Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It took over 9 months from the date the seismic on 112 was completed to drilling.
The seismic on 444 was completed (still to be interpreted) 2 months ago.
If they keep the same timeline, that's 7 more months. April 2014.
would like to see this app available for windows 8 devices.
a very steady increase in market share on the platform is occurring and promises to continue.
If the new business model can lead to profits, then look out.
Problem now is the company has been and continues to lose money.
and nothing to answer our questions about financing.
wake me up next march.
So you guys delete my questions which opened the door wide open to really push this company. What is the average investor supposed to think about this? If you have to hide a simple question about how the company is expected to capture market share with its new business model, what are we to think of your true intentions?
So in short, the current model is outdated and they're trying to turn into a Jiffy Lube to save their business.
Why do you think they'll be successful?
somebody point to me the good part here?
stores are getting closed and the company is losing money.
Any guesses on when the company may have something to say about what's next?
This is what I was trying to find out the other day as well. We didn't even know where this well was as opposed to the Wolverine site. It's almost like they went out of their way in hopes of finding a huge payday right off the bat in what may have been a more risky location. At least that's the feeling I'm getting here. A move that would stink of financial desperation.
so $6 any minute now?
3 strikes and you're out.
This is strike 1.
3 total. One in each and one more of their choosing.
Now I guess they get two chances in 444 or it's going to be a wipe out.
No. I can't find any record anywhere of what the estimates of this current well may be. Can you point me in the right direction?
if nothing else, it would be nice to know how what they find compares to what might have been expected. maybe that would be an indication of what might else be in the area too. or not, i don't know, but if they hit a 90% probability rather than the conservative 10% we're hearing about as they calculate potential in this region, it might be telling.
then again, when we hear about p10 being around 35MM, i'm not even sure if wolfman is being included in that calculation or not. another question i'd like to know.
remember what tchauncy said. if the hole is dry, we'll likely know more quickly than if it isn't.
that said, it's hard to imagine we won't know something before too much longer. surely they're reached TD at this point and have a pretty good idea what they have. i'd think we'd know something within a matter of days now, but that's just my worthless speculation coming into play.
see slide 23 for more clarification on what i'd like to know.
http://www.slideserve.com/dyllis/terra-nova-energy-ltd-tgc-v
i'm very interested to know if there's something similar for the current drilling site.
On page 40 of this link, Holloman gives a similar table for PEL 444
http://www.hollomanenergy.com/_resources/PART1.pdf
i'm curious why wolfman wasn't included. surely the 3D has led to the current spot, but where was wolfman before? was it not even considered a lead before the 3D? if that's the case, i can't help to wonder what else is out there that we haven't heard about.
i'm also curious to know if the 3D survey has changed any of the estimations given in the first link.
thank you but that doesn't answer my question.
no kidding...
all of the sites i named have associated geological data. the entire presentation here http://www.slideserve.com/dyllis/terra-nova-energy-ltd-tgc-v listed wolverine as the probable first drilling spot.
there's no mention of wolfman at all that i could see. no associated data or expected reserves or nothing unless one of the names was changed. that's what i'm trying to find out. what exactly are the expectations of this current site and where exactly is it.
Wolverine, Grizzley, and Badger are all referenced on the Terra Nova ppt. Anybody know where and what Wolfman is? P50?
TGC (TNVMF) price cut in half on the TSX with only 17,000 traded.
Time Price Shares Change Buyer Seller
08/02/2013 9:31 AM EDT 0.085 3,000 -0.09 019 085
08/02/2013 9:31 AM EDT 0.085 3,000 -0.09 001 085
08/02/2013 9:31 AM EDT 0.11 4,000 -0.06 015 085
08/02/2013 9:31 AM EDT 0.14 7,000 -0.03 036 085
busy finish today. interesting.
The bottom corner of PEL 444 is going to be flush with oil. This current "pool" may or may not exist, but it won't be the end if they strike out here.
manipulated drop here. now the fear sets in.
If we can keep pumping out an SA speculative article or two a week for the next few months we'll all be rich!
When does PEL 444 drilling start?
They just finished the seismic survey and presumably will take a month or two to analyze the data.
The survey for this current portion of 112 was completed something like last fall. A good eight months from then to what we believe now is finally drilling. Is that same time frame expected for the next well?
What's the time line here in the short term?
Drilling to commence any day.
Approximately 10 days to reach target depth.
Then what? How long to determine what they've found?
Also, agree, it look like this one is on the doorstep of going back to .60 and beyond.
Do we know if the well has spudded yet? Mid-July still the target date?
Celtics2011, I follow you now. And I've got 20K shares riding with you as well. GLTA.
I can't view that article. Can some of the key points be summarized? I suspect this might answer some of the questions I have about our direct competition with this RapiMeds product.
Since I'm posting, here's a release from February that's worth reposting. http://globenewswire.com/news-release/2013/02/27/526625/10023044/en/ScripsAmerica-s-RapiMed-R-Product-Generates-Tremendous-Retail-Interest-at-the-2013-ECRM-Cough-Cold-Analgesics-Allergy-Conference.html
I thought this was nice: " ScripsAmerica presented RapiMed® to promote its placement and sale across retail outlets throughout the United States and reports that the Company received verbal order commitments from 62 of 66 retailers that it met with during the conference."
Does the process used by Tylenol Meltaways have similar wide reaching potential applications?
What might some other similarities and differences be between Rapid Meds and Meltways be?
What will the price be in a month?
If they miss?
If they hit big?
If hit, but nothing crazy?
If there's shale?