Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I bought this stock because I am dealing on a daily basis with a subsidiary of theirs that builds enterprise grade UAVs for agriculture, industry, law enforcement and the military. I am importing some of their agri models and have been totally impressed with the quality of these autonomous crop sprayers and the work ethic of their employees. I bought it at 1.27 over the past few weeks because I thought this small subsidiary has a lot of potential. When they declared this dividend, I almost crapped. I spent years following rmbs. This bunch is the dead opposite. They want as much money for their owners as they can get. Don't anybody tell them how we run companies over here.
Dagong Tech
"Granting 741-1" means that item number 741 was granted
6/3/04 741 Stipulations regarding thrid party discovery filed by Rambus, Inc. and Infineon (cgar) [Entry date 06/04/04]
http://www.usjeff.com/RambusVsInfineon/Docket.htm
IFX Docket Update
6/9/04 -- So Ordered: granting [741-1] stipulation regarding third party discovery. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 6/8/04 ) Copies Mailed: y (khan) [Edit date 06/09/04]
6/9/04 -- Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [708-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Answers to Questions asked at Depositions of Infineon Witnesses Hans-Peter Bette and Rudd Corwin set at 9:00 6/10/04, [665-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel the Production of "Lock-In" Documents set at 9:00 6/10/04, [662-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel answers to questions asked at deposition of Infineon witness Johann Harter set at 9:00 6/10/04, [660-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel production of documents in response to Rambus's fourth set of request for production of documents and things set at 9:00 6/10/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
http://www.usjeff.com/RambusVsInfineon/Docket.htm
IFX Docket Update
(We sure aren't in Kansas anymore!)
5/28/04 735 TRANSCRIPT for date of May 21, 2004 hearing of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne (placed in brown expandable (thom) [Entry date 06/01/04]
5/28/04 736 RESPONSE (in opposition) by Infineon Inc. to [708-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Answers to Questions asked at Depositions of Infineon Witnesses Hans-Peter Bette and Rudd Corwin by Rambus, Inc. (FILED UNDER SEAL w/Exhibits ALSO UNDER SEAL) (thom) [Entry date 06/01/04]
6/1/04 -- Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [708-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Answers to Questions asked at Depositions of Infineon Witnesses Hans-Peter Bette and Rudd Corwin set at 10:00 6/9/04, [665-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel the Production of "Lock-In" Documents set at 10:00 6/9/04, [662-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel answers to questions asked at deposition of Infineon witness Johann Harter set at 10:00 6/9/04, [660-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel production of documents in response to Rambus's fourth set of request for production of documents and things set at 10:00 6/9/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
6/2/04 737 MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (khan)
6/2/04 738 ORDER granting [565-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon in limine to exclude FTC ALJ's Initial Decision. It is ORDERED that the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 6/2/04] (khan)
http://www.usjeff.com/RambusVsInfineon/Docket.htm
IFX Docket Update
5/24/04 722 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [644-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Counterclaims and Affirmative Defenses based on Invalidity and Unenforceability on the Grounds of Indefiniteness, lack of Written Description, Enablement and Inequitable Conduct before the Patent Office (Exhibit A FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) Entry date 05/25/04]
5/24/04 723 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [646-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Twelfth Count in its Counterclaim (for Monopolization) (cgar) [Entry date 05/25/04]
5/24/04 724 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [648-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment of Infringement (Filed Under SEAL) (Exhibits 1 & 2 FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) [Entry date 05/25/04]
5/25/04 -- Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [704-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Equitable Estoppel Defenses set at 9:00 6/30/04, [702-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Fifteenth Counterclaim - that Rambus's Conduct was "Unlawful" in Violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Section 17200 set at 9:00 6/30/04, [700-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Fifteenth Counterclaim - that Rambus's Conduct was "Fraudulent" in Violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Section 17200 set at 9:00 6/30/04, [698-1]motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no Literal Infringement based on the term "Read Request" set at 9:00 6/30/04, [696-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment that Claims 1 & 2 of U.S. Patent No. 5,953,263 are invalid over Japanese Patent Publication No. Sho. 63/1988-239676(YAMAGUCHI) set at 9:00 6/30/04, [694-1]motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no literal infringement of claim 26 of the '804 patent set at 9:00 6/30/04, [692-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment that claim 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,034,918 is invalid over U.S. Patent No. 4,763,249 set at 9:00 6/30/04, [690-1] motion by Infineon for Summary Judgment of no literal infringement of claim 18 of the '918 patent set at 9:00 6/30/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
5/25/04 -- Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [708-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Answers to Questions asked at Depositions of Infineon Witnesses Hans-Peter Bette and Rudd Corwin set at 9:00 6/9/04, [665-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel the Production of "Lock-In" Documents set at 9:00 6/9/04, [662-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel answers to questions asked at deposition of Infineon witness Johann Harter set at 9:00 6/9/04, [660-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel production of documents in response to Rambus's fourth set of request for production of documents and things set at 9:00 6/9/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
5/25/04 -- Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [574-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon in limine to exclude reference to Arthur Andersen and/or Enron Under Rules 402 and 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence set at 9:00 6/10/04, [572-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon in limine to exclude evidence of, or reference to, the Federal Circuit's Fraud Decision set at 9:00 6/10/04, [569-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon in limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Conspiracies set at 9:00 6/10/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
5/26/04 725 ORDER that the parties shall file briefing addressed to the meaning of the part of the decision in Kingsdown Med. Consultants, Ltd. v. Hollister, Inc. on which Rambus relies as the predicate for this motion. . . . SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS; the plf shall file a memorandum by 6/7/04; the dfts dhsll file a responsive memorandum by 6/15/04; the plfs may file a reply memorandum by 6/18/04; the parties are admonished that, except as is necessary to account for evidentiary developments during the trial, the Court will entertain no further proposed instruction based on Kingdom, it being the intent of the Court to foreclose further litigation over this issue at the last minute such as been the the inclination of the parties herein as of late. (signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed and Faxed: yes [EOD Date: 5/26/04] (khan)
5/26/04 726 ORDER under Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Pltf's motion is DENIED IN PART AS MOOT AND GRANTED IN PART ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 5/26/4 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/27/04] (cgar) [Entry date 05/27/04]
5/26/04 727 ORDER (Plt'f Motion in Limine No. 4 (dkt #576)) the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 5/26/4 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/27/04] (cgar) [Entry date 05/27/04]
5/26/04 728 ORDER granting [572-1] motion by Infineon in limine to exclude evidence of, or reference to, the Federal Circuit's Fraud Decision it is further ORDERED that the facts and legal contentiions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 5/26/4) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/27/04] (cgar) [Entry date 05/27/04]
5/26/04 729 ORDER granting [569-1] motion by Infineon in limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Conspiracies; it is further ORDERED (Dft's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Conspiracies (dkt #569) that the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 5/26/4 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/27/04] (cgar) [Entry date 05/27/04] [Edit date 05/27/04]
5/26/04 730 ORDER granting [574-1] motion by Infineon in limine to exclude reference to Arthur Andersen and/or Enron Under Rules 402 and 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence; it is further ORDERED that the factsd and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 5/26/4 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/27/04] (cgar) [Entry date 05/27/04]
5/27/04 731 RESPONSE (Notice) by Infineon of filing with the FTC pursuant to the Courts' April 27, 2004 Bench Order (cgar)
5/27/04 734 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Carolyn Luedtke to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 76383 (scoo)[Entry date 05/28/04]
5/28/04 732 ORDER that the deft's oral motion, made pursuant to paragraph 7 of the Order of May 21, 2004, for protection against the pltf's request for leave to file a motion to compel discovery of Kirkland & Ellis LLP is GRANTED, thus the plf may not file is proposed motion, there being no good cause shown therefor ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/28/04] (scoo)
5/28/04 733 ORDER that the hearing currently scheduled for June 9, 2004 at 9:00 is moved to June 9, 2004 at 10:00 a.m. ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/28/04] (scoo)
5/28/04 -- So Ordered: granting [734-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Carolyn Luedtke to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $50.00 Receipt # 76383 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne )Copies Mailed: yes (scoo)
5/28/04 -- Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [708-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel Answers to Questions asked at Depositions of Infineon Witnesses Hans-Peter Bette and Rudd Corwin set at 10:00 6/9/04, [665-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel the Production of "Lock-In" Documents set at 10:00 6/9/04, [656-1] motion by Infineon for Leave to File Supplemental Brief on subject matter waiver set at 10:00 6/9/04, [662-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel answers to questions asked at deposition of Infineon witness Johann Harter set at 10:00 6/9/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
http://www.usjeff.com/RambusVsInfineon/Docket.htm
IFX Docket Update
I was out all last week and a BUNCH of stuff happened while I was gone!
http://www.usjeff.com/RambusVsInfineon/Docket.htm
More IFX VA2 Update
5/12/04 683 MOTION with Memorandum in Support by Infineon for Leave to File brief to exceed local rule 7(E)(3) page limitation (cgar) [Entry date 05/13/04]
5/12/04 684 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [646-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment on Infineon's Twelfth Count in its Counterclaim (for Monopolization) by Rambus, Inc. (cgar) [Entry date 05/13/04]
5/12/04 685 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [644-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Partial Summary Judgment on Infineon's Counterclaims and Affirmative Defenses based on Invalidity and Unenforceability on the Grounds of Indefiniteness, lack of Written Description, Enablement and Inequitable Conduct before the Patent Officei (FILED UNDER SEAL) (EXHIBITS A-K FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) [Entry date 05/13/04]
5/13/04 686 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for dates of 05/07/04 (placed in brown expanable)(cgar) [Edit date 05/13/04]
5/13/04 687 ORDER granting [683-1] motion for Leave to File brief to exceed local rule 7(E)(3) page limitation ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 5/13/04] (cgar)
5/13/04 688 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [648-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Summary Judgment of Infringement (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits A-N FILED UNDER SEAL, Declaration of Jospeh C. McAlexander and supporting Exhibits A-G FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar)
http://www.usjeff.com/RambusVsInfineon/Docket.htm
Here's what turned up on the IFX docket:
4/26/04 664 RESPONSE by Infineon to [638-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Leave to File Amended Reply to Defendants' Revised Second Amended Counterclaims (cgar)
4/26/04 665 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Compel the Production of "Lock-In" Documents (cgar) [Entry date 04/27/04]
4/26/04 666 MEMORANDUM in support of by Rambus, Inc. [665-1] motion to Compel the Production of "Lock-In" Documents (Declaration of Sean P. Gates attached) (Exhibits (#1-17) to Declaration of S.P. Gates placed in brown expandable) (cgar) [Entry date 04/27/04]
4/26/04 667 MOTION by Rambus, Inc.for Leave to File Surreply regarding subject matter waiver as it pertains to attorney-client and work product privileges (cgar) [Entry date 04/27/04]
4/26/04 668 MEMORANDUM in support of by Rambus, Inc. [667-1] motion for Leave to File Surreply regarding subject matter waiver as it pertains to attorney-client and work product privileges (Surreply recv'd (SEALED)) (cgar) [Entry date 04/27/04]
4/26/04 669 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Strike portions of the reply expert report of Joseph C. McAlexander unrelated to the Federal Circuits's Construction of read request (cgar) [Entry date 04/27/04]
4/26/04 670 MEMORANDUM in support of by Rambus, Inc. [669-1] motion to Strike portions of the reply expert report of Joseph C. McAlexander unrelated to the Federal Circuits's onstruction of read request(Declaration of Peter A. Detre and Exhibits (A-E attached) Exhibits 1-4 SEAL) (cgar)[Entry date 04/27/04]
4/27/04 671 Minute entry:Payne, J., Diane Daffron, OCR. Parties by counsel. Arguments had on Defendant's Motion Re: Subject Matter Waiver, Exfoliation. Arguments had on Plaintiff's Motion to Take Discovery Re: Document retention. Motions taken under adivsement by the Court. (snea)
IFX Docket Entrys From 23rd that turned up today. Who is Johann Harter? http://www.aecapc-europe.com/html/speaker_2004_harter.htm
Note that I didn't update USJeff.com's docket. It cost almost $7.00 every time I get it in the proper format. I need to redo it so that I can just grab the new items. JF
=================
4/23/04 660 RENEWED MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Compel production of documents in response to Rambus's fourth set of request for production of documents and things (cgar) [Entry date 04/26/04]
4/23/04 661 MEMORANDUM in support of by Rambus, Inc. [660-1] renewed motion to Compel production of documents in response to Rambus's fourth set of request for production of documents and things (Exhibits placed in brown expandable) (cgar)[Entry date 04/26/04]
4/23/04 662 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. to Compel answers to questions asked at deposition of Infineon witness Johann Harter (cgar)[Entry date 04/26/04]
4/23/04 663 MEMORANDUM in support of by Rambus, Inc. [662-1] motion to Compel answers to questions asked at deposition of Infineon witness Johann Harter (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) [Entry date 04/26/04]
4/26/04 664 RESPONSE by Infineon to [638-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Leave to File Amended Reply to Defendants' Revised Second Amended Counterclaims (cgar)
IFX Docket Update
Lots of new entries:
http://www.usjeff.com/RambusVsInfineon/Docket.htm
Hynix Docket Update
4/8/04 432 STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte : setting procedure for production of materials from Infineon action containing third party information (cc: all counsel)[5:00-cv-20905] (dhm) [Entry date 04/09/04]
4/13/04 433 STIPULATION and ORDER : setting procedure for production of materials from infineon action containing third party information by Special Master Hon. Read Ambler (cc: all counsel) [5:00-cv-20905] (gm) [Entry date 04/14/04]
http://www.usjeff.com/HynixVsRambus/Docket.htm
IFX Docket Update
4/6/04 624 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [593-1] motion to take discovery of Infineon's document retention policies and practices in order to defend against Infineon's newly added counterclaim under Cal.Bus.& Prof. Code 17200 by Rambus (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits FILED UNDER SEAL) (khan)[Entry date 04/07/04] [Edit date 04/07/04]
4/8/04 625 MOTION by Infineon for Judgment on the Pleadings as to certian Rambus affirmative defenses (cgar)
4/8/04 626 MEMORANDUM in support of by Infineon [625-1] motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to certian Rambus affirmative defenses (cgar)
4/8/04 627 MOTION by Infineon to Strike certain sections of the supplemental reply report of Prof. David J. Teece (cgar)
4/8/04 628 MEMORANDUM in support of by Infineon [627-1] motion to Strike certain sections of the supplemental reply report of Prof. David J. Teece (Exhibits 5-8 placed under SEAL) (cgar)
4/9/04 629 ORDER, if the Pltf feels itself aggrieved and is so inclined, it may file a supplemental reply brief (re: Rambus' Reply Memorandum on Subject Matter W waiver as it pertains to Attorney-client and work product privileges filed on April 9, 2004) by 5:00 pm April 14, 2004 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 4/12/04] (cgar) [Entry date 04/12/04]
4/9/04 630 Reply by Rambus, Inc. on Subject Matter Waiver as it Pertains to Attorney-Client and Work Product Privileges [605-1] by Rambus, Inc. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) [Entry date 04/12/04]
4/12/04 631 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine #1 (to Exclude Evidence or Argument regarding alleged breach of duties or other obligations by Rambus to Infineon or other JEDEC members) (cgar) [Entry date 04/13/04]
4/12/04 632 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine #2 (to exclude evidence or argument that Rambus's amendment of patent cliams was based on "stolen" ideas or was otherwise wrongful or illegal (cgar) [Entry date 04/13/04]
4/12/04 633 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine #3 to exclude evidence or argument regarding prior District Court comments or findings regarding potential trial witnesses (cgar) [Entry date 04/13/04]
4/12/04 634 REPLY by Infineon to response to [565-1] motion in limine to exclude FTC ALJ's Initial Decision (cgar) [Entry date 04/13/04]
4/12/04 635 REPLY by Infineon to response to [569-1] motion in limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Conspiracies (cgar) [Entry date 04/13/04]
4/12/04 636 REPLY by Infineon to response to [574-1] motion in limine to exclude reference to Arthur Andersen and/or Enron Under Rules 402 and 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (cgar) [Entry date 04/13/04]
_
4/12/04 637 REPLY by Infineon to response to [572-1] motion in limine to exclude evidence of, or reference to, the Federal Circuit's Fraud Decision (cgar) [Entry date 04/13/04]
4/13/04 638 MOTION by Rambus, Inc.for Leave to File Amended Reply to Defendants' Revised Second Amended Counterclaims(sketch order placed on left) (kste) [Edit date 04/13/04]
4/13/04 639 MEMORANDUM in support of [638-1] motion by Rambus, Inc.for Leave to File Amended Reply to Defendants' Revised Second Amended Counterclaims (Amended Reply to Dfts' Revised Second Amended Counterclaims with exhibits-Rece'd Only pending ruling of court; UNDER SEAL) (kste)
4/14/04 640 TRANSCRIPT for dates of April 2, 2004 of Conference Call before the Honorable Robert E. Payne (khan)
4/14/04 641 ORDER that the request for an extension to file its supplemental reply re: subject matter waiver as it pertains to attorney-client and work product privileges; it is hereby ORDERED that the request is granted; it is further ORDERED that plaintiff shall file its supplemental reply by 4/16/04; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y and by facsimile y and by facsimile [EOD Date: 4/14/04](thom)
http://www.usjeff.com/RambusVsInfineon/Docket.htm
From IFX Docket - Note I'm not going to hang this on the site today. I'm going to be out of the office. Anyway, 17200:
4/6/04 624 REPLY by Rambus, Inc. to response to [593-1] motion to take discovery of Infineon's document retention policies and practices in order to defend against Infineon's newly added counterclaim under Cal.Bus.& Prof. Code 17200 by Rambus (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits FILED UNDER SEAL) (khan) [Entry date 04/07/04] [Edit date 04/07/04]
IFX Docket Update - A/C Priv Fight is on
4/5/04 613 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Steven M. Perry to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72874 (cgar)[Entry date 04/06/04]
4/5/04 614 MOTION by Rambus, Inc. for Lynn Healey Scaduto to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72874 (cgar)[Entry date 04/06/04]
4/5/04 615 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine 1-4 (Seeking to Exclude evidence or argument related to Rambus' JEDEC-Related conduct (cgar)[Entry date 04/06/04]
4/5/04 616 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine 1-4 (To exclude evidence or argument that Rambus's amendment of Patent Claims was based on "stolen" ideas or was otherwise wrongful or illegal) (cgar)
[Entry date 04/06/04]
4/5/04 617 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine 1-4 (to exclude evidence or argument regarding prior District Court comments or findings regarding potential trial witnesses) (cgar)[Entry date 04/06/04]
4/5/04 618 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Infineon to [576-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. in limine 1-4 (to exclude evidence or argument based on expert testimony not disclosed in an allowed ruel 26 report) (cgar) [Entry date 04/06/04]
4/5/04 619 RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [569-1] motion by Infineon in limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Conspiracies (cgar)[Entry date 04/06/04]
4/5/04 620 RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [574-1] motion by Infineon in limine to exclude reference to Arthur Andersen and/or Enron Under Rules 402 and 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (cgar) [Entry date 04/06/04]
4/5/04 621 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [572-1] motion by Infineon in limine to exclude evidence of, or reference to, the Federal Circuit's Fraud Decision (cgar) [Entry date 04/06/04]
4/5/04 622 RESPONSE by Rambus, Inc. to [565-1] motion by Infineon in limine to exclude FTC ALJ's Initial Decision (FILED UNDER SEAL) (cgar) [Entry date 04/06/04]
4/6/04 -- So Ordered: granting [614-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Lynn Healey Scaduto to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72874, granting [613-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. for Steven M. Perry to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72874 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
4/6/04 623 Memorandum Regarding Rambus's Waiver of the Attorney Cliend and Work Product Privileges on the Subject of Rambus's Pre-Trial Document Destruction filed by defendant Infineon, defendant Infineon (FILED UNDER SEAL) (EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL) (khan)
http://www.usjeff.com/RambusVsInfineon/Docket.htm
RE: Stipulated Order
Someone said that a "Stipulated Order" would be one that Rambus agreed to???
No, I don't have it yet. Where's the fraud?
http://www.usjeff.com/RambusVsInfineon/Docket.htm
IFX Docket Update - I'll hang this and Friday's on the docket in about an hour.
4/5/04 612 Stipulated Order that Rambus' attorney-client privilege and work product objections to the production or introduction into evidence of the documents listed on Attachment A are deemed to have been made and overruled on the grounds stated in the Court's Feb. 26, 2004 Order; that the documents listed on Attachment A to this Stipulated Order and the realted depositions may be disclosed to members of the parties' respective trial teams on an "Outside Counsel Only" basis but shall not be disclosed to others, either voluntarily or in response to subpoena, without further order of the Court (See Stipulated Order for detaisl)(signed by Judge Robert E. Payne 04/02/04 ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 4/5/04] (cgar)
IFX Docket Update - I won't hang it until Monday.
4/1/04 610 ORDER for the reasons stated on the record of 01/08/04 it is ORDERED (1) that the following claims of the following patents having been decided anf disposed of by previus orders which were not appealed shall not be the subject of further proceedings in this remand either by way of discovery of trial... (2) the following claims of the following patents shall be the subject of further proceedings in this remand by both discovery and trial to the extent allowed by the claim construction opinion of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and any orders entered herein respecting the scope of discovery and trial as to such claims of such patents... (7) the definitions of "Block Size", "First External Clock Signal" and "Second External Clock Signal" are controlled by the Court's March 15, 2001, Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion (Docket No. 198)...(SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS)( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 4/2/04] (cgar) [Entry date 04/02/04]
4/1/04 611 TRANSCRIPT of hearing before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of March 26, 2004 (placed in brown expandable)(cgar) [Entry date 04/02/04]
It's kind of funny in a perverted sense. It reminds me of "southern justice" in the 50's. I got the new stuff hung:
http://www.usjeff.com/RambusVsInfineon/Docket.htm
IFX Docket Update - Will Post on Site later
3/26/04 603 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [567-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon to Strike Sections One and Two of the Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. Richard T. Rapp (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits A-T Filed Under Seal) (cgar)
3/26/04 604 Minute entry: Payne, J., Sandy Beverly, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for arguments on motions. (snea) 3/30/04
605 Memorandum on subject matter waiver as it pertains to attorney-client and work product privileges by plaintiff Rambus, Inc. (scoo) [Entry date 03/31/04]
3/31/04 606 REPLY by Infineon to response to [567-1] motion to Strike Sections One and Two of the Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. Richard T. Rapp (Exhibit E Filed under SEAL) (cgar) [Entry date 04/01/04]
3/31/04 607 RESPONSE by Infineon to [593-1] motion to take discovery of Infineon's document retention policies and practices in order to defend against Infineon's newly added counterclaim under Cal.Bus.& Prof. Code 17200 by Rambus (Filed under SEAL) (Exhibits Filed under SEAL) (cgar) [Entry date 04/01/04]
4/1/04 -- So Ordered: granting [602-1] motion by Infineon for Jeanne Marie Heffernam to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72694 ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes (cgar)
4/1/04 608 ORDER granting [541-1] motion by Infineon to Strike the Industry Royalty rates section of the Supplemental Expert Report of Prof. David J. Teece, granting in part, denying in part [527-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Strike Sections 2.2 and 2.3 of the Second Supplemental Expert Report of Joseph C. McAlexander and the Supplemental Report of Dennis W. Carlton, specifically respecting Dr. Carlton's supplemental report, the Motion is DENIED respecting the Pltf's challenge to the portion of the report pertaining to geographic market, except to the extent noted on the record, the Motion also is DENIED respecting the Pltf's challenge to the portion of the report pertaining to alleged anti-competitive effects absent a showing of market power, the Motion is DENIED AS MOOT with respect to that portion of Dr. Carlton's supplemental report containing his assertion that his economic opinion is not altered by the decision of the U.S Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Respecting Mr. McAlexander's supplemental report, the Motion is GRANTED AS to sections 2.2 AND 2.3 of the report;the Request for Supplemental Expert Reports of the Pltf (dkt #517) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, specifically, the Motion is GRANTED to the extent the Pltf seeks to submit the supplemental expert report of Dr. William Huber respecting the claim term Read Request, but DENIED to the extent the Pltf seeks to submit the supplemental expert report of Dr. William Huber respecting the claim terms First External Clock Signal and Second External Clock Signal ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 4/1/04] (cgar)
4/1/04 609 Stipulated Order any briefs in opposition to pending motions in limine shall be filed by 04/25/04, any reply briefs shall be filed by 04/12/04 and a hearing on those moitons in limine shall be held on a date to be determined by subsequent Order of the Court ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes and facsimile [EOD Date: 4/1/04] (cgar)
Bert's gone http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=bert+mccomas
So's Sherry http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=%22sherry+gar...
Jack seemed to disappear on or about December 8, 2003, http://www.eet.com/search/search_eetimes.jhtml;jsessionid=4C5R4BLLPCSBAQSNDBCCKHQ?site=4&queryTe...
Nothing from Bert or Sherry for a couple of years. Bert's prolific pen has dried up. What does it mean?
HYNIX Docket Update
/24/04 426 PROOF OF SERVICE by Plaintiff of deposition designations [418-1] [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm) [Entry date 03/26/04]
3/25/04 422 MINUTES: ( C/R Lee-Anne Shortridge) ( Hearing Date:3/23/04) Claims Construction hearing held before JudgeRonald M. Whyte. Court issued a tentative claim construction as to the various claims. Matter continued to 3/24/04 at 2:00 pm for hearing on motions for summary judgment. The Court will send out a written claims construction ruling to the parties. [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm) [Entry date 03/26/04]
3/25/04 423 MINUTES: ( C/R Lee-Anne Shortridge) ( Hearing Date: 3/24/04) Hearing held before Judge Ronald M. Whyte. The motion for summary judgment [366-1] is submitted, the motion for summary judgment of invalidity of claims referring to "precharge information" under Rambus's construction [359-1] is submitted, the motion for summary judgment of non-infringement under Hynix's proposed constrution of "operation code" [358-1] is submitted, the motion invalidity under Rambus's proposed construction [358-2] is submitted, the motion for summary judgment of non-infringement under Hynix's proposed construction of the term "device" [357-1] is submitted, the motion invalidity under Rambus's proposed construction [357-2] is submitted, the motion for summary judgment non-infringement under proposed constructions of "block information" [356-1] is submitted, the motion for summary judgment of invalidity under Rambus's proposed construction of "synchronous memory device" [355-1] is submitted, the motion for summary judgment of non-infringement under Hynix's proposed construction of "second external clock signal" or, in the alternative, invalidity under Rambus's proposed construction [354-1] is submitted. The Court to send out a written ruling to the parties. [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm) [Entry date 03/26/04]
3/25/04 424 REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT; Date of proceedings: 3/23/04 ( C/R: Lee-Anne Shortridge) minutes [422-2] [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm)[Entry date 03/26/04]
3/26/04 425 SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSION by Plaintiffs Hynix Semiconductor, Hynix Semiconductor, Hynix Semiconductor and Hynix Semiconductor regarding "synchronous memory device" and "packet" [355-1] [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm)
3/26/04 427 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF by defendant Rambus, Inc. re construction of "Synchronous Memory Device" and Definition of "Packet" [355-1] [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm) [Entry date 03/29/04]
3/26/04 428 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE by defendant Rambus, Inc. [427-1] [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm) [Entry date 03/29/04]
3/26/04 429 PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant Rambus, Inc. of request for judical notice [428-1], supplemental brief [427-1] [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm) [Entry date 03/29/04]
3/29/04 430 REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT; Date of proceedings: 3/24/04 ( C/R: Lee-Anne Shortridge) minutes [423-1] [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm)
http://www.usjeff.com/HynixVsRambus/Docket.htm
The latest from the IFX docket - I'll hang it on the site later.
3/26/04 603 RESPONSE (in Opposition) by Rambus, Inc. to [567-1] motion by Infineon, Infineon to Strike Sections One and Two of the Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. Richard T. Rapp (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Exhibits A-T Filed Under Seal) (cgar)
3/26/04 604 Minute entry: Payne, J., Sandy Beverly, OCR. Parties by counsel. Matter came on for arguments on motions. (snea)
The latest from the Hynix Docket - I'll hang it on the site later.
3/24/04 426 PROOF OF SERVICE by Plaintiff of deposition designations [418-1] [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm) [Entry date 03/26/04]
3/25/04 422 MINUTES: ( C/R Lee-Anne Shortridge) ( Hearing Date: 3/23/04) Claims Construction hearing held before Judge Ronald M. Whyte. Court issued a tentative claim construction as to the various claims. Matter continued to 3/24/04 at 2:00 pm for hearing on motions for summary judgment. The Court will send out a written claims construction ruling to the parties. [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm) [Entry date 03/26/04]
3/25/04 423 MINUTES: ( C/R Lee-Anne Shortridge) ( Hearing Date: 3/24/04) Hearing held before Judge Ronald M. Whyte. the motion for summary judgment [366-1] is submitted, the motion for summary judgment of invalidity of claims referring to "precharge information" under Rambus's construction [359-1] is submitted, the motion for summary judgment of non-infringement under Hynix's proposed constrution of "operation code" [358-1] is submitted, the motion invalidity under Rambus's proposed construction [358-2] is submitted, the motion for summary judgment of non-infringement under Hynix's proposed construction of the term "device" [357-1] is submitted, the motion invalidity under Rambus's proposed construction [357-2] is submitted, the motion for summary judgment non-infringement under proposed constructions of "block information" [356-1] is submitted, the motion for summary judgment of invalidity under Rambus's proposed construction of "synchronous memory device" [355-1] is submitted, the motion for summary judgment of non-infringement under Hynix's proposed construction of "second external clock signal" or, in the alternative, invalidity under Rambus's proposed construction [354-1] is submitted. The Court to send out a written ruling to the parties. [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm)[Entry date 03/26/04]
3/25/04 424 REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT; Date of proceedings: 3/23/04 ( C/R: Lee-Anne Shortridge) minutes [422-2] [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm)[Entry date 03/26/04]
3/26/04 425 SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSION by Plaintiffs Hynix Semiconductor, Hynix Semiconductor, Hynix Semiconductor and Hynix Semiconductor regarding "synchronous memory device" and "packet" [355-1] [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm)
>>secret room
I don't even go there. I'm just a peon on the outside and plan to stay that way.
Hynix Docket Update
3/23/04 418 DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS by Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm)
3/23/04 419 PROOF OF SERVICE by Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor of deposition designations (without attachment) [418-1] [5:00-cv-20905](dhm)
3/24/04 420 DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS by defendant Rambus, Inc. [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm)
3/24/04 421 PROOF OF SERVICE by Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor of Deposition Designations (with attachments) [418-1] [5:00-cv-20905](dhm) [Entry date 03/25/04]
http://www.usjeff.com/HynixVsRambus/Docket.htm
IFX Docket Update
3/23/04 600 TRANSCRIPT of conference call before the Honrable Robert E. Payne on date of 3/23/4 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar) [Entry date 03/25/04]
3/24/04 601 Statement regarding late produced documents in support of Response by defendant Infineon, [543-1] motion response to Rambus's Motion to Strike Sections 2,2 and 2,3 of the second supplemental report of Joseph C. McAlexander and the Supplemental report of Dennis W. Carlton (Filed under SEAL) (Exhibits A,B,C,D,E,H and J Filed under SEAL) (Exhibits F, G, I placed in brown expandable) Inc., Infineon, Infineon(cgar) [Entry date 03/25/04]
3/25/04 602 MOTION by Infineon for Jeanne Marie Heffernam to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 72694 (cgar)
http://www.usjeff.com/RambusVsInfineon/Docket.htm
http://www.usjeff.com/RambusVsInfineon/Docket.htm
I tried to match the Rambus PDFs to the correct docket. PLEASE let me know if you see any mismatches. Thx, JF
Are they not listed somewhere in the docket?
IFX Docket Update
3/23/04 -- Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [520-1] motion by Rambus, Inc.to Dismiss Rule 12 (b)(6) set at 10:00 3/26/04, [520-2] motion by Rambus, Inc.for Partial Summary Judgment Rule 56 (b) concerning Infineon's counterclaim Count 15, based on California Bus. & Prof. Code 17200 set at 10:00 3/26/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
3/23/04 -- Oral Argument Hearing as to Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp. on Subject Matter Waiver set 8:00 4/15/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
3/23/04 595 TRANSCRIPT of Motion to Compel Hearing before the Honorable Robert E. Payne for date of 03/16/04 (placed in brown expandable) (cgar)
3/23/04 596 ORDER that the hearing re: the Motion to dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) or in Alternative Motion for Partial summary Judgment concerning Defts' Counterclaim 15 of the Plaintiff, currently scheduled for 3/26/04 at 2:00 pm is hereby rescheduled to 3/26/04 at 10:00 am; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y and by facsimile [EOD Date: 3/23/04] (thom)
3/23/04 597 ORDER that defts by 3/24/04 shall submit the requested supplemental materials respecting the motions pertaining to expert reports; defts shall supplement its materials to specify precisely what it means by the phrase "newly produced" materials and precisely what "newly produced"materials it is referring to in its papers; in addition, the defts shall send a cpoy of this supplementaion by faccsimile directly to the Court; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y and by facsimile [EOD Date: 3/23/04] (thom)
3/23/04 598 ORDER that the parties shall file papers address the topic of subject matter waiver as it pertains to the attorney-client work product privileges on the following: plaintiff shall file its memorandum addressing the issue by 3/30/04; defts shall file a response by 4/6/04; plaintiff may file a reply by 4/9/04; a hearing on the issue shall be held on 4/15/04 at 8:00 am; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: y and by facsimile [EOD Date: 3/23/04] (thom)
3/23/04 599 ORDER that it is hereby SCHEDULED for 3/26/04 at 10:00 am; the Motion to Strike Portions of Second Supplemental Expert Report of Mr. McAlexander and Entire Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. Carlton of plaintiff; the Motion for Supplemental Expert Reports Pertaining to the Claim Terms Read Request and First and Second External Clock Signals of plaintiff; and the Motion to Strike the Industry Royalty Rates Section of the Supplemental Expert Report Submitted by Dr. Teece of defts; argument shall also be heard on plaintiff's pending Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) or in Alternative for Partial Summary Judgment Concerning Defts' Counterclaim 15; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne )Copies Mailed: y and by facsimile [EOD Date: 3/23/04](thom)
Hynix Docket Update (nothing about hearing)
3/23/04 418 DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS by Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm)
3/23/04 419 PROOF OF SERVICE by Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor of deposition designations (without attachment) [418-1] [5:00-cv-20905](dhm)
Micron Docket Update
No biggy
3/19/04 548 NOTICE of Firm Registration as an LLP and Name Change filed by out of state counsel for Micron Technology (rc)[Entry date 03/22/04]
http:\\www.usjeff.com
Hynix Docket Update (Claims construction hearing docketed)
3/16/04 -- RECEIVED Proposed Order re plaintiff's request re equipment in courtroom ( Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor ) [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm)
3/16/04 -- RECEIVED Stipulation and Proposed Order re extension of time to file Hynix's summary judgment replies ( Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor ) [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm)
3/17/04 415 ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte granting plaintffs' request re equipment in courtroom ( Date Entered: 3/17/04)(cc: all counsel) [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm)
3/19/04 416 PROOF OF SERVICE by Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor, Plaintiff Hynix Semiconductor of order granting plaintiffs' request re equipment in courtroom. [415-2] [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm)
3/22/04 417 MINUTES: ( C/R not reported) ( Hearing Date: 3/18/04)Tutorial held before Judge Ronald M. Whyte Claims Construction hearing will be held 2:00 3/23/04 ; [5:00-cv-20905] (dhm)
http:\\www.usjeff.com
IFX Docket Update
3/18/04 591 ORDER the jury trial currently scheduled for May 10, 2004 is CONTINUED until June 10, 2004 at 9:30AM; Jury selection shall begin on June 10, 2004 at 9:30 AM; Opening arguments shall commence on June 11, 2004 at 9:00 AM; the presentation of evidence shall commence on June 14, 2004 at 9:00AM; the Final PTC currently scheduled for April 29, 2004 is CONTINUED GENERALLY; a date certain will be determined at a later time ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne ) Copies Mailed: yes [EOD Date: 3/18/04] (cgar)
3/18/04 -- USCA Federal Circuit LETTER a petiton for writ of mandamus has been filed (Misc. No. 762 - In Re Rambus Inc) (cgar)
http://www.usjeff.com/RambusVsInfineon/Docket.htm
Thanks Skeptic, I hung the links on the IFX docket to put them in their proper context. I wonder how they select which ones to put up?
http://www.usjeff.com/RambusVsInfineon/Docket.htm
>>Many have decided not to post on yahooligan and will not share the info.
Jeff
Very good. I'm in complete agreement.
Jeff
Also, I updated the rmbs/ifx attorney listing:
http://www.usjeff.com/RambusVsInfineon/Docket-A.htm
I missed a three of the new ones on the previous (cheap) look at PACER:
3/16/04 582 Stipulation RE Use of Previously Produced Documents in Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies, AG, et al. filed by Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology (khan) [Entry date 03/17/04]
3/16/04 587 Minute entry:Payne, J., Diane Daffron, OCR. Parties by counsel. Counsel for the parties advised the Court regarding agreements they have reached concerning discovery matters. Argreements stated on the record for the Court. (snea) [Entry date 03/17/04]
3/17/04 583 STIPULATED ORDER that the Court's 2/26/04 Order compels Rambus to produce to defts any documents it produced in the Hynix or FTC litigations that are coered by the 3/7/01 Order and the twenty-seven documents that fallw ithin the reach of the 3/7/01 Order that it has never disclosed previously; ....See Order for Details... ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 3/16/04 ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 3/17/04](thom) [Edit date 03/17/04]
http://www.usjeff.com/RambusVsInfineon/Docket.htm
Here are the orders. I'll put them on the docket once I get to the office (where my MS Front Page is):
3/17/04 584 ORDER that oral argument on the Motion to Stay the Order Provisions of the Second Paragraph of the Court's Order of 2/26/04 of the plaintiff, as well as the Motion to Dismiss or, in Alternatiave for Partial Summary Judgment Concerning Defts' Counterclaim 15 shall be held on 3/26/04 at 2:00 pm; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 3/16/04 ) Copies Mailed: [EOD Date: 3/17/04] (thom) [Edit date 03/17/04]
3/17/04 585 ORDER denying [545-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to Compel the Production of Documents in Response to Rambus's Fourth Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things, denying [537-1] motion by Rambus, Inc. to the extent to Compel Infineon to Witnesses for Depositions, granting [537-2] motion by Rambus, Inc. to the extent for a rule 26(f) conference, thus, a Rule 26(f) conference was held during the hearing of 3/16/04; ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 3/16/04 ) Copies Mailed: y [EOD Date: 3/17/04] (thom)
3/17/04 586 ORDER that for the reasons stated on the record on 3/16/04, the plaintiff may file a motion addressing whether it has established a prima facie showing that the defts engaged in spoliation; the following schedule shall controlb riefing: plaintiff shall file its motion and memo addressing the issue by 3/22/04; defts shall file a response by 3/31/04; defts shall file any reply by 4/6/04; a hearing on the issue shall be held on 4/15/04 at 8:00 am ( signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 3/16/04 ) Copies Mailed: [EOD Date: 3/17/04] (thom)
3/17/04 -- Motion hearing for Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon, Rambus, Inc., Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc., Infineon Holding, Infineon Corp., Rambus, Inc., Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Holding, Rambus, Inc., Micron Technology, Hynix, American Lawyer, Infineon, Infineon, Infineon Inc. [473-1] motion by Infineon Inc. to Stay Trail pending rulings in the FTC action against Rambus set at 2:00 3/26/04, [520-1] motion by Rambus, Inc.to Dismiss Rule 12 (b)(6) set at 2:00 3/26/04 before Judge Robert E. Payne (snea)
>>I'm surprised this has not been plastered everyhere on MF and Yahoo! since it seems kind of pertinent
I took down the original site and am replacing it with the new one. The guys on yahoo DO NOT need too much information since they don't handle it very well - you know, threatening judges and the like. <G> Anyway, it's kind of interesting that the denial has been known here for a day.