Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Here we go
45 days I think is tomorrow.
Was the LOI ever signed though ? ( March 31). Lol
When is the supposed 45 ‘business’ day milestone ? This week ?
Can someone explain this to a noob on nspt?
(Apologies in advance if this has been exhausted)
Simple
Pawsonomics
If weshield is a valid company (which I think it is), there sure as hell would put a cease and desist if they weren’t being bought out / with their name being dragged around by the “con man”.
There are 70 + employees at weshield.
He isn’t the president. Just a founding partner so I don’t think he’s really running the show. But probably put money into it
https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-sinensky-26646379
https://www.zoominfo.com/pic/we-shield/482900250
I would say Romans background does point to logistical knowledge and being able to run this
https://www.linkedin.com/in/roman-vinfield-195523a
He’s got the funds. They started sourcing most likely well before the glut of ppe when people were saying ‘it’s just the flu’.
I could see it happening. So yes. I can see them having 100 mil in revenue especially during a pandemic.
I’ve been in since .003 myself although I’ve sold and bought throughout this whole year.
If you look back I’ve been critical of this company and stil wondering if it’s real.
Even with a $2 billion deal and this acquisition, with 3 billion in shares it still puts this at 6-7 cents at 1x That what. Said this weshield isn’t or hadn’t been a company for a long time. Their plan was mostly to get in and out. And that’s what they are doing. Good for them if it’s real.
I’m looking for another pop and I’m pretty sure it’ll happen. But long term I’m not keeping my yayo here
IMO of course.
One other thing. Finally you can get some more info on the fuel maximizer by looking up the patent number. That’s want available or I couldn’t find it before. So thanks to that Twitter picture, you can read up a bit more on the patent. Again. Remains to be seen on true data of which it claims.
I don’t care if he’s stable or not. If it’s really the ceo of weshield on a message board, that’s poor judgment. But if he makes me money, I don’t give a bleep.
That being said. HB asks the question of weshield bringing in 100 mill in a year. Well ‘supposedly’ Opti has a 2 Bil deal of which 25% was competed As of last call. Is it real ? Remains to be seen but Opti has its hands on ‘supposedly’ 500 mil competed ppe deal.
If people were good at logistics and thought a little ahead and had connections overseas, I can believe they can make deals like this. But again. Need connections and money. Is it possible ? Yes. Is it real? Remains to be seen
Um. I don’t think it’s him. And if it is, it’s foolish if he’s on iHub.
The mother of all RS was RNV@. Holy crap that was 1000:1 RS and dropped like a lead balloon. Looks like they may need to do it again. Glad we aren’t in that BS sandwich. Although this sandwich is rather bland right now.
I’d really like to hear from the company a bit more on their darn quarterly and plans going forward. Give us a little more insight. Pivoting is fine. Being quiet is not giving share holders any confidence.
They started it up for the pandemic. They are getting paid and selling the company ASAP. Good on them.
As for Opti. Who knows.
Never say never Steve. I’m sure that comment was in context of thinking the labs would take off. They have not so they need to think hard about things. You never know. I for one don’t think there will be but I’m not ruling it out.
The original statement of no reverse plot said not before a dollar but also not ‘in the near future’. That’s over a year ago and since no catalysts have pushed this higher (whether there is game playing or no interest) it behooves them to think of everything on the table. I hope not and I hope we have more exciting announcements near term that this still doesn’t happen. IMO.
https://stockdaymedia.com/tpt-global-tech-discusses-the-launch-of-tpt-medtech-llc-with-the-stock-day-podcast-tptw-april-27-2020/
Nice close
Thanks Pam. Appreciate some insight into some questions. I have been accumulating through all this and also believe they have some good things coming. Just a belief though. If it were just a Covid play I’d say it’s toast. But there are a few diverse aspects of this company that add a lot of value. And the labs are not just for Covid which some people here continue to try to push otherwise. Good luck to you and keep up the good sleuthing.
I wouldn’t say that. That test report was for optecs fuel maximizer. What I HAVE been saying is the ‘technology’ exists (HHO) and has shown promise. I have no idea what optecs fuel maximizer does or how it does it.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016815001714
The guy down under has a serious misstatement in his declaration. Of all people, he should know how to compare and contrast an experiment as such. Instead, he blatantly missed the point about where the additional energy is coming from. IMO.
The test report is novice and is definitely contradicting.
All good. Yeah I did misunderstand you. But I agree. Good luck to you
The big picture doesn’t look that great near term.
I’d love to know the breakdown of SaaS, tests that were paid for and anything out of Nevada. I’m also thinking fall and back to school and winter will see some more testing again. Projections point upwards at the end of year. Be interesting to see what happens
The other facets will be picking up. I noted the subscriber reduction in the annual report. That wasn’t good but I’m guessing that was a result of Covid and hoping it will pick back up. Rural internet is finicky and perhaps many people in rural areas were affected more so and they needed to drop internet as an expense. I’m guessing.
But blue collar. They are picking up. They have Ted lasso on their web page. If you haven’t seen Ted lasso you’re missing out. Anyway they are affiliated with apple tv. (Ted lasso). So something must be right there. Production is coming back online.
This is why they have a diverse portfolio. So in my eyes if we didn’t make ya yo in one place, there are other opportunity. Diversification. My opinion though. I’m sure others will differ. But agree. It wasn’t a spectacular quarterly
Last year’s Yearly report shows about 30k in revenue for tpt Med. tech.
This latest quarterly shows revenue in the mid 300k for tpt med tech. 375,650 to be exact. So yeah, tpt med tech is bringing in revenue.
Page F11 here:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=14873620&guid=-bUUkaTjXSo8xth
Page 10 here
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=14978881&guid=-bUUkaTjXSo8xth
Ain’t no doubt about it.
The document states over and over the test trailer consumed more fuel than the comparison therefore it’s 5% less. That is some funny math. Doesn’t look good for the maximizer. Maybe I missed a line or two. But oooooph
Would love to hear the reasoning.
Define ‘it’.
So you want me to contact someone from across the globe to convince him he is incorrect stating there are no gains in increasing fuel consumption / efficiency and lower emissions after I sent multiple links showing all the work efforts going on that are addressing this ? Meh. No thanks. His statement is false as stated.
Looks like the government and multiple other entities are just throwing money at a wall I guess.
Who knows what Opti is doing or what the fuel maximizer is doing. I’d like to know. Am I saying it’s the holy grail? Nope. I question it too.
I read his article and I’d like to jump to the HHO part. His comment is incorrect because it has incorrect assumptions and is not looking at the entire picture.
First. He claims the energy required to create something to burn in the same car is a net zero sum. I would agree if it were just ‘create hydrogen and then burn the hydrogen and oxygen’ to create the energy to move the vehicle. You couldn’t get something for nothing. Here is the error though: the claims are that HHO assist in the efficiency of the burning of the fuel. If there is 1% of fuel unburned (or whatever) it is here where the additional energy comes from, not from the gases that were created. It is from the unburned fuel that would have been leftover which have a lot more energy in its chemical bonds than the electricity used to create the HHO. It is simple laws of thermodynamics. If you can get a cleaner burn, if you can burn more fuel in the cylinder power stroke and not have it pass unburned to the catalytic converter (which does nothing other than reduce emissions through heat redox), if you can have the spark timing changed or advanced, if you can have a cooler temperature at the intake, all of these things equate to higher horsepower, efficiency increases and lower emissions. Perhaps another way to compare this is a turbo. A turbo is somewhat passive as it spins up from the already burned gases / high pressure exhaust that in turn sucks in more air and packs it into the cylinder. You would think it’s a net zero sum but the actuality of it is bringing in more oxygen to burn with the fuel and forcing higher compression in the cylinder. This is grossly simplified as I know more fuel comes in and a slew of other things happen. But the effect is the same. The burning of the fuel is more efficient. ( https://www.edmunds.com/car-buying/turbocharger-technology-gives-new-cars-more-mpg.html ).
Electrical energy is used to split water, which combines with existing fuel and air. This allows for more fuel to be burned in the cylinder. It also allows for cooler temperatures at the intake which allows the engine to change spark timing (which the computer controls by sensing knocking, O2, etc).
While John may be correct talking about the overall hydrocarbon coming out of the tail pipe, the incorrect assertion is there is more ‘work’ being done in the cylinder and engine, not the system as a whole.
So yeah. There are some incorrect assumptions in his article IMO. And I believe there are means of still increasing efficiency in ICE’s.
His other mentions I agree with though. Magnets on fuel lines, fuel additives, vortex creators seem to be all BS.
I am no automotive expert either. But the information is out there and believing a single person’s account of it belittles all the other work that does show promise. Of course is Opti that promise? Maybe maybe not. Most likely not. But it is doable
Why would the government mandate this ?the government mandates requirements, not methods
Does anyone realize how long it takes for the auto industry manufacturers betting and getting a technology into a design cycle ? Look it up.
And yes the technology has the ability to get these sort of numbers. Not sure about the fuel maximizer itself but HHO at the intake does.
I never said it wasn’t a scam or was a scam. I’ve questioned the share structure and the constant kicking the can down the road with nothing really coming to concrete fruition.
What I am saying A) the technology exists and is viable and B) there is always room for improvement and anyone saying there are no gains in the 1% of unburied hydrocarbons is the one that is full of it. That’s old school thinking and frankly I question someone who can’t see the gains that have been happening I’ve the past decade.
There will be increases in efficiency and the ICE isn’t going away anytime soon.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X20300063
Supporting paper showing that you can ‘still’ increase efficiency and fuel economy with a HHO enhancement at the intake of an ICE
“ConclusionLaboratory experiments have been carried out to investigatethe effect of HHO gas on the emission and performance of aSkoda Felicia 1.3 GLXi engine. A new design of HHO fuel cellhas been performed to generate HHO gas required for engineoperation. The generated gas is mixed with a fresh air in theintake manifold. The exhaust gas concentrations have beensampled and measured using a gas analyzer. The followingconclusions can be drawn.1. HHO cell can be integrated easily with existing enginesystems.2. The engine thermal efficiency has been increased up to 10%when HHO gas has been introduced into the air/fuel mix-ture, consequently reducing fuel consumption up to 34%.3. The concentration of NOx, CO and HC gases has beenreduced to almost 15%, 18% and 14% respectively on aver-age when HHO is introduced into the system.4. The best available catalyst was found to be KOH, with con-centration 6 g/L.5. The proposed design for separation tank takes into consid-eration the safety precautions needed when dealing withhydrogen fuel.It is recommended for the future work to study the effect ofboth compression ratio and ignition advance on the engineperformance and emissions with introducing HHO gas intothe gasoline engine”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016815001714
https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1110016815001714?token=D4262A9B671948201D8637D35856915F93E2A55E28AB3194E84397889F00F47D55B2E4F676B373C992AE0FC53BCECA6C&originRegion=us-east-1&originCreation=20210524104647
Meh. They bought all the stuff and supposedly had pictures of all the filters (KM). Were they real? Who knows but I’m not understanding the ‘returning’ bit. There literally was a pandemic and nothing was selling. They had the inventory last year so things are starting to sell again. The fact that they were .0005 or whatever wasn’t from selling Fuel maximizers, it eas the crazy dilution.
You’re entitled your belief. There are absolutely technologies always coming out increasing mpg and engine efficiency. https://www.carthrottle.com/post/a-brief-history-of-turbochargers-in-cars/
As a test engineer yourself, you of all
People should know how a product test campaign gets handled. And you don’t pay someone to just give you a glowing result. You pay to validate your requirements but theres a rep from the company there to coordinate the whole thing. I’ve lead several test initiatives for systems, sub systems and products as a whole.
Who knows about opti. But it’s otc and I keep saying it. Im a gambling man at times and I made money here. Not sure if you were here last summer / fall last year but i was (and still am) questioning share structure and the BS around their promises (and yes I question the FM) But still can make money.
I was going to say, by their logic , if it’s released on Friday it’s bad bad bad but … if it’s released on Monday it’s good?
Eager to find out where this is going. The quiklabs are not out of the picture yet but are definitely not pulling the weight they were anticipated to be.
That being said fall brings school and college openings. Looking at projections, there will be an uptick again in the fall. And whether that triggers a testing campaign again, we shall see.
Eager to see what Nevada and California has done with this. My expectations are still set.
5G though was a nice piece of news.
Sweeeeeeet
Betting on it
Where did you get that ‘quote’ from. Not me
And to be clear.... I am not promoting Optec. I just see some holes here
1% is huge.
Also this was 2005 and there has been significant tech increasing fuel efficiency and yea... burning more fuel
https://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/car-technology/a19854205/the-evolution-of-the-combustion-engine/
True.
Again I’m not trying to sell it. I remember going through this last year looking it over and remember saying the same thing. Can’t produce much hydrogen from water vapor. But can’t remember I if it was generating ozone or not
Please provide us the link to where the ceo said they were uplisting in 2020.
Since you did your DD it should come quick. I just want to understand it and see it for myself. Sticky it if you can. I tried looking.
Ok then.
Just because you heard it on the board doesn’t mean it’s real.
And yes. I am not too happy with where this is. But I’m not a pumper or basher. I still see opportunity.
It’s OtC so my expectations are set as always.
Again. Where did the company state up lost in end of 2020.
And why would the company throw out a stock price estimate ???
The company never said this...
Could you forward any messages from the company of CEO? I always remembered end of ‘this’ year. 2021. I never heard end of 2020.
Fuel maximizer testing report. I just googled it. I’m looking for the tech that’s in it and the description of how it operates. Anyone ?
http://www.m-v-t-s.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/20180125_Optec-Fuel-Maximizer-MVTS-Certified-Test-Report-V6_Final-2.pdf
I suppose the hemi is BS since it increases efficiency of combustion
https://www.wermopar.com/blog/what-hemi-engine#.YKUnDyX3bDs
Or increase compression ratios is BS as it increases efficiencies of combustion as well
https://www.imedpub.com/articles/influence-of-compression-ratio-on-the-performance-characteristics-of-a-sparkignition-engine.pdf
Again. Not saying Opti has the magic device but there are methods for increasing combustion to reduce emission and increase HP which increase mpg.
Um. Your video in the first portion talks about percentage. That is the overall percentage coming out of the tail pipe. Not the combustion chamber. The catalytic converter works wonders in reducing overall hydrocarbons whether your engine is running good or like sh8t. So if you burn more fuel in the engine, you effectively get more horsepower and more fuel efficient running engine. Consider the move from the carburetor to the fuel injector. Then the fuel injector to the direct injection. Each one had a significant increase in fuel economy and fuel consumption along with lower emissions.
Those were not BS.
It has been shown that ozone induction promotes a timing change on spark. By changing the timing of the ignition / spark plug, you can change all sorts of things like emissions and horsepower.
“Results showed that earlier injection timings improved the promoting effect of ozone on gasoline autoignition mainly because of the extension of the fuel-ozone residence time. Moreover, results showed how the nitrogen monoxide (NO) contained in the residual burn gases can react with O 3 molecules before they can decompose releasing the O responsible for the autoignition enhancement. In the second part of the work, results showed that seeding the intake of the engine with of 383 ppm of ozone, allowed to improve the gasoline reactivity and to reduce the intake temperature from 130°C to 40°C at a constant IMEP of 3 bar. Analysis showed that while ozone is employed to reduce the intake temperature, combustion initiated and developed at lower temperature with advantages in term of NOx emissions. Also unburned hydrocarbon HC emission reduced, while CO emission increased. In order to take advantage of the effect of ozone, the injection strategy had to be adapted: a first injection during the intake stroke was necessary to get the promoting effect of ozone while a second injection during compression stroke was employed to induce the fuel stratification necessary for controlling the combustion phasing and to avoid excessive heat release rate.”
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315698190_Potential_of_Ozone_to_Enable_Low_Load_Operations_of_a_Gasoline_Compression_Ignition_GCI_Engine
So if this device can generate ozone at the intake, it is possible. Buuuuut I have no idea what this device looks like. And I too would love to see the clarification in their PR that states and proves the increases in Hp and decreases in emissions they claim.
Again. I’m not saying their device does this, I’m saying the technology is there and methods have shown positive results.
Those other items stated in the video are different than this method.
Of course the big thing that can be done is going all electric. Solves most of the problems.