Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What will speed up adoption big time ??
Having one of your competitors WOWing your clients and potential clients with notifiWHATEVER.
Don't let the volume mislead you.
Much if not most of it is MMs trading to each other. This allows them to adjust the price up or down without becoming out of balance long or short.
For instance today the usual effect of a SHAC presentation is to amp up demand. So this AM MMs raised the price and shorted the stock to new enthusiasts. At the end of the day they worked the price down and covered so they would go in to the weekend neutral.
This is a bit simplistic but gives one some clue how the market works and where some of the volume originates.
AMZN and/or MSFT
Choices, choices
Realtors....Probably 20% of realtors are responsible for 90% of the transactions so expect that only they would sign up for notifiRE.
Not all bad though as those people researching properties would likely be wowed by the tech and many would sign up to use in their work or personal endeavors.
NFUSZ technology should spread like wildfire once a critical mass of exposure is reached.
Sent this.........
https://nfusz.com/super/ajax/ajax2.php?mediaid=iWd0dm
To a good friend who has been the leading realtor (sales $$$) in the Napa Valley for several of the past few years.
I'll report back.
Dennis is unfortunately
very difficult to listen to. Rory my advice is to find an alternative person to speak publicly about nFUSZ.
He may be a great VP but is grating to have to listen to.
Regrets
That is the competition??
If so I really like their price points.
Will reveal notifiEVERYTHING as a true NOBRAINER.
Stresses benefits of reducing transactional friction
Great video and sweet spot that nFUSZ is addressing...with limitless applications
Similar 100k bid was posted at 96 cents.
New bid or chasing
Or phony
Of course it is frivolous
It is a printing error that will be corrected
SHAC
No sound
You are the least offensive poster
Probably explains why you were banned.
Inverted world.
Exactly. And those concerned about every PR and penny of valuation from a company with no revenue consider this.....The price was near 10 cents in January
....a thirteen bagger in 4-5 months. I'd say investors see this tech as very promising.
If you bought over the current price and are pissed...you expected to buy the bottom???? Really??
Relax. Let the story unfold. You've found a great product with good management
Did I say relax?
SAGES and CB gazers form a separate thread?
Then I could visit if I misplaced my tarot cards.
And save a lot of time in the process
Well if it gaps up to $55 it won't skip your order. Think buyout.
More likely on buyer excitement ...news contracts etc...MM might ramp up the price rapidly picking up orders previously placed so a gap to say $15 with a move that eventually reached $55 over 10 minutes....You'd have to settle for $40.
My sell order is at $35. Make you feel any better?
Etrade bizzarre behaviour
My thesis is that Etrade itself or a client is very underwater on a short sale and needs cheap shares to cover i.e. 20% over current price would sure be cheap.
For confirmation Etrade has been very big on the bid the past two trading days.
Consider this...a sale order is just a computer entry...hardly consumes more electricity or hogs the hard drive. But Etrade claims that the MM reject the order...get serious....what do they care???
And Etrade uses real humans that they are paying $$$$ to contact you and acquaint you with the error/irrationality of your ways...get really serious.
There are other forces at work here unique to the Etrade position.
Might acquaint the Sheriff with this "unique" situation.
You wouldn't miss the gain
If it opened at $55.....say from a buyout offer.
The previously placed sell orders would be raised to the open price.
Just a point of information.
Redspeed you have a very informed opinion and now that I know what led up to this meeting I am somewhat more optimistic regarding its effect.
And i suffer from no lack of DD...my only inherent shortcoming is that my historical perspective is only three months.
And as we have experienced naked shorting can suck the breath out of enthusiasts on this board that are fuelled mainly by bluster and hope. It will take serious buying pressure to overcome short resolve before revenues of significance are generated.
This opinion is the foundation for my patience and serves me well.
Family funds......
These folks are rich and undoubtedly very conservative and not prone to put much (if any) in a pink sheet stock.
Maybe they will risk a farthing but I wouldn't expect much from this crowd until revenues and uplisting.
Sorry.
Value of nFUSZ
One cannot put a value on this company/tech if Rory decides to hold and fully develop the business.
Think of it this way.....the biggest threat to shareholder value is a premature sale.
Yes of course I'm overlooking an as yet unseen competing technology but first mover advantage/adoption is unlikely to be negated overnight.
So Rory my advice: Stay healthy and ambitious.
And if your shares were lent from margin account and you now place them in a cash account the short seller will be forced to return the shares to the lending brokerage.
Meaning that the short is forced to cover.
Pity.
They will be buying in the open market
If they buy.
Don't assume too much.
Those coveting ORCL PR
Consider this:
The PR when released should have a much more profound effect now at $1 than earlier at $3.
There, the bright side, made your day.
Shell Video.......
Would someone help me find the Shell video
Thanks in advance
Sheriff Joe has plenty of work to do
Told that he is a shareholder....perhaps he is taking stock for services.
Please....No more good news. I can't afford it.
Seriously....Nakeds were still big time underwater so they had to bring it down again.
The rebuttal is revenues/earnings or better yet a buyout at $10. That is my wet dream for trapping the shorts.....basically cutting off their heads. Figuratively of course
Literally and figuratively the post of the day
"My one post here today. Buy more hold long and shut up haha go fusz"
Really?
Looks like normal trading to me with a bias to the upside.
No instant gratification.....must be manipulation.
Doubt that that is the appropriate mantra for successful investing.
Certificates are the absolute surest way to be certain that they are not lent out.
The end.
IRA's aren't marginable and brokerages are not allowed to lend those shares within the account.
Also accounts that allow margin but margin is not being used are treated as if they are non margin (cash) accounts and the stocks cannot be lent...this per TDA
True Rory erred in confusing revenues with earnings but............ consider once FUSZ begins generating serious revenues the profit margin will approximate 85% so the disparity between revenues and earnings will be small.
I agree...he is using earnings and revenues interchangeably
Price/revenue is not price to earnings
Someone should tip him off
Not the WOW type but that Shell video was an epiphany.
If one doesn't "get it" after that video then wait 3 years....notifiEVERYTHING will be everywhere.
Respectfully: NO they didn't
Naked shorting does not depend on borrowing shares...they are created (imaginary) and sold...they are counterfeit.
They legitimate purpose of naked shares is to allow MM to sell shares (that they don't possess) when there is high demand...to allow for an orderly uptick in the market. They then strive to cool the market and cover at a lower price. Everyday stuff.
The problem is when the MM allow the unlimited creation of nakeds to crush the market and thus allow shorts to cover what had been a losing position....which all shorts were in at $3.00.
The cascade of fearful selling (something must be wrong with the company) leads us to where we are today before cooler heads prevail. Also shorts must start to cover their positions to book profit which eventually prevents further price erosion.
"sorry for those that sold"
Don't feel that way but understand how the mind works and how the pressure of the next 5 minutes can make one do what in retrospect seems foolish.
Those of you that sold in the past 3 days have a weekend to reconsider and reevaluate your DD. Some, me included, feel that nFUSZ has never been better positioned for success...
Which brings me to ask those who have sold to consider redeploying their funds back into FUSZ at this now more favourable price.
There are few feelings worse than watching a stock take off after you have exited precipitously, crushed by the pain of the sell off...which in this case was not from any business negatives.
Sadly this is what unchecked criminal enterprises do to investors on a daily basis. Fortunately in this situation we have a great product and a quality experienced CEO and financial needs less than the usual start-up company. So if you have been able to hang on through this assault then financially you should be OK.
However this outrageous and sinister behaviour can lead to bankruptcy, divorce and depression and/or the unplanned prolongation of working years.
Needless suffering.
Hell please exist for this crowd.
The greatest way to inflict pain on shorts, naked or legal, is to sell the company and force short coverage. Fortunately nFUSZ has a real product which will generate good revenue and will not be shorted to zero.
Shorts picked a bad one to attack and Rory is going to make them earn their stripes.
I suggest that you would benefit from a more informed opinion re share count and dilution. No matter how you slice it there is no further dilution and the total share count after all conversions is less than 160m.
Take it to the bank.
Unlikely that Marketo will be a buyer
Here is why:
Believing ALL (sure) that I read here....Marketo has a market cap of less than $2B. If nFUSZ is to be bought out at a paltry $10/share....that's $1.6B. So not likely that they could swing it and taking stock in lieu of $$$ is a non starter.
Rory et al would be far better off to develop the business and sell later at $50. No NEED to sell now...the fun is just beginning.
OT: Whoever made a comment with whomever as the subject might consider reviewing some grammar rules, or better yet, just stick to stock related soothsaying.
Convert your account to a non margin account. That makes it unlikely that you shares will be lent out. And if they have been already the shares will be called back in.....the short will have to replace them.
If you are on margin, meaning that you have bought shares with borrowed money, you will have to sell enough shares so that the margin balance becomes zero.
Alternatively you could fund your account and wipe out the margin balance.
My understanding is that shares can not be lent from a non margin account.
That said I have been led to believe that occasionally, and illegally, that shares are lent as it is easy money for the brokers in high demand situations.
Suggest that you call your broker to confirm that your shares have not been lent and instruct that you specifically forbid them from lending. For record keeping specify this instruction by email.