Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yea I know having a little today!!LOL
Johnnie U didn't short Revo did you LOL!!
Right That's what I was trying to get across!!
Up Up we go!!!!!!!!
Why disclose the terms then every other company will want to settle for same thing AF did they are spot on by not disclosing the terms
REVO Strong!!!!!!!!
I cant believe you are trying to argue with a court document
Revo!!!!!!!
We Have a BINGO!!!!!! FOLKS
Plaintiff Eyetalk365 LLC and Defendants AlarmForce NC, Inc. and AlarmForce LP (collectively, “the Parties”) jointly bring this motion to request that the Court stay all current deadlines until September 8, 2015, so as to allow the parties to finalize their settlement.
Good cause for the requested stay is present because the parties have agreed to a settlement of all claims and all that remains is for the parties to complete their obligations under the settlement agreement.
Accordingly, the Parties request that the Court stay all current deadlines until September 8, 2015.
/s/ Gary R. Sorden
Gary R. Sorden, Pro Hac Vice
Braxton, Hilton, & Perrone, PLLC
4975 Preston Park Blvd.
Plano, Texas 75093
Telephone: (512) 633-1625
Facsimile: (469) 814-0023
Sorden@bhp-ip.com
David C.
And remember these patents that are being tried today are not only patents Revo owns but ,They are protecting all the other patents they own. Because Eyetalk365 has a license only on a select few and Revo does not want liens or anything else on those patents
Eyetalk365 was the way to go with this Revo owns the patents when this is over Those Patents will not have any Liens or encumbrances on them because Eyetalk is only licensed and they are taking the full brunt of the expenses (if any) when you invested here you invested in Lien free patents. And if Carter and Ali does own Eyetalk365 that's fine in fact that's brilliant if you owned those patents for as long as they have you may have done same JMO!
That's no problem 600milly puts the share price at what .04 to .05 and if you own shares now at 0012 where does that put you on 1 million shares My advice if somebody don't like it buy more shares JMO make up the difference in what you would like to make!
There is no pump and dump about this the facts are all there i.e court appearances 8k's and well respected Attorney's Jury Trials Markman Hearings it all there for anyone to see This is a Attorney's dream they are in the thick of it right now IMO !!
If it goes Revo's way with these proceedings BIG Companies will be buying Revo stock to try an offset what they may owe Revo in Lost Revenue to them JMO!
Guru said it best -there is so much big money sitting on the sidelines watching right now it would make us look like small investors they are just waiting and maybe dabbling a little here. And don't think for a minute that in the Gallery in those court rooms that there isn't spokesman's there for the biggest of company's watching these proceedings JMO!
I don't think that will happen Ninja -People are finding out that these Patents are worth millions if not Billions of dollars everyone wants some but afraid to commit either way -just my opinion
Right Johnnie Hence the Jury Trial Its all about the CASH OWED and a Jury will decide that!
09:30 AM
3:14-cv-00524-FDW-DSC Eyetalk365, LLC v. Alarmforce NC, Inc. et al
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and June K. Allison representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Plaintiff)
Brett Christopher Govett and G. Kirkland Hardymon and Michael Bechtel Regitz Jr. representing Alarmforce NC, Inc. (Defendant)
Brett Christopher Govett and G. Kirkland Hardymon and Michael Bechtel Regitz Jr. representing Alarmforce LP (Defendant)
Hearing in CHARLOTTE Courtroom 2-1
**** Jury Trial ***
I am thinking that they are fighting over (with Alarmforce) the dollar amount that is owed Eyetalk365/revo and they want a jury to put a amount on it!!
The patents are very solid- It has been already decided by the Patent Office in case against Alarmforce .Alarmforce was denied that's a fact and it will be brought again in these proceedings in fact the case with Alarmforce I wonder if they are fighting about what is owed to Revo its a Jury Trail because of the Patent Office verdict- these others Hearings are if the did infringe??? CPI Livewatch ECT!!!
09:30 AM
3:14-cv-00524-FDW-DSC Eyetalk365, LLC v. Alarmforce NC, Inc. et al
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and June K. Allison representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Plaintiff)
Brett Christopher Govett and G. Kirkland Hardymon and Michael Bechtel Regitz Jr. representing Alarmforce NC, Inc. (Defendant)
Brett Christopher Govett and G. Kirkland Hardymon and Michael Bechtel Regitz Jr. representing Alarmforce LP (Defendant)
Hearing in CHARLOTTE Courtroom 2-1
**** Jury Trial ***
09:00 AM
3:14-cv-00526-FDW-DSC Eyetalk365, LLC v. CPI Security Systems, Inc.
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Plaintiff)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing CPI Security Systems, Inc. (Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing CPI Security Systems, Inc. (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing CPI Security Systems, Inc. (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing CPI Security Systems, Inc. (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Hearing in CHARLOTTE Courtroom 1-1
**** Markman Hearing ***
3:14-cv-00527-FDW-DCK Eyetalk365, LLC v. Live Watch Security, LLC
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Plaintiff)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing Live Watch Security, LLC (Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing Live Watch Security, LLC (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing Live Watch Security, LLC (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Hearing in CHARLOTTE Courtroom 1-1
**** Markman Hearing ***
3:14-cv-00524-FDW-DSC Eyetalk365, LLC v. Alarmforce NC, Inc. et al
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and June K. Allison representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Plaintiff)
Brett Christopher Govett and G. Kirkland Hardymon and Michael Bechtel Regitz Jr. representing Alarmforce NC, Inc. (Defendant)
Brett Christopher Govett and G. Kirkland Hardymon and Michael Bechtel Regitz Jr. representing Alarmforce LP (Defendant)
Hearing in CHARLOTTE Courtroom 1-1
**** Markman Hearing ***
3:14-cv-00526-FDW-DSC Eyetalk365, LLC v. CPI Security Systems, Inc.
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Plaintiff)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing CPI Security Systems, Inc. (Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing CPI Security Systems, Inc. (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing CPI Security Systems, Inc. (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing CPI Security Systems, Inc. (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Hearing in CHARLOTTE Courtroom 1-1
**** Markman Hearing ***
3:14-cv-00527-FDW-DCK Eyetalk365, LLC v. Live Watch Security, LLC
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Plaintiff)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing Live Watch Security, LLC (Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing Live Watch Security, LLC (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing Live Watch Security, LLC (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Hearing in CHARLOTTE Courtroom 1-1
**** Markman Hearing ***
If you look at the Court Calendar Eyetalk365 is still in Court today . Here is a link make sure you put Frank Whitney as the Judge They are still arguing these cases
http://www.ncwd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-court-calendar
It looks like Gary Sorden and the firm he works with is here to put the Final numbers on the Monetization for Eyetalk365. If you read about all the players in the Firm its there specialty.
http://www.bhp-ip.com/OurFirm
Gary Sorden has very impressive background besides working for Eyetalk365 he has work for Nissan and Southwest Airlines here is his Resume
http://www.bhp-ip.com/Attorneys/Sorden
it's all about the Patents!!!!!! nothing else
exactly !!!!!! spot on
Yep the beehive is buzzing today everybody is working on both sides -thats a fact
I gave everybody the DD in a prior post, the websites to lookup and follow -the rest is up to you
For some reason they (lawyers)all got there butts drug into court today !!
09:30 AM
3:14-cv-00524-FDW-DSC Eyetalk365, LLC v. Alarmforce NC, Inc. et al
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and June K. Allison and Steven Robert Daniels representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Plaintiff)
Brett Christopher Govett and G. Kirkland Hardymon and Michael Bechtel Regitz Jr. representing Alarmforce NC, Inc. (Defendant)
Brett Christopher Govett and G. Kirkland Hardymon and Michael Bechtel Regitz Jr. representing Alarmforce LP (Defendant)
Hearing in CHARLOTTE Courtroom 2-1
**** Jury Trial ***
3:14-cv-00526-FDW-DSC Eyetalk365, LLC v. CPI Security Systems, Inc.
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and Steven Robert Daniels representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Plaintiff)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing CPI Security Systems, Inc. (Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing CPI Security Systems, Inc. (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and Steven Robert Daniels representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing CPI Security Systems, Inc. (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and Steven Robert Daniels representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing CPI Security Systems, Inc. (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and Steven Robert Daniels representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Hearing in CHARLOTTE Courtroom 1-1
**** Markman Hearing ***
3:14-cv-00527-FDW-DCK Eyetalk365, LLC v. Live Watch Security, LLC
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and Steven Robert Daniels representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Plaintiff)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing Live Watch Security, LLC (Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing Live Watch Security, LLC (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and Steven Robert Daniels representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing Live Watch Security, LLC (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and Steven Robert Daniels representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Hearing in CHARLOTTE Courtroom 1-1
**** Markman Hearing ***
3:14-cv-00524-FDW-DSC Eyetalk365, LLC v. Alarmforce NC, Inc. et al
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and June K. Allison and Steven Robert Daniels representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Plaintiff)
Brett Christopher Govett and G. Kirkland Hardymon and Michael Bechtel Regitz Jr. representing Alarmforce NC, Inc. (Defendant)
Brett Christopher Govett and G. Kirkland Hardymon and Michael Bechtel Regitz Jr. representing Alarmforce LP (Defendant)
Hearing in CHARLOTTE Courtroom 1-1
**** Markman Hearing ***
3:14-cv-00526-FDW-DSC Eyetalk365, LLC v. CPI Security Systems, Inc.
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and Steven Robert Daniels representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Plaintiff)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing CPI Security Systems, Inc. (Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing CPI Security Systems, Inc. (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and Steven Robert Daniels representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing CPI Security Systems, Inc. (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and Steven Robert Daniels representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing CPI Security Systems, Inc. (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and Steven Robert Daniels representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Hearing in CHARLOTTE Courtroom 1-1
**** Markman Hearing ***
3:14-cv-00527-FDW-DCK Eyetalk365, LLC v. Live Watch Security, LLC
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and Steven Robert Daniels representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Plaintiff)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing Live Watch Security, LLC (Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing Live Watch Security, LLC (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and Steven Robert Daniels representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Benjamin Freedman Sidbury and Carlos Perez-Albuerne and Gardner M. Edgarton and Margaret Kane Thies representing Live Watch Security, LLC (Counter Claimant)
David Casterton Boggs and Gary R. Sorden and Steven Robert Daniels representing Eyetalk365, LLC (Counter Defendant)
Hearing in CHARLOTTE Courtroom 1-1
**** Markman Hearing ***
Watch for the updates on the address's I gave you- the push is on the Lawyer's are making there arguments to the Judge thru the Markman hearings
Yes sir- big drama its happening it got pushed up in court
Frank Whitney is the judge presiding over the Case (s) today!
http://www.ncwd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-court-calendar
You are right Johnnie- These Markman trails that are happening today was not suppose to of happened until 09/20/15 I firmly believe that the big push is upon us NOW!
http://www.ncwd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-court-calendar
And one other fact is that already the United States Patent Office has upheld these patents against AF saying that the patents are solid .That's fact Do your DD people its all there for you to see!!!!!!!
None of these companies thought for a moment that Revo would defend there property in court and now the hand writing is on the wall. The law firm that has taken on these challenges has sifted through all the intellectual property and determined ( long before it was made public)that Revo is being taken advantage of by these companies by way of not recognizing Revo as the first patent holder. Its all very clear, now a whale has swam by looked at the DD and is buying or as Guru has stated its a buyback.
Do your DD People!!
People are loading because they can see the truth in the patents!!and the patents are very real!!!
Revo is doing well Just hang in there Longs
REVOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!
Revo has big buyers slopping up the shares right now LOOKS GOOOOOOD!!!!!!!!!!
Either the buyback has started or Revo is getting bought out?????
That's nice DD I did not know the numbers of shares in the Bank thats GOOD NEWS!!!!!!!!!!