Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Zac,
I agree. DRGP has provided Lebed with plenty of factual positives upon which to build an legitimate PR campaign.
Tomorrow should be exciting!
Melissa K. Rice Bio,
"Melissa K. Rice has an extensive background in business and is also licensed to practice law in the state of Florida. Ms. Rice has been practicing attorney specializing in securities regulations and corporate transactions, assisting emerging companies in debt and equity financing, as well as providing general corporate governance advice to emerging companies, from October 2000-to the present. Ms. Rice graduated with a Bachelors of Science degree in Marketing from the University of Tampa, a Juris Doctor degree from Stetson School of Law and a Masters of Business Administration from Stetson University."
http://sec.edgar-online.com/2007/04/27/0001193125-07-093897/Section2.asp
Absolutely, GOOOO! DRGP!!!!
Can you provide links?
What is your interest in DRGP? You sound like person who has a large position and are afraid you have made a poor decision in investing DGRP.
If this is the case, if I were you I would just relax and wait to the PPS to rise.
I agree with you that we should have a lot of upside from here with virtually no downside risk.
It would seem that some here are better at DD than others.
In what countries do you think it will be marketed?
The strength of DRGP is the compelling business model. But most important is the sophistication of management's algorithms for determining advertising investment spend. Further, the products are extremely high-gross margin. This stock is a great buy at this level.
I'm looking forward to Friday. Even more I'm looking forward to see the financials on the 15th.
I agree with you 100%.
I just sent you an e-mail. Yahoo Group is fine. Check the e-mail I sent you and let me know if I can help.
ProfitScout~~How true!
Mighty_Mezz~~Not even close to the truth.
ProfitScout~~I agree 100%.
Press ReleaseSource: H-Quotient, Inc.
H-Quotient Announces End of Litigation
Thursday March 2, 12:38 pm ET
VIENNA, VA--(MARKET WIRE)--Mar 2, 2006 -- H-Quotient, Inc., (Other OTC:HQNT.PK - News) announced final resolution of litigation that commenced on April 7, 2004. The Company was sued for more than $10 million in the Rao et al v. H-Quotient matter. Today all parties completed a settlement agreement that terminated all claims and resulted in no award to any party.
President and CEO Douglas Cohn said, "The Company has always maintained that this case was without merit, and today's result confirms that assessment."
This announcement may contain, in addition to historical information, certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Such statements reflect management's current views and are based on certain assumptions. Actual results could differ materially from the assumptions currently anticipated.
r more information visit the H-Quotient web site at www.hquotient.com and the Standard Holdings Group web site at http://www.standardholdingsgroup.com
Contact:
Contact:
H-Quotient, Inc.
(703) 821-3434
Source: H-Quotient, Inc.
ProfitScout~~I agree with you 100%. eom
Subject: Re: Feedback from my Broker.
I just heard from my Broker. He just read me DTC's response to my Broker's inquiry as to where the Certificates are. DTC said that they have not heard back from their Agent (Continental), and that DTC will exit their position from the shares as soon as they receive the Certifificates back from Continental for DTC to distribute to the Brokers. My Broker said that they will, unlike with free trading shares, my Brokerage will be holding the restricted SNDH Dividend Certificates in my Brokers name. My Broker will issue the Certificates to their clients when ever their clients request them. They assured me that they would not rest until they had enough Certificates to cover the aggregate number of shares required to cover all of their clients positions. Ameritrade said it will hit the fan if DTC shorts them on the share count. Some brokers will take the certificates and coordinate with Continental as to who the rightful owners are. My broker will not do this. They're only interested in that the total number of Certificates that they receive from DTC are in sufficient number to cover their clients position.
My Broker said that other Brokers may have to accept too few shares from DTC because other Brokers may be holding some big short position. He said other Brokers might just make a journal entry into their clients accounts in hopes that not enough of their clients will request more Certificates that these Brokers can make available.
This supports DC's and our contention that the only way to have real accountability is to request, of your respective Brokers, that your restricted SNDH shares be sent to you in Certificate form or the shorts will win.
Subject: Re: Feedback from my Broker.
I just heard from my Broker. He just read me DTC's response to my Broker's inquiry as to where the Certificates are. DTC said that they have not heard back from their Agent (Continental), and that DTC will exit their position from the shares as soon as they receive the Certifificates back from Continental for DTC to distribute to the Brokers. My Broker said that they will, unlike with free trading shares, my Brokerage will be holding the restricted SNDH Dividend Certificates in my Brokers name. My Broker will issue the Certificates to their clients when ever their clients request them. They assured me that they would not rest until they had enough Certificates to cover the aggregate number of shares required to cover all of their clients positions. Ameritrade said it will hit the fan if DTC shorts them on the share count. Some brokers will take the certificates and coordinate with Continental as to who the rightful owners are. My broker will not do this. They're only interested in that the total number of Certificates that they receive from DTC are in sufficient number to cover their clients position.
My Broker said that other Brokers may have to accept too few shares from DTC because other Brokers may be holding some big short position. He said other Brokers might just make a journal entry into their clients accounts in hopes that not enough of their clients will request more Certificates that these Brokers can make available.
This supports DC's and our contention that the only way to have real accountability is to request, of your respective Brokers, that your restricted SNDH shares be sent to you in Certificate form or the shorts will win.
My Guess is 2/17/2006 at 07:00 am.
healthstocks~~We all know what was said and what has actually happened. What is you point?
ProfitScout~~Good answer! eom
theBroker~~Because you will receive a generous Dividend which will also serve to put the shorts in a trick as the Dividend shares will be restricted. Connect the dots.
ProfitScout~~Maybe they will now start prosecuting these crooks!
Will Lyons, No problem.
To Will Lyons, I don't see where OLED is in competition with PTHO.
PTHO is a nanotechnology R&D Firm, next-generation electro-optic (EO) plastics for future applications vital to modern commerce, homeland security, and medical technology. PSI-TEC's proprietary electro-optic plastics are produced at the molecular level for superior performance, stability and cost-efficiency and are expected to replace more expensive, lower-performance materials used in fiber-optic ground, wireless and satellite communication networks.
OLED works with polymer organic light emitting diode (P-) technology for displays used in various consumer and industrial applications, including flat panel televisions, mobile phones, PDAs, digital cameras and camcorders, portable DVD players, electric shavers, MP3 players, and other applications.
In short, PTHO is involved in the development of a high speed electro-optic (EO) plastics that will be used in the manufacturing of communications fiber optics and modulators that can transmit an electrical signal which can be converted into an audio as well as a visual image.
I do see where OLED may become one of the many OEM Manufacturers of the next-generation electro-optic (EO) plastics that PTHO is developing.
Other companies developing similar technologies include LUMERA CORPORATION (Nasdaq:LMRA).
Please read the following information from the two companies sites.
_______________________________
OLED - Cambridge Display Technology, Inc. engages in the design, development, and marketing of polymer organic light emitting diode (P-) technology in the United Kingdom. These technologies enable the manufacture of P-OLED displays, which are thin, lightweight, and power devices that emit light when an electric current flows. The P-OLEDs displays are used in various consumer and industrial applications, including flat panel televisions, mobile phones, PDAs, digital cameras and camcorders, portable DVD players, electric shavers, MP3 players, and other applications. The company licenses its technology to display manufacturers. Cambridge Display Technology serves its customers located primarily in Europe, the United States, and Asia. The company was founded in 1992 and is headquartered in Cambridge, the United Kingdom.
____________________________
PTHO
Revolutionary Breakthrough in Nanotechnology
PTHO (Wilmington, DE) - PSI-TEC Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of PSI-TEC Holdings, Inc. (Pinks:), a nanotechnology firm, announced today the completion of the penultimate step in the fabrication process of a revolutionary new nanomaterial.
Mr. Frederick Goetz, President and CEO of PSI-TEC Corporation explains PSI-TEC laboratory's recent breakthrough consists of the fabrication of an electro-optic material constructed atom-by-atom at the molecular level. These patented materials are expected by PSI-TEC scientists to have broad application in civilian and military telecommunication and advanced computational systems.
Mr. Goetz continued: "Another major potential applications for the nanomaterials that we develop is something called 'optical interconnect technology,' an area of intense interest by many major players in the high-tech arena.
"Optical interconnects will quite literally provide computers with the ability to operate at light-speed."
Optical interconnects are the core component in the construction of "optical computers," i.e. computers which integrate the conduction of light (as opposed to electricity) at various stages for extremely high-speed computation. The development of breakthrough electro-optic nanomaterials such as those being developed by PSI-TEC has long been a major obstacle in the creation of optical interconnects.
Optical interconnects, not long ago considered futuristic, are currently the object of aggressive investigation by Intel, IBM, Agilent Technologies and the U.S. Government.
The nanomaterials under development by the PSI-TEC Corporation consist of many billions of individual electron oscillators (called chromophores), each less than three nanometers (or three billionths of a meter) in length. These tiny oscillators operate at a quantum mechanical level to facilitate the transformation of electricity into light at extremely high speeds. PSI-TEC's recent breakthrough consists of final fabrication of these miniscule oscillators in their "ionic" or "salt" form. The ultimate step in the fabrication process consists of the liberation of these electron oscillators from their ionic state which is expected in the very near future.
"This is an extremely exciting moment for us," said Mr. Goetz. "This achievement is the result of many years of molecular engineering and material design. I can see quite clearly now that our patented nanotechnologies will dictate how electro-optic plastics are made from now on--and that electro-optic plastics are the future of all broadband telecommunication.
"Our breakthrough technology is exactly what the industry has been waiting for."
About PSI-TEC
PSI-TEC Corporation is a developmental stage company that engineers next-generation electro-optic (EO) plastics for future applications vital to modern commerce, homeland security, and medical technology. PSI-TEC's proprietary electro-optic plastics are produced at the molecular level for superior performance, stability and cost-efficiency and are expected to replace more expensive, lower-performance materials used in fiber-optic ground, wireless and satellite communication networks.
Other companies developing similar technologies include LUMERA CORPORATION (Nasdaq:LMRA.
Will Lyons~~Do you have the name of the Company?
This is another stock I've own. Starting to look very promising.
_________________
PTHO Stock Breakout
Technically, PTHO has been trading in a very tight range around the $2.25 level. Increasing levels of broker and investor participation along with upcoming massive exposure will generate astounding upside movement, producing initial gains which could shoot the company back to it's year high of $5.45, then eclipsing this level on the way to double-digit territory.
Company Introduction
PSI-TEC Holdings, Inc. (OTC: PTHO) is an innovative, emerging leader
engaged in the scientific development of highly advanced, next-generation
Electro-Optic (EO) polymers. Speed, performance, and efficiency of their
patented technologies place PTHO at the forefront of NanoTechnology, the
world’s fastest growing industry.
Record Sales and Earnings
PTHO scores high marks as one of the very few “pure play” publicly traded NanoTech companies. Given their earning power and exponential revenue growth, standard analyst formulas would peg the stock at 5X to 7X its present valuation, even at a conservative P/E multiple.
PTHO has already received strong interest from leading technology companies in its core target markets of telecommunications, satellite, and aerial guidance / reconnaissance. Given the tremendous impact the Company’s polymers present for these markets, it is not unreasonable to envision a licensing agreement for use of PTHO’s technology that may very well exceed the $100 Million benchmark. We expect PTHO to conclude one or more lucrative licensing arrangements with major corporations over the near to intermediate term.
Escalated sales forecasts share a robust equivalency with the early, dramatic growth rates of Fortune 500 leaders in their heyday. Very seldom do you get perfection, yet this flawless, unknown gem has qualities resembling high- caliber Blue Chips that place it on a level that’s about as close as you can get.
Out of thousands of OTC companies we have reviewed, PTHO is the stock best qualified to earn the designation of Soaring Stock Pick! PTHO has hit its cruising speed, analytically viewed as a Company operating on a higher level. While approaching significant corporate milestones, we’re tuned into the cash-rich results of cascading growth nearly across the board.
Early investors must act quickly to avoid competing for shares as a flood of new buyers will imminently wake up and jump on board, leaving procrastinators to sit around wondering why they didn't buy PTHO when it was really cheap in September.
Certain information contained in these materials is "forward-looking" information, such as projections, estimates, pro formas, or statements of intentions, expectations or plans. All forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside of the control of the company. Consequently, actual results may, and probably will, differ materially from the results contemplated in such forward-looking information. Stock Marketing Group, LLC was paid $1,000 for this advertisement. As with any company, nothing can ever be guaranteed, we simply give the facts and allow the investor to make a professional decision.
Profitscout~~Yes, I see PTHO as the next Microsoft. From what I read their discovery, once in the hands of a Fortune 100 company, will replace all fiver optics as we know them. The upside is virtually unlimited. I hope to see their financials soon.
To 'Brown Dustman' Res might still be around! lol
The Big Easy and Katrina
by Paul Leaman
The Big Easy,
with it's mirth
Yes, it's gaiety
known on earth.
It's night life
so alluring,
It's celebrating,
so enduring.
Now in darkness
the long hot night,
Gives no alurment
offers no delight.
Cries of desperation
fill the night air.
Now one bemoans
it's more then we can bear!
With brackish water
all around,
barely a spot
of good dry ground.
The heat's unbearable
both night and day,
With water all around
there's no place to lay.
Wading through water
polluted and deep,
Some call out for loved ones
others stand and weep.
Dead bodies can be seen
floating in the mire.
All look for some place,
any place higher and drier.
With the levee now gone
the sea wall broken down,
The water has poured in
covering the whole town.
All are being told that
everyone must leave,
To know how they feel
is truly hard to perceive.
Where can they all go
with everything gone?
I grieve for each one
seeing all they've undergone.
My prayer for them is
many will seek His face,
through this dreaded time
respond to His embrace.
Yes, though His hand be heavy
might they turn to Him in prayer,
And trust Him even now
in this time of dread and despair.
© by Paul H. Leaman
09/01/2005
ProfitScout~~Agreed! eom
Sonyboy~~Nonsense! eom
Press ReleaseSource: H-Quotient, Inc.
H-Quotient Clears Way to Complete Audit Monday August 29, 3:47 pm ET
VIENNA, VA--(MARKET WIRE)--Aug 29, 2005 -- H-Quotient, Inc. (Other OTC:HQNT.PK - News) announced that with resolution of the significant aspects of major litigation and, separately, issues concerning the acquisition of the Company's Canadian subsidiary, Stewart & Shaw Inc., management has directed its auditors to complete the Company's 2003 and 2004 year-end audits.
On April 7, 2004, the Company was sued for more than $10 million in the Rao et al v. H-Quotient matter. The court awarded and upheld its judgment awarding H-Quotient $385,000 against IntelliServices' former president, while seven former IntelliServices shareholders who owned less than six percent of that company's stock were awarded $359,000, which the Company is appealing. Earlier, two former IntelliServices employees were awarded $157,500, and H-Quotient deposited the full amount to the court in lieu of a bond and has appealed the award. This litigation arose from H-Quotient's acquisition of IntelliServices stock.
This announcement may contain, in addition to historical information, certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Such statements reflect management's current views and are based on certain assumptions. Actual results could differ materially from the assumptions currently anticipated.
For more information visit the H-Quotient web site at www.hquotient.com.
Contact:
Contact:
H-Quotient, Inc.
(703) 821-3434
Source: H-Quotient, Inc.
__________________
The plain facts are:
To All: IMO, First I need to get a couple of terms defined for the purpose of this post.
Term # 1 - "Primary Plaintiffs" = Dr. Rao
Term # 2 - "Remaining Plaintiffs" = All other plaintiffs except for Dr. Rao
385 K is currently owed to H-Quotient by Dr Rao.
359K is may be owed to the Remaining Plaintiffs by H-Quotient. Motions and appeals can still be made concerning this award.
The difference between the 385K that H-Quotient has been awarded and the 359K that Remaining Plaintiffs may be awarded is 26K in favor of H-Quotient.
There is an additional 400K up for grabs in punitive damages by the Remaining Plaintiffs, however IMO, if H-Quotient prevails against Dr Rao concerning the 359K, then the opportunity for the Remaining Plaintiffs to be awarded any damages then disappears.
July 29th is the hearing date and a decision will come sometime after this date.
IMO, I liken this to a hurricane that is now dwindling down to light shower.
IMO, No matter which way this goes, H-Quotient will not suffer any significant material injury.
____________________________________________
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
This is a combination of several great posts, posted on the IHUB board.
Sonyboy: Well, I've got to give you credit. You're good at what you do. And what is it you do again? Hmmmmm. Spend countless hours researching, compiling, posting. Warning unsuspecting shareholders. A friend of the little man. Do you help little old ladies across the street and help your neighbors take the garbage out too? What a fine man. But, there's a difference between you and me. Whenever I've sold a stock, I've moved on. I didn't post on the stock any more...that is unless I was short. Then the compulsion to share all my bad feelings were just too overwhelming. And, I imagine, the compulsion becomes a mind deafening roar the bigger the short position. I suppose I'd post 24/7 if the short position was big enough. My own research suggests that you're position is truly big enough. And, you've done well for yourself and your bosses. Started shorting back in April of 2004...I think April 7th probably. That was the day the stock crashed. Interesting that was the day the Rao suit was filed. But no else knew about that but you. Hqnt wasn't notified till ten days later. You didn't trade on insider information did you? So now we play chicken. You're going to try and drive the price to zero. Let's see who covers first.
On your points:
1) Have you spoken to Jack Anderson? Has anyone you know talked to him? No. He's on his deathbed. Doug and Jack were friends for 18 years and partners for 5. Jack's family hasn't allowed anyone to contact him. There's no proof he even said it. Or, if so, what the context was. So, this point is irrelevant. But, it makes such good copy to keep bringing it up, doesn't it?
2) The answer to point #2 is simple. We've never had our day in court. Attorneys messed things up initially and there has never been another hearing date given. But, you knew that already.
3) Interesting viewpoint. The Jury gives a bigger award and you assume it's because they felt Doug was..how did you put it..."Such a sleazeball"...sounds like a dispassionate statement. You can't prove that...but it makes a great headline huh? Yes, you're good at what you do.
4) The trade credits exist. They from to a company called Oncorp (sp?). The 10,000 sq ft building may have fallen through. So what?
5) Speaking of trade credits, you made a little freudian slip there Timothy...you mentioned that no one have been able to refute YOU'RE evidence. You must mean the "Evidence" you posted on Our-street. Say, how is the lawsuit with the SEC, HQnt, the company in Colorado and the company in Illinois going? Wow, 4 major lawsuits with lawyers representing you in 4 different venues. That must get expensive, huh? Tough on a guy unemployed in Slovenia. Say, who's paying those legal bills again?
6) Yes, in April and May the financials were promised. That was just before the Rao suit was filed. And you know how agressive the Rao's attorneys were. Forensic auditors. Papering Hqnt to death with discovery questions. Dominating Hqnt management and it's auditors with request after request. Given the acquisition of Stewart and Shaw and the excessive burden of discovery heaped upon hqnt, it's not at all surprising that the financials have been delayed.
And, btw, my boss would understand the delays under the circumstances.
7) Musky Don praised the software which proved to be flawed. Hqnt's own tech guy had to fix it to the tune of about $385,000. Ok, so we didn't use Musky Don to help fix the software. He may have lost money in hqnt. So, no one else can invest here now?
8) James Connors was paid about $83,000 in legal fees for representing hqnt. Now he wants more. It's not going to be settled on the internet and you know it. They'll just have to work that out. What does that have to do with anything? Oh yeah, I forgot...makes a good headline. Keeps up the selling pressure. BTW, I heard Doug doesn't drink. Can we come up with something juicy on that? Like, he a recovering alcoholic? Hmmmm, wanted for public drunkeness in Utah? Work on it, I know you'll come up with a good one.
9) Doug IS a nationally syndicated writer. His works still appear in various respected journals. And he does respect the first amendment...just not yelling fire in a movie theater. That is criminal behavoir. There's a difference. But, you know that already.
10) Hqnt bought Intelliservices. They bought the stock from the Intel. shareholders under a contract that they warranted the disclosures to be true and accurate. The $385,000 judgement against Rao proves he made false statements. When the problems with the software came to light, giving it back was an option which was considered. But, who says they had any money left or that they wanted it back? They'd just passed off a bill of goods. They were happy. Cohn went about fixing the software at considerable time and expense. They would have benefitted by Hqnt ultimate success...but they wanted $12 MM instead. Hey, it's a free country, you can sue anybody for any amount. And, btw, thanks for the free legal advice about how Cohn should have handled this. I'm sure he or his attorneys never thought about the course you recommended...damn! Well, if you'll give us your name and phone number we'll be sure to call you first next time.
So, all you shorts out there, get ready for a punishing blow when the financial statements finally reveal what good things have been happening way, way off radar.
_____________________________
There is only one reason that these posters have posted 24/7 since april 2004, and that is to drive the price of the stock down, period. Any reasonable person can see that. There is a massive short position. They will need to cover soon.
___________________________
Sec10: Now who's being naive? Quoting you: legitimate companies don't have things happening off the radar. That's the mark of a scam. Legitimate companies disclose.
Oh really? When IBM is exploring buying a company do they disclose? When companies are in talks to merge, sell, buy, invest, expand, develop...do they disclose? Sure, when it is in the shareholders interests to do so and not before.
____________________________________________
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
HQNT/SNDH is still an upside explosive situation! (update)
______________________________________
Marc Nathan is going to be the head of a subsidiary
On June 8th H-Quotient reported that it is creating a subsidiary that will include all of the Company's software products: PyysicianQuotient, DentalQuotient and LabQuotient. The CEO of the new company will be Marc H. Nathan. Mr. Nathan is the CEO of a private equity investment firm, Bulldog Financial, Inc., a director of US HeartScan, Inc., and a consultant to other public and private technology companies. Bulldog Financial is a large shareholder in HQNT.
Please read the complete news release at the end of this writing.
_______________________________________
H-Quotient is selling at a 2 year low; is extremely undervalued; selling for less than .40 a share; has less then 40 million shares outstanding; has an Earning Per Share of at least .13 for 2003 (and likely more for 2004); is debt free; is ever expanding; is a profitable company; pays dividends nearly every quarter; and the CEO takes no salary. The CEO not only takes no salary, but is also the largest single shareholder. The CEO Douglas A. Cohn has sold NONE of his shares even when the price was over $2. Doug will be the greatest beneficiary by getting the stock price back up where it belongs.
________________________________
Other indicators of a looming increase in PPS: There is the 24/7 non-stop bashing efforts on the public message boards. The content of the bashers' posts is only noise and misinformation but the fact that they are afraid to leave HQNT unbashed for even a single day (or a single hour on most days) demonstrates how much the shorts still fear another strong run-up as happened last year. And now they have SNDH to worry about too. If HQNT was as bad off as they try to pretend, they would never expend as much time and energy as they do trying to chase investors away from it.
_________________________________
Regarding Questionable PRs and Financials
PR disclaimers are just that, disclaimers! All PRs include the following disclaimer for a good reason!
"This announcement may contain, in addition to historical information, certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Such statements reflect management's current views and are based on certain assumptions. Actual results could differ materially from the assumptions currently anticipated."
Bashers have tried to make a lot of hay out of some HQNT PRs that in retrospect have been less than accurate, when in fact they are making much to do about nothing. However, I don't believe that Doug lied about anything or knowingly made any misstatements. I believe that the one absolute is that everything Doug does is for the benefit of the stockholders, a fact that I believe will become apparent as events unfold.
I believe that the questionable PRs truthfully reflected management's current views and assumptions at the time the PRs were written. I'm convinced that Management's views and certain assumptions, that were believed to be true when the PRs were released, changed after the PR was released. I believe that it was subsequent to the release of the questionable PRs, and in the course of conducting normal legitimate business, that Management decisions were made for the good of the shareholder and the Company that caused the problem with the PR's. Some of these decisions retroactively altered the accuracy of the already released PR's. It is only in hind sight that it became apparent that some PRs misstated the situation.
Business is a fluid thing, sometimes changing minute to minute. I'm sure that Doug believed that every thing he said was true when he said it. I also believe that the welfare of the Company made it necessary for Management to make decisions which created results that differed materially from the assumptions that were anticipated when the PRs were released.
This is why there is a disclaimer on all PRs. It is to protect the Company and the shareholder. The declaimer protects the Company from legal action when honest misstatements are made in PRs and it protects the shareholder by letting the shareholder know that the information contained in the PR isn't chiseled in stone.
I see no credible indication of deception or pattern of criminality here. What I see is Management conducting normal business.
_____________________________________
Anyone can view fully audited reports for 1999 thru 2002 by visiting the Investor Relation section on the HQNT Company website. We all hope to see all overdue profitable financials in the near future.
___________________________________
I think that the HQNT/SNDH shorts have a big Margin Call in there near future.
___________________________________
LINKS:
Link to HQNT: http://www.hquotient.com/
Link to SNDH: http://www.standardholdingsgroup.com/default.html
Link to Web Pack International: http://www.web-pack.com/
Links for Information on short selling and naked short selling:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=3319
http://www.suite101.com/discussion.cfm/investing/106539/14-23
Links to Earnings:
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2004_Oct_18/ai_n6239660
_______________________________________
H-Quotient Announces Software Subsidiary and Management
Wednesday, June 08, 2005 08:58 ET
VIENNA, VA, Jun 08, 2005 (MARKET WIRE via COMTEX) --H-Quotient, Inc. (OTC: HQNT) announced that it is creating a subsidiary that will include all of the Company's software products: PhysicianQuotient, DentalQuotient and LabQuotient. The CEO of the new company will be Marc H. Nathan, and its offices will be in Houston, Texas.
These structural and management changes are expected to provide an important focus on the software products and the necessary energy to drive that business to the next level.
Thomas Hewitt will continue as Chief of Technology for the new company from his offices in Charlotte, N.C. He has a degree in computer science and 22 years experience in technology systems that include the development of advanced medical software systems, an automated securities system, and a fixed income securities trading system. He also serves as a vice president and the derivative trading system architect at a major bank.
Mr. Nathan is the CEO of a private equity investment firm, Bulldog Financial, Inc., a director of US HeartScan, Inc., and a consultant to other public and private technology companies. He was a judge at the 2005 Rice University Business Plan Competition, a speaker at the Software Technology Conference SXSW Interactive, and a contributing columnist to O'Reilly's MAKE Magazine. Nathan is a member of Rice University Technology and Entrepreneurs Alliance, Houston Angel Network, Houston Technology Center, Texchange, and Houston Inventors Association. He is a graduate of the University of Texas.
This announcement may contain, in addition to historical information, certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Such statements reflect management's current views and are based on certain assumptions. Actual results could differ materially from the assumptions currently anticipated.
For more information visit the H-Quotient Web site at www.hquotient.com.
Contact:
H-Quotient, Inc.
Ashley Bell
703-752-0690
Marc Nathan
713-960-9900
SOURCE: H-Quotient, Inc.
Copyright 2005 Market Wire, All rights reserved.
______________________________________
Earnings Business Wire, Oct 18, 2004
VIENNA, Va. -- H-Quotient, Inc., (HQNT) previously announced preliminary unaudited earnings and sales for the year ending December 31, 2003. The Company's acquisition of Stewart & Shaw, which began in 2003 and was finalized on May 4, delayed the completion of audited and subsequent earnings releases. The accounting issues relating to the acquisition of this Canadian medical manufacturing business are now resolved.
Preliminary unaudited revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003, increased to $3,016,361 compared to $2,677,315 for the year ended December 31, 2002. Including other income, revenues for the 12 month period increased to $4,104,565 compared to $2,396,253 for the 12 months ended December 31, 2002. Operating expenses for the 12 month period, decreased to $476,085 compared to $1,131,326 for the 12 months ended December 31, 2002. Net income was $3,628,480 or $.13 per share for the 12 month period ending December 31, 2003, compared to $1,264,927 or $.04 for the same period in 2002.
http://www.findarticles.com/p/search?qt=hqnt&tb=art&qf=free
Sonyboy~~You sure waste a lot of space trying to run Doug down.
Sonyboy~~You should drop Rao of your litany of evidence that demonstrates that Doug is “untrustworthy" because it doesn't demonstrate untrustworthiness on Doug's part at all, nor was the verdict muddled anywhere except in your own mind.
bartermania~~This is great information. Thanks!
ramjet~~Great post. Good for you! eom
Regarding Aug 23, 2005 Press Release:
The most recent SNDH press release is very significant.
The three keys to understanding this significance are:
"The amount of revenue will depend upon the success of the system..."
"Austrian customer has just tripled its trading level..."
"The customer is now trading $1.4 million with the software..."
"...the contract entitles Standard Holdings to a percentage of trading profits."
SNDH will be paid a percentage of the profits. It can easily be seen how this translates into a significant increasing annual earnings.
It will be interesting to see the first Quarter's results.
Sonyboy~~How do we know that you are an American citizen or that you are trustworthy?
How do we know why Anderson said what he said about Doug?
Why should Doug prove anything to you? Who gave you summary authority in Doug's life?
I feel sorry for you if this is as good as you can do in speaking the truth. Your spin could be frustrating your attempts to tell the truth.
I believe that Doug is more trustworthy that you.
Sonyboy~~You are confused and wrong as well. Doug wins and Rao loses. Now isn't that simple.