Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Hi, Christopher Hodgkin a.k.a. 'Norwester.'
LOL.
D'ya get your lawsuits/threats all straightened out?
With SI?
'To your satisfaction?'
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Lemme know ...
Here or there.
bonnuss
Oops: delete. Responding to wrong msg/poster...
Forgive me.
See next post, if anyone could possibly be that interested.
;)
bonnuss
Hey 'SI Bob' <g> and 'IH Matt' <g>
GREAT! I think that you two can really make something out of this site ... or in some other iteration of the collusion of your expertise ... interest ... motivation, most importantly.
I'll 'show up' -g- and try to 'control myself' -g- as to TOU, etc....
Seems to be the 'christian,' 'moral,' 'patriotic' thang to do, don't it?
Until the Bush fraud gets ass-kicked all over real-time mainstream media ...
Starting (finally) right now ... via ENE -- 'Kenny (Lay) boy', Daddy's Carlyle Group intimacy with the Saudis ...
<snicker>
Happy New Year, you two geeks ...
;)
bonnuss
Yeah, sure yer are. Happy. LMAO. CYA here or there, unfortunately ...
Christopher.
bonnuss
LOL. Forget about this one, did ya? Two posts ago here?
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=215525
<<Anyone here who believes that they have been arbitrarily and capriciously suspended by SI,
please PM me with your info. I'm contemplating litigation against SI, and would like to see
whether there is a case for a charge of systemic arbitrary and capricious application of the
TOU.
Let me know also whether you want your comments kept confidential or don't care.
TIA>>
LMAO, NW...
bonnuss
Yeah, okay ... right. -g-
I understand from your posts here on IHUB that you are soliciting 'clients' who may wish to sue INSP.
Is this correct?
bonnuss
How very interesting, depending on who you are on SI.
F*kn A ... I'm frequently capriciously and unjustifiably 'jailed' for crossing the right-wing nutcase threshhold for tolerance, shall I say. There's quite a band of them over there ... I'm sure you've seen the RWE threads and the regulars on them all over the site with collective 'power' to stifle -- or censor -- dissenting voices.
I see that they are feeling very empowered now that their president supports similar censorship and violation of civil rights in R/L.
It's a cocky thang .......................
LMAO.
You're probably one of the ringleaders.
bonnuss
Hi, Poet, R. Black et al ...
I think RMBS is going to the fabled 'zero' sooner than later.
<g>
V... Vee ... vis a vis ... viva the Vees ...
LMAO.
bia
Poet/Greg: the psychopathology existed in the best of times,
... as well as now, in the 'worst'(?) of times.
Put some bucks into the pockets of addicted (sorry, hate to use the word because I don't believe in it) gamblers, and WHOA! Women become cheap objects, subject to derision; material 'luxury' purchases become measures of self-worth; the 'omnipotence' renders all others 'inferior.' ALL others.
I would be really interested in your takes as professionals on this psychological phenomenon as much as you'd care to comment.
Although, I don't care for this place so far, as I see some real problems with some of the 'early adopters.' More power plays.
In good times or bad, the integrity or lack of remains surprisingly constant.
bia
LOL, JXM ... indeed. / eom
Yup ... Keith's a good guy. Guileless. Ain't worried ...
... about 'who runs things' on Internet message boards ... <g>
It's people like Keith who are the 'sanest' among us ...
I'm biased, however, because I'm the same way.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
bia
It's also false, JXM.
Vendit got his special little a** kicked right out of SI ... by the current administrator here.
bonnuss
I don't follow you anywhere. LMAO. You wish. / eom
I don't associate with a**holes regardless of alleged "T/A" expertise.
LOL.
That's why I'm not interested in you or your board.
Or your 'phone chats.' Or anything else about you.
I'm 'here' to expose you for the jerk you are.
I'm certain IH Matt and IH Bob can easily verify your two other aliases -- again, that would be 'R.Black' and 'Redmond VA' -- and if they verify in public, here, that you pulled this BS stunt same as on SI, then I might be sort of open to posting on the IHUB site.
Let's see what the owners of the site do with this ... and I'll be back when they respond.
WHAT SAY YOU, BOB and MATT??
bonnuss
And you may address me as your nemesis.
Just a little bit smarter than your royal hein-ass.
LOL.
bonnuss
<g> All in due time, Reid ... or would you prefer that ...
... I address you as R.Black?
Or, 'Redmond VA?'
Things get so confusing when one operates under multiple aliases.
LMAO.
bonnuss, the one and only.
Oh, Reid .. a.k.a. 'virtualinvestor.' LMAO.
Gotta lotta files on your little dirty shenanigans ... behind 'closed doors,' of course ...
... Shall I reveal them here?
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
bonnuss
LOL, JXM ... indeed.
Just a few of us, including some of the administrators, know precisely why Vendit 'chose' to 'relocate.'
ROFLMAO.
Best regs,
bia
Hey, there, Bob ... here's a 'what if' I know you've seen in your prior life -g-
What if the Chairman him/herself posts sensitive, real-life contact information and then has the power to delete the selected 'victim's' replies?
Further complicated with the "five deleted posts and yer out" theory ...
For example, for those here who may not have encountered this in the past.
Let's say a 'thread head' ... or "Chairman," in your IHUB PC terms <g> decides to make an aggressive attempt to 'drive a poster away' from not only his thread, but the site itself.
This Chairman has knowledge of the poster who he doesn't care for in personal info terms -- real name, address, phone numbers, etc.
So, sets up a thread and possibly using other account names (yep -- that happened even on SI -- it's not just a Yahoo! phenom) ... reveals such information to all of Cyberspace. Inviting harassment not in simple investing board 'flaming' capacity, but in real life stalking/intimidation terms.
I'm sure you can imagine potential consequences for the site itself .. and its 'administrators.'
I think that's lawsuit material, myself ...
Your and Matt's comments?
bia
Hi, Matt ... LOL. In a perfect world, we'd all be rich.
In the imperfect world in which we all operate as human beings, you ain't ever going to make this board of yours work as long as it's dedicated to investing ...
Money is at stake.
I just learned that you are 18 years old.
No offense, but ... you got a lot to learn about human nature, dude.
Limiting 'discussion' to stocks only will doom this whole endeavor.
Already, even those who first appeared here attempt to control it.
Thru you.
Adding layers of censorship will only serve to drive people away.
Just my two cents ... and be very careful who you listen to 'developing' your TOS and censors.
bia
Got puts? NEWP = 22 and change A/H ... eom
Hi, R.Black!' You like it @ $17?
Not me! Of course, I tend not to rely on superstitious figments of my imagination in order to conserve capital.
<g>
You, as well?
PS: In some circles, THIS is the week to buy the market.
Best Regs,
'bonnuss'
Break rules? LOL .. I don't think so, but I'll HURRY right over there (above here?) to review.
Although, I might indeed be on thin ice posting here.
[Edit #2: Nope. I don't believe I've 'broken' Rules #1-3 .. wow, looking at footnotes below those rules, however ... must comment .. they're pretty da**ned STRICT, yet rather vacuous, would you say, Redmond? Nothing to really 'hang one's hat on." <g>]
[Edit -- uh oh, Redmond ... LOOK: this is a 'safe house' for 'friends' of 'Voltaire. Does that mean we need to buy stock? What do you think? At all times? Particularly RMBS and NEWP? Is that a requirement for being a 'friend of Voltaire?]
Because one of the most iimportant things in my life is to maintain good relationships with people here on the new I-Hub website regardless of anything else.
<g> and <breathless sigh> ...
RMBS @ $200, you say ...
Yep -- in a time machine last year this time.
But, that was before the 4:1 split.
Remember?
bia
Hi, KG ... well, I think both NYSE and NAZ down ...
... don't hold me to this, of course <g> ... but I predict short-term low of 1500 NAZ easy ... I'll call it as conceivably possible within the next 30 days.
NYSE I'll not venture any guesses ... but probably should ... and short it.
I also think sometime this year that the NAZ will drop to 1200 or below.
Just my opinion, however.
What do you think?
'b-i-a'
###
Thanks, Matt ... while I agree with you in principle, I've seen many other and similar 'noble efforts' fail miserably ... relying on the individual integrity of Cyberspace anonymous posters on investing boards -- get a few nutcases into the 'community mix' and all falls into absolute ruins ... <g>
Don't ever count on 'one's' integrity -- to 'take the high road' ... meaning, ignore the idiots and flamers ... including mine.
I'll go now to this tool place of yours to see about charts, etc.
Thanks.
I may or may not stick around here.
Best Regards in any event,
bonnuss
Okay, cool, Matt.
So the next time that 'Vendit' posts here on this thread off-investment topic -- and any other thread here on the InvestorsHub, you'll 'step in,' correct?
bonnuss
Okay, Matt.
So, do you also 'promise' other posters the same 'protection?'
Reason I ask is that I'm not sure I want to make an investment of my own time here when being forced to kowtow to those self-appointed 'gurus' such as Vendit with who I don't agree, and furthermore, will not accept personal abuse, in the form of threats towards my personal identity, as this one has done in the past, with 'full approval' by you ... who represent this web site's 'adminstration.'
???????????????????/
TIA,
bonnuss
Oops... Matt...I hadn't read back far enough on this board...
...and that is the reason for my deletion of the post preceding this one.
Back to the point.
Do you consider this post 'on topic,' which is the reference on other investing boards/sites that proceeded your founding of this one:
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=53565
Question #2: Has the person behind the alias "Vendit" bought controlling stock in your company?
If no, that's what I think Vendit needs to do.
Buy the mutherf**er.
Then he has 'ultimate control.'
Like, 'divine' control.
Vendit is, after all in his own little mind, evidently, our very own 'rescuing deity.'
Are you serving as the 'holy ghost,' Matt?
Just curious.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
bonnuss
LMAO.
Lot more to the Vendit thing than meets the eye, ain't there?
And it now appears that he's succeeded in 'bribing' the IHub administration.
Right, Matt?
bonnuss
No, Matt, I am not aware of 'what SI used to be in terms of 'professionalism.'
I have been a paid member of SI for a year now and maintain my customer relationship there.
More to the point, are you telling me that if I don't post strictly about stocks that you will 'yank my membership' here?
Spell it out.
Thanks.
bonnuss
Matt: <<as long as they are interested in professional discussion of
investments>>
Professional?
That's very confusing to me.
Would you be so kind as to define what you mean as 'professional?'
Thanks.
bonnuss
No problem, Matt/IHub Admin.
I am new here and I'm sure that you are gathering that many if not most of your posters are from SI.
Is that good or bad news to you?
Would you like me to begin a discussion here on investment strategy -- is that your point?
Okay ... let's start with RMBS.
Do you have charting ability here i.e. Yahoo and SI?
I haven't had the time yet to investigate ...
Can you point me to portfolio tracking/charting ability on this site to save me the time?
Thanks,
bonnuss
PS/Correction: I think that 'RedmondVA' should post as he/she chooses.
Documenting Voltaire's posts here is good, IMO, because it goes to credibility.
I don't mean at all to say that I 'will take the high road' -- seen that little manipulative ploy 'way too many times -- and it's funny -- those who do the most lying always 'get by with it.'
Frankly, Keith, you're very naive, IMO.
I say to 'RedmondVA' ... LOL ... and go for it.
Exposing the character of these self-appointed icons is what it's all about.
Rose -- oh, no ... I'm sorry. At least you got out @ 22, though.
Me? Follow anythign down? LOL. In a word, yes.
This is a guess without actually going back to count up .... about a year ago, I had positions in 25-30 stocks. Most tech (all the big ones -- SUNW, MSFT, CSCO, INTC, WCOM, etc) with a few DJIA. Plus four mutual funds.
Today, I am in three stocks -- GE -- and it ain't a very big position at all. QQQ -- again, rather small position. And 200 sh of some 'old' DIS.
I hold puts on SEBL.
And the rest is cash.
I sold most of those 'way late ... many I was able to cop profit, but nothing like, of course, what I could have made (kept <g>) had I had the sense to sell last year this time.
I suppose I plan to reinvest 50% again ... when the market turns. Up, like. <g> I don't mind missing the bottom at all ... so I'm sure I will.
HAve a good weekend, Rosie et al ...
bia