Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Glad to hear...
will let you know
I would agree
i will have a look
very interesting
$SNTL u are correct is PINK and you are correct RULE 144 exemption needed to clear restricted stock is "not applicable to SNTL". And there u go again posting COMPLETING WRONG SEC INFORMATION. If you are on the PINKS and where a SHELL company at one time RULE 144 will not apply and you cannot free up restricted shares under rule 144. The only way to free them is by registering them. SEC RULE 144 applies to ALL publicly traded companies. Being on the PINKS just means you are not FULLY REPORTING under the FULLY REPORTING GUIDELINES of the SEC and RULE 144. That is why there are so MANY sub paragraphs to cover all aspects. SNTL is also a former "SHELL" company. Please refer to the VERY informative RULE 144 SEC GOV guidelines i posted early incase u still dont understand. Very simple actually.
$SNTL for those of us in the REAL business world we know Revenue includes a profit. Like for instance candlestick making is easy to see the profit because it is in scents not dollars.
$SNTL again only posting partial and non factual information. Registration required, Fully Reporting status required all required by filing a Registration statement Under SEC rule 144 regs for Former Shell Companies.
http://www.mofo.com/files/Uploads/Images/FAQRule144_145.pdf
Unavailability of Rule 144 for Securities of Shell Companies
What are shell companies?
A shell company, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act, is a registrant with no or nominal operations and either no or nominal assets, assets consisting solely of cash and cash equivalents, or assets consisting of any amount of cash and cash equivalents and nominal other assets.
Can shell companies take advantage of Rule 144?
No, securities issued by a shell company cannot be sold in reliance on Rule 144. Also, Rule 144 may become available for securities issued originally by a shell company that is no longer a shell company if the company:
• is a reporting company;which SNTL is not without a filing
• has filed all required reports during the preceding 12 months (or any shorter period during which the company has been subject to reporting requirements);which SNTL has not because under PINK SHEETS there are no reporting requirements because they have NOT FILED TO BE FULLY REPORTING IE: S1 LIKE I said in the first lesson
and
• has filed current "Form 10 information" with the SEC reflecting that it is no longer a shell company.which SNTL has not
See Rule 144(i).
$SNTL do ur REAL DD on RULE 144 in regards to "ONCE A COMPANY IS LABELED AS A SHELL RULE 144 WILL NOT APPLY" Instead of constantly posting only less then Half facts for personal agenda. SNTL before Seeker-Tech took over was once a shell. Rule 144 does not apply. SEC 101. Call Broker-SEC attorney, FINRA, Transfer Agent or anyone with a brain that is involved with publicly traded companies.
You are playing out of your league...
http://www.mofo.com/files/Uploads/Images/FAQRule144_145.pdf
Unavailability of Rule 144 for Securities of Shell Companies
What are shell companies?
A shell company, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act, is a registrant with no or nominal operations and either no or nominal assets, assets consisting solely of cash and cash equivalents, or assets consisting of any amount of cash and cash equivalents and nominal other assets.
Can shell companies take advantage of Rule 144?
No, securities issued by a shell company cannot be sold in reliance on Rule 144. Also, Rule 144 may become available for securities issued originally by a shell company that is no longer a shell company if the company:
• is a reporting company;which SNTL is not without a filing
• has filed all required reports during the preceding 12 months (or any shorter period during which the company has been subject to reporting requirements);which SNTL has not because under PINK SHEETS there are no reporting requirements because they have NOT FILED TO BE FULLY REPORTING IE: S1 LIKE I said in the first lesson
and
• has filed current "Form 10 information" with the SEC reflecting that it is no longer a shell company.which SNTL has not
See Rule 144(i).
$SNTL ... He gave an accounting for what happened and Rescinded. Again False Facts and SPIN> It was Jeff Diginova's job to put out a press release and make public knowledge of this and he did not. MS even asked him to make it public when they rescinded and he did not. They cannot put out a press release they do not have authority to put out. Because of all the Breaches of contract, breaches of share exchange agreement, fraud, lies and Illegalities of NHSH insiders they obviously had to move on. Once they gave notice and Rescinded under right they are not in control Jeff was. Ask him and others why they did not make it public. Ask him why they took back the stock and agreed to it and to then turn over control to Joe, then someone else and now someone else...etc. SNTL even posted a public letter on IHUB giving in detail the recindment and why. now over and on
There you to again posting or insinuating inaccurate facts or "MIS"quoting facts. REAL DD 101 for you because it is obviously needed. When a company was once labeled as a "shell" in the past RULE 144 (which is needed to clear up RESTRICTED stock DOES NOT APPLY). Call ANY SEC attrny. If you dont know any let me know and I will forward you 5 to chose from to verify this widely known and simple fact. Which means any and ALL restricted stock in SNTL will STAY restricted until there is a REGISTRATION statement filled Ie: S1 etc. Which as I stated takes anywhere from 7-10 months to complete AND no registration statements have been filed by SNTL. So 40 mil, 20 mil 100mil makes no matter UNTIL a REGISTRATION STATEMENT IS not only applied and filed for but COMPLETED AND STAMPED "OK" BY THE SEC.
$SNTL what about them? call the transfer agent urself. Float has not changed. stop trying to insinuate facts that are not even facts to try and cause FALSE doubt. OBVIOUSLY 40 mil is restricted BECAUSE THE FLOAT HAS NOT CHANGED. Again do some REAL DD. Restricted stock stays restricted. There are NO convertibles, preferred's or ANY debt conversions avail in SNTL WHAT SO EVER. Do DD read the filings. In this case for what I know and FACT SNTL would need to file a registration statement in order to name and free up any restricted stock. Registration statements take 7-10 months and no registration statements have even been filed at this time. Float WILL NOT CHANGE without a registration statement regardless of what ANYone wants to spin, pretend or make up. This is a FACT.
$SNTL SunScents, it's been about a month since you said this as well as MANY more and ALL of your predictions and "facts" you posted have all been proven wrong by the company "SNTL" and Mike Kendrick IMO. So what is next?...
SunScents
Wednesday, June 19, 2013 6:02:40 PM
Re: penniesbgone post# 9725
Post # of 10170
The difference between QASP and SNTL is virtually zero. Niether make any money.
Looks like SNTL is making money
and this two months ago
SunScents
Friday, May 24, 2013 5:00:38 PM
Re: Wildcard post# 9324
Post # of 10171
Nope, I am pretty sure for a fact that it's not tiny. Unless you consider the reported float tiny and I sure don't. And the possible float could be huge for a company that has ALWAYS lost money.
float is still 24mil and looky looky making money
and this
SunScents
Friday, May 24, 2013 2:16:24 PM
Re: Porgie Tirebiter post# 9313
Post # of 10171
Transparency by Seeker Tec International would certainly answer these questions. But, that has NEVER been something that they are good at.
$SNTL and MK seem pretty transparent to me. How bout that 1st ever REAL contract with first ever REAL revs announced today
and this
Re: Fritz post# 9227
Post # of 10171
Mike Kendrick, the guy who runs that Seeker Tec International Company is a known bad guy. I don't think anybody is going to get any honest information there.
pretty straight forward and honest guy to me and giving SNTL its first ever Revs
and this
SunScents
Wednesday, May 22, 2013 2:55:32 PM
Re: Wildcard post# 9177
Post # of 10171
So, how'd that trip to Angola go?
Angola trip looks like it went pretty good Sunscents. How bout them Revs
and this is a really good one
SunScents
Tuesday, May 21, 2013 11:26:42 AM
Re: catdaddyrt post# 9138
Post # of 10171
Mike Kendrick failed at every first phase he attempted with Mineseeker and OUR money. To this date, he hasn't found a mine or saved a childs life.
So, Mike Kendrick simply changed the name to Seeker Tec International in order to raise more first phase money.
It's really that simple.
Fail once, try again, fail again, try again. Mike Kendrick has been up to taking invstors money for many years. And yet the mutilation of Human Beings by land mines continues. And Mike Kendrick, Mineseeker, and Seeker Tec International haven't done a thing about it.
looks like Mike Kendrick succeeded with Mine-seeker/Seeker tech and OUR money. And imagine that they have started clearing land-mines and saving potential lives after all on the first $2mil contract announced that has brought In the very first REV$$$ to SNTL. Now if that is not a success story and start woot
and this
SunScents
Tuesday, May 14, 2013 6:56:29 PM
Re: doughboy2 post# 8978
Post # of 10171
I'm sure you know as well as I do, that there will be problems.
The sooner that our President Don Gay gets Kendrick out of here, the better. Hopefully, Gay can find some company that actually can produce a profit and bring value to common shareholders. This Kendrick bloke sure isn't able to do that.
Looks llike Mike Kendrick ACTUALLY produced a profit and brought and will continue to bring value to common shareholders
and the list goes on as well..
$SNTL..yep...soon and ur shares on the ask below 6 cents will be broken too IMO....
$SNTL the ask is growing because the shares u bought at $.0428 ur putting right back on the ask IMO of course.....but its a good opinion
$SNTL....nah
$SNTL....its coming.....today?....love Bigwitz
$SNTL...catdaddyrt....it's all good and always has been. Information is key in all parts of life and sometimes you can only go on what you/we think are the facts, are told are the facts or assume are the facts. Until the REAL facts or information come to light. I for one have never blamed u or anyone for being upset about past dealings with MK only upset and the FACT that they never knew or do not know the REAL TRUTH and FACTS. I have also said and will continue to say "IF EVERYONE REALLY KNEW HOW REAL AND HOW BIG $SNTL-SEEKER-TECH IS GOING TO BE THEY WOULD BE SELLING EVERY DOG THEY OWN TO GRAB WHATEVER THEY COULD IN THIS COMPANY...IMO of course.
$SNTL nope nor was he able too as they were toxic and failed to deliver what they promised under contract. Nor do the last two even matter. Catdyrt looks like MK is doing just like he said "he would" as real companies take time and REAL companies announce REAL contracts and REAL companies yield REAL revenue from those REAL contracts.
bashers trying to keep playing their same old tune are starting to look well........you get the picture.
$SNTL...last time I checked the $4mil pakistani pr did not happen or yield any revenue. And as you said
Quote
"Considering Mr. Kendrick's track record in regard to what he PRs, , and then considering that the source of yesterday's PR"
Mikes track record seems pretty good here so far. Considering MK announced a $2mil land-mine contract and 2 months later put the company under "REVENUE" from that $2mil contract for clearing land mines.
well YES we get the picture loud and clear. $SNTL, MK, mine seeker and all have proven REAL and REAL revenues. If one just stands on the track and keeps talking one usually run over by the Train.......
$SNTL...Porgie....lets not "bite" the tires anymore....I say jump in the car, sit back and enjoy the ride coming....... It is going to be EPIC...IMO
$SNTL...imagine that..who would have thunk.....tomorrow and the REACTION does not matter at this point right away. What matters IMO is that the bashers have been proved WRONG and that this company is REAL. $2mil contract and revs coming in. Imagine what would happen if they had a $15mil, $30mil or $60mil contract next? Who knows where the price would go....This company has MASS future appeal in this market and can have a MAJOR control foothold IMO going forward.....time will tell but right now the future is looking VERY BRIGHT!.. I say $.50-$1.00 by EOY IMO......
$SNTL I agree SunScents that it would be great to hear something from the company Validating previous PR's of contracts and hearing revenue would even be better at this point IMO. So any update would be great. Any update on contracts or revenue would be "greater" 'bad grammar admitted' and would probably answer the Angola question for u, me and everyone else.
$3 to $5 soon IMO
$SNTL...quiet before the storm?....hhhmmmmm
$SNTL. sorry wigg I forgot, I also asked them about any potential new contracts and they said "they could not comment at the moment but they believe the shareholders will pleasantly surprised of their current and Ongoing progress."
$SNTL..I also called Seeker-Tech and asked them with the contracts they have when they expect to report revenue and they said they are looking to be under revenue and report the revenue within the next 30 days.
$SNTL...when I called the company they said they had some of their People down their for roughly 10 days and were already working on it and are continuing to work on it.
$SNTL actually it goes to the shareholders of SNTL. Any existing shareholders of the other two "scam" shells should look to the original Management and control shell owners (not mineseeker)that "scammed" all you shareholders by defaulting on agreements, breaching exchange agreements, warranties and defrauding their shareholders by doing so which lead to Seeker-tech having to go their own way and now become SNTL.
$SNTL.. yeah well welcome to the Elderly club and the answer would be that is not "where they value it" the answer would just be there must a reason..I believe there are WAY too many un factual assumptions being posted on this board whether bashers that don't even own stock or ones that have bought stock and continue to post only negative 'ASSUMPTIONS". Again keeping this ON topic reply about SNTL to ur SNTL post even you are making and assumption
Quote
Simple answer: That's where they value it.
when you know you have no proof or actual facts to back up that statement other then your Opinion.
I Truly believe Porgie that you will be pleasantly surprised of the REALITY of Seeker-Tech in the VERY near future IMO...
Again without wasting VAST amounts of time and energy the wise and fruitful thing to do would be to just wait and see if Seeker-TEch performs or not. That is plain and simple and nothing else in between period. There is nothing anyone on either side can say about Seeker-TEch "that has not already been said from either side" until they either "fail" in SNTL or "succeed" in SNTL.
(Now I need more coffee)
God Bless have a great Sunday morning.
$SNTL yes the same reason that Google, Amazon, Groupon and ALL the others did either PRE IPO or, during IPO or after IPO. They are raising money for Ongoing company work, acquisitions, burn, attorneys fees, filings the list goes on and on and on....just like the guys that invested in the three I mentioned and thousands more that put $10k in a company that needed ongoing funds in the beginning......once they proved themselves that $10k guy is worth $$300mil....
$SNTL you have no idea what ur talking about with PIPES...If you like i can refer you to over 15 Broker Dealers and over 7 SEC attorneys that have all done or been involved with over 150-200 PIPES collectively in the last 12 years. There is NO collective avg price. 15-25% avg standard min. This is only in direct response to your "knowledge" on PIPES.
$SNTL...actually u r extremely incorrect and extremely uniformed. Most legit companies offer restricted stock in private placements. Most Broker Dealers ONLY offer RESTRICTED stock in their PP's for companies or when they do a public offering or a public raise...Bonds are rarely if EVER used. There are WAY to many problems, insurances and legalities tied with Bonds and the Bond market has slipped because of WAy too many counterfeit/ frauds/problems cashing them in. Preferred shares are usually issued to the officers and controllers with lots of covenants and restrictions. MOST LEGIT companies these days are even shying away from preferred because they put them way above the playing field of the common shareholder without any shareholder recourse. That is why it always becomes a big deal for anyone with preferred stock to try and cash in.That is why MOST Legit companies issue Restricted stock (with or without covenants" etc...Google, Amazon etc etc on and on all private placements with common and Restricted stock when they were private which is why when they did an IPO all those shares had to be NAMED in the registration and MANY were not even named and had to wait an additional 6 months before they became free trading because they were Private Placement Restricted shares...
$SNTL.....I got my bib on and I think I am going to order seconds......
$SNTL....can u imagine what would happen if they actually produce revenue?.....what would there be to bash about anymore...would it not be REAL then?
$SNTL...so yummy
$SNTL...mmmmm yummy
$SNTL you are correct and at the time and what was put out all believed that would be the case based on things as u correctly stated that unfortunately never happened. But IMO this is a new company with a REAL business and REAL contracts that will soon show REAL revenues and much much more IMO. We all lose money from time to time on good and bad intentions. Sometimes what at first seemed bad and not real turns into good and a reality. Losing money once or twice is one thing but finally making money on something real is much better and i think you would agree