Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I agree with this dude. eom
Fortune teller is on our side, GP. eom
Intelligent analogy Jeunke! Well said. eom
10-4 Here's to better days to come. eom
I don't believe institutional investors like to get involved with OTC stocks due to various reasons...and I don't think we'll get answers to the most popular questions here, so the questions are redundant. Take the top 5 questions and think about what it would take to answer them. No way that will happen.
I don't believe they consider it to be the "silent treatment", but rather the normal process to commercialization, with an emphasis on holding their cards close to the vest. They probably don't even consider that some investors would like their hands held. (not directed at anyone in particular)
If I remember correctly, Robert Blum of Intel, attends many of the same conferences Dr. Lebby does. I'm sure the two of them are well acquainted. Anyone agree?
You're correct th...thanks. eom
You can say that again, th...eom
Their new slogan, TH. "LWLG inside!" eom
Vein ratio metric is one for one today. We might be onto something.
I'd like to introduce a new metric for the stock. We'll call it the Vein Ratio. Pre-market Vein Ratio is up today, based on the new website. Let's see if the stock follows. (Warning...this metric is very volatile, and subject to mood swings and rants and raves.)
Haha...GP back from vacation in Cleveland...
Loose lips, sink ships.
Can you explain this post of yours...were you lying when you said it? If not, why are you still here?
chsmoke Friday, 06/05/20 11:04:13 AM
Re: prototype_101 post# 56361
Post #
56362
of 56787
and yet, proto, and yet.
i've thrown in the towel. good riddance to me. good luck to
all you believers, i hope you get a nice payoff...
From 1980 to 1998, Apple stock ranged between .51 and 1.33. Almost 20 years under $2. Wow. I didn't realize that.
I don't believe you'll accept that explanation though. You'd rather paint him as a carnival barker with a PhD.
What are you waiting for? You choose to invest cash in a company with hopes of a large return on your money. You equate fasten your seatbelts, we're embarking on something that's never been done, to Dr. Lebby and LWLG owing you money? You invested in a penny stock, trying to do the never before done...if they do it, you make a lot of cash...if they don't, you lose everything. They still won't owe you anything.
I believe that coming from a scientist, Dr. Lebby's fasten your seltbelt comment indicated that from the information and data he was privy to, the path was clear...He saw the road ahead, saw some bumps, but knew he and LWLG could drive it. I think that was an accurate comment from his standpoint but many here took it to mean money in their pockets right away. (which is understandable)
I don't believe he meant money was coming quickly...I believe, he believed it could be done, and wanted us along for the ride.
I agree with you. eom
You tell em' th6565!! eom
And what would you do with that information if you got your update on where we are? Do you expect it to give you some indication of whether you should sell now and buy back in 3 months time? Do you expect it to induce you to buy more now?
I don't think any update is going to spell it out.
Haha, Perkins!...eom
My impression and opinion of the Cisco representative is that he provided disinformation.
Who knows what Cisco is thinking?
Cisco will need to come to LWLG, sooner than they think.
Solid presentation and I agree with X that Cisco needs to defend their position. (made their bed)
I'm not annoyed. I think it's funny. Their motives are much more transparent than they believe. I think it's important to have an analysis of as many posters here as possible, to determine good faith comments and negative agendas. Who to believe and who to refute? I believe I've read every comment posted here for many, many years.
I love these guys that tell us we're idiots and say they're leaving and not coming back, and 10 days later they're at it again. Unbelievable.
Congrats Poch
Good answer mc67...eom
Thanks for giving us a break from your posts until Sept. Enjoy your time away.
Agreed Ned4. To be in early on something with this potential is very cool.
Easier said than done here with LWLG, FJack...but you're right.
This section of the presentation from HG Genuine reveals independent confirmation that another company is using a LWLG product.
You may be correct th6565. LWLG is very conservative with wording of information. One thing...in the recent investor presentation by ML...he spoke about organically moving to a higher exchange...He has spoken about it before in that way so it's nothing new, but I don't think he would repeat it if he wasn't fairly certain it's possible.
I'm not here to provide you with a sense of security or a path to making money on LWLG. Do what you will. Probably best for you to sell and move on. I'm secure in my vesting in LWLG...you're obviously not.
I agree 100% FJack. Odd to have to explain the obvious to seemingly smart individuals. The only conclusion is that they have ulterior motives and what you said goes in one ear and out the other.
Thank you for passing this summation along.
Alright then GP...YOU can take ME, golfing in Ireland...
I agree that the web meeting caught me off guard. Once I thought it over, I pictured all of them at home. They decided prior to have ML prepare a presentation, took care of their live business, (voting), and let ML take it away with his prepared presentation. I think that under the virus circumstances it made sense.
I was also under the impression there would be a live Q/A.
I agree, the communication regarding the format of the ASM was really poor and left many of us wondering what was going on. I place blame directly on MNGT, especially TZ and JM, as they led the meeting and let this miscommunication occur. MZ?...I have no idea what they bring to the table...my feeling is that if MNGT reviewed the format of the ASM with MZ and MZ didn't vehemently disagree then they are at serious fault too as this is their expertise.
I enjoyed the presentation ML gave, however.
ML said he is happy with MZ, which I found odd, given we haven't really seen any fruits of their labor. Maybe it's behind the scenes...