and we have our CMKM O/S shares.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
August 20th – We only have to wait until August 20th.
Information on O/S that may be of interest.
I was rereading the SEC purchase contract filed by UCAD.
A lot of people questioned about UC holding more than 50% of the outstanding shares of CMKM.
I believe I may have proof that this is true.
-------------------------------------------------------------
I believe we are all aware that corporate decisions must be approved by:
1. The Board of Directors , and
2. A majority shareholder approval (51%).
In order for CMKM to approve the sales of assets to UCAD, both items above must have been approved at some unknown meeting.
I was never mailed any voting ballots nor have I signed a proxy allowing another individual to vote on my behalf.
So let’s stick with item 2 above “A majority shareholder approval (51%).”
Under Nevada Corporate Law any decisions to buy and/or sell assets of the corporation must be approved by a majority shareholder vote.
NRS 78A.070 Shareholders’ agreements: Authority to enter; effect; amendment.
1. All shareholders of a close corporation who are entitled to vote may agree in writing to regulate the exercise of the corporate powers and the management of the business and affairs of the corporation or the relationship among the shareholders of the corporation.
http://www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-078A.html#NRS078ASec080
--------------------------------------------------------------
I was reviewing the UCAD purchase agreement and discovered something very interesting. (Section 5..)
5.1 Organization of Seller; Authorization. Seller is a
corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing
under the laws of Nevada with full corporate power and authority to
execute and deliver this Agreement as it pertains to any
representations or untertakings of Seller. The execution,
delivery and performance of this Agreement has been duly
authorized by all necessary corporate actions of Seller and this
Agreement constitutes a valid and binding obligation of Seller,
enforceable against it in accordance with its terms.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1104194/000123224704000032/enio12.txt
-----------------------------------------------------------------
At some time there was a meeting held about the sale of assets to UCAD.
At this meeting CMKM Board of Directors voted and approved the sell of assets to UCAD.
At this meeting a majority interest (more than 51%) of CMKM Shareholders voted and approved the sell of assets to UCAD.
------------------------------------------------------------------
The same scenario is used for the purchase of “25% of Juina Mining.”
At some time there was a meeting held about the purchase assets in Juina Mining.
At this meeting CMKM Board of Directors voted and approved the purchase of assets in Juina Mining.
At this meeting a majority interest (more than 51%) of CMKM Shareholders voted and approved the purchase of assets in Juina Mining.
/
/
/
/
/
What this is saying is that no matter “what” the issued and O/S of CMKM shares, UC and the CMKM Board of Directors have always maintained a 51% shareholder voting privilege.
Worst case scenario on the Float is:
Assuming 500 billion shares issued
UC and CMKX Board of Directors 251 billion shares
Shares issued to Nevada Minerals 75 billion shares
(500 B) less (251 B) less (75 B) = 174 billion
Worst case scenario is 174 billion float shares
joye1
Re: Are you the Pedro I read on the RB CMKX board and sterling's board?
-------------------------------------------
Yes I am.
Unfortunately the IHUB is only allowing me 3 post for the first 24 hours (I believe).
It is nice to meet you!
Hello Everyone
I just joined your site.
I am looking forward to us all working together!