Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
SPUTNIK - I have one QUESTION for you IF YOU CAN ANSWER IT STRAIGHT. If you say that you are a fair person, why do you never post anything that is positive about the Q? I haope you don't give a flippant answer that there is nothing positive or something equally inane that makes you look stupid. And pls. post it publicly as I can't PM you.
FLORIST - good to hear from you.
DJR - It is no use trying to elicit any response from the RESIDENT NO SHARES BUT CONCERNED ABOUT ALL US SHAREHOLDERS guy. He will act the crusader part to the hilt and not reply to the point when grilled. Just look at his posting history. He will dump the same old shit that everyone knows over and over again with no bit of originality and twists that data out of context, just like he did Florist's.
Robert - It is a waste of time trying to correct LOW-LIFE organisms. They are set in their ways and that is to BASH JUST FOR THE HECK of it. But they do it pretty cleverly, by injecting LIES and ASSUMPTIONS with know facts (always NEGATIVE, by the way). You can at least say that people like LOBO and JUNK have both positive and negative views about this company, but what do you say about SUCH CREATURES THAT NEVER HAD ANY STAKE BUT SPEND THEIR ENTIRE LIVING DAY AND NIGHT on this message board. HERE IS A BASHER (whether paid or not). Hopefully he is paid, because that would make him a STUPID BASHER if he weren't.
If rehashing LOBO's DD and prior PRs thought provoking, then I am the Ruler of this world.
How can u figure out the thinking of a NOBLE(?) LOW-LIFE organism. If this one were such a noble soul, he should be utilising his energy to solve the TRUE ILLS of the society that are more severe than a 1/1000 th of a penny stock. That should tell you something about LOW-LIFEs. I can understand LOBO's grouse (crusade?) - He atleast owned the stock.
LOBO - How can you be sure that FO and Alexis lied? How are you so sure that this SENWOT NELLA or whatever is right? Also, what is wrong if FO yanked the program because it was crap, in his opinion? As I posted earlier, Skunks may have seen it before it was yanked. Now that makes that Maurice fellow look stupid abt his insinuation that skunks is Alexis.
That is why I think the CLOSET could be such a losing series. If the creators are spending their time trying to challenge a poster on a message board, instead of fighting it out legally - that should be telling something about their competence.
I sincerely hope so too. I think the way she posts do not befit a VP of a company and if FO wanted someone to pump his company, he can always find some junior level person to do that. I think that Skunks and zeus had seen the CLOSET when they aired that one or two episodes, before they yanked it out.
Yeah, me too. But that is ahead in the future (hopefully not tooooooo far away).
Zandant - That was excellent post(s) to the issue at hand. If Maurice has an issue with QTN, he has to take it to the courts or directly with them. I do not understand the intention behind the challenge issued to skunks whether she is Alexis or not. If that is their intention, they better prove it. Also Skunks needs to answer the simple question, whether she has seen the CLOSET or not, and if not why she has lied about it. All said and done, today's PR shows that the Q is moving along pretty nicely. I don't know whether you have noticed or not, the pattern to FO's PR's lies in their not completing as per the PR's, but COMPLETING at a later date (sometimes far later). Nice to see that you are still keeping your humor. GLTA.
Trying to be as NOBLE as you guys. You said that you were selling all of your stake here and then attacked LOBO who was actualy doing some serious DD not just a rehash you and SPUT keep spouting.
Not TO 500 & Long. To the list he was posting to send.
Did you not sell all of your holdings in QBID? Why don't you spare yourself the anguish and spend your time DD'ing potential companies than re-hashing this JUNK(LOL!).
As usual Lobo, amzing clarity in your letter-writing. Thanks to all who helped you also. Sent them and let us hope that we will get some answers.
Count me in Lobo.
FROY - Did you join with SPUTNIK? That explains a lot of your RECENT BEHAVIOUR. Now that you are LIBERATED (since you sold) ENJOY your life and LET US UNFORTUNATE(S) BE.
You TELL ME Sput. For someone who has no stake in this POS(your words) it was funny looking at your posts egging ppl. to start a class action law suit. I still like to read yours posts BTW.
SPUT - Fancy you still here. Thought you would be gone LONG BACK what with FO still the CEO and your conviction that he can NEVER DO ANYTHING RIGHT. Why do you keep wasting your TIME in this POS?
Itesprit - Thanks for the explaination. So in theory, FO can reduce the o/s by retiring a bunch of his shares at any time.
I have absolutely no issue with your investing philosophy. My issue is your CONSTANT GRIPE about FO. When the audit is released, do you think that FO will be replaced? If you abhor FO that much do not buy ANY STOCK in a company run by him. BTW, I do find your posts amusing and occassionally informative (when you are not griping and rehashing FO's folly's).
SPUT - For a person not invested in a stock and have no intention in the near future, you do spend an awful lot of your PRECIOUS LIFE (Time) discussing the fallibilities of this stinking CEO run company. What is that telling all of us invested here about YOU?
Get this straight. If you don't like the way FO is doing things, do it like LOBO did (and is still doing) or SHUT YOUR MOUTH. If you tried to do like LOBO, you would have no credibility, because you don't own any shares. Don't just vomit the same old lines that everyone knows. It is becoming an irritation.
Itesprit and ALL - If FO can issue shares to himself to maintain control (22 Bill) what will stop him from converting all of those shares to 1 share with voting rights and equivalent value? In such a scenario, will the O/s be reduced by 22 bil? Some sane answers please. TIA
Welcome into the fold Sput. Accept my apologies for calling you a Roach and a Low-life, now that you have explained yourself. But you will still be viewed critically till you blood yourself by getting into QBID.
LOBO - As usual you are a class act, sir. Pls. accept my salutations. As u pointed out in your post, the audit should clarify a lot more issues than the stupid CC we had yesterday.
If we now look at QBID - without all the baaggage from over a year ago (I know it is easier said than done) and say it is QBID Part II from TODAY (post CC) - I think we are in a great shape than ever before. THANKS TO YOUR EFFORTS we now have a CEO who is forced to be honest most of the time (let's expect FO to be lying sometimes) and more communicative than he ever has been.
I think the grassroots movement to get answers really worked wonders (not withstanding ppl. getting mad at the messenger). I hope at this point in time that we all make our money back and some profit (if that is possible). Keep the good work going.
RR - You better get your facts straight. FO said the O/S was 21 bil.
Is this IDIOT the infamous KARZOID?
Mr.G- You live in my neck of the woods. I am in Nashville, abt. 4 hrs from you. And like you a long and holding strong.
Thanks BP. eom.
Can someone pls. post Doctoall's post abt the OPEN HOUSE? TIA.
Thanks Lobo. As usual full marks to you for an in-depth briefing. Happy to see you confident again.
Be a man or a woman enough to have the guts to attack a poster for what he posted not his wife. You showed yourself for what you are. You are a CHEAP LOW LIFE. WORSE THAN SPUTNIK and CHARLIE48.
Lowest form of insect infestations. They have no stake in QBID, but keep posting all their life on this board. Especially Sputnik has changed his style recently, being very sympathetic towards the disgruntled longs here, slowly making himself legit.
BS Charlie - You r being too simple. Why do you even post on this board when you don't own any shares of this POS (in your opinion).
Sure thing, but that is your opinion. In the last two months the pace has increased. Even in your constant negative mode cannot deny this.
Rickhan - Absolutely right. Syracuse is a major college town (loosely speaking). Over the past few days we have had a lot of bashers literally drumming the death roll of Q. Lowlife creatures like SPUD,KAren and the mega-messaih IB have all run riot here. There definitely is a method to the madness of FO. Not discounting the amount of shares in the market, Q is moving along nicely. As skunks would put it, it is tracking well. As long as it is broadcasting (in the limited areas, as many here point out), we should be OK. It may take longer to recoup our money, but definitely Q will make it big one day. Whether we will all become millionaires is a moot point. We may or may not make it as rich as we thought we would, but I think over the long run we will make more than what we invested. It is a stock to hold patiently right now.
where did he admit to dilution? Did he issue the shares directly into the market? If he issues the shares for acquisition and the person/company sold his shares how is FO responsible for it?
So how can we call that dilution. If you and I receive stock as some form of payment from FO and decide to sell those shares how can we blame FO for dilution? I know that he has lied to some extent, but don't tell me that YOU with your infinite wisdom in PINKS did not think for a second that the CEO was getting all sorts of funding without issuing shares.
IB - Pls. define dilution. If FO is not the one selling shares how can that be dilution?
500 and Long - Pls. stop this childish bickering. This is way beyond civility. If you have some proof lay it on the table. Just accusing Skunks for the sake of it and because she does not agree with your point of view is not right on your part. If you are so against this stock pls. sell and save yourself the angst. But if you really want to lambast Skunks, do it reasonably. Nobody buys because of her or will sell because of you. If that is the case that investor is stupid. GLTY.