Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So you are saying the same thing I am. BLM oversees the process but the the company doing it.
Do you think BLM does back ground checks on companies? All they care about is paying fees. Have you talked with the BLM staff in Kingman? If so what did they say. They have approved many companies that have had issues. So is SIRG registered to do business in AZ? Ever ask that question? If not go to the Arizona Corporation Commissions and look.
Is it in the records that they get salaries? I think it is and would you work for a company and not get a pay check? Salty, would you work for free? If you I would be happy to hire you.....
That is good stuff but it came from the company and it is their spin. Have you been able to verify it independently? Call the NV Corp. Commission ask why SIRG is in default. Better yes try to get a hold of someone at SIRG.
No property, no assets and no equipment left in the company if SIRG does not pay the amount in the Grand View agreement and comply with all the terms.
The shareholder would be left with debt and a shell company. That seems risky to me.
Thanks for posting that. As you peel the onion of SIRG you find some very deep issues.
Then the DD SKA did an outstanding job on is not an issue and NV has not put the Corp in default?
"sirg...now in default too..they can't seem to make up their mind, ...increase, decrease, and now in default, but I'm sure that will get remedied to sell that increase in shares:
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=Uk5bViH2qqz99jcGYeuYwg%253d%253d&nt7=0
SIERRA RESOURCE GROUP, INC.
Business Entity Information
Status: Default File Date: 12/21/1992
Type: Domestic Corporation Entity Number: C14039-1992
Qualifying State: NV List of Officers Due: 12/31/2012
Managed By: Expiration Date:
NV Business ID: NV19921077040 Business License Exp: 12/31/2012"
So Sierra's Nevada corporate registration is in Default? I guess for not filing or not paying correct?
Cool, Do they share that also with a TV repair shop, a Dunkin' Donuts and a dry cleaners? Or is it all theirs?
Now that is real DD. Thank you at least you are willing to look also.
?Graphics Design Company?
I think he was referring to the Corp office in Las Vegas, NV. Those look like mobile trailers at the site.
I just looked at the address on Google maps and this address also hosts this company.
www.graphicwebdesign.net/contact.html
A Graphics Design Company. Maybe they did the website.
You can contact them at:
Contact Graphic Web Design
Address:
9550 South Eastern Ave. Suite 253
Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
(702)433-6815
SO MUCH FOR A REAL OFFICE.
Good info. Thanks
I get the process but if you look on the counties website, BLM and the internet there have been many companies associated and claiming to own the property. If SIRG had bought it from St Geneviere I could understand it but it changed hands more than just once with very little records on it. Like Quick Claims Deeds showing transfers.
Were all the transaction correct and done properly with recording processes handled like they should be? I do not know.
If a title search was done to show that then great that protects investors. If not why and does it need to be? SIRG may have inherited an issue that happened several years ago. I see Quri and Medina as red flags because of the SEC issues on Quri and the lack of info on how Madina got the property in the same year, 2009 (a real questionable amount of shifting happened for the mine that year) as the Quri SEC issue. Just pointing out concerns that I see.
Arimetco
ST. GENEVIÈVE RESOURCES LTD. -04
TSC ENTERPRISES INC. - 90’s
BILLITON STRATCOR INC MORTGAGEE – 96
S G V RESOURCES INC – 04
Medina Group - 09?
Quri Resources - 09?
Copper Mesa Mining Corp - 09?
Ascendant Copper - 09 changed name to Copper Mesa
Redstone Resources - owned by Copper Mesa?
Sierra Resource Group - 09
EMERALD COPPER CORP - 2012
Yes I am am. Were you trying to connect the past deal with SIRG? They are separate transactions. So if I sell you a complete car and you drive it and strip it then sell it to someone else is it the same car I sold you? Ask the questions of how the deal came down. You have the SEC info. Do you have questions?
So did SIRG acquire it from St. Genevieve? No it was another company. Is that the same? Come one people you are being used if you do not ask the simple questions... What changed between the other owners and SIRG. Look at the details. Ask the questions....
Me as well. I thought they were a scam company. It is good to hear other that have the same problems. All I get when I call 702.462.7285 (the investors relation # is some girl that does not seem to even know who works for SIRG and can not connect me to someone there.
I agree with you 100%. This company has more issues than they even may even know about. What do they have to hide!
I do not think that the company even cares because I have tried to contact them at the investors number and no reply after tens of messages.
SKA you are a genius in the fact that you hold the company responsible for how they use the stock holder money... You are brilliant. What make the company responsible? Crazy. How may timezs has SIRG lied to us all.....
Who was the 43-101 written for? Was it Sierra or another company? If it was for another company does SIRG have any legal right to claim the validity of the claims from that. I think you would find that they do not have ownership of that report considering they bought it from a third-party. LOOK AT THE CHAIN OF RECORDS... The facts say it all........ Facts do not lie.... Look for yourselves & ask the company.....
So what did SIRG say?
Thank you StockKingArthur. At least there is someone here who looks like they will do their Due Diligence and ask the hard questions about what is really going on with this company.
If the over-stacking was not an issue then would SIRG have a responsibility (according to SEC Rules)to acknowledge it was done? It is public record as of September of last year? Did the company know about it? If so why not address it at that time or if not why did they not know about the claims being posted? You are either way bad practice to not know or address an issue. Unless I missed a press release where they did address it.
I am not saying the staking is valid I just wonder why it was not disclosed and what is happening to resolve it. Has a property search been done by SIRG to make sure title is clean? If a judge has to decide it puts everything up in the air. If this other company has some legit right to it the SIRG has paid a lot of cash for perits they can use.
Maybe I am the only one that is concerned and if so I will drop it but I do not want to be holding the feed bag if there are issues.....
So I am guessing that according to you, the AMC's from the BLM do not mean anything. So no worries?
I am just making a logical deduction on facts. BLM says there are 76 mining claims in section 22. If each claim is roughly 20 acres each for a total of 1520 and the section is 1200 acres. Something does not add up.
TOWNSHIP 23N, Range 18W SECTION 22
NE
AMC418103
LODE
BT 18
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
NE
AMC418118
LODE
JLR 5
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NE
AMC418119
LODE
JLR 6
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NE
AMC418120
LODE
JLR 7
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NE
AMC418121
LODE
JLR 8
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NE
AMC418122
LODE
JLR 9
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NE
AMC418123
LODE
JLR 10
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NE
AMC418124
LODE
JLR 11
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NE
AMC418125
LODE
JLR 12
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NE,NW
AMC418126
LODE
JLR 13
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NE,NW
AMC418127
LODE
JLR 14
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NE,NW,SW,SE
AMC418109
LODE
BT 24
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
NE,SE
AMC418101
LODE
BT 16
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
NE,SE
AMC418107
LODE
BT 22
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
NE,SE
AMC418108
LODE
BT 23
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
NW
AMC418128
LODE
JLR 15
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NW
AMC418129
LODE
JLR 16
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NW
AMC418130
LODE
JLR 17
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NW
AMC418131
LODE
JLR 18
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NW
AMC418132
LODE
JLR 19
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NW
AMC418133
LODE
JLR 20
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NW
AMC418134
LODE
JLR 21
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NW
AMC418135
LODE
JLR 22
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
08/26/2012
2 0 1 3
NW,SW
AMC418110
LODE
BT 25
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
NW,SW
AMC418111
LODE
BT 26
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
NW,SW
AMC418112
LODE
BT 27
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
NW,SW
AMC418113
LODE
BT 28
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
SE
AMC418093
LODE
BT 8
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
SE
AMC418095
LODE
BT 10
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
SE
AMC418097
LODE
BT 12
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
SE
AMC418099
LODE
BT 14
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
SE
AMC418104
LODE
BT 19
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
SE
AMC418105
LODE
BT 20
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
SW
AMC418136
LODE
YJBS 37
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
SW
AMC418137
LODE
YJBS 38
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
SW
AMC418138
LODE
YJBS 39
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
01/07/2012
2 0 1 2
SW,SE
AMC418106
LODE
BT 21
EMERALD COPPER CORP
AMC418086
09/18/2012
2 0 1 3
Go to the County and to BLM and to your own due diligence. But it looks to me like 2 companies claiming the same piece of land.
So I would call that a dispute. Who has right I do not know but if it has to go to court to be decided that is a delay.
Claims Disputes
In looking on the internet I found this. Is this how claims disputes are handled? Is there a lawyer in the group?
Resolving Co-Claimant Disputes About Acquiring
a Delinquent Co-Claimant’s
Interests
§ 3837.30 Disputes about acquiring a
delinquent co-claimant’s interests.
If co-claimants are engaged in a dispute regarding the acquisition of a delinquent co-claimant’s interests—
(a) The co-claimants must resolve
the dispute, without BLM involvement,
in a court of competent jurisdiction or
proceeding as permitted within the
state where the disputed claims are located.
(b) The co-claimants must file with
BLM a certified copy of the judgment,
decree, or settlement agreement resolving the dispute before BLM will update its records.
Search Notice Of Mining Claim Location
Looks like documents - #2012054158 thru #2012054210
If my math is right that is 52 claims on and near the Chloride Mine. Also look on BLM's LR 2000 website. They paid the fee to file with BLM.
Return Address:
FOGNANI & FAUGHT PLLC
1801 BROADWAY STE 800
Denver Co 80202
I know that BLM does not authenticate claims. Their policy is to have the courts handle that because they do not want liability. Looks like 2 companies are claiming the same ground. Unless SIRG is moving the company to another owner.... I don't know but it looks odd to me.
I ask the Mohave County Recorder to email me the original claim notices so I could see the maps:
This is who I called:
Earlene L. Mahar
Recording Deputy
Mohave County Recorders Office
PH 928-753-0701 Ext 4590
Earlene.Mahar@co.mohave.az.us
Emerald Copper Company
Who are they and why do their claims go over SIRG's? Is there a claims dispute here and if so why has SIRG not publicly addressed this? Do that not owe it to the share holders? I found it at the Mohave County Recorders and at BLM.