Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You mean the hilarious 95 opinions ?
What has running a public company have to do with business experience ?
Did the company release that they were shorted ?? NO. Opinions stated that they were shorted. Again NON FACTUAL. Thanks for verifying these nonfactual opinions.
Alleviates absolutely nothing. Show me the change in restricted shares.
All so called claimed DD her is factless. It's based on argumentative opinions on opinions. Therefore factless. Show me anything on the GTRQ "Opinion List" that was factually released from the company.
It's nothing more than a worthless Opinion List and would be overlooked and dismissed by anyone with a clue in business relations. QED.
That is simply your opinion about Gregg Sullivan. NOT A FACT. Business experience does not necessarily come from "public companies". Only those with zero business experience would make such an outrageous claim.
Was that info regarding SS released by the company ??? NO. So therefore merely an opinion, Not a fact.. So therefore opinion checked not so called " fact checked".
As for the GTRQ Nope list ....... Absolutely worthless .. Totally based on opinions.
Correct. "the restricted share count never changed." Nice to see an actual fact posted here. Every so called "debunking" of facts here are based on opinions. Opinions are not facts therefore "debunking" of said facts are Nonfactual. So therefore, and very plain for all to see, there are NO "fact checkers" here. Only GTRQ opinion checkers. QED.
"Are you referring to the level of due diligence that exposed the gtrq pie in the sky lofty bs that wasn't even remotedly close to factual? "
Yes this is the due diligence that wasn't remotely close to factual I'm referring to.
Not the case.... But with the level of thorough DD claimed here one would be aware of the facts surrounding said deposit ??????
"I met with Gregg at the end of March to resolve this issue and I offered him my support to help with certification in exchange of full refund but he declined my offer."
Really ! Lol. You were engaged in the certification process from the start yet claim to have offered certification support end of March.
At least be honest. You held up the certification process. You failed GTRQ in what you were engaged to do. In that process you failed Itraq customers. You think blaming GTRQ will salvage your reputation and that of Itraq ? Too late.
Have Itraq customers received refunds ??
Just like my last question, which concerned GTRQ stock, was more than conveniently ignored ?? Lol.
It's still a false claim, and that's fact.
Don't forget the false claims of sub penny by end of 2015.
Well said. It's rather obvious with all the comparisons being showcased against GTRQ that there is a somewhat lowly understanding of the technology associated with the GTRQ module.
Demeaning Gregg / GTRQ is used to fill this void.
There is huge potential in this market and as you say a small percentage will suffice.
Btw, so much for the GPS "game changer"... It certainly changed the battery life ! Lol.
So now Itraq's shortfalls are being thrown against GTRQ. Pathetic.
It really is a case of fling everything against the GTRQ wall and see what sticks.
Itraq jumped the gun and GTRQ gets the blame.
Really ??? "Company diluting" roflmao.
Dust = ETF ie. Exchange Traded Fund.
I disagree, for commercial purposes Cell-id is the least expensive.
One can add GPS, Bluetooth etc to suit certain consumer requirements.
GTRQ's aim is to market their module commercially.
Exactly. GPS can be fitted/installed in a truck cab. It will not register indoors ie warehouse, workshop, ferry cargo hold, tunnels etc.
It is not feasible to install GPS in trailers/containers as they don't have a constant power supply, which GPS demands.
Cell id will register indoors whether attached to anything from a container to a package.
Cell-id is more cost efficient commercially.
Cell-id will be a "Gamechanger" as opposed to GPS.
Exactly. GPS way too expensive to be a game changer.
Really ?? A GTRQ long exited on a 400 share trade ??? Roflmao.
GTRQ Product already showcased, product in certification process, patent application submitted, buyers awaiting certification, then revenues.
So there is no proof to back up the claim that the GTRQ patent press release "has no basis in facts whatsoever". Therefore just another factless opinion.
Thanks for verifying that.
And can proof be provided to confirm the said GTRQ press release "has no basis in facts whatsoever." ?
Incorrect. As the GTRQ patent application is current the company press release is also current.
There are no traces of applications for at least a year.
SEATTLE, June 2, 2015 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- GeoTraq, Inc. (OTC:GTRQ), a development stage company focused on developing next-generation wireless location technology, announced the successful submission of a utility patent application to the USPTO. The patent application incorporates multiple claims to proprietary circuit design, firmware functionality, and software platform architecture that defines and supports Cell-ID modules.
No proof, thanks. Just another zero credibility statement regarding GTRQ.
Oh... What ever happened to that "burden of proof" statement we constantly hear off regarding GTRQ claims ?? Is that for selective use only ??
Any proof to back up that statement regarding the GTRQ patent ??
No it's not wrong, the below was posted for all to see.
"GTRQ Patent is dead it's not going to happen... Company failed"
Now we have a patent application from 2012 being flung against the wall as current GTRQ DD !! Seriously ! Keep throwing, something may stick lol.
No problem. After all, publicising just one aspect of a two sided coin is misleading to all.
It happens all to often in GTRQ's case.
Fact is there have also been GTRQ paint downs.
GTRQ so called "paint jobs" are only discussed in the upward direction. GTRQ "paint downs" seem to be like the Elephant in the room. Never mentioned ! Lol.
No, I wouldn't say "interesting". I would deem that outdated and irrelevant.
4 year old info.... Really ! Lmao.
Not searchable for a year after submission.
Provisional patent was applied for first, which carries "Patent Pending" status, then utility patent was filed afterwards.
News was released as below in June 2015.
SEATTLE, June 2, 2015 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- GeoTraq, Inc. (OTC:GTRQ), a development stage company focused on developing next-generation wireless location technology, announced the successful submission of a utility patent application to the USPTO. The patent application incorporates multiple claims to proprietary circuit design, firmware functionality, and software platform architecture that defines and supports Cell-ID modules.