Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
We know they added 25 million shares for the quarter in the last released Q. The problem is it is likely that number has been increasing as the share price has been falling, it takes more shares to equal a dollar amount for services rendered. It's not cheap to get Clay to dream up why will be great.
It's not really important though, I mean when we are bigger than intel it just means our shares will be worth $2500 each instead of $3500.
Could it possibly be that the big fat "0" they once again posted for revenues in the the Q is preventing a rally?
You really have little to worry about, since i'm pretty sure a majority of this board expect this to be on the Nasdaq and over $5 a share in the near future.
They have had repeated delayed filings whenever Squires has been at the helm, you can't blame that on the lawsuits.
You know as well as I do that the stock price is where it is because of the lack of revenue and the late filings, not because of these suits. The stock price has been on a prolonged downward trend long before these loans even occurred. People keep looking for a boogeyman to explain the stock price when the reasons are clear as day.
Good luck finding a lawyer for that ridiculous lawsuit. The lawsuits have very little if anything to do with the share price and proving otherwise would be impossible. Maybe that same lawyer will then file a class action lawsuit against QTMM for all those who have bought and suffered losses because of their unfulfilled expectations.
This is the second time today BigE that I have to ask you to quit posting facts that interrupt the dream. Some of us here are too busy posting nonsense to have time to do silly things like read reports.
Would you please quit posting facts which don't fit the narrative.
If Fidelity wouldn’t let you buy before they still would not because in their eyes nothing has changed. We filed one 10q but are still delinquent. Until current none of the brokers that prohibit buying delinquent issues will permit you to buy.
First off, they'd have to be either insane or a degenerate to put their life savings in any stock, let alone a penny stock let alone this penny stock.
Secondly, maybe they are trying to protect others from falling into the trap that is this stock.
Lastly, maybe they are trying to use this board as it was intended as a message board, rather than as a sales brochure for QTMM stock.
Maybe you are right and "QDs will have their day".
The thing you don't get and have never understood is that doesn't mean QTMM will have anything to do with it.
I predicted to BigE over a year ago and here 6 months ago that eventually we'd begin to hear more and more about other uses for qdots and later the company would come out and call displays the low hanging fruit not worth our time and decide to move towards other areas. Of course it will take some time to send samples out and negotiate contracts, but we will dominate solar next decade!!
You should write Fidelity a letter of thanks for not letting you add, they have saved you from yourself.
He had 110K invested as he has stated in the past. Due to the fantastic success of this company, he no longer has to worry about it daily since it's no longer a large amount.
As usual your timing is impeccable, you knew never to add until we got to 3.5 cents.
Of course you posted this exactly one year ago........
"Be happy and load up / add to position at these low prices between 7 cents and 9 cents. When domestic production begins in October-December and revenue rolls in, share price under 12 cents will be history"
You do realize you've called a bottom at 12 cents, 10 cents, 9 cents, 7 cents and 5 cents.
I predict you are within 3.5 cents of calling your final bottom here.
"It is not logical to expect an up trend with delinquent financial report filing, no news of sales contracts and no revenue. "
That hasn't stopped you from predicting one for the last 18 months.
Thanks for sharing your fantastic insights.
Here is one of your pearls of wisdom from last August:
"Don't worry, be happy, the long term monthly chart is very promising, a perpetual up trend will come in Q4 and accelerate in Q2, 2018."
Are we done with the upward acceleration yet??
"Watch Universal Display Corp (OLED.NASDAQ)'s Q2 financial report due to be out this Thursday and check its Q2 net sales, 2 consecutive quarter of slump net sales after peaking in 2017 Q4 will signal TV makers giving up on OLED technology and choose QD LED technology"
Have you ever posted anything here correct or honest???
Oled's net sales always jump around due to the time of the year and due to license fee payments. However their TV revenue's have continued to grow.
This is from Q!, the quarter you claim may signal TV makers abandoning OLED.
"LG just announced record earnings for its first three months of the year, making 1.11 trillion won ($1.03 billion) in profit off 15.12 trillion won ($14.1 billion) in revenue — the highest first-quarter figures in company history. The standout performer was LG’s home entertainment division, which reported a 76.5-percent increase in operating profit year on year, largely driven by the sale of high-end OLED and “Super UHD” LED 4K TVs. LG says it's seeing “rapid growth” in the premium TV market."
"https://www.theverge.com/2018/4/26/17283994/lg-oled-tv-sales-q1-2018-earnings"
I'm not endorsing OLED as a stock, their complete reliance on patent revenue is scary, but there is zero correlation between OLED's stock price and qdots.
What's the "wow" for?? It was here on Wednesday or Thursday, so it's not exactly surprising that it's back.
The wow should be for ihub once again proclaiming we hit a 5 year upwards price breakout today
"Display makers have a choice QLED vs OLED."
In what world??? Look at the prices tvs are being sold for, you have 50 and 55 inch model closing out around $200. No one is making money in that market. The vast majority of sets sold are not going to be oled or gdot,
Amazing how you posted a correction of the spell check error 17 minutes after i had already corrected it myself
There is not a single company out there "adapting to QD's from OLED"
LG is by far the dominant player in the OLED TV market. They are not switching to Qdot. Sony and Panasonic are continuing to expand their OLED TVs. BOE and other Chinese firms are bringing OLED tvs out this year.
Samsung has been Qdot in Tv's for awhile now and has seen their share of the premium market collapse. Samsung only makes small form oleds, and has continued to expand capacity. They have never mentioned any plans to shift any of their small oleds to Qdots.
Vizio and other companies bringing qdot tvs out have never had an oled set.
You've put money in this stock for years and yet you know zero about the competition
Is the K from 5 or 6 years ago still in stickies where he predicts sales starting in the next quarter??
Forget the Pozner effect. These are the Squires effects at work. This occurs to a stock with no sales and continued late reporting. Sooner or later when those things happen the stock will tank. The good news is i guarantee we are now within 3.75 cents of a bottom.
The truly ridiculous thing is for the last week next to the QTMM chart on iHub it's reporting we are having almost daily 5 year upward price breakouts. That's great charting right there.
We've been seeing for the last half decade.
The paper is ridiculous because all it did is name the biggest companies out there to get the fanboys excited, and look it's worked. Every person and company in the world is a "potential partner" for every other person or company, yet a year later you still repost that nonsense.
The thing is none of it matters. In a year or two when Steve says we are going to scrap the thought of displays as low hanging fruit in order to concentrate on the real money in solar, you will be leading the applause.
You can scratch Vizio off that ridiculous paper.
I love the term "partners and potential customers". Of course every company on that list is also a "partner and potential customer" of every person and company in the known universe, but that's a little detail no one here points out.
You are not referring to the link he questioned. He questioned your link to the Saudi Arabian Quantum Solutions not you link to fold able displays
"If Nanosys has a low cost, high quality NHM QD, why isn't EVERYONE using them? "
Maybe a better question to ask, is if QTMM has a low cost high quality NHM QD, why isn't ANYBODY using them???
And i love how you have the nerve to say a report is biased after you yourself were the one to post it. As usual, when facts are posted that don't fit the dream you are trying to sell, you either ignore them or dismiss them.
Ultimately you will disappear from this board like a lot of other people who have been saying this will be a billion dollar company, how about that??
Please. If they announced a contract for $50,000 you would repost it daily for a month.
There is no bigger fantasy than expecting someone to sign a billion dollar contract with us. Let's maybe aim a bit smaller, like maybe 100K or so?? I realize many on this board subscribe to the big lie theory, but there has to be at least a smidgen of realism in it.
Since the market is expected to grow at 5.7 CAGR from now until 2023, that must mean the market is already 18 billion or so
QTMM's percentage of the 18 billion = 0
Yet you post just "5%" like it's easy. They've been trying to achieve just one sale for half a decade yet you think "just 5%" is realistic???
You've been posting these ridiculous pipe dreams for almost a decade, doesn't it get old posting the same stuff over and over
Canaccord is getting paid by QTMM. It's that simple. You take money to Canaccord they will advise you too. If Nanosys and Nanoco call them today and offer to sign, they will advise them too. It's not an acknowledgement or recommendation, it's a simple business deal.Kisco is trying to sell some of our product to their customers but so far hasn't had any more success at it than we have. It costs Kisco nothing to try to sell our products for a percentage of the deal, they are not paying us a thing.
Stunning that Art would agree, considering that Squires hired him to a position he had zero qualifications for in which his main duty was to pump the stock.
This board is getting more ridiculous by the day, which isn't easy given its history. People post links about the claims of other companies that have actual customers and those claims are brushed off as lies, but the claims of QTMM are regarded as gospel though they've shown nothing but missed deadline followed by missed deadline for years, at least when they bother to file.
I can't wait for what happens 2 or 3 years down the road when Steve says we are our abandoning our attempts to make inroads in the display market in order to concentrate on saving the earth. I'm sure 80% of the people here will applaud and start calculating how rich Solterra will make them.
"Why would our current CFO even have interest if there was no end game?"
Maybe because he's bringing in $6700 a month for what amounts to little more than a part time job?? People take jobs at failing companies everyday. Maybe a better question to ask yourself is why Sri, a person who knows more about the display industry than anyone here or at the company, wanted to sell when we are a guaranteed success.
Or no one is interested in buying
Wow 300 whole shares traded today......
The only thing more impressive than that was that the 300 shares were over 2 separate trades.
One other thing differentiates QTMM: lack of any customers.
Yes, automation has been covered here repeatedly. Many post links about how Nanosys and Nanoco are automated. You ignore them.
"Blue QD enables a blue film that replaces blue LEDs and pick and transfer, for flexible, brighter products, especially MicroLED. Revolutionary. "
Yet a report this week stated that Samsung will be coming out with a QLED/OLED hybrid which will feature blue oleds. They must not have received Steve's memo about blue q dots.
Judging by our sales, no one else received that memo either.
Sharp does not have an OLED tv, and I'm not even sure Sharp exists as much more than a name nowadays in the US. I'm guessing you meant to say Sony. Sony's OLED's are nice, but I couldn't justify paying $1000 more for a 65" Sony than I did for my LG when they use the same screen.
I'm assuming you have a typo as LG does not have a QLED, but does have an OLED. The Samsung QDot tv's have been overpriced for what they delivered. Samsung has been charging a premium price for a so so TV. LG's OLED's were expensive but they delivered on picture. Now the prices on both are falling rapidly.