Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
All we need is the important stuff; just sum it up for us please.
Thanks.
Can you post the link to whichever Ironridge 13 G has that number? Thanks. Haven't seen that specific number anywhere although I recall something in one of the files that assumed around 300 million.
http://www.sec.gov/news/digest/2006/dig070506.txt
That turned out to be the last of that company.
There's an Ihub board here in case you wish to browse. Ticker ADZR.
Thanks and good catch on the address too. Looks like clerical errors on the Network Solutions domain reg. info. The zip code listed on all addresses is for Macon, OH, the phone numbers are for MaSon, TX--except for one fax number, area code 856 I think it was, which is surely incorrect. Ah well, nice to ponder for a sec.
I'll buy FB at 23.4 for a long term hold (several years). Looks like I'm not going to get thought with this market updraft. Too bad. Well, I just watch and wait; unfortunately it'll pop on new news from AAPL near the end of this month or thereafter and it'll be bye bye the 20's. There are better short term bets than FB, anyway.
"Do you post on any other stocks besides ANTS on iHub or do you have a different screen name for each stock?"
No. And No.
What about you? Same question back.
Nor will I play around with bulletin board stocks generally. My full portfolio today is ANTS (because I'm stuck with it) MLNX, REGN, ALLT, NUS, TSCO, QCOR and two different 3x bull ETFs (TNA, MWJ) and one 2x bull ETF, XIV. It was a very good last two days, up about 7%. I trade in and out a lot, and more so with the ETFs, where I play both inverse and long to play the ongoing market volatility. Life on a roller coaster, boy howdy.
I can construe that it is a positive sign, based on Mr. Ivey's prior position as President of AdZone Research. IMO he should never have been appointed Director or Secretary for ANTS with such a cloud over his background. IF Mr Kautzmann learned of it after the appointment and therefore removed Mr. Ivey, then it would reflect well on Mr. Kautzmann's integrity. I do not know that that scenario for Mr. Ivey's removal is in fact the case. As I clearly said, I remain at arms length regarding Mr. Kautzmann's integrity. Time will tell. It's simply good Mr. Ivey's name is no longer connected to ANTS.
Okay, here it is. Thanks to DreamMaster's post #
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=76268059.
The address given by Network Solutions domain name info shows an address for ANTS Technical Contact as:
Technical Contact:
ANTs Software, Inc.
Dr Frank N Kautzmann III - Chairman (drfnk999@gmail.com)
+1.2814144121
Fax: +1.8562341017
4605 Duke Drive
Suite 850
Mason, OH 45040
US
Status: Active
That suite is the address of RCM Technologies--Nasdaq, RCMT.
They employ some 1,560 people or so, have an IT portion of their business.
See:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=RCMT+Profile
and
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=Rcmt&ql=1.
Also
http://rcmt.com
And, for the best information on what they do on their IT side check out their business description in the following job posting:
http://www2.jobdiva.com/private/myjobs/openjob_outside.jsp?a=5delfm2w02kdz96ddkjpqyt3nasfne263bfkmdie3nca0fngmx53d9e56r334w4few&from=COMP&id=2793363&SearchString=&StatesString=
So let's PONDER on what--if anything--Mr. Kautzmann may be doing with, or through the services of, RCM.
Anyone?
Hope all these links work. I'll check em after this posts and repost them if necessary.
G'night.
Didn't say you did, but I read posts about ANTS and several posters keep hammering about a reverse split, so I speculate there is coordination there. Just my opinion. I want to know WHY. You have posted on yahoo's board--or at least someone know as Tigerpac has, so I'm going to assume a probability that you also post on RB, perhaps as Surfnowork, who signs off with "Just My Opinion" as you did earlier. Since his posts and yours are close to agreement, I will continue to assume the possibility that you are one of the same, or at a minimum in contact with Mr. SDW. Whatever, doesn't matter to me overly, just want to see honest posts and either an opinion based on real facts, or simply a cleear statement of opinion unembellished by claims to some non existent "news."
As for your claim that the Amended Statement of Ownership and following 8-K's give any evidence of a pending reverse stock split to back your opinion, I see no evidence AT ALL; exactly where in the document is it embedded? I don't see nothing. Show it and quote it, please.
Now my next post going to be good. Links to something to ponder at least. I'm trying to compile it right now, just missing one document and I'll have it soon, soon,
G'day.
The question is, does the CEO have a right to somehow appoint new board members to serve without the majority vote of shareholders after the old board leaves en masse? Anyone know the answer? As for Mr. Ivey, the 8-k claims he was voted out by a MAJORITY of board members, but we have only been told of two: Kautzmann and Ivey. Did Ivey vote himself off, in which case that is a majority, or have other boardmembers been appointed an we shareholders have yet be to properly notified by an 8-k filing. Perhaps new board members were appointed in the last day or two and an 8-k will be filed by Friday. But why not today in conjunction with the Ivey 8-k? I think the CEO needs a training manual, however, with Ivey's past I am pleased by his dismissal, which is a positive sign that Kautzmann intends to run this business honestly. I'm reading a lot into that and remain at arms length until I see more. I have one bit of research to follow up on regarding a connection of his and will post what I find tonight or tomorrow.
And which news is that inkling based on? Or are you just tinkling down your leg? Not one FACT is evident about a reverse merger. So can it, please and just say something like:
I believe it's likely we will see a reverse split, maybe a reverse merger is in the works. Just a hunch based on watch similarly situated company's in the past.
There.
Stop bs'ing about the "news." There is none about that.
There very well may be a reverse split at least in the future, but you are part of a campaign both here and on Raging Bull to MAKE people worried about this. WHY?
Tigerpac is right.
I am interested in the names of new board members: real names, known names will tell me what to expect going forward. Should be interesting. Hope for some positives!!
Real Data is a nothing company. ANTS is likely a company of one at this time: Kautzmann. As far a known all engineers left by summer last year. What is in the works is unknown at this time, probably looking to license the patents and or merger. The IP IS valuable, though.
Cross check "RDI Real Data Inc" + "Corelogic" on Google search. Patent infringement lawsuit. Do same with "Zillow" + "CoreLogic" + "lawsuit." Zillow settled. RDI probably was forced to shutter the website or chose to since their AVM model was using Corelogic's patent without licensing. This doesn't mean willfully not that Kautzmann isn't a good replacement at ANTS. Just information to clarify why realdata.net, his website, is now a landing page only. Next...
Tpac: you know it's not credible that it's a shell company with no assets. It's anyone's guess what is there, but Ironbridge wouldn't have agreed to the deal and received Preferred in exchange for cleaning up ANTS financial messes; or even agree to invest $1 million in some crank business shell transaction. Nor is it a likely coincidence that Kautzmann is a wonk on information systems, real-time computing and Artificial Intelligence, among other things. Very likely the ACS and patents survive. Further, an executive interested only in acquiring a shell company is unlikely to want one where a lot of shareholder lawsuits could potentially be filed, or one with court cases still outstanding. They would purchase a "clean" shell. So...No. But you know that already. Now ANTs loss carry forwards ($100 million +) for tax purposes are likely are still on the books and that asset has some small value to merger candidates---but that alone wouldn't obviate the rest.
I said end of next year, I believe. Why dream of .3 when you can dream in dollars? Nobody here knows anything, you are all dreamers.
As is your quest for knowledge on this board. Good luck to you as well. All in good spirit.
Headed for $2 (in my head). Big defense dept. roll out contracts coming. That's my guess but I don't have any evidence. Just putting two and two together. Now that I think of it, that makes four. So $4/sh. end of next year.
He got a stock tip while he was out surfing?
Yes, that is possible. But I don't think you are only one person.
You forgot to put IMO, so where's tha factz?
Sales guys are at IBM, that's part of the OEM agreement.
Your source please: "IMO, IBM doesn't like to be deceived or embarrassed and both happened to them."If you state this as a FACT, you need evidence. Since there is none, you're all bs.
You think IBM didn't look under the hood before agreeing to put the code inside db2? IBM is a leader in this, their reputation was involved, their employees are some of the very best. No, Tigerpac, your speculation is bs.
This is factually inaccurate in the particular. There were some patchwork code enhancements made based on beta testing and results of the working ACS and was incorporated into both the ACS AND into the IBM Db2. Once that was done senior IBMers did a few roadshow presentations to CEOs and CIOs at several baseball ballparks. THAT WOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED if the tech was buggy as Tigerpac says. Something else was/is up or afoot depending on how you look at it.
Surfpac or Tigerpac:
Re: "Far easier and quicker these days to replace the entire system." That''s bunk, and knowing your knowledge, I believe you know that. If what you say were true, IBM would not have needed EnterpriseDb to enable JP Morgan's migration away from Oracle servers to IBM's recently. Secondly, you just don't start from scratch on new servers running old, complex applications and huge data warehouses that were built around one server's functionalities.