Reading about the Woozle effect....
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
And you would know there ARE cards, would you?
Ten days ago $mONI tweeted:
So last week (technically the week before last) $mONI stated
"Next week new Officers and Directors will be posted." Today $mONI is saying "The newest officer and director has been submitted to OTC Markets."
What happened to the plural "Officers and Directors"?
Is this a repeat of the Scoot Harmolin we-gonna-get-more-than-one-new-director-oops-if-we-do-we'll-have-to-file-change-of-control-with-OTCM bidness?
Have I ever mentioned that I think $mONI has got to have the biggest clown car in the OTC? They don't own much else, but that Clown Car is a Beaut!
Are you asking?
No, they are not and don't call them Shirley.
I've never said I was here for anything other than the entertainment.
Go $mONI
Or put another way ...
Many children have good reason to believe in Santa Claus.
Until they don't.
Yup. Some believe in unicorns and leprechauns and some think ... eh, no.
Different views, different vision.
And yet ...
Anyone questioning this latest is making "scam" talk, but you can STATE as though true and proven and announced in some universe somewhere that isn't HERE:
WHAT "established business"? Is it the Part 135 Charter or something else? And if the UNNAMED absolutely-happening-this-time Part 135 company didn't work out, why should anyone believe at this moment in time that the new UNNAMED absolutely-happening-this-time "established business" is actually going to materialize??
$mONI has a three year history of NOT producing. Again, WHAT is different?
But what exactly is different, Sunshine?
$mONI has announced many things, nearly ALL of which have not come to pass. What exactly is different THIS time??
Uh ... when the pink story has lost the plot?
I've never said the controlling Preferred A were cheap though NONE of us know (or should know anyway) what FO paid for them. However, I do believe Nathan's 2.2 billion were all but irrelevant. I also think ANYONE who bought the controlling Preferred A and then paid, as you maintain, buckets and buckets of moola to cancel Nathan's 2.2 billion would be little more than a drooling idiot. (That's a business term, btw.)
As I recall, rumor was that Frank never fully PAID Nathan for control of wOGI/mONI, so there's that as well.
Oh, and exactly WHEN did I ever say that you dodge questions? You don't need to - you are "to" busy making crap up.
Say you wanted to buy control of a penny stock. How do you do that? Do you pay a lot for 2.2 billion common shares if the company is actually controlled by its Preferred A shares, regardless of how many common shares are issued? Or do you focus on acquiring the Preferred A?
Say you wanted to sell your control of a penny stock. Would you demand a lot of money for your 2.2 billion common shares if the company is actually controlled by its Preferred A shares THAT YOU ALSO OWN, regardless of how many common shares are issued? Or would you focus on selling the Preferred A and include the 2.2 billion shares, KNOWING THAT THE NEW OWNER OF THE PREFERRED A COULD REVERSE SPLIT YOUR 2.2 BILLION SHARES INTO OBLIVION AND JUST ISSUE MORE SHARES?
What is so difficult for even the most seasoned pink stock trader to understand about $mONI and its share structure, past and present?
Bonus Question: If $mONI's share reductions are such a big, f'ing deal, why hasn't anything yet come of this AMAZEBALLS share reduction THREE YEARS IN??? (Oh, I know. It's going to happen this week. Any day now. Soon. Maybe?)
Only if you bought at .003 and sold at .022, in which case, you're not a shareholder either. Sis LMAO
No one needs to "make a mockery of" your intelligence. I think you are abundantly capable of doing that yourself.
And as for what anyone on the $mONI board believes, I really have no control over that. What I do know is that no one's belief that I'm shorting this or any stock makes it true.
Thank you so much for your kind concern, but I reassure you the ONLY thing I am short of is ANY shares of $mONI.
What "news"?
It was another $mONI tweet. And so far, those haven't been worth much.
Why is it best to keep my thoughts to myself? No one else here does.
Sheesh.
I'm still pondering why, if $mONI is really in real reality going to announce a new CEO and Directors and merger NEXT week, why put out a tweet this week to announce an announcement next week? Why not wait a week and just announce already. I mean, REALLY, who benefits from yesterday's tweet?
stervc, "as like with" (sheesh) only yourself...
There you go again as like with only you can. If this isn't about you, it isn't about me either, darlin. It's about $mONI and seeing if they are truly going to deliver. If they deliver or not is going to have absolutely nothing to do with me and anything regarding my past or history. The ball is in their court to deliver as a company and not with me or anything dealing with me. (See! I can state that, too! SMH)
You believe they will...I don't believe anything. I KNOW that up to NOW, $mONI hasn't delivered, not ever, "as like with" your magnanimous price predictions projected.
The latest tweet is just one more in a long succession of tweets that, to date, haven't born fruit. Maybe the latest $mONI carrot dangled before investors will result in something. Maybe it won't. I don't actually care one way or the other.
Betting - for or against - implies a wager. I haven't made one. I'm not here because I'm seeking a fortune - or beer money. I'm here cuz y'all are just too funny.
That word: disclosed. I don't think it means what you think it means.
So, insider trading, eh? Great.
Okay. If you say so. But ...
Why? How? What? When? Who?
Based on observing your predictions for several stocks over the past 12 years, I do not find your 'belief' reassuring.
"WTF could be bigger that a junk ticker like $mONI could possibly attract?"
The Moon, baby, the $mONI Moon. We're goin'
Soon.
PS Check your inbox
Even though nothing - absolutely NOTHING - that FO has presented to investors has come to fruition in what is is now? Nearly three years??
No gold
No crypto fees or crypto spin off
No Part 135
No 60+ (what the frack?) companies
And now, not even Scott Harmolin's nuts.
Nada. Zilch. NOTHING.
All true.
Except the chocolate.
You've stated that you've been in the OTC market for twenty years:
Even IF $mONI ever glimpses a quarter, much less sits at one, HOW exactly will that teach me? So maybe you get lucky. So what. POST YOUR TRADING RECORDS.
How? How will you teach me? Will you send me your OTC trading records?
Honey, I've NEVER stated that one can't make money in the OTC markets. I'm saying that I don't believe ANYONE who brags here about how much moola they've made in the OTC markets.
Meaning, specifically, YOU.
Riiiiight.
Cuz good thangs happen when Borders tweets. 🙄
There is nothing in the financials about $mONI owning BC or any other crypto. I HAVE read the financials, idiot. Suggest you do same.
That was a year ago and exactly f*ck all came of it.
Oh, except for Master Pumper Sterling predicting $13 a share. How many suckers can a stockchuck suck in, eh?
LOLOLOLOLOLOLzzzzz
(Pssst. Stick around a while, fool. You'll begin to get it.)