The 6 years I mention was related to Patent law, not Judge Casper previous ruling. I've always assumed that her decision would be appeal and fought vigorously as it a noose around WDDD ability to consult settlement talks with any organization.
Basically the patent covers online communication through 3-d avatars. My approach to identifying targets was two folds: "fighting/shooting" and sports games. Sorry I can not provide you a comprehensive list but my target list include for consoles:
Mircosoft studios (halo) Sony online entertainment (Socom), EA (Battlefield, medal of honor, Fifa, Nhl, Sims, Madden), Take Two ( Grand Theft Auto 5, NBA2K), Ubisoft (Assassin Creed)
PC games: DOTA 2, Starcraft 2 and League of Legends.
Of course the console manufactures Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo , as they get a piece of the revenue from the sale of the games and they provide server support. If they really want to push it, they can go after Steam as well.
Certainly there are other offenders and some of the targets on my list might not be pursed for some reason or another. Worlds patent is at the core of modern gaming. There are a lot of people with deep pockets that does not want this company to succeed. Keep in mind WDDD would only be eligible for US revenue so worldwide sales does not mean anything.