Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Wouldn't help having the email. Unless things have changed, the TA is gagged from releasing any information. It had been like that since the last reverse split (prior to that split you could get updates).
How does L2 look?
Maybe we can get the same volume as UNGS today?
(Never thought I would say that again lol)
Just noticed the huge volume and pps increase. Nice to see!
Bid is quite lower than the last trade. And the ask is way higher.
Seems like a bunch of asks got pulled?
Like I said, it can (not always) take the TA a day or so to update their records. I said nothing about reporting to the OTC markets. Calling the TA would not disprove my thesis, as this was told directly to me by a TA.
Enjoy your anniversary.
I would wait until tomorrow or Friday before assessing if there was an increase in the OS or not (IMHO). I have been told personally by a TA before that it can take a day or two to update. Hopefully the OS does remain the same.
You have repeated this falsehood before. When shares are added to the market, they show up in the OS (could be a day or two delay). The change in the OS does not wait until 'they' are finished selling. If a debt is partially/fully converted into shares to hit the market, then the OS increases at that time.
It's possible Wayne is selling his shares, that does not mean the company is selling shares, and that does not mean dilution is happening (as you claim).
If the company only sells shares as you claim, then why hasn't he OS changed?
Nice buys today.
We need to get the base back in the 0.20-0.30 range.
I only know of one other broker, Questrade in Canada that still has their shareholders' shares as restricted. And by shareholders, I mean shareholder, and by shareholder, I mean me lol
Somebody has had enough and wants out now. At least, hopefully this is just one disgruntled shareholder.
Yes, that is if you paid 0.0001 for you UNGS shares. I would guess that a fair amount of GCAN dividends were acquired from shares of UNGS at 0.0001. However, for people that were with UNGS for more than a couple of years, they would have been in at higher prices (similar to the prices now I believe). So some people definitely had bought at higher levels, and maybe again at 0.0001.
I think I bought at 0.0003 and then doubled up at 0.0001.
The last UNGS split was 1 for 4000. That's where you are remembering that number from.
The GCAN dividends were 1 for every 500 shares of UNGS.
So, each GCAN dividend cost an UNGS shareholder 5 cents.
Yes please, post the response.
However, you are skipping over the fact that it never closed above 0.01 (let alone have the required closing bid above 0.01) in the 30+ days between May 20 and June 28. They did not keep the requirements to maintain status. The facts are clear about the trading history, and the requirements not being met. The only thing unclear is if the company has been officially notified, and if the public will be notified.
Are you 100 % certain a notification would be filed? I understand a de-listing would be filed. But is not possible that a warning would only be sent to the company, and not be public information?
Can you agree that regardless of whether a warning has been sent, that ABCE has not maintained the requirements, and thus SHOULD be in the 90 day period right now?
How do you know the company has not been warned or notified?
From May 20 until at least June 28, the closing price (let alone the closing bid) was below $0.01. I think it actually extends up until today that a closing bid has not been at least $0.01, but either way, there are at least 30 calendar days where ABCE did not meet the closing bid price in order to MAINTAIN OCTQB status.
Thus ABCE is in the 90 day grace period now, and must have a closing bid price of at least $0.01 for 10 consecutive trading days to keep its status.
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/abco-energy-inc-ABCE/historical/more-historical-data
Agreed, but ABCE didn't maintain that, so now it is in the following situation:
Quote:
Bid Price. Maintain proprietary priced quotations published by a Market Maker in OTC Link with
a minimum closing bid price of $0.01 per share on at least one of the prior thirty consecutive
calendar days;
So otcmarkets states it needs to have a minimum closing bid price of $0.01. It is very clear that it is the closing bid, not any price intraday.
It clearly says as of the close. So does my other link directly from otcmarkets. Please read the following document carefully:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/files/otcqb_standards.pdf
You are seriously arguing that a document straight from otcmarkets that outlines the OTCQB listing requirements is incorrect? Please explain, and provide whatever proof you have. I have provided proof directly from otcmarkets.
Why have there been so many small trades (20 - 300 shares, or $5-$60) in the last few weeks?
All shareholders should know that this is in fact the correct information, as proven by the otcmarkets link in my previous post.
Sorry, but your information isn't quite correct:
The bid didn't close over a penny, so my understanding is that the clock has not started over.
You actually think they are one of the most honest companies? They repeatedly told shareholders that they were not going to do a reverse split, and then all of a sudden, you guessed it, a reverse split. This happened twice, so I disagree that the company is one of the most honest ones.
I agree, that is good. I just think the original date should have been referenced, so that nobody is duped into thinking it is a new project.
I can understand what you are saying, but I still slightly disagree. IMO, the new advertising Co should mention that the project is from June and say it is a reminder of recent business done.
The following response however from somebody who knows the project has already been announced is misleading:
I don't see why the new advertising Co would need to post something that happened a month ago. The reaction on IHUB was as if it was a new contract (which is why I posted the first release of this project), which it is not. It is very misleading for this PR to be duplicated (and don't worry, I'm not saying you posting the 'news' is misleading)
Why are they putting out the exact same news release as on June 11?
Tight spread now too lol
There are only a handful of people trading this right now. Most shareholders I suppose are just waiting
Bid support just disappeared
Will be nice when we are able to see renewed interest here, especially when the interest remains for a while.
Seems like no reaction to this news?
When the CEO had an interview on Cheddar, didn't people say that it wasn't a reputable site? How about this interview:
https://cheddar.com/media/bruce-linton-on-this-works-acquisition-and-acreage-holdings-deal
The CEO of Canopy growth was recently featured on Cheddar. You know, Canopy Growth, the largest MJ company in Canada.
200 shares cleared the ask of 0.24? lol
5 calendar days for 10Q
I owned UNGS for a year or two before the GCAN dividend was announced.
However, it did take a year after the stock dividend date for my shares to appear in my account. Maybe that is the difference.
Thanks.
What do you make of the letter stating that Questrade only has 477 shares, whereas my account at Questrade states I have 4940 of restricted GCAN shares?