Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So what's with the % increase?
Ever seen the old movie "the cooler" lol feeling like that guy I see. This will be decent going sideways now, who knows the 52 week is stellar maybe one day we see it again
So what we now have authorized X billion shares on hemp. So split into 4 companies each with more shares= more share this guy can sell. Lol I'll wait
By the way you guys who think the fiscal cliff effects these penny stocks are hilarious.
What I want to hear is a plan from the company on how they are acquiring new customers, or we've soldX amount of units since the vote. Or better yet let's see the next filing.
More products also would be nice.
Hope for the best here
PHOT After Hours Trading Share on facebook_likeShare|Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on emailShare on gmail
PHOT News & Analysis
GrowLife Commends President Obama on Prioritizing Marijuana Law Enforcement
12/17/2012 8:30:00 AM - PR Newswire
The Real Story Behind CSEY, ZERO, PSON and PHOT
12/14/2012 9:31:00 AM - Market Wire
GrowLife Commends Colorado's Signing of Amendment 64, Looks Towards $46 Billion Opportunity
12/12/2012 8:30:00 AM - PR Newswire
The Real Story Behind SLIO, PHOT, SAFC and AONEQ
12/7/2012 8:00:00 AM - Market Wire
GrowLife Applauds Arizona Courts for Upholding Legalization
12/6/2012 8:30:00 AM - PR Newswire
Read more PHOT News & Commentary
Subscribe
No million share sale at all.
Pre-Market Charts | After Hours Charts
Dec. 18, 2012 Market Close: $ 0.0356
After Hours Volume: After Hours High: After Hours Low:
26,777 $ .0354
(16:00:04 PM) $ .0354
(16:00:04 PM)
Visit the Most Active in the After-Hours trading session.
Trade Detail
After Hours
Time (ET) After Hours
Price After Hours
Share Volume
16:00 $ .0354 High 26,777
See also: After Hours Trading, Premarket Trading , & PHOT Quote
Read more: http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/phot/after-hours#ixzz2FSj1JIt5
Please share where this figure came from
This will be the PR
"Mass. Communities Seek Delay In Medical Marijuana Law"
Lol referring to other news again
PR- "hey good job Colorado" -end of PR
Wasn't trying to say anything about your experience, that is odd they do/did that with orders. I also did not mean anything negative about your buy price, I as well believe this will run a lot more in short time only insinuated not to worry.
I only mentioned the free ride because I learned by my own stupid mistake.
Sorry if I came off the wrong way
Not trying to burst your bubble but you should read the whole thing yourself.
President Obama's recent comments about marijuana legalization, noted this morning by Mike Riggs, hit a familiar theme: Going after newly legal recreational users in Colorado and Washington, he said, is not a good use of the federal government's scarce resources. He and his underlings have repeatedly said the same thing about medical marijuana users. But going after pot smokers has never been a "top priority"—or any priority at all—for the Drug Enforcement Administration, which eschews cases involving small amounts of marijuana. Those are handled by state and local police, who account for 99 percent of marijuana arrests. So leaving individual users alone does not suggest that Obama is any more enlightened, compassionate, tolerant, or rational than his predecessors. The new aspect of the policy announced by Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder with respect to medical marijuana was that they promised prosecutorial forbearance not only for patients but also for their suppliers, provided they complied with state law. Obama has conspicuously failed to deliver on that promise, cracking down on medical marijuana dispensaries more aggressively than George W. Bush. So even if he said it is not a good use of Justice Department resources to target state-licensed growers and retailers, you would have to take it with a shakerful of salt. In the event, he did not address suppliers at all in his ABC News interview with Barbara Walters.
"As a politician," ABC News says, "Obama has always opposed legalizing marijuana." That's not quite true, since as a candidate for the U.S. Senate in 2004 Obama told a group of students at Northwestern University that "we need to rethink and decriminalize our marijuana laws." That is literally what Colorado and Washington have done, removing all criminal penalties for possessing up to an ounce and for growing or selling marijuana in accordance with state regulatons. (Colorado also has decriminalized home cultivation of up to six plants and noncommercial transfers of up to an ounce.) It is not clear exactly what sort of decriminalization Obama had in mind, but presumably he meant at least that users should not be subject to criminal penalties. That position proved inconvenient during his presidential campaign, when he went back and forth on the question of whether he still supported marijuana decriminalization. At one point, a spokesman said Obama had "always" favored that policy and had accidentally indicated otherwise during a debate by raising his hand in response to a question he had misunderstood. A week later, he retracted that correction.
What does Obama say now?
He told Walters he does not support legalizing marijuana "at this point." He said something similar last April, when he told Jimmy Fallon, "We’re not going to have legalized weed anytime soon." Well, he was wrong about that, since Colorado and Washingtton legalized marijuana just seven months later. But maybe he meant that the federal ban on marijuana will not be repealed anytime soon. Putting these two comments together, I surmise that Obama will endorse marijuana legalization after it happens. Or maybe, like Bill Clinton, he is just waiting to leave office to express his actual opinion about the war on drugs, assuming he has one.
In the meantime, Obama says, "what we're going to need to have is a conversation about how...you reconcile a federal law that still says marijuana is a federal offense and state laws that say that it's legal." He calls it "a tough problem," because "I head up the executive branch; we're supposed to be carrying out laws." In truth, there is no need to "reconcile" anything; the states are under no obligation to punish every action Congress considers a crime. The question is how gung-ho the Obama administration will be in going after marijuana growers and distributors who are no longer subject to state penalties. The intensity of its response, which will help determine whether Colorado and Washington have the freedom they should to chart their own courses, is completely within Obama's discretion.
On Wednesday, ABC notes, Attorney General Holder said, "There are a number of issues that have to be considered, among them the impact that drug usage has on young people, [and] we have treaty obligations with nations outside the United States." The Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs requires signatories to enact criminal penalties for the nonmedical production, possession, and distribution of cannabis. But that requirement is subject to "constitutional limitations," which in the United States bar the federal government from demanding that the states ape its drug laws. Does the treaty compel the federal government to crack down on state-licensed marijuana suppliers in Colorado and Washington? Apparently not. Since the 1970s, the Dutch government, which is also a signatory, has nevertheless managed to tolerate retail sales of marijuana, which remain technically illegal. Similarly, the U.S. government could maintain its ban on marijuana while tolerating sales by state-licensed pot shops. Obama just needs a little Dutch courage.
Addendum: Ethan Nadelmann of the Drug Policy Alliance parses Obama's words at The Huffington Post, seeing hope in the fact that the president is no longer laughing at questions about marijuana and in his call for a "conversation" rather than a federal diktat.
And you READ that where? Please provide
No issue on scottrade either.
If your in at 4.60 and you think it's going over 10 shortly, then you should feel good about it.
I would also tell you not to use a broker that tells you when and what you can trade. Every broker does require you to wait if you purchase using unsettled fund until the prior trade settles to sell again otherwise you'll pull a free ride trade and get a nice letter in the mail not to mention a call or freeze of your account.
Hope this week goes well for you
So here's what's crazy I've been watching the "after hour" sales posted, which we know doesn't trade after. So this late reporting has happened quite a bit lately and the same 550000 k each time.
Very messed up....
Is that what you got out if that?
reason.com/blog/2012/12/14/obama-on-marijuana-legalization-if-not-n
Hmmmmmmm
Nice
Please explain..
Not new, i lost and forgot my other login. ive been here a very long time my friend. I wouldn't be here if i didn't think good things are coming I would've dumped the 500k i have by now even with a proffit at the current price, but im holding long enough to at least triple my entry.
http://reason.com/blog/2012/12/14/obama-on-marijuana-legalization-if-not-n
Good news for the little guys growing at home, not so much yet for the big companies growing
Boy and gals, one day that wasn't like the past two and your panties are in a bunch, wow. Cant expect every day to gain, every stock has a day or two or 50 through a year. I thought today would've been much better than it was, I hoped for 8, lol. But oh darn looks like you'll actually "own" a share before you can sell it huh? if you want to freak out and sell i will gladly pick up more at your expense, and sit on them until the next earning report. This jumped because of the MDBX news, but this is much bigger than that. Wait until the next earning report when the real numbers show the progression of this deal alone. Id be more worried if the only business they had was MDBX but its not. I personally think LONG TERM this is beyond great potential. MDBX 110 to 65 today? this lost $.36c from open - .91c from the HOD, if you cant afford to lose a few bucks your trading the wrong stocks.
Yes I know thanks anyway
Good luck
Anyone notice the chart for MDBX vs AVT. Pull a 5 day, they are almost exact( beside price of course) craaaaaaaaaaaaazzzzzy
So maybe their advertising sucks? Hopefully they are paying for Advertising to consumers and they don't think we're the consumer by buying the stock. I mean how is this not moving better than Mmj companies that can't even sell product yet? Very strange.
So does this mean Kane is moving over?
To accommodate expected growth, some members of the CBIS management team will be joining X-Change Corp. The Company has appointed the following individuals to the Board of Directors:
•Robert Kane – President & Chief Executive Officer
Just not making sense here agreements with MDBX and they sell off the only legal products that can go in them now? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm I'm going to lose hair scratching my head over this move.
Wha ohh!
May want to look into companies that make equipment for people to grow their own if its not legal to sell it, Yet could be months before anything is sold legally, Just another play to consider along with this
I must say I enjoyed today, well and yesterday too. Pretty much unfolded where I thought. I will now say price tomorrow will be high between 7-8.50. Then holding steady to run EOD at 5.50-6
, hmmmmmm what was the price when MDBX broke out?? Feels the same thing may be in the works. J/k but its nice to hope
What's MDBX vs AVTS outstanding shares or float?
I would love to be right again on this, i made sure I bought with settled funds to so if we hit the moon I can make some money well way more money
Remember what I said lastnight? LOL! were right in that range! to be honest I sold 2k shares today, had to, will be back in at the pull back. Say the dip (cool down) around under 4 - I may not get it but........
$10? I expect somewhere around there by next Friday.
Possible - but not anytime soon, the company may be realizing how much they are going to start banking and hold, just hoping they keep up demand with MDBX and others and not get off track with other obligations as well.
BUT thank goodness for the MDBX contract surely if there was a merger or sale that had to give us just a little bit more in the pocket
See ya at market open
http://investors.flextronics.com/mobile.view?c=98555&p=irol-irhome
Pretty FN big lol billion dollar revs 1 billion cash if I read that correctly lol
I've been around awhile sitting and reading posts for awhile on certain stocks, lost my PW and stuff but decided I wanted to mess around today so I set up a new one. These OTC stocks are fun as S...T, the real stocks been not to exciting and everyone is waiting for the big announcement aka cliff. So I got time to kill so may as well run high risk until the end of the year, lol.
Raise your hand if you like money, now move your finger off the sell button, move it to your ask price and move it wayyyy up. Relax........don't drop your ask down because a few share went for less. Make a gap and make them jump. To many share went cheap today with this volume we could've got me to mid 4s or more, but you all let it go. Shame on you lol
I'm so glad to have been in a week ago lol
Doubted myself for not selling today but I've got a feeling this will be in the 5-8 range sooner than later. Comparing some figures to MDBX if that stays where it's at this one should be at LEAST 10% of that price. This is MDBX bread and butter.