Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You were talking about it yourself here, answers to both questions, June 8th. :). People were commenting on the mailer before that.
When did the mailer first start? When did Kathy Ireland already address it?
Someone asked Charles Constantinau yesterday,
@JohnDee78791547: @ShaleIntel Are you still loading up on Fannie and Freddie?
@ShaleIntel: @JohnDee78791547 yes, nice day today for us
old news, and the author says at the bottom
"You have been warned.
Disclosure: I am/we are short NUGN.
I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions."
@ShaleIntel: $FNMA on the up, again. Lots of support out there. $FMCC
@TreyGarrisonHW: So if you're a fan of late-night news, or a fan of me (and I know I am), I'm likely going to be on Inside Story w/Ray Suarez show tonight.
Good point!
"Materials produced in discovery in this case and included in the attached appendix undermine, and in some instances completely dis- credit, important components of the central narrative on which the Government’s defense in the D.C. Circuit action was based, and Plaintiffs should be accorded the opportunity to fully apprise the D.C. Circuit of that reality while briefing is still ongoing.
Plaintiffs will not recount here the relevance of every item in the appendix to the issues in dispute in the D.C. Circuit action, but the deposition transcript of former Fannie Mae CFO Susan McFarland is illustrative. As we explained in our motion to de-designate the transcripts of the depositions of Edward DeMarco and Mario Ugoletti, a key point of dispute in the D.C. Circuit action is what the government knew about the potential for Fannie and Freddie to reverse their deferred tax assets valuation allowances at the time of the Net Worth Sweep. See Depositions Motion 12. We further explained that Mr. Ugoletti’s deposition testimony revealed that he had no basis for stating in a declaration submitted to the D.D.C. that “neither the Conservator nor Treasury envisioned at the time of the Third Amendment that Fannie Mae’s valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets would be reversed in early 2013, resulting in a sudden and substantial increase in Fannie Mae’s net worth . . . .” Id. at 11 (quoting Declaration of Mario Ugoletti ¶ 20, Perry Capital LLC v. Lew, No. 13-1025 (D.D.C. Dec. 17, 2013), ECF No. 24-2).
3
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218 Filed 08/03/15 Page 4 of 7
Ms. McFarland’s testimony further undermines Mr. Ugoletti’s declaration. During her July 15 deposition, Ms. McFarland testified that
?????????????In short, Ms. McFarland’s testimony further demonstrates that information the govern- ment submitted to the D.D.C. is, at best, incomplete and misleading, if not outright false. To “protect the integrity of the judicial process,” Plaintiffs should be able to alert the D.C. Circuit to that fact. See New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742, 749 (2001). "
The company will hold a conference call at 9:00 a.m. Eastern time (ET) on Tuesday, August 4, 2015, to discuss the company's results with the media. The conference call will be concurrently webcast.
To access the live audio webcast, use the following link http://www.visualwebcaster.com/event.asp?id=102689. The replay will be available on the company's website at www.FreddieMac.com/investors.
and the amicus briefs
YW! Legal teams hard at work! No summer recess for them! :)
Yes, time to win! We haven't even seen the "protected" info, yet it sounds terrible. Why does the gov not fold?
Redacted Version
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
FAIRHOLME FUNDS, INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, )
v.
) No. 13-465C
) (Judge Sweeney) )
THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. )
PLAINTIFFS’ PUBLIC, REDACTED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MATERIALS DESIGNATED AS “PROTECTED INFORMATION” UNDER SEAL
Plaintiffs Fairholme Funds, Inc., et al. (“Plaintiffs”) respectfully move, pursuant to Para- graph 18 of the Protective Order (“P.O.”) entered in this action (Doc. 73), for entry of an order (1) authorizing them to file under seal in the D.C. Circuit certain materials disclosed through dis- covery in this case and identified in this motion, (2) granting them general authority to file pro- tected information under seal in the D.C. Circuit, and (3) authorizing them to file protected infor- mation disclosed in this case under seal in Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. Federal Housing Finance Agency, No. 13-1053 (D.D.C.).
1. The specific materials Plaintiffs seek authorization to file under seal in Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. The Federal Housing Finance Agency, No. 14-5254 (D.C. Cir.),1 appear in this motion’s appendix. The Court has already granted similar relief with respect to two deposition
1 The D.C. Circuit has consolidated the Fairholme appeal with the appeals of other cases challenging the Net Worth Sweep also pending before that court. See Order, Perry Capital LLC v. Lew, No. 14-5243 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 27, 2014), ECF No. 1519092. The Fairholme plaintiffs (con- sisting of Plaintiffs in this action, minus Continental Western Insurance Company) have been di- rected to file consolidated briefs with certain plaintiffs from the other appeals. See Order, Perry Capital LLC v. Lew, No. 14-5243 (D.C. Cir. May 6, 2015), ECF No. 1551023.
??
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218 Filed 08/03/15 Page 2 of 7
transcripts and a number of documents, see Order (July 7, 2015), Doc. 186 (“July 7 Order”); Or- der (July 9, 2015), Doc. 194 (“July 9 Order”), and it should take the same approach with respect to the highly-relevant materials at issue here.
The producing parties have designated all of the materials in the appendix for withhold- ing from public disclosure under the Protective Order, but Plaintiffs do not believe that any of those materials satisfy the Protective Order’s definition of “Protected Information.” See P.O.
¶ 2; see Plaintiffs’ Sealed Motion to Remove the “Protected Information” Designations from the Depositions of Edward DeMarco and Mario Ugoletti at 4–10 (June 12, 2015), Doc. 162 (“Depo- sitions Motion”) (discussing standard for proper designation of materials as “Protected Infor- mation”). Plaintiffs therefore intend soon to initiate the process, under Paragraph 17 of the Pro- tective Order, for removing the Protected Information designations for the appendix materials. Given the procedures governing such Paragraph 17 requests, as well as the current schedule for the briefing of several pending motions seeking such “de-designation” relief, it is likely that that process will consume a considerable amount of time.
Wholly apart from such de-designation requests under Paragraph 17 of the Protective Or- der, Paragraph 18 of the Order provides a mechanism to allow relevant information produced in this action to be brought to the attention of other courts reviewing issues relating to the Net Worth Sweep, as reflected in this Court’s recent orders. This makes perfect sense, since the pur- pose of the Protective Order is to shield sensitive information from public disclosure, not to con- ceal relevant facts from another court.
Moreover, requiring Plaintiffs to await the outcome of any dispute over the “Protected Information” status of the materials in the appendix would cause Plaintiffs to suffer severe preju-
2
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218 Filed 08/03/15 Page 3 of 7
dice. As this Court recently observed when it authorized Plaintiffs to file other discovery materi- als with the D.C. Circuit, “pressing briefing deadlines in [Plaintiffs’] pending appellate case” jus- tify the limited relief Plaintiffs seek here. July 7 Order; July 9 Order. Specifically, Plaintiffs have already filed their opening brief in the D.C. Circuit, with the Defendants’ briefs due on Sep- tember 14 and Plaintiffs’ reply brief due on October 26. See Order, Perry Capital LLC v. Lew, No. 14-5243 (D.C. Cir. July 7, 2015), ECF No. 1561238. Materials produced in discovery in this case and included in the attached appendix undermine, and in some instances completely dis- credit, important components of the central narrative on which the Government’s defense in the D.C. Circuit action was based, and Plaintiffs should be accorded the opportunity to fully apprise the D.C. Circuit of that reality while briefing is still ongoing.
Plaintiffs will not recount here the relevance of every item in the appendix to the issues in dispute in the D.C. Circuit action, but the deposition transcript of former Fannie Mae CFO Susan McFarland is illustrative. As we explained in our motion to de-designate the transcripts of the depositions of Edward DeMarco and Mario Ugoletti, a key point of dispute in the D.C. Circuit action is what the government knew about the potential for Fannie and Freddie to reverse their deferred tax assets valuation allowances at the time of the Net Worth Sweep. See Depositions Motion 12. We further explained that Mr. Ugoletti’s deposition testimony revealed that he had no basis for stating in a declaration submitted to the D.D.C. that “neither the Conservator nor Treasury envisioned at the time of the Third Amendment that Fannie Mae’s valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets would be reversed in early 2013, resulting in a sudden and substantial increase in Fannie Mae’s net worth . . . .” Id. at 11 (quoting Declaration of Mario Ugoletti ¶ 20, Perry Capital LLC v. Lew, No. 13-1025 (D.D.C. Dec. 17, 2013), ECF No. 24-2).
3
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218 Filed 08/03/15 Page 4 of 7
Ms. McFarland’s testimony further undermines Mr. Ugoletti’s declaration. During her July 15 deposition, Ms. McFarland testified that
?????????????In short, Ms. McFarland’s testimony further demonstrates that information the govern- ment submitted to the D.D.C. is, at best, incomplete and misleading, if not outright false. To “protect the integrity of the judicial process,” Plaintiffs should be able to alert the D.C. Circuit to that fact. See New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742, 749 (2001).
2. Plaintiffs have sought to identify in the appendix all remaining discovery materi- als that they may seek to file with the D.C. Circuit. But Plaintiffs’ review of the discovery mate- rials is ongoing, and Plaintiffs may identify additional such materials that they will seek to file with the D.C. Circuit in the coming weeks. Because filing these materials in the D.C. Circuit is appropriate irrespective of whether they have been properly withheld from the public, Plaintiffs
4
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218 Filed 08/03/15 Page 5 of 7
request that the Court issue an order authorizing them to file under seal in the D.C. Circuit any and all materials produced in discovery in this action. Such an order would conserve the re- sources of both the Court and the parties without risking public disclosure of any Protected Infor- mation.
3. Finally, Plaintiffs seek an order authorizing them to file under seal in Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. Federal Housing Finance Agency, No. 13-1053 (D.D.C.), any and all materials that this Court at any time authorizes them to file in the appeal of that action in the D.C. Circuit. Plaintiffs plan to file discovery materials they have been authorized to file under seal with the D.C. Circuit in short order. Plaintiffs may also seek to file the same materials with the district court in connection with a motion for relief from judgment on the basis of newly discovered evi- dence. See FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(2), 62.1. Plaintiffs should be authorized to file information un- der seal in the D.D.C. for the same reasons, and to the same extent, as they are authorized to file that same information under seal on appeal of the D.D.C.’s decision in the D.C. Circuit.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court enter an order (1) authorizing them to file under seal in the D.C. Circuit certain materials disclosed through discov- ery in this case and identified in this motion, (2) granting them general authority to file protected information under seal in the D.C. Circuit, and (3) authorizing them to file protected information disclosed in this case under seal in Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. Federal Housing Finance Agency, No. 13-1053 (D.D.C.).
?5
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS
Document 218 Filed 08/03/15 Page 6 of 7
Date: July 20, 2015
Of counsel:
Vincent J. Colatriano
David H. Thompson
Peter A. Patterson
Brian W. Barnes
COOPER & KIRK, PLLC
1523 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036
(202) 220-9600
(202) 220-9601 (fax)
Respectfully submitted,
s/ Charles J. Cooper
Charles J. Cooper
Counsel of Record
COOPER & KIRK, PLLC
1523 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036
(202) 220-9600
(202) 220-9601 (fax) ccooper@cooperkirk.com
?6
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218 Filed 08/03/15 Page 7 of 7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing was filed under seal via the Court’s Electronic Case Filing system on this 20th day of July, 2015, and served upon counsel listed below by electronic mail:
?Elizabeth M. Hosford Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice Post Office Box 480
Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 Elizabeth.Hosford@usdoj.gov
Barrie Prinz
Associate General Counsel Deloitte LLP
555 12th St. N.W.
Suite 400
Washington, D.C. 20004 bprinz@deloitte.com
Richard B. Harper
Counsel for Grant Thornton LLP Baker Botts, LLP
30 Rockefeller Plz.,
New York, NY 10112 richard.harper@bakerbotts.com
Laura Schwalbe
Counsel for PwC
WilmerHale
1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 laura.schwalbe@wilmerhale.com
Michael Ciatti
Counsel for Freddie Mac
King & Spalding LLP
1700 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 200
Washington, D.C. 20006 mciatti@kslaw.com
D. Zachary Hudson
Counsel for Fannie Mae Bancroft PLLC
500 New Jersey Avenue, N.W. 7th Floor
Washington, D.C. 20001 zhudson@bancroftpllc.com
s/ Charles J. Cooper Charles J. Cooper
?7
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-1 Filed 08/03/15 Page 1 of 16
APPENDIX Volume 1
Redacted Version
Exhibit 1:
Exhibit 2: Exhibit 3: Exhibit 4:
Exhibit 5: Exhibit 6: Exhibit 7:
Exhibit 8: Exhibit 9: Exhibit 10: Exhibit 11: Exhibit 12:
Exhibit 13: Exhibit 14:
APPENDIX VOLUME 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
FHFA00013354 (August 17, 2012 Emails between Mario Ugoletti,
Edward DeMarco, and Amy Lakroune)............................................................A001
GT005306 (June 27, 2012 Handwritten Notes) ................................................A005 FHFA00025815 (January 4, 2012 Agenda for Discussion with FHFA) ..........A009
FHFA00031708 (August 8, 2012 Email from Mario Ugoletti to
Edward DeMarco).............................................................................................A012
FHFA00060194 (July 19, 2012 Fannie Mae Strategic Planning Session Presentation) .....................................................................................................A014
PWC-FM 00147059 (June 30, 2012 Memo from Gregory Metz et al. to PricewaterhouseCoopers re 2Q 2012 Valuation Allowance Assessment) .......A064
PWC-FM 00010788 (November 13, 2009 Memo from Timothy Kviz re
Value of Senior Preferred Stock Issued to Treasury and Value of the
Commitment Set Forth in the Purchase Agreement) ........................................A071
UST00002404 (August 7, 2012 Freddie Mac Second Quarter 2012 Financial Results Supplement) .........................................................................................A075
UST00380783 (February 14, 2012 Millstein & Co. Housing Finance Reform Presentation) .....................................................................................................A109
UST00393810 (August 15, 2012 Briefing Memorandum for Secretary
Geithner) ...........................................................................................................A178
UST00517664 (August 17, 2012 Emails from Jim Parrott and Mary
Goodman) .........................................................................................................A184
UST00406876 (July 19, 2012 Emails from Alan Goldblatt and Adam
Chepenik) ..........................................................................................................A187
UST00480703 (February 6, 2012 Housing Finance Reform Proposal)............A189
UST00503991 (August 17, 2012 Emails from Timothy Bowler, Jim Parrott,
and Chris Russell).............................................................................................A205
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-1 Filed 08/03/15 Page 2 of 16
?
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-1 Filed 08/03/15 Page 3 of 16
EXHIBIT 1 REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-1 Filed 08/03/15 Page 4 of 16
EXHIBIT 2 REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-1 Filed 08/03/15 Page 5 of 16
EXHIBIT 3 REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-1 Filed 08/03/15 Page 6 of 16
EXHIBIT 4 REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-1 Filed 08/03/15 Page 7 of 16
EXHIBIT 5 REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-1 Filed 08/03/15 Page 8 of 16
EXHIBIT 6 REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-1 Filed 08/03/15 Page 9 of 16
EXHIBIT 7 REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-1 Filed 08/03/15 Page 10 of 16
EXHIBIT 8 REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-1 Filed 08/03/15 Page 11 of 16
EXHIBIT 9 REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-1 Filed 08/03/15 Page 12 of 16
EXHIBIT 10 REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-1 Filed 08/03/15 Page 13 of 16
EXHIBIT 11 REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-1 Filed 08/03/15 Page 14 of 16
EXHIBIT 12 REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-1 Filed 08/03/15 Page 15 of 16
EXHIBIT 13 REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-1 Filed 08/03/15 Page 16 of 16
EXHIBIT 14 REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 1 of 13
APPENDIX Volume 2
Redacted Version
Exhibit 15: Exhibit 16: Exhibit 17: Exhibit 18: Exhibit 19: Exhibit 20:
Exhibit 21: Exhibit 22: Exhibit 23: Exhibit 24: Exhibit 25:
APPENDIX VOLUME 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
UST00503874 (August 10, 2012 Emails from Autumn Lynch
and Timothy Bowler)........................................................................................A209
UST00504519 (July 24, 2012 Email from Timothy Bowler and attached
Bank of America Analysis)...............................................................................A212
UST00504469 (August 9, 2012 Emails from Timothy Bowler, Matthew Anderson, and Daniel Indiviglio) .....................................................................A221
UST00508175 (January 6, 2012 Briefing Memorandum for Secretary
Geithner) ...........................................................................................................A226
UST00517850 (August 8, 2012 Emails from Jim Parrott, Matthew
Anderson, and Zachary Goldfarb) ....................................................................A237
UST00522259 (May 31, 2012 Briefing Memorandum for Secretary
Geithner) ...........................................................................................................A239
Transcript of the Deposition of Timothy Bowler, July 1, 2015........................A246 Transcript of the Deposition of Anne Eberhardt, July 8, 2015.........................A373 Transcript of the Deposition of Ross Kari, July 10, 2015 ................................A479 Transcript of the Deposition of Susan McFarland, July 15, 2015 ....................A572 Transcript pf the Deposition of Jeff Foster, July 14, 2015 ...............................A684
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 2 of 13
?
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 3 of 13
EXHIBIT 1 REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 4 of 13
EXHIBIT REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 5 of 13
EXHIBIT REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 6 of 13
EXHIBIT REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 7 of 13
EXHIBIT REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 8 of 13
EXHIBIT REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 9 of 13
EXHIBIT REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 10 of 13
EXHIBIT REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 11 of 13
EXHIBIT REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 12 of 13
EXHIBIT REDACTED
Case 1:13-cv-00465-MMS Document 218-2 Filed 08/03/15 Page 13 of 13
EXHIBIT REDACTED
Preferred were double what they are now before Lamberth ruling. They're both just catching up, IMHO.
due 8/3
MOTION to Remove the "Protected Information" Designation from Certain Unredacted Information in Documents Produced by Freddie Mac (Public, Redacted Version) re 171 MOTION to Remove the "Protected Information" Designation from Certain Unredacted Information in Documents Produced by Freddie Mac , filed by All Plaintiffs.Response due by 8/3/2015.(Cooper, Charles) (Entered: 07/15/2015)
due 8/10
ORDER: Defendant's response to The New York Times Company's Motion to Intervene due by 8/10/15. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (ta) Copy to parties. (Entered: 07/15/2015)
8/13 status conference, closed to public
Congress starts their month long August recess, due back September 8th, so Watt should go ahead and just release Fannie, Freddie, stop wasting our time.
The date itself seemed pretty early. I was expecting the second week. The conference call should be interesting, probably covering areas of progress, like this person tweeted.
Charles Constantinou ?@ShaleIntel Jul 31
Freddie Mac $FMCC announced it sold via auction 3.6 deeply delinquent non-performing loans from its #mortgage #investment portfolio. #Smart
Freddie Mac Sets Release Date for Second Quarter 2015 Financial Results
MCLEAN, VA--(Marketwired - Jul 30, 2015) - Freddie Mac (OTCQB: FMCC) announced today that it plans to report its second quarter 2015 financial results before the U.S. financial markets open on Tuesday, August 4, 2015.
The company will hold a conference call at 9:00 a.m. Eastern time (ET) on Tuesday, August 4, 2015, to discuss the company's results with the media. The conference call will be concurrently webcast.
To access the live audio webcast, use the following link http://www.visualwebcaster.com/event.asp?id=102689. The replay will be available on the company's website at www.FreddieMac.com/investors.
All materials related to the call will be available on the Investor Relations page of the company's website at www.FreddieMac.com/investors.
Freddie Mac was established by Congress in 1970 to provide liquidity, stability and affordability to the nation's residential mortgage markets. Freddie Mac supports communities across the nation by providing mortgage capital to lenders. Today Freddie Mac is making home possible for approximately one in four home borrowers and is one of the largest sources of financing for multifamily housing. Additional information is available at FreddieMac.com, Twitter @FreddieMac and Freddie Mac's blog FreddieMac.com/blog.
I'm sure the media will be covering this one. It will be interesting to see how the president responds. Tomorrow is his bday They could have a Free Fannie party theme, Free Fannie party hats. :)
LOL, honest trying to sell old news as new?
Bostonsesco, I believe this was the latest extension as far as discovery,"ORDER granting 188 motion for extension of time to complete discovery. All jurisdictional discovery to be completed by 9/4/15; status report due 9/18/15. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (ta) Copy to parties. (Entered: 07/09/2015)"
8/10 defendants' response about protected info, 8/13 status conference
Charles Constantinau tweet
"Freddie Mac $FMCC announced it sold via auction 3.6 deeply delinquent non-performing loans from its #mortgage #investment portfolio. #Smart"
Sweeney gave them leave to file in the Circuit and district, so I assume so. I wonder if that case would have turned out differently had Wilkins stayed in as judge and not replaced by Lamberth?
I believe that was just Fairholme filing the docs in the court of appeals, since Sweeney just granted them the leave to do so. I thought the judicial notice part was interesting though.
BULLET: US MBS: ''During the week of August 17, 2015, the.....
BY Market News International
— 10:23 AM ET 07/31/2015
US MBS: "During the week of August 17, 2015, the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York (New York Fed) Open Market Trading Desk will begin a process to streamline
the administration of the agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) held in the
System Open Market Account (SOMA) by consolidating some of these securities
through a service offered by Fannie Mae (
D. C. Circuit filing
07/29/2015 UMDER SEAL MOTION filed [1565601] by Fairholme Fund and Fairholme Funds, Inc for judicial notice and attached UNDER SEAL SUPPLEMENT to the motion. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 08/13/2015) [Service Date: 07/29/2015 by US Mail] Pages: 16-20. [14-5254]
Doesn't it seem like a big deal for a judge to grant these plaintiffs leave to file this protected information in other courts? district and circuit? etc
Who decides where that money goes now?
It's just their regular council meeting, but it always bugs me that they are all in the same room. They could get it done!!! Who pays these people? Oh ya, it's us, the taxpayer. :)
It would be great, if they did it while congress was out for their August recess. :)
mainly Sifi status, Frank/Dodd stuff
regulation :)
Yes crazy money! Big money doesn't like gov shenanigans, 7 year conservatorship. :( Get rid of that, we're gold!
That would be nice! Johnson said if congress can't come to an agreement, Watt and Lew need to get together about release. They've gotten together for multiple FSOC meetings since Johnson said that in November. Let's go!!! Let us go!!! :)
FSOC meeting tomorrow. I have a few Fannie, Freddie questions for them, while they are all in the same room. Maybe Fairholme's list of questions? Oh wait, this one is closed to press. :)
The Council is made up of ten voting members and five nonvoting members.
The voting members are:
the Secretary of the Treasury, who serves as the Chairperson of the Council;
the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System;
the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC);
the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB);
the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC);
the Chairperson of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC);
the Chairperson of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC);
the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA);
the Chairman of the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA); and
an independent member with insurance expertise who is appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for a six-year term.
The nonvoting members, who serve in an advisory capacity, are:
the Director of the Office of Financial Research;
the Director of the Federal Insurance Office;
a state insurance commissioner designated by the state insurance commissioners;
a state banking supervisor designated by the state banking supervisors; and
a state securities commissioner(or officer performing like functions) designated by the state securities commissioners.
The state insurance commissioner, state banking supervisor, and state securities commissioner serve two-year terms.
It's still "protected" information, only those given access can view them.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 13-465C (Filed: July 21, 2015)
************************************* FAIRHOLME FUNDS, INC. et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * *************************************
ORDER
On July 20, 2015, plaintiffs in the above-captioned case filed a motion for leave to file certain materials designated as “protected information” under seal with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (“D.C. Circuit”) and the United States District Court of the District of Columbia. The court finds no need to await a response from defendant to plaintiffs’ motion. Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED.
Plaintiffs are (1) authorized to file under seal in the D.C. Circuit certain protected materials contained in the appendix attached to their motion, which were disclosed to plaintiffs through discovery in this case; (2) granted the general authority to file the protected information disclosed in this case under seal in the D.C. Circuit, and (3) authorized to file under seal in Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. Federal Housing Finance Agency, No. 13-1053 (D.D.C.), the protected information disclosed in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Margaret M. Sweeney MARGARET M. SWEENEY Judge
I like having the cc's now though. Maybe Layton will give an update about the derivatives. :)
Everything's crossed! :)
That seems early, thanks TII!