Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I completely agree coolerheadsprevail.
I believe I do. I have actually been pleased with the way the PPS has been holding up for the last 3 weeks or so. However, I am still in the green (barely), so I also recognize that I am not feeling the level of pain that a lot are right now. Signing off good night.
Yeah. I saw that over at the vringo.free.board.
Sure a lot of negative nellies here tonight. Hang in there. Feb. 15 is due date for the reply briefs and JJ should be issuing some orders shortly thereafter.
Yeah, we will see. But I am in this for the long haul, so I hope to not stress too much if it goes below $3 today.
I am pleasantly surprised how well the PPS is holding up.
Just posted on YMB re moving shares to cash accounts. If you can, please chime in to keep the message on the top if that short-ridden board. Thx.
Yes, xlt leader, I see that an article just hit SA now that echoes what you are saying. The shorts can't find enough shares.
The author of the article linked to prior post recommends a stop loss at $2.64. Any thoughts? Anyone think that this might be too high, thereby allowing a bear raid to manipulate one out of his/her shares?
No offense taken. To our bright future with Lang ang gang!
That's a strange conclusion. I am a solid long. I probably should not let crap articles get to me, but sometimes they do. Good night.
Wow! This Foolish article is pathetic. The author shows an amazing amount of ignorance. Where do these Fools come from anyway. Sad. Very sad.
To be expected - the new Fool's article is typical in its lack of substance and weakly supported conclusions. These Fools get tiring.
xlt leader, I agree. All my shares are in a cash account with a very high ask amount (ie, unreachable at this point) entered. So, the shorts can't borrow my shares. If we all keep our shares out of the shorts' hands, this should at least help maximize the initial short squeeze.
Thanks for the article Jonj1. I don't like hearing some if these statistics, but hopefully JJ (and the appellate court) will rule in our favor.
Seems unlikely that this news would not have cause a sharp spike due to inevitable leak. I hope I am wrong, of course.
The never-ending "fruit talk" is a clear sign that lack of real news is driving some of us bananas.
Glad you are back in Big Arlen.
What did CNBC say? Link?
I will take bored any day. Although I know virtually nothing about charting, this very tight range strikes me as a sign of strength, rather than weakness.
Many, many shots on goal. Low risk and extremely high upside!
I hear you tryz. Exactly my sentiment.
Looks like I might have lost my chance for a final load up in the $2.50's. That's fine - I am extremely overweighted in this stock anyway. Or is this early green just a head fake?
I will take that as a joke, brickcity.
The nice thing about standing ready to use dry powder and avg down more is that the bleeding turns from pain into a positive buying opportunity. This raises the spirits and gives one the calm, patient disposition needed to ultimately win big time. IMHO.
Acrazjo - I am on the same page as you. Looking to buy one last time and hoping to catch close to where we bottom out. Started buying at $3.60 and lowest yet was $2.88 the other day. Avg now $3.11. Holding way more than originally planned.
Poor article from one of the Fools is out. The writer doesn't know the basics about VRNG. The judge limited damages to $30 million? Yeah, right.
I hope you are right. I agree that JJ is undoubtedly using the verdict and the unresolved issues (mainly the past damages apparent mistake and the running royalty figure, and probably his own ruling on the laches issue) to coax a settlement. Have a good weekend.
Thanks. I don't see this as anything to worry about then. JJ will not alter the jury's decision on this issue.
Did Google try to eliminate the obviousness issue through a motion for summary judgment?