Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
When I read the PR it sounded like a partnership with the land owner or a lease deal where GDSM pays to build the greenhouses then sublets it to a grower. I could be completely off and/or reading too much into it, but that's how I read it.
If you look at the bottom of the home page you'll see an image for "authorize.net preferred reseller". I'd say that's the partner.
I'm guessing it's the same Barbara Carroll who is a director at ILST.
http://www.ilstholdings.com/corporate.html
http://www.linkedin.com/in/geografx
Would you mind sharing Greg's email address? I'd like to ask him a couple of questions.
Been watching the action here today. Nice call, M0NEYMADE.
Has anyone been able to verify the patent application #? I'm coming up empty trying to search for it.
I've read some pretty bad things about them, especially for pennies. They apparently charge $0.00495 for every 1000 shares traded after the first 1000. So, to trade just 1M shares would be a $9.85 commission.
It's under "Ask the CEO".
http://www.gdsmholdings.com/investors/ask-the-ceo1.html
An update from the "Ask The CEO" page:
It has been a long time since we heard any news, what is going on?
Since the last press release, the Company had been working on financing the Galahad acquisition and has been internally focused. A couple of points:
1. The Company was unable to obtain debt financing for the Galahad acquisition, partly due to declining production rates, but mainly due to the large judgment against the Company. Financing such a large project with equity would not only be challenging but extremely dilutive. As such, the Company terminated the LOI.
2. After the failed Garfield investment (initial investment returned) and the inability to obtain debt financing due to the judgment, GDSM has focused on two areas:
a. Completing the audit
b. Settlement talks with Gelpid.
First, regarding the audit, I expected it to be complete by now and the Form 10 filed. The audit is moving slowly as a result of the difficulty in getting information from previous management(s). Not that there has been a lack of willingness to provide the data, rather the difficulty of locating documents. Despite the obstacles, my goal is to have the audit completed by year end.
The Company has, within the last week, entered into serious settlement talks with Gelpid. Term sheets have been swapped and for the first time, there appears to be a willingness to settle this matter, which will significantly benefit the Company. It should be noted that both sides realize that the only way for Gelpid to realize value is for the Management to create value.
A settlement paves the way to restart the acquisitions of energy interests and the potential for an exciting new subsidiary.
In conclusion, the Company has been quiet, but for good reason. There are no guarantees that a settlement can be reached, but I can assure, the audit will be completed and I will not stop pushing this Company forward.
http://www.gdsmholdings.com/investors/ask-the-ceo1.html
It wouldn't surprise me if Tiger knows who Bill Boyd is but not Bubblin Crude. All evidence points to Bubblin Crude being a new corporation.
I also just located a Bill & Gail Boyd in St Clair, MI. This makes more sense, since the check was deposited into the Seaway Community Bank in St Clair, MI.
I'm not so sure you have the right company. In an email from Mike Shea, he confirmed to me that his contact was Bill Boyd of Michigan. There is a Bill and Gail Boyd in Wyoming, MI but I've not been able to locate a Bubblin Crude in MI.
There's a recent Bubblin Crude Corp registered in NV but no officers are listed.
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=OvCP%252fDtg0iVs5wfBXfY%252bfQ%253d%253d&nt7=0
If you go here (http://ww2.deq.state.mi.us/mir/) you can do a well data search and see that Tiger Development has 2 permits for section 13-T25N-R6W.
New domain name confirmed.
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, LLC (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: GDSMHOLDINGS.COM
Created on: 11-Jul-13
Expires on: 11-Jul-14
Last Updated on: 11-Jul-13
Registrant:
Michael Shea
67 Old Kings Highway
Wilton, Connecticut 06897
United States
Administrative Contact:
Shea, Michael michael.shea@silvermineadvisors.com
67 Old Kings Highway
Wilton, Connecticut 06897
United States
(203) 210-5614
Technical Contact:
Shea, Michael michael.shea@silvermineadvisors.com
67 Old Kings Highway
Wilton, Connecticut 06897
United States
(203) 210-5614
Point taken, but even your reply had a typo. ;)
There was a typo in the email address in the PR. You can find the correct email address on this page.
http://www.silvermineadvisors.com/contact.html
Here's some useful contact information for the consultants involved.
Norco Accounting & Consulting, Inc.
8214 Westridge Dr
Tampa, FL 33615-1845
Phone: (813) 881-8171
Fax: (813) 889-9369
Contact Information
Principal: Ms. Judith Norstrud (Owner)
Mr. Andrew Norstrud (Owner)
http://glitch43.com/Norco/aboutus.htm
Peter Messineo, CPA
PCAOB Registered Firm
1982 Otter Way
Palm Harbor FL 34685
Telephone: 727-421-6268
Fax: 727-674-0511
http://www.pm-cpa.com
Haseltine Law Office
1629 K St, NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC, 20006
Phone: (703) 627-2652
Fax: (703) 372-5173
611 E Glenoaks Blvd
Glendale, CA 91207
Phone: (818) 291-0661
Fax: (703) 372-5173
http://www.wbhlaw.net/
Wow, crazy volume today. Most we've seen all year. Go GDSM!
I emailed JR about the website this weekend and he acknowledged my email, so yes, he's aware of it.
Looks to me like the site's been hacked by Russians. View the page source.
I don't think anyone was denying the AS increase, just the timing. This confirms the amendment was effective on 2/13/13 and there was no dumping during last year's run.
I don't see anything about a reverse split in that 8K. Am I missing something here?
Piper Jaffray initiates coverage on Inovio Pharmaceuticals (NYSE: INO) with a Overweight. PT $1.00.
http://www.streetinsider.com/New+Coverage/Piper+Jaffray+Starts+Inovio+Pharmaceuticals+%28INO%29+at+Overweight/8016998.html
You call this distance? KMAG is mentioned in the TRI* 8K.
J. Duncan Reid, age 53, CEO & Chairman of the Board. J. Duncan Reid has more than 30 years of experience in a variety of industries, serving in senior management roles in both private and publicly held companies. Since 2003, Mr. Reid has served as the owner and operator of 2023682 Ontario Inc., a privately held Canadian mining company. He is the founder and since 1997 has served as the CEO of KMA Global Solutions International Inc. (OTCBB:KMAG), a manufacturer and supplier of electronic article surveillance tagging solutions. He has functioned as an asset owner in the mining industry for over ten years, during which time he has established a unique position for TrioResources AG to surpass its competitors. During this time, Mr. Reid has developed both the technical and managerial skills necessary in order to establish, expand, and transform junior mining companies to the next level, and
prepare them for growth. Mr. Reid earned a Bachelor of Commerce from the University of Windsor, with Honours.
Great day today. Looking forward to many more.
Wow, INO's moving today!
A little GDSM news from the 12/31/12 WSRA shareholders report:
Gold Star/Gold Crown/GDSM
GDSM has elected to work with Western on the development of the Azurite mine and for the moment postpone its work at the Gold Star property. This decision was made as a result of a review of the current status of the two properties in terms of development, the permitting issues, issues of timing to production and the opportunity to work with additional investment partners without any further dilution to their current corporate structure.
http://www.westernsierramining.com/ShareholdersReport123112.pdf
No offense, and thanks for trying to answer, but your answer was the same generalization that I've been reading from others for weeks. I'm just trying to get a grip on what "liability" really means in this case and it's pretty tough to research.
What's the risk to the MM in taking on a previously suspended grey that's not there when a stock gets suspended in the first place?
Another way to frame the question is to compare a previously suspended grey to a never-been-suspended grey. How does one pose a greater liability, and what exactly is that liability to the MM?
What's the risk to a MM in taking on a previously suspended stock as compared to being with one when it's suspended for the first time? I keep hearing about how risky it is, but how does a MM actually assume more liability in that case?
Whatever the reason, it seems insane to me with all the results due over the next few months.
Interview with Dr. J. Joseph Kim by BioMedReports
Sure doesn't look like a home to me.
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&sugexp=les;&gs_mss=2+ravina&cp=9&gs_id=9a&xhr=t&safe=off&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&biw=1280&bih=851&q=2+ravinia+dr+atlanta+ga&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=0x88f5094317c5e567:0x37799132e6274446,2+Ravinia+Dr,+Atlanta,+GA+30346&gl=us&sa=X&ei=HcdhUPXgNpGI8QTW-oCQBg&sqi=2&ved=0CB4Q8gEwAA
Is there any proof of there being something to "get in front of people"? A picture? A video? Or even a PR of a demo being conducted somewhere?
I've been trying to find the answer to that for a few days now.
Nice action today!
Does anyone know if a prototype or demo unit even exists? I can't imagine anyone signing a contract without seeing one in action first.
Looks like today's news might bring the volume we've been waiting for.
Nice volume today! How about a week of this action next time?
I got mine. I told myself if we traced back this far I'd hit it again. Glad I did.
1. The meeting is "open to all investors, interested parties and
shareholders of both companies" to "have any questions or concerns they may have answered". So, yes, that's very much a public meeting.
2. How do you think they're going to "screen out potential troublemakers"? You think they keep a naughty list or something?
Of course he hopes GDSM gets funding. That money will be going to WSRA. If he wanted to distance himself, he'd back out of the JV, not accept $50k towards the new mine.