Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
>> What if the hydrogen powered fuel cells just bust the hydrogen out of H2O?
In order to get the hydrogen out of water you need energy.
The hydrogen you get from H2O must be enough to move the vehicle plus recharge the system that is used to get the hydrogen out of H2O.
To make that feasible you must a come up with a system capable of getting hydrogen out of the water using almost no energy.
At that point you just invented the perpetual motion which is just not possible.
Does anybody knows what would be the value of SESN after it changes its name to CARM?
If you had, let's say 10,000 shares how many shares of CARM will you get?
What's going to happen with SESN shareholders after the merge?
Will the new ticker CARM carry the existing SESN shares?
Will the SESN ticker be delisted?
How did they manage to negotiate "new capital at better terms than its current financing arrangements"?
With interest rate increase by 0.75% I wonder why they waited this long.
Positive news though.
UK hydrogen breakthrough paves way for cheap truly green power
https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1600898/energy-crisis-uk-hydrogen-breakthrough-paves-way-cheap-truly-green-power
The articles reports that it is possible to replace expensive platinum with cheaper iron making the green tech more affordable.
That's a game changer!!!.
15M shares? Nice!
I have about 2.5M @ $0.0039 avg price
If this stock skyrockets thanks to Pot Bill over time it could go to $1.00
What's your avg price?
FCEL is a High Risk Investments based on their fundamentals, poor execution, poor performance and weak business trajectory.
This is company that struggled for many years to stay afloat.
I was in the share dilution a few years ago, bankruptcy and the removal of Bottone.
Institutions have their own reason to hold their positions.
Maybe you want to ask them why they are still holding.
I am personally still holding because I believe FCEL tech is good, they have unmatchable IP and most of all because I wanna make money of of this.
LONG FCEL
I have been a holder of FCEL for many years and I'll certainly be still here by June.
Fund Managers protect their portfolios by reducing risk.
By Fund Managers standards FCEL is classified as a High Risk investment under this market conditions.
What they do is rotating and rebalance their assets.
They shifts to more secular investments until the markets enter a more favorable phase.
We just got out of 2 years of exuberant growth and euphoria.
Now, most growth stocks lost between 30% to 50% from their All-Time-Highs and in some cases even 70%.
Fund Managers are doing what they are supposed to do to keep their jobs.
Carbon Capture seems to be the best technology FCEL can offer at the moment.
Being the only company in the world with that kind of tech is certainly an advantage.
But setting a TP of $12.00 for this year is a bit optimistic. We're not in 2020-2021 anymore with 0% yield that made equities a lucrative investment. Fund managers are distancing themselves from high grow stocks and a possible recession does not help either.
This year is about uncertainty and lots of volatility and Target Prices are very hard to predict. Let alone future geopolitical landscapes that may or may not favor FCEL.
Long FCEL
Totally Agree.
It doesn't convince me either.
Does the cost of retrofitting justifies high energy bills?
When the investment is fully recouped?
Even if it works it can have a market for few parts of the country where the excessive heat forces you to have A/C on night and day.
Thinking about Vegas or Phoenix for example.
You're right.
The bio-gas used by the plant of Long Beach in California is a renewable source of energy thus making the produced hydrogen GREEN.
Thanks srm4u who provided you with some education about the topic.
You will find the right answer there.
I believe that's a VERY SMART and RESPONSIBLE question to ask.
Unfortunately, answers are not very clear or understandable in common English.
Results from Google will get you too many different angles that lead to debatable arguments that will end up to no conclusions anyways.
People still struggle to understand, fail or simply don't care while they're comfortably watching Netflix on their couches and driving their polluting, clean air burner vehicles.
The truth is that it's our lifestyle that is toxic to us and our planet.
We already have solutions, ingenuity, will and working technologies to stop this.
FCEL is certainly one of them
The reversal has already started around the planet, we just need time now.
I'm afraid, you got it backwards
Q2 ! 06.10.2021 !!! (Premarket) EPS estimate consensus: -$0.05
Unless you're from Europe. But this is for the U.S. audience.
No problem, it's all good!
I'll discuss that gladly.
From your text: "FuelCell Energy’s solid oxide electrolysis platform operates at much higher efficiency, producing more hydrogen for a given amount of power input".
And that's ok. Question is... where do you get the power from to make the electrolysis to happen?
Until we reach extremely cheap ways to produce green hydrogen, current ways of producing zero emission power like nuclear will always win.
But nuclear has critical waste issue, plants are expensive and take several years to build.
Nuclear fusion won't be around for several decades due to its complexity, although latest news claim it will by 2035.
Hydrogen is very interesting because is abundant and when it's employed produces no pollutants.
We certainly are able to generate hydrogen in many ways but they are still not very efficient because economically speaking we need to subtract the energy employed from one process from the power we generate.
Also, Fuel cell themselves have a shelf-life. While it's true that they can be recycled easier than Lithium batteries ultimately we'll have to deal with waste as well.
Unfortunately, we will always have solar waste, or other waste no matter what while trying to produce hydrogen.
The ultimate goal is to produce green hydrogen only.
That's the only way to achieve zero emissions.
Energy is needed to convert an element to hydrogen so it's just not possible to remove some waste from the equation, be solar panel or wind turbines.
Energy cannot be produced only transformed.
So, from this level is it only to go down?
No real projects or products?
Sure. We just need to have the economy up and running full steam ahead.
2021 is going to be an insane year in terms of growth, with Green Energy and Eco initiatives ECOX should be fine.
Between $0.15 and $.20?
No kidding. I have been holding this thing since the symbol was DIGX.
I have to say I am way happier with the current structure and kind business now than back then.
Covid slowed down the growth of this company so I guess we'll wait and see.
Did you get burned by this one?
Bingo! going to > .05
If you make more than $1 Million a year.
Not a popular decision though.
CPAs are already looking for new loopholes.
Reposting interesting links from Hoghead7 posted last Friday.
Links were broken. The URLs contained a '$' sign that the iHub editor tries to translate into a ticker symbol.
Just in case you haven't had a chance to read them.
CT PURA 19-07-01RE02 NFCRC Letter 04_16_20.pdf
FCE Written Exceptions DN 19-07-01RE02.pdf
$XOM Acquiring $FCEL?
With $FCEL below $13 I would not be surprised of a possible $XOM takeover.
Acquisitions usually push up the price of a stock by a lot.
$FCEL can easily double in one day just with the announcement.
I remember when Alaska Airlines made public the acquisition of Virgin America the stock went up 80% that day and kept going up for some time.
Of course, it's just speculation but we all know that the carbon capture technology and $FCEL know-how makes a lot of sense for $XOM.
FCEL going down has NOTHING to do to with the stock itself.
It's the tug of war between the Bond Market and the Equity Market.
Cheap bonds always win against equities.
This instability will likely last until end of April. Do not expect any big breakouts from tech stocks in general.
Until we have clear and strong signals from the economy telling us what Powell has been advocating so far, we won't see any growth stock make a bold upward move. FCEL is just a victim.
In the meantime, you want to scoop up the cheapies every time there's an opportunity and sell covered calls to generate income.
It's reasonable to say $50 by end of 2021 because we still need plenty of infrastructure, research and local political commitment.
If the hydrogen economy takes off as hoped and clearly delivers its promises then $100 is going to be the floor.
Politics plays an enormous role.
FCEL started to rally when Biden got elected back in November. We finally got back to the Paris Accord and the environment is very promising. We need to have politicians to shift towards renewables, cleaner energy and move away from oil and coal. Natural Gas is good because can be used to produce blue hydrogen and once we start mass production costs will go down as a result.
The next boost for FCEL will be from the money that the new administration will invest of the aforementioned technologies.
In my opinion this is an unstoppable trend. Hydrogen is here to stay. FCEL has been in this business for more than 50 years and costs went down to a point where depicting an H-economy is not a pipe dream anymore.
Totally different reasons for that but both industries are High Growth, lucrative and overvalued.
Also, the two technologies are not strictly related. FCEL is not even in the EV market like PLUG for example.
It's more of a structural issue. Check the DOW and the NASDAQ.
The former was not hit during the sell-off but the latter was beaten down pretty bad. The DOW contains more stable, classic industrial companies with big floats.
If you didn't average down you missed the opportunity of your life.
Every time there's a sell-off, big opportunities open up.
No way this is going to $22
And $9 does not make any sense at all.
It will come back. 100%.
In the meantime you can buy the cheapies and average down.
Buy some protective PUTS
There is no rise in "yields".
What we have is a bond market that sells products with very attractive returns.
Institutions are buying them because they are pricing in the fact that a strong recovery is expected and when that happens we have inflation.
At that point they expect the FED to raise the discount interest.
Those bonds need to be that high to protect investors against inflation.
Someone is speculating that we're going to have that situation.
But Powell said no.
Now we have institutions dumping stocks because with a higher yield you make stocks less interesting. (Because stocks are capital intensive and money gets more expensive to borrow with a higher yield).
So, there a speculation that the discount interest will be raised in the future to counter balance inflation.
The bond craze is the result of that speculation. No rise in yields for now.
Unless you see expiration date and strike price of on those puts that statement is very vague.
My opinion is that they are trying to scare off retail investors.
NIO clearly stated in their call that they are aware of the chip shortage but they also said to have enough supply in Q2 to build 7,500 cars/mo and then starting July (beginning of Q3) the scarcity of chips will be a thing of the past.
To me, that looks very good.
I am into ERRB since 2014 and as many of you I have seen the value of this stock deteriorating over time.
Not an happy ERBB investor here.
Nonetheless, the float is at 2.1B. NOT 22B.
That would be $42 Million @ $0.02 per share.
I don't know where you get your data. My source is TDA.
Their 52wk low is $0.0002 so if you bought at that price you could have 56x your investment.
After the dilution and several bad years of fluff my break-even price is an impossible $34.12. Do you see the company reaching that price some day?