Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes sir. Still waiting patiently.
Nice to hear from you. Hope all is well and glad to hear you're still invested in WDDD along with the rest of us.
Not the same company as ours. Highly doubt this volume surge was due to a release from 2 weeks ago.
Read article
Thinking the same here. Lots of moving parts here though with the Apple escapade still going on. But I give them credit for being first to the punch on 5G expansion. The PC integration really looks cool too. I'll probably jump in this week.
Very nice find quilt.
LMAO => "we plan to meet with and provide an update to interested investors, many of whom will be looking at CEL-SCI for the first time" - Just more suckers lining up a the trough. He's got the balls to write this stuff after stealing investor money for over 20 years.
Ditto That. This has been the case for years. Countless reverse splits, never ending private sales and completely underhanded distribution of warrants. I/WE/EVERYONE has been their ATM machine for almost 20 years. I lost a long time ago on this - I just want it to die now so the charade is put to an end. Geert should be in jail - period - no excuses.
LOL, it's always been a penny stock - everyone just keeps overpaying for this 20+year old crooked company to pay their cronies. There is no business and never was.
That person was me. And my post got deleted since apparently it is okay to arbitrarily decide the course of a forum. In this case, folks get to post ad nauseam about every possible conspiracy theory and outcome in the known WDDD universe. Does it keep interested investors reading? Probably not, because we all have our own courses of action already decided CONTRARY to some opinions here. Yes, we can ignore reading everything but on the other hand why bother posting up to 20 times a day?
What Pop? You haven't seen any pop yet.
The real pop will come in a couple/few/several months. We all know this and SOME of us choose to just let our money sit it out for now. Others, choose to penny flip out thinking the self-fulfilling prophecy they spew will come true. As for knowing who has how many shares, I could give a SH1T. I know what I have. And I just bought some more discounted shares that someone else bailed on.
Not likely you'll ever see that price again. Nice try on the FUD.
No one is going anywhere... Anyone who is here is likely here for the ride. And I can ASSURE you it's going to get real interesting pretty soon. We'll see how much good all the FUD spreading goes from here on out.
Point being that there is plenty of money on the table for all - that's lawyers, the "diluting" warrant holder investors and all other shareholders.
The shit heads at Activision have been playing the game long enough.
Read 'Em & Weep - Like I said before, it's their personal cash machine LOL. They should have been shutdown by the SEC 10 years ago.
SELLING SHAREHOLDERS
The persons listed in the following table plan to offer the shares shown opposite their respective names by means of this prospectus. The owners of the shares are referred to as the “selling shareholders”. The selling shareholders acquired their shares in the transactions described below.
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the securities by the selling shareholders. We will pay all costs of registering the securities offered by the selling shareholders. These costs, based upon the time related to preparing this section of the prospectus, are estimated to be $2,000. The selling shareholders will pay all sales commissions and other costs of the sale of the securities offered by them.
August 2017 Financing
On August 22, 2017, we sold 1,750,000 registered shares of common stock and warrants (Series PP) to purchase 1,750,000 unregistered shares of our common stock at a combined offering price of $2.00 per share. The Series PP warrants have an exercise price of $2.30 per share, are exercisable on February 28, 2018 and expire on February 28, 2023. In addition, we issued warrants (Series QQ) to purchase 87,500 shares of unregistered common stock to the placement agent for this financing. The Series QQ warrants have an exercise price of $2.50, are exercisable on February 22, 2018 and expire on August 22, 2022.
Warrants Issued to Holders of Convertible Notes
On November 2, 2017 holders of convertible notes in the principal amount of $1,059,300 sold in June 2017 and holders of convertible notes in the principal amount of $1,235,000 sold in July 2017 agreed to extend the maturity date of these notes to September 21, 2018. In consideration for the extension of the maturity date of the convertible notes, we issued a total of 716,400 Series RR warrants to the convertible note holders that agreed to the extension. Each Series RR warrant
entitles the holder to purchase one share of the Company's common stock. The Series RR warrants may be exercised at any time on or before October 30, 2022 at an exercise price of $1.65 per share.
December 2017 Financing
On December 19, 2017 we sold 1,289,478 shares of common stock for $2,450,000 to 19 private investors. The purchasers of the common stock also received warrants (Series SS) which entitle the purchasers to acquire up to 1,289,478 shares of our common stock. The warrants are exercisable at a price of $2.09 per share and expire on December 18, 2022.
Ergomed
As of December 29, 2017 we were indebted to Ergomed, plc for services provided by Ergomed in connection with our Phase III clinical trials. On January 2, 2018 we issued Ergomed 660,000 shares of our common stock in partial payment of the amount we owed Ergomed.
I was being ultra conservative. Any logical settlement would bring 2-2.5% of revenue directly attributable to patent licensing. I'm pretty sure all $7B would not be covered. It was just a seat of the pants number.
Go-go Activision! 7.35B in revenue. We want this year’s 73M royalty!!
Is there a recent calculation available?
I had a pretty sweet Excel spreadsheet setup a while back and must have dumped it during Spring cleaning last year. I would expect one of our other astute followers may have a recent calculation backing up the $mil sought. Mine was pretty detailed but anything may help.
It should never be forgotten. It should stand as an example of what a corrupt system will do. I’ve already noted my opinion on Google judge payoffs in that case. And if that was not true, that makes things even worse. How could you possibly have a technically knowledgeable judge like Chen and a blithering technical idiot like Wallach on the same panel in a detailed tech case. Rader would have never allowed that combination to occur in the first place.
LMFAO
It will soon be time to pay the piper.
He had a 30-year plan alright.
Of robbing the investors blind with countless offerings and and reverse splits. This is precisely what I was referring to before about Federal prison. He and his cohorts should be someone's "wife" in prison.
An Interesting Read =>
CAFC says PTO Reexamination Should Not Preclude Validity Challenges at District Court
www.ipwatchdog.com/2018/01/28/pto-reexaminations-should-not-preclude-validity-challenges/id=92783/
These guys should be in federal prison.
Numerous reverse splits and addl offerings and zero results other than padding their pockets.
XSPA still owns the patents related to the Google case.
Better yet => I was PAID to say so.
He did not just cross the line, he jumped over it with both feet.
Hence my prior writing questioning whether or not he is even suited to sit on the panel on certain cases. He may be fine with certain issues but with tech related cases, his lack of technical knowledgeability is borderline insanity. And if not that, questions arise of what motivated him in that case. Was it something more? You fill in the blanks here - there was quite a lot of money involved there and Google had a lot of cash and influence.
So long as SCOTUS allows free-wheeling judges to blatantly misinterpret laws written by Congress to protect inventors' patent rights, we might see another Vringo style escapade surface. But also, maybe not - the climate has certainly shifted in the last couple of years. Infringers need to just buck up. And Congress needs to protect its citizens' (both individual and corporate) intellectual property rights. Patent Rights are NOT "public rights" - but we'll soon see what SCOTUS thinks with the Oil States decision.
I am quite familiar with the term Sua Sponte.
This is precisely the reason why I asked for some legal minds to chime in here. I was one of the recipients of Mayer's little BS game with Vringo. I made a lot on their first run and lost some of it on the second round, so in all, I ended up ahead. This was not the fate with many others. But back to Sua Sponte.
Sua Sponte actions are typically rendered when there is no driving action by the plaintiff or defendant. Most times these are dismissal actions. And yes, you note correctly, they can be spurious, opinionated and sometimes technically uneducated opinions. HOWEVER, they do NOT cross the lines of the case matter at hand. The case matter at hand in this CAFC action is whether certain claims had the right to survive. Not the validity of other claims within the patent that already survived a District Court and Markman.
Still hoping for educated legal opinions.
Great to hear from you PatentPlays. I was just going to cover this subject and how it played out in the past with our old buddy Mayer.
We all know he was the driving force in the Vringo debacle. And you just added some thoughts on Voip-pal issues. It is my non-legal opinion that within this CAFC forum the judges panel is LIMITED to the matters presented to them - that being the appealed claims - and NOT the claims (and patentability in general) already locked in place per the Markman that WDDD survived.
Knowledgable legal members kindly chime in here as this is the real albatross.
As far as I see it, we only have a couple of risk levels here. Yes, it would be nice to have some/all IPR denied claims returned, however if there is NO chance some loose-cannon judges can shotgun our ship, we are already beyond the highest level risk we could encounter.
It depends on whether they handed him as much cash equivalents as Google likely did. Yes, I said that. There is no other answer for that ridiculous hand down to Vringo.
This is not crypto.
We will not be seeing anything more than $1.75 - $2 anytime soon. Based on one case, it's inherent payout, attorney's cut and a number of other factors, anything over $2 would take starting more high stakes cases. This is not likely until the current case plays out fully.
THREE REVERSE SPLITS IN THIS PIG.
Seriously, anyone trading this or investing a penny here is completely crazy. They have hosed folks with two 10-1 and one 25-1 reverse splits in the last 5 years alone.
You would do better burning your cash in the street.
Don’t forget me. 500K shares.
It was me. 100K in total.
Gravy train almost over - finally!
Well it's refreshing to see the Cel-Sci crooks are still trying to make payroll. Not for long.
It's just a shame I bought into this crap a while ago. Classic 20-year long microcap boiler room promo.
Without substantive public disclosure of the Mayer and Wallach track record on other IP related decisions who is to say she doesn't assign them? She can assign whomever she pleases to manage the caseload. That was clearly evident in the Vringo case. Why was Chen the only patent knowledgeable judge assigned? Because she directed the ultimate outcome simply by choosing who she chose? Maybe, maybe not.
However, given the timeframe before any judges are assigned to a filing, compilation and public disclosure of the "Mayer & Wallach" connection in IP kills may remove them from consideration altogether.
I don't know if this this would reveal anything at all but if there were breadcrumbs leading to IP case assignment trend by Prost which defies logic and ethics, it may prove to help.
A well-documented IP Disqualification Hit Squad article I believe would be welcomed.
It certainly makes no sense whatsoever logistically or procedurally to assign judges with no USPTO experience to those types of cases unless there was an undisclosed agenda. This would legally be the only way cover up such an effort. Unfortunately, it may be a massive undertaking to "connect the dots" here but I would suspect such an expose would swiftly make its way through the media.
The Cel-Sci management gravy train is soon coming to an end.
It's about time the SEC just shut them down. Multiple reverse splits over a 20-year period and the only thing that has been successfully completed by management is a steady ad constant screwing over of shareholders. The only folks who have ever profited from this company are management, cronies and the market makers and promoters.
General and administrative $3,955,000 = STILL SUCKING MONEY OUT
It's been going down for over 20 years now. Dilute, reverse split, repeat. And I am quite sure they have been selling them in the open market.
They did not buy - they were distributed free shares as part of their BS compensation plan. Prove they actually paid for them in cash please before you mislead folks here.
It's not. It's at $20