Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You'd have to research the whole story to understand the excitement.
That is SOOO bogus!! Stinks of corruption!! I had no idea!
Sounds like it's time to snatch up a bit more. Heard rumors that's tough to do. Can you shorters push that sucker down to .02 please!! I'd like to weight my average back down!
Question. IF the judges ARE replaced, how will the current proceedings take place? They wouldn't have to start over, or extend deadlines, would they??
It's all sounding wonderful to me!!
I completely concur!!
I meant the entire PTAB organization. Not this PTAB in particular. Maybe if we all begin contacting our government!!
Has anyone heard if they've made any changes to the panel? That would be prime news!!!! So exciting to see accountability and conflicts of interest being addressed. Ultimately I feel the entire PTAB should be removed. It's obviously become corrupt with all the COIs, IMO.
So what's the next deadline we're waiting for? November?
Me too!!
What gets me is, why in the world would all the money and time be a requirement in order to get the patents be approved the first go around, if the system is set up to disallow them so easily?!?!? What is the point of patenting ANYTHING?!?
Yes, but if "obviousness" was the case, why wouldn't Unified have won from the get go?
Likely I have some sort of pop up blocker going on... hell if I know how to change that :P But thankfully I have friends that were able to provide me the info. Thanks for the help :) GO VPLM!!! I'm wondering if I missed a buy in in the .03s... Hmmmmm.
I wonder what could pop up if that kind of investigating could be done on Apple, or the PTAB players ;)
O, found them... didn't realize it wasn't in chronological order. However, when I hit "download", all it says it "Got File" with a checkmark... but I can't find it in my downloads anywhere. Any suggestions?? I'm using a Mac (I know... shoot me for using the "enemy's" products) haha!
Can anyone post a copy, or provide a link to, Apples responses? I've looked on the PTAB site and don't see anything dated past 4/28/17.
Mad Money Link - not much... but it's mentioned at least
[url][/url][tag]https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/mad-money-w-jim-cramer-full-episode/e/50195266?autoplay=true[/tag]
approx 25:15
I don't see anything dated past 4/28. Are you sure the Response is in? For some reason I thought it was due 5/18.
I would think that the only reason any new IPRs would be filed is because they have reason to feel the current IPRs will fail. If they felt they were going to be successful, why waste the effort filing more. Yes, they had a deadline to beat, but I'm leaning toward the other.
Exciting news!! I would happily accept a couple hundred billion!
Thanks!!!
Can someone post the link of the newest IPRs bing requested?
Yes! I would LOVE to buy more at those prices!!
I had the same exact question in mind. I'd love to find a way to get this all tax free!
It's obvious who is manipulating this stock... Certainly not any of the longs, nor the board. Hold strong VPLMers!! Don't sell out! You'll likely never be able to get back in! If it drops anymore I'm seriously tempted to double my holdings (that is, if I can get an order filled!)
It's always just days before something big happens that all these roaches crawl out...
Oops. Looks like you got that covered. Haha.
No "comparison" other than Just sayin', everybody starts somewhere. It does not define who you become. Do you disagree?
Didn't Steve Jobs start in a garage?
I am in full agreement. But alas, I refuse to get off this ride :) There is just far too much potential to pass up!
Does anybody have any news they can share about how the depositions are going? Or who this inventor is whose phone number is so important to their case?
The following were parts that stood out for me:
As the forensic audit ofthe Kipping-Locksmith loan found with respect to the openended
line of credit in that transaction, the onerous terms from the issuer's perspective were a
sign that the loan was not an arms-length transaction.
With respect to the issue ofwhether the oral line of credit extended by Locksmith to
VPLM was a security,
The oral line ofcredit, unlike an oral promise ofparticipation in a profit sharing plan, was
not represented to be an investment Nor was it easily tradeable as an investment.
Accordingly, the oral line of credit was not a security. Moreover, even ifwritten, the line ofcredit did not meet the Reves test. The line ofcredit
was a loan to the issuer by a single individual. Such an individual transaction would not be
viewed as a security by the public and would not ordinarily be traded as an investment.
Scottsdale also argues that Enforcement failed to prove that any proceeds ofthe sales of
VPLM flowed back to the issuer or that there were any links between the issuer and the persons
485 involved in selling VPLM stock through CSCT and Scottsdale.
When I read through it all, I believe it said that the initial transactions were in fact a loan, and not an investment, and therefore not eligible for trade. And that, here, they are finding the trading firms all guilty of "egregious" (abominable) behavior. But I could have misunderstood, as the documents are full of legal terms I may not fully understand. Anyone else with a bit more intelligence on the matter care to contribute?
It sounds like this is stating that the transactions that Scottsdale (and Kipping) were a part of were found to be, in fact, in violation of regulations. Is this correct?
I'm hopeful :)
That is amazing!! And has many good implications IMO!! ;)
Nice response. I concur ??
No, just one that can't be bought.
The dates anticipated only have to do with the status of the IPR and other events such as the EU. They may or may not impact the PPS in any way. We're all quite aware of this. The Feb. date was pertaining to VPs response deadline for the IPR rebuttal, which was better than we could have expected, IMO. The Apr. one will be Apple's response, I believe.
I believe the idea is to "SHARE" the heck out the Facebook post. How many here have "Liked" their page and share all new PRs and posts with their Facebook family and beyond? That's FREE advertising!