Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You can safely bet there are also no revenues right now. If they had them, they could announce them and the share price would pop and then they could have done an offering and received much better terms.
BUT,according to the Q from 2013 that BigE reposted, that was a reactor with a purpose.
No matter, I'm sure if we don't sell anything now the next reactor will really have a purpose.
I agree, at times this company is a lot like Steve Jobs.
The shares are not really a big deal, the biggest problem with this is that it would seem to suggest that the long heard revenues are just around the corner line is not true. It would seem unlikely that they would sell shares at this moment if a contract was soon to be announced which would increase the price of the shares and thus lessen the dilution.
It is not a surprise. LG does not have the capacity for more small OLED screens, it is why the G3 currently has a LCD. LG is pouring hundreds of millions into large OLED display fab plants with a huge one coming online in a month or so and another early next year, but has not put nearly as much into building small screen oled plants. Perhaps that's because LG has never been as successful as Samsung with phones so they have not needed to, but that's just a guess. LG has been putting a lot of money into flexible oled screen fabrication but so far has not found a huge market for the products.
What does it matter what Bayer put into making that patent portfolio?? The portfolio was worth what it was paid for, not what went into it. For all we know Bayer put 20 million into it, took what was valuable and sold us the scrap. I'm not saying that is the case, but we do know we didn't pay much for it so apparently Bayer could not find anyone who thought it was of much value.
What BigE is saying is Nanoco received more confirmation of their progress by receiving a grant for research. While the money for them is nice, it is also a public affirmation that they are doing something, not a paid for commercial that is useful if you have insomnia.
They are not producing, all they have said is that they have/will have the capacity to produce. The quantum dots are not one size fits all, they have to be made for each specific customer, and I'm sure if they had a customer to produce for we would hear about it.
Actually they have a complete choice as to when to sell, and I'm pretty sure none of us here have seen this particular trust. If the trust was set up as demanding income every month,the trustees would have to sell some of the assets in the trust, but the trust would not say which asset, that would be up to the trustees. No trust would ever say you have to sell a certain stock at a certain time, that would be ridiculous.
Judging by his net worth, the trust contains far more than QTMM and the Posners chose to reduce their stake here last month. Again, I'm not saying anything about them making a run for the exits, rather they are reducing their holdings here in an orderly manner.
I'm going to safely guess they were not selling because they needed money, as the amount they sold would be little more than pocket change to them.
Most likely is that they have no interest in having so large a stake in a high risk stock so they are taking some off the table. It's not a panicked run for the exits, rather it's an orderly reduction of risk and pocketing some profits.
It's not the Posners, it's the evil MM's that are conspiring to hold us back. I didn't realize that at first but was educated here.
I never said anything about QTMM shares, I still have hope they can succeed or I wouldn't be here. I said Solterra shares if they existed right now would be worthless, because without the dots there is nothing there.
Ok, it aint so.
Though right now, I think an Enron share would be worth about as much as a Solterra share would be.
Actually we have nothing in common.
Domo is a private company and thus has been able to hide it's deals and income for years. Privately held businesses do not have to report their business dealings.
QTMM is a public company and thus has to report it's income, and has reported none. It's why the stealth nonsense posted here for years was just that, nonsense. A public company has to be to some degree visible, making stealth impossible.
Little if anything has been done with Solterra for years. Go look at the website, it has some hot news update, though it's from 2011. Right now it's little more than a dream for some here. If QTMM succeeds and has money, maybe it comes back. If they fail to sell any dots now and decide to try to stay afloat, maybe then they try to get more funding and make something of Solterra down the road. Right now, however, there is nothing there but a dream.
They gave out the 3 cent option when the stock was at 6 cents, so figure maybe a dime or so for the option price now as we are at 15 cents. Hopefully not for as many shares this time though, 5 million is a nice haul if this ever does anything.
Huh???
Did you even open the link?? The article speaks about how great OLED TV's are, and you reply exactly, q dots blow away oleds????? Where exactly was that in the link???
It's a legal formality statement. Since he was announced as CFO this has to be done as it officially notifies the SEC that he is an officer of the company so any future transactions by him regarding QTMM stock will be treated as an insider and reported as such.
Last week you had us over $3 with a contract.
Now it's at $2.
So next week will you have us at $1.
And the week after will you have us BK.
This is the place for old news.
It has been known here since January that Samsung was not going with Dow and was making their own dots, yet every week that story gets repeated here and spun like it somehow good news for QTMM.
Dow and Samsung never had a deal so there was no deal to cancel. It was thought that they were working together since the plant was built in South Korea, but in fact the plant was being built to supply LG and Dow does have an agreement and contract with LG.
Again, Samsung never had a supply deal with Dow.
On the contrary, I'd say that I'm one of the few here who is following China. We hear on and on about how there is no supply for quantum dots, yet Samsung has come up with their own. How many of these Chinese firms coming to market displays will make or find their local supply of dots.
The issue isn't whether or not Dow/Nanoco is selling to Samsung or anyone else, on that I honestly could not care less. The issue is how many other companies can make/acquire dots as easily as Samsung can. If pricing pressure exists at this early stage, a lot of those "bigger than Apple" dreams are going to fall by the wayside very quickly.
Why would it have an effect on Nanoco if they never had a deal in the first place. No deal was cancelled, it was thought a year ago that Dow would get Samsung when the Korean plant was announced but no deal was ever struck.
If anything, this report is a red flag. If pricing pressure is already a part of the dot landscape, perhaps supply is not the issue we all thought it was. If this Korean firm can make them, how many others can or will.
Maybe they are holding the ask here because there is no contract right now and thus they have sell orders??
People buy and people sell. It's not a conspiracy.
Reverse splits almost never work and are usually recipes for disaster. In this case, even if a miracle happened and the stock didn't tank after a reverse split, there is still nowhere near enough value to uplist.
For all the talk about uplisting, it's really a process that is meaningless to QTMM right now. If the share price multiplies 10 times or more it's something to talk about, until then it's all empty words.
Why would I care in the least what Nanoco's stock price is? I don't know if I have ever even mentioned them in 4 years here, but why let a little fact like that get in the way of one of your comments??
I believe QTMM will rise or fall on their own merits, but some here like to point out how it's the evil MM's or the shorts controlling things. The problem is, I don't see them commenting when we have had endless days of tape painting where we were down all day until 3:58 and then a 100 share trade brings us even. Games are played both ways, but some here seem blind to that.
Clearly gaming going on. Without the millions of shorts we'd certainly be over $20 a share on fundamentals alone.
We don't need articles about the competition, anyone following this board clearly knows we have no competition. We need more useful content like we are going to $30 a share in a couple years, we will be bigger than Apple, or we have the dream team. We need more of that and more reposts of PR's from the last 5 years.
Most of those reports are a joke, that is why I always laugh when someone posts them here with a look they mention QTMM statement. The intros mention anything and everything that will link to them in hopes of drawing attention. If a report has to do this to draw sales, how much is it really worth?
Samsung is going to resume making OLED televisions and apparently they will be using the method LG has been using. It will be interesting to see if they are able to do this without any patent issues.
http://www.oled-info.com/news
That's why QTMM is in the best position. The other companies have deals but those deals some see as shaky. No one sees any of our deals as being shaky.
They never become public knowledge, it is to no ones benefit.
If a miracle happens and they actually make a sale, we can probably assume we has an NDA with that company, but other than that we will never know.
qtmm + solterra= qtmm
Solterra is a pipe dream. If QTMM ever achieves real revenues, maybe Solterra will be a reality, but until then it does not really even exist. The website has not been updated in 5 years. QTMM is a company with very limited funds, they certainly have not been spending much if any into R&D for Solterra and they certainly are in no position to make panels themselves. Meanwhile, other companies are putting tens of millions into research in the solar area.
If QTMM hits it big, maybe Solterra becomes reality, but right now it's little more than a pipe dream.
Or since 45 cents this has been the stock to sell.
I don't know what the future will bring, but I do know the nonsense on this board has been ridiculous at times this week.
Maybe only a handful know the potential....
But a lot of them also don't understand the reality.
That video was free. The video within the video was not free, though if they spent anything over $20 on it they got ripped off. You have to love the "great video" line at the end though.
You mean every single person who walked in the doors at CES got their own video??? Cool
You can bet if we had the smallest dingiest booth there would have been pictures galore up of it here. We were walk ins, the same as every other person attending the show.
I'm guessing the Solterra IPO will happen right after QTMM is placed on the Dow Jones average.
I don't know, I tend to think the only real challenge is finding someone out there willing to buy product from us.
No matter how many times you post that the latest PR does all but name the purchaser, it does not make it true. The latest PR does not state that there even is a purchaser.
QMC can PR anything and you can see in it whatever you will, but unless the market receives confirmation of our ability to produce a salable product, this will continue to sink away.
I seem to remember a couple hundred previous last buying opportunities.
If it was as "good as a done deal". we would not be trading at 16 cents. It was as "good as a done deal" last summer too, when they shipped 20 grams to a leading Asian display maker. That was certainly supposed to be a sale and a done deal too, until we never heard about it again.
This company issues press releases when they send out samples, don't you think maybe, just maybe we'd get one for an actual sale???
Qdots and 4K have nothing to do with one another. You can make a 4K TV from any kind of TV platform and a QDot LED does not have to be 4K.
Every TV out there right now is "last years tech".
As for the 4K, check the reviews. Many reviews such as CNET rate it the best TV available even without 4K. On Best Buy's site it received a 4.9. The problem is the cost. I came very close to buying one, but could not justify the cost relative to 65" televisions. Samsung's Qdot tvs will have the same problem, no matter how nice, they won't sell unless they come way down in price.