Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Good morning yoga/morning stretching music. Post it again on approval, maybe then I'll do stretches again too.
I'm glad it worked out for you. For me, it's not an ignore/unignore problem, it's a glitch in the Matrix problem😠. TBC
Yeah, probably happening more often than we think.
Here's a wacky hypothesis. It used to be you can only have 6 or 7 posters on ignore at 1 time then sometime in the last couple of years I was able to put a ton of posters on ignore at 1 time to my hearts content which I did. Maybe too many posters on ignore are causing an anomaly in the system just like in the Matrix (which I just rewatched).
OK, I see where you're coming from. Bam! one way or the other in my book.
For my eyes only, or not. For the record, Hopeforthefuture3's post 688770 is invisible to me also even though not on ignore. The only reason I know is via someone's response to him.
Something weird going on w my ihub. The only way I can see your post is via Mani's response to you. I recently saw another post from you discussing the 8k and I confirmed you are not on ignore. When I go to the listing of posts in Classic view there is a post at 11:04 and 11:06AM but not your post at 11:05. I thought this happened w another poster too but thought I messed up but after quadruple checking, I don't think so.
I thought you were in the buyout camp?
Yeah, right. That's exactly Dr Liau had in mind when she said
Well, I don't know about the other drugs w the longer timelines you mentioned but just as a general rule w CRSPR drugs, I would think that evaluating safety was a much bigger issue than you would see w DCVax-L. None of that Off-target editing that we see w CRSPR. And to my knowledge the DCVax-L administration never had a death of a Jesse Gelsinger to worry about.
After reading Hoffman's post 575287 and your recent reference
https://theintercept.com/2016/09/24/naked-shorts-cant-stay-naked-forever/#:~:text=Once%20that%20CUSIP%20changes%2C%20the,converts%20to%20the%20new%20CUSIP
I get the impression they can get away w it, that those naked short sales will remain in the ether if NWBO becomes NewCo. But, maybe, the lawsuit can change that if/when they get to discovery, at least that's what I'm hoping/feel is the end game w the Posner lawsuit, which, will take awhile.
I gave you and GermanCol thumbs up for different reasons. GermanCol for his take on the lack of communication by management (for me it's lack of quarterly Q&As for one) and your take that's it's an odd time to sell w MHRA approval in the next few months.
Chit! You weren't kidding. You do develop firmware for a living. At least did.🙃
Thanks for sharing Doc
Doc logic; let me know what you think about this post when you have some time.
And then they will have to validate and do comparability. As hyperopia guesstimated when the PR came out, Flaskworks will be ready sometimes toward the end of the year.
Putting the spotlight on these crims can't hurt but they are going to need more than circumstantial evidence to take them down.
Yes, agree. The article gives a good summation of the last 6 months to go along w the author's (and our) puzzlement on why the share price is so low considering the relatively good news and doesn't consider the # of shares going up by only about 5%, since Sept. 30th as causing that. If, as speculated, there are 2 billion naked short shares, that may have something to do w it and make spoofing look like a stroll in the park.
Being a disciple of "Jack 'quarterly numbers have to be met' Welch" would explain alot. Several years back, there was someone on this board raving about Jack Welch which I thought was BS. Back, in the early 90s, they came out new tech for their refrigerators. Stupid me bought one, The motor lasted about 3 years. What a lemon and they soon discarded that technology. Since then I stopped buying GE products and or buy-in to blowhard Jack.
I liked that the author referred to the MHRA as a "a prestigious regulator"
A 60 Minute show would have a field day w that. And I would "unignore" that viewing.
I can't wait till the 'STFU' thought becomes a reality
Yeah, that was my first thought/impression too. Lots of moving parts they need to consider.
Erroneous argument in comparing Flaskworks to other automated closed cell manufacturing systems. You just need to know that it is priceless in the manufacture of DCVax-L and making it ~12x more efficient than the manual method which is, well, priceless. Those other automated closed cell manufcaturing systems CAN'T make DCVax-L just likes NWBOs semi automated system for Direct, tangential flow filtration, can't make L. An apples to oranges argument.
These thoughts have crossed my mind many many times but I try to push them out just as often; crossing my fingers.
Hmmm, I wonder what event that could be?
Dang, I was just in a NJ eartquake w some real shaking going on in the house!
Or men are hunters focusing on one thing only whereas women are gatherers foraging multiple sources be it edible wild plants, insects, eggs, etc which is more attuned to modern corporate structure.
Oncojock? Nah, but Maybe.
Senti, regarding
Thanks for that heads up. Excellent!
Kudos to Hoffmann's summary. On another note, in reading this summary, I can't help but think how Streeterville Capital/Fife would benefit from the loan agreements they negotiated w NWBO w at a lower price.
Thanks Chiugray. That makes sense but where they get that from? Not from the PR. 10K?. Dr Ashkan? TBC.
Yes, I found it interesting/fascinating in multiple ways. Thanks for sharing.
I found it fascinating that Bo, after getting his tumor resected and not having enough tumor to make enough doses, waited for his tumor to grow back bigger so that after a 2nd resection, he would have enough tumor to make enough DCVax-L. This guy will have inadvertently, or not, created a new SoC (for DCVax-L), whereas you don't immediately resect the tumor, you wait till it grows big enough so that you'll be able to manufacture enough doses. The balls on this guy to wait w the possibility of the bigger tumor impacting some critical function or perhaps the tumor becoming non-resectable. But w chemo being the other option, he had no other option in my book, or in the books of those aware of DCVax-L's potential.
I found it interesting that an American did not have a problem in going to Kings College for DCVax to be processed. I kind of thought that wouldn't be a problem but you never know how much red tape you need to get thru.
And thirdly, I found it interesting that they treated him for Grade 3 Oligodendroglioma and not grade 4 GBM. As you know the MAA is for nd and rGBM but the PIM designation for DCVax-L covers ALL malignant gliomas. Interesting.
They're both right but I give the edge to JHU. You had the wrong link. This one works: https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/merck-challenges-johns-hopkins-universitys-keytruda-patents-claims-breach-contract-after
Maybe by you in the UK? (how else to explain it🫤) but in the US it's currently ~3%.
Yes, UCLA clearly has stated publicly in PR documentation that the trial is DCVax-L but I wanted to test drive Exs claim. On the face of it, he seemed to be making a valid observation but giving it a little thought, it's a clunker of a claim that I can see for myself w/o the need for UCLAs support. Basically, I did this exercise for my own head and other longs who might have thought similarly.