A "novel"? Dude, Joe wrote TWO sentences and linked to a post by a different poster. Is all your "DD" this perceptive?

I never suggested it was deceptive. It's careless. And $mONI's attorney of record was careless in his review. I repeat

Well maybe he is working on the "merger" or maybe he just signs off on the filings. It seems like a pretty easy and possibly lucrative and somewhat dependable source of income.

I do hope if he is working on whatever dealeo $mONI might have in the works, he pays more attention to the details than he appears to pay to the filings. I mean 500,000 shareholders of the Preferred A??? Come on...

What $mONI legal team?

The Moon Equity Holdings Press Release of August 2, 2021 stated:

"acquisition of Royal Costino LLC"
"wholly owned subsidiary"

It doesn't get much clearer than that.

To "get around to saying" in April 2022 (EIGHT months later) that the deals were "cancelled" is a joke, even IF the statement "unsatisfactory Legal and Compliance requirements identified in our final review" is true. To "get around to saying" in August 2022 ( a full YEAR later) that "The negotiations pertaining to the Peruvian mine transaction were terminated" just clouds the water further.

Was $mONI just "negotiating" the acquisitions of Royal Costino and Minera Radiante all along? Were the three PRs in 2021 UNTRUE? Was the disclosure in the June 2021 OTC filing that "On July 29,2021 Moon Equity Holdings Corp Acquired 100% of Royal Costino" a LIE? Was Moon Equity Holdings leading on investors throughout the entire "GOLD!" period??? For what end? WHO benefited???

I do not know how ANYONE, shareholder or not, can defend $mONI with regard to the gold deals that WEREN'T.

Just sayin

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/moon-equity-holdings-corp-details-133000222.html

Thank God $mONI didn't announce the acquisitions in a press release.

Oh wait. $mONI did. Three PRs. Announced as done deals.

Then later (nine months later, right?) tweeted they cancelled "negotiations."

Oops. Oh well. Sorry. Our bad. Not.

LOLOLOLOLzzzz

No. The 'gold mines' were not explained. $mONI never even said that WERE gold mines. The first half of the scam was the 'gold processing plant' that Nathan Hall was trying to sucker numbskulls into well before FronkO entered the scene. The second part was an additional processing facility dealeo that never closed. The third part of the scam was the third or was it fourth generation Incan Indian Gold Guy, which was stupid and culturally insensitive because the artifacts and civilization was called "Incan." The people are called Quechua.

And $mONI did not explain the failure in any way that made a lick of sense.

Of course, I thought the whole business was suspect to begin with and some will remember that I warned about the positive "Net Expense" in the PR - which is a LOSS. When your Net Expenses are $500/day, the business is losing $500 every day. It's not rocket science.

Sheesh.

And if FronkO paid a dime for the $2 billion shares, he really is a moron. THE ONLY SHARES THAT COUNT ARE THE PREFERRED A CONTROLLING SHARES.

But hey, if you need an explanation of that, go talk to the 500,000 Preferred A shareholders. Surely one of them can explain it.

LOLOLOLOLzzz

Doesn't stop $mONI bagholders from posting drivel either.

Are you sure? Either that you weren't trying to make me look foolish in front of everyone? Or that I actually looked foolish to anyone much less "everyone" or at all?

Here's an idea. Instead of talking about other posters (specifically ME) and what their (MY) motives might be, how about we stick to talking about $mONI, mONI's management, mONI's consultants, or mONI anything at all.

Not that there is much to discuss regarding $mONI, eh?

"We shall see."

Perhaps. More likely we'll never know how much if any money any of these boastful clowns make BECAUSE THEY DO NOT HAVE TO MAKE AUDITED PUBLIC REPORTS OR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

Nor does FO or $mONI.

$mONI doesn't even have to explain why, ten months later, NOTHING - ABSOLUTELY NOTHING - has come of this January tweet:

Have done. Found nothing that proves Dorado Goose "made bank," as you say, assuming by "made bank" you mean made a lot of money quickly.

But more importantly, what exactly do shares issued to Dorado Goose do for $mONI shareholders? Hmmm?

How do you know? Citations, please.

The Tearoom closed?????????

Where WILL concerned shareholders get their "facts"?

Whereas your responses to me don't say anything at all about $mONI, the subject of this board.

What a stupid and utterly irrelevant question with respect to $mONI.

Better is: do either Frank Ottaviani or consultant Daniel Borders ever tell the truth?

RE: Daniel Borders, $mONI CONsultant
In my experience, people who say they don't lie, often are.

Funny how that works.

Is that patience spelled g-u-l-l-i-b-i-l-i-t-y?

I wonder how this document that former(?) $mONI CONsultant Frank Benedetto tweeted (before his account was suspended) and to which Carjockey2 linked - I wonder how it would look now....

And before ANYONE (not you, SunshineSmiles) starts accusing me - AGAIN - of being in possession of documents I shouldn't have, I refer ALL to this rebuttal post of my own:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172515805



https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171631162

WHOA, NELLY!
How many times have you boasted "NO DILUTION! NO DILUTION!!!"

SHEESH!

And since Franko gave DB more shares and has NOT announced that DB is no longer "CONsulting" for $mONI, whatever that meant, DB is STILL $mONI's CONsultant in all his offensive glory.

Go $mONI.

So you can't answer my question which is HOW do YOU, much less "everyone" know "that this new company isn't a fly by the seat of your pants type"?

Typical.

How? OMG!!!! HOW?????

How should anyone know there even IS a company or 60+ of them or whatever the latest story about $mONI is?

No worries. I didn't really need to ask. I know that $mONI pumpers think Daniel Borders is the bee's knees. I question whether anyone should take the advice of an obnoxious twittiot - such as $mONI CONsultant Daniel Borders - who, by his own admission, hasn't even taken the entry level exam for a stockbrocker.

Which part - redspeed's analysis or Daniel Borders' tweets?

Perhaps "nuff" hasn't been said. Just sayin...

I think "Duke" might be a typo. Prolly should be "Duck."

I say this, referencing the apparent caliber of $mONI's two previous CONsultant choices. And because ducks are basically short necked geese and Tommy's choice of a really stupid company name was Dorado (Golden) Goose.

Personally, I'm guessing he's never read the story, the moral of which is about how greed leads to loss.

Also lazy, stupid or just plain deceitful is this repeated explanation in the filings:

Nonsense.

This is how the world works.

What IS lazy is stating that there are 500,000 shareholders of the 500,000 Preferred A shares in every filing for a YEAR.

Lazy on FrankO's part, lazy on the part of the LAWYER who signed off on it, and lazy of OTCM, too.

"Trypolar, he'll try anything."

LOLOLOLOLzzzzz

None of $mONI CONsultant Daniel Borders' efforts seem to have made much diff. I wonder why FrankO gave him another 3 million shares.

Trust me, there's a fourth: None of the above.

The sorry state of $mONI is much more entertaining with the fourth option.

$mONI filing says the Golden Goose shares are for "services." So, I'd say say yes, he is some kind of CONsultant.

Maybe the shares have changed hands but if not even the NEW owner* can scrape enough pennies together to pay OTCM for a Change of Control, then what does that tell investors about $mONI?

*or ownerS since $mONI filings state that there are 500,000 shareholders of the 500,000 preferred. LOLOLOLOLzzzzz

I got curious about "Dorado Goose, LLC" the half Español, half English Ganzo Dorado or Golden Goose. Dorado Goose, LLC was issued 5,000,000 shares valued at .01 per share on September 23. $mONI closed on Sept 22 at .033.

This new Issuance was for "Services." Like what, $mONI?

What is Tommy Wang of Dorado Goose, LLC registered in Puerto Rico doing on behalf of $mONI that could possibly be worth $50,000???

Am I the only one who is curious about this?????

AND WHAT HAPPENED TO THE PART 135 AIR CHARTER DEALEO THAT $mONI AND ITS PUMPERS MADE SUCH A BIG F'N DEAL ABOUT, hmmmmmm??? Is Tommy Wang working on that or on the BIG 60+ COMPANIES!!! dealeo?

What is going on with $mONI?

There's a $mONI pony?????

Hmmmm....no subsequent events. None. Nada.

No mergers, acquisitions, new management, nothing.

$mONI, are you SURE you're not a shell company??
https://thebitgiftcard.com/

Dorado Goose, LLC???? Looks like Frank raised hisself some operating funds in September.....

This means that half a million people understand this statement, which I do not.

Just noticed that there are 500,000 shareholders!!!!

But I don't feel too badly about not noticing this before since the attentive lawyer also missed it in the 2022 Annual.

That's pretty funny, Frank.

Gotta pay boy wonder somehow.

If it is true, Scott should learn sooner rather than later that ya best have a sanquine story without too many details and no inside information ready at all times when you're in the pinks.

Or stop answering the phone to unknown callers.

And maybe some known callers. 😉 🤷

No. Just. No.