Working or fishing
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I agree!! Haa I'm still here from 2012 also.. what's up hinky!!!!
I'm guessing back to .0058- .0062
Too funny I took out the ask at .0 0 7 1.. now the ask is it .007.slap the ask so we can be done with these games!!!!
Yes it moves when news comes out it moves way down every time!
Isnt that an error they dont own any Audio Eye do they? Better check that out
Truly looks like another OTC turd to me...
douche!
server offline... R.I.P. BadGaming! what a JOKE!
Same crap everyday.... year after year.. it will never change. This seeing .03 or anywhere near will never be seen here I doubt it will ever make it back to .02...... been hearing the float is locked almost everyday for the past 8 years seems to make no difference
I highly doubt it...
That's incorrect sir the post you posted it is a lie fake news it is a huge lie this will never hit $0.77 in your dreams my friend this stock is garbage!!!!!!
Down she goes how far is she goes we all know triple zero!!!! This is garbage... like I said for Glen to settle for garbage like he did they must have had a pretty good amount of crap on him
It was not a huge settlement! It was a huge loss and a huge disappointment 20 mill stolen from them and they settle for 2.5 mill
Like i said they must have had some really good dirt on Laken to settle for such a huge loss.. A very sad situation for us longs..
too bad the CEO is a loser... this will never get past a penny again just more crap.. Glen said shareholders would be happy ... NOT!!!! pure gabage here always will be
Wait 20 million stolen from XA and he settles for 2.75 mill... after 4 years... Wow thats about the worst it could be.. aside from getting nothing... how sad. sounds like Hudson Grey got what they wanted and we got screwed... Oh and let me guess Hudson Grey is still in business.. Lol what a joke. im sure fog made out pretty well. How very very sad for the rest of us longs,,, truly pathetic 7 years of the same crap... They must have had some pretty substantial amount of STUFF on Glenn for him to cave as bad as he did!
Hmmmmmm... I wonder if there's gonna be a dividend that would be awesome!!
What does that have to do with anything here? Please tell me
There isn't going to be any news out today... just love all the rumors and nonsense and that link to his post this morning doesn't work
Still no bid...
Probably won't hear anything for another month
There isn't because the company went black he took the company black.. come on man do your due diligence
OMG!!!! Settlement reached!!!! And here we sit.... How much... Hmmm??? Does that mean joey and his band of thieves admitted guilt?? HYPWR WHOOPS I MEANT. SQUIRREL NUTS or something
We just had one... What are you talkin about?
Lmao!! Ive been here for 6 years... posters and fog have been saying the float is locked or will be for 3 years now.. there seems to be massive manipulation going on here... all you pump and dumpers do the same thing... The float is locked too funny!! i personally think shareholders here will get screwed... and i am one of them.. ive avg down too a million shares at .0048 so just hoping it goes up to a penny and i can double my money after 6 years... wish i had sold at some of the previous run ups but i believed in glen and the lawsuit.. so i held... like i said in previous posts im here until the end. Its been very frustrating to say the least...
maybe this is why some have lost hope... apparently this paragraph isn't very true...
Good Gaming Inc. CEO David Dorwart stated, "November has proven to be an incredibly busy time for us as we continue to lay out the groundwork necessary to scale our company to a point of sustainable growth. We are now creating diversification within our industry, producing quality content, and attracting new members and players, which will lead to increased revenue streams. This diversification into additional esport sectors will only add to our shareholder value and is paramount to the success of our business model." He also stated, "We now believe that in the months going forward, we can rely on a consistent stream of newsworthy events. We will keep our shareholders informed of pertinent company news and information and will limit the release of shareholder updates to an as-needed basis, and with our quarterly 10Q filings."
and the part where they say need to know basis..lol That cracks me up! Where is the quarterly? hasn't been one since Sept.... the player count is down way down!!! Dont see anything about what they said 3 months ago. where are the weekly call to duty tourneys? where is everything he talked about? He really doesn't need to make anymore money the guy is filthy rich... This seems like a small company he can take a massive write off on and declare some kind of benefit from IRS or something.. very strange indeed why he decided to get involved with this company.. No news worthy events in 3 months hmmm.. very interesting..
Non-disclosure agreement
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Many banking institutions maintain client privacy through confidentiality agreements. Some, akin to attorney–client privilege, offer banker–client privilege.
A non-disclosure agreement (NDA), also known as a confidentiality agreement (CA), confidential disclosure agreement (CDA), proprietary information agreement (PIA) or secrecy agreement (SA), is a legal contract between at least two parties that outlines confidential material, knowledge, or information that the parties wish to share with one another for certain purposes, but wish to restrict access to or by third parties. The most common forms of these are in doctor–patient confidentiality (physician–patient privilege), attorney–client privilege, priest–penitent privilege, and bank–client confidentiality agreements.
It is a contract through which the parties agree not to disclose information covered by the agreement. An NDA creates a confidential relationship between the parties to protect any type of confidential and proprietary information or trade secrets. As such, an NDA protects non-public business information. Like all contracts, they cannot be enforced if the contracted activities are felonies. NDAs are commonly signed when two companies, individuals, or other entities (such as partnerships, societies, etc.) are considering doing business and need to understand the processes used in each other's business for the purpose of evaluating the potential business relationship. NDAs can be "mutual", meaning both parties are restricted in their use of the materials provided, or they can restrict the use of material by a single party. It is also possible for an employee to sign an NDA or NDA-like agreement with an employer. In fact, some employment agreements will include a clause restricting employees' use and dissemination of company-owned confidential information. In legal disputes resolved by settlement, the parties often sign a confidentiality agreement relating to the terms of the settlement.[1][2]
Contents
1 General types
1.1 Unilateral
1.2 Bilateral
1.3 Multilateral
2 Content
2.1 Australia
2.2 California
2.3 India
3 See also
4 References
5 External links
General types
A non-disclosure agreement (NDA) may be classified as unilateral, bilateral, or multilateral:
Unilateral
A unilateral NDA (sometimes referred to as a one-way NDA) involves two parties where only one party (i.e., the disclosing party) anticipates disclosing certain information to the other party (i.e., the receiving party) and requires that the information be protected from further disclosure for some reason (e.g., maintaining the secrecy necessary to satisfy patent laws[3] or legal protection for trade secrets, limiting disclosure of information prior to issuing a press release for a major announcement, or simply ensuring that a receiving party does not use or disclose information without compensating the disclosing party).
Bilateral
A bilateral NDA (sometimes referred to as a mutual NDA or a two-way NDA) involves two parties where both parties anticipate disclosing information to one another that each intends to protect from further disclosure. This type of NDA is common when businesses are considering some kind of joint venture or merger.
When presented with a unilateral NDA, some parties may insist upon a bilateral NDA, even though they anticipate that only one of the parties will disclose information under the NDA. This approach is intended to incentivize the drafter to make the provisions in the NDA more "fair and balanced" by introducing the possibility that a receiving party could later become a disclosing party or vice versa, which is not an entirely uncommon occurrence.
Multilateral
A multilateral NDA involves three or more parties where at least one of the parties anticipates disclosing information to the other parties and requires that the information be protected from further disclosure. This type of NDA eliminates the need for separate unilateral or bilateral NDAs between only two parties. E.g., a single multiparty NDA entered into by three parties who each intend to disclose information to the other two parties could be used in place of three separate bilateral NDAs between the first and second parties, second and third parties, and third and first parties.
A multilateral NDA can be advantageous because the parties involved review, execute, and implement just one agreement. However, this advantage can be offset by more complex negotiations that may be required for the parties involved to reach a unanimous consensus on a multilateral agreement.
Content
A non-disclosure agreement can protect any type of information that is not generally known. However, nondisclosure agreements may also contain clauses that will protect the person receiving the information so that if they lawfully obtained the information through other sources they would not be obligated to keep the information secret.[4] In other words, the nondisclosure agreement typically only requires the receiving party to maintain information in confidence when that information has been directly supplied by the disclosing party. However, it is sometimes easier to get a receiving party to sign a simple agreement that is shorter, less complex and does not contain safety provisions protecting the receiver.[citation needed]
Some common issues addressed in an NDA include:[5]
outlining the parties to the agreement;
the definition of what is confidential, i.e. the information to be held confidential. Modern NDAs will typically include a laundry list of types of items which are covered, including unpublished patent applications, know-how, schema, financial information, verbal representations, customer lists, vendor lists, business practices/strategies, etc.;
the disclosure period – information not disclosed during the disclosure period (e.g., one year after the date of the NDA) is not deemed confidential;
the exclusions from what must be kept confidential. Typically, the restrictions on the disclosure or use of the confidential data will be invalid if
the recipient had prior knowledge of the materials;
the recipient gained subsequent knowledge of the materials from another source;
the materials are generally available to the public; or
the materials are subject to a subpoena – although many practitioners regard that fact as a category of permissible disclosure, not as a categorical exclusion from confidentiality (because court-ordered secrecy provisions may apply even in case of a subpoena). In any case, a subpoena would more likely than not override a contract of any sort;
provisions restricting the transfer of data in violation of laws governing export control and national security;
the term and conditions (in years) of the confidentiality, i.e. the time period of confidentiality;
the term (in years) the agreement is binding;
permission to obtain ex-parte injunctive relief;
description of the actions need to be done with the confidential materials upon agreement ending;
the obligations of the recipient regarding the confidential information, typically including some version of obligations:
to use the information only for enumerated purposes;
to disclose it only to persons with a need to know the information for those purposes;
to use appropriate efforts (not less than reasonable efforts) to keep the information secure. Reasonable efforts is often defined as a standard of care relating to confidential information that is no less rigorous than that which the recipient uses to keep its own similar information secure; and
to ensure that anyone to whom the information is disclosed further abides by obligations restricting use, restricting disclosure, and ensuring security at least as protective as the agreement; and
types of permissible disclosure – such as those required by law or court order (many NDAs require the receiving party to give the disclosing party prompt notice of any efforts to obtain such disclosure, and possibly to cooperate with any attempt by the disclosing party to seek judicial protection for the relevant confidential information).
the law and jurisdiction governing the parties. The parties may choose exclusive jurisdiction of a court of a country.
Wrong!! there were no GMER shares givin as a divi stop spreading false info please!!!!!
Hmmm.. Our Mine craft servers have been offline for about 5 hours now.. Wonder what happened
correct
GOOD GAMING!!
Go!! Good gaming
All Aboard where? This POS?
You make me laugh... your false accusations based on nothing
Lmao!!!!!
Very impressed by the website! Ive been here from the beginning, Even entered a hearthstone tournament back when they first started. In My Opinion.... The website has come a long way great job! Adding more servers brilliant! Going in the direction they are going seems to be working. If they do half of what they say i think they will still be successful. So far what they have said has come to fruition.traffic on the website was up over 350 this weekend. I for one have no problem with the direction they are headed. I wish i had more shares... And yes at times ive been negative and hard on both stocks but ive been avg down and very happy with my position, the naysayers here can just be ignored that's for sure... $GMER$ $CMGO$ !!!!!
P.S. https://minecraft-server-list.com/server/355421/
Hmmmm... where's j-rod at? he said we were going to close in the red todaynot!!!!.. hey man did you get your.005 like you said you were going to do probably not
But I've been smart I've average down to $0.04
But I've been smart I've average down to $0.04
But I've been smart I've average down to $0.04