Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Convenient timing of the negative article that showed up recently. Right when placement pricing was likely being finalized.
Large offer at .75 usd. Investors looking to sell shares at breakeven to participate in the placement and gain a warrant free. In my experience, they will need to sell under the placement price if they want out quickly. The value of the warrant justifies a slight difference.
http://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/02/11/2174254/0/en/Excelsior-Mining-Announces-Upsize-to-its-Previously-Announced-Bought-Deal-Financing-to-C-28-Million.html
Incase anyone was wondering like me, the company didn't send this PR out to investors yet, they will PR when it is filled.
I care. Thanks for posting. Do you prefer trading JO to JJOFF?
Can you point me to the post you read over there, Fro? I'm keeping track of how LWLG is being marketed. BTW, I was is PRAN. I remember you from the Yahoo board.
I hear JM has been working on recruiting Big Bill Hell as SVP of sales after seeing his compelling marketing on YouTube.
Not until travel restrictions from the Xirus are lifted. A year or so.
100% agree the R/S was a Bozo move.
If management could have got this company acquired, that would have been the move. Otherwise, waiting around for sales and waiting around for trial progress was going to be boring.
After a steady run-up and with Covid still surging, possible shutdowns looming. A little pullback isn't anything to be bothered by. Sales in a month. Wow, no fluff in that update.
With brokerages having gone to zero commission on NASDAQ/NYSE trades and apps like Robinhood blocking all OTC/OTCQX stocks, the OTC needs to do a much better job adapting.
I 100% agree with what Richard is indirectly saying, it should easier now to find a replacement for LPC than ever before.
That post didn't age well.
Can you work your magic at MZG and get Lebby waving the flag at the Daytona 500 for some publicity?
Have a blessed day.
Silence, Fool! We want the stock to reach the same price as a full size candy bar. We won't get there if you keep taking things literally
It's easy to find worse run companies, I don't use that to condone mediocrity. 100 million isn't low by pre-revenue standards. It's not high but not being high doesn't mean it's low.
I believe shares outstanding were at 47 million when Jim signed on with LPC. Now we're at 95 million.
The g is silent.
This move felt more organic than the usual LPC rip.
They could hold as many shares as they wish but choose to stay under 5%. I am curious what their actual core position is in between selling or if they have one at all.
LPC moves like the g in Lasagna.
Agree, bet they sold a ton. Though yesterday, anything that went for the .83 bid showing was sucked up by a strange .83405 purchase.
No, there is nothing that obvious. If there were, many would know.
I'm in agreement with you and your other post. We, investors, are hoping for a major event just to get this stock moving or hoping for a buyout. I'm sure it will be grand starting from .60 some cents. A tender offer at $4.13. They'll tell us Jim played hardball! We started at $2.91! I don't expect Lebby to suddenly care about investors profiting at the negotiating table. I would expect his concern will be about how much future involvement he has.
They need to use Jim's salary to hire someone who understands capital markets but can also put the rent check in the mail. A real renaissance man who isn't forgoing social security to work here.
Whenever you suspect they're selling, they are. Neither Jim or LPC will provide any transparency on purchases, and that is how they want it.
I would like to note that this capitalistic drive which would lead to share purchases is absent in many people, particularly in the lab/science crowd. Lebby doesn't have it. Some (including Lebby IMO) look down on the money-driven types, which includes investors who are usually only concerned with their investment. They view selfless interest in progress as morally superior.
Ironic, when your progress is funded solely by investors.
And better IR
It would. The company always says they manage money well, and they do. But they don't manage the ultimate dilution controller; the share price.
The share price is answering your question.
Steve, sorry that I didn't see your reply. Not sure which one you missed, the three were;
Nobel Con-February. Micro 500-August. Proactive Investors-September.
"3? I must have missed one?"
Well, here we are. We don't have any established trading under $20. Breaking through could mean a quick trip to $18s. RSI is already pretty weak though.
We should pay Jose to do our IR.
Why is it expiring so soon? Also, this election is very important for Nio. If the administration changes it will be negative for you the mining industry. This may be part of delay on financing. Speculation of more aggressive regulations coming.
Would really be a huge bummer for MGMT to have someone looking over their shoulder, holding them accountable etc.
LPC wouldn't be necessary. No more Broncos tickets.
It was a great time to buy, Jeunke22. We can always count on a pop being generated so LPC can eject their recently purchased shares. Though, I thought we would flounder for a bit longer in the .50s. Move like a butterfly, sting like a bee, that's how we do it at LPC. Gotta switch up the play now and then, keep the traders off their tail.
A higher share price is not always in the best interest of shareholders or management if this is how they are satisfied to achieve it because it makes Lightwave look suspect (justifiably so) to investors. Instead, we might be attractive to penny traders. The gains we get are temporary and manufactured.
I don't consider Lebby to be ineffective at handling this side of the business because he is in fact willingly non-participative. I'm sure he could be very effective if he chose to. Tom was ineffective. Jim is ineffective. This is condoned with various rationalizations/justifications. Usually always involving something about timing. I didn't know there was ever a wrong time for a CEO to take IR or his company's image to investors somewhat seriously, but I can't wait for it to eventually happen at Lightwave! Or at least delegate the job to someone competent, not MZ Group and JM.
Low 20's is a good buy.
.57 cents. He hasn't done anything to deal with the issue yet. Lebby let Jim host three presentations despite receiving complaints from key investors after the first one aired. That sounds like the opposite of addressing an issue.
They are not unreachable but very difficult to get an insightful responses from. And the worse the sentiment is the more they don't want to show any favoritism. We used to get insight at SHMs or from investors showing up at EPIC events but because of Covid that helpful aspect is lost. MGMT does not effectively keep investors on the same page with any consistency. That has been the case the entire time I've owned the stock.
I'm a bit confused. After Jim's third presentation this year shareholders should not have tell the company he isn't meant for this work. They already had to know this long ago. I would be more interested to know why Lebby and/or Karen did not do at least one of these themselves.
We were talking to ProActive long before MZ Group. Lebby knows he would do a better job and that this will draw negative attention for Jim. Hopefully, this is Lebby's way of setting up to make a case to the BOD that Jim should be replaced. I know he is weirdly protected by geriatric board members and certain investors. I have the impression Jim is an albatross for Lebby.
For more context, on here you can not label another user in a post or they can request it be removed.
Yes, but because of Avita stock I used a prenup.