Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Not good logic. It’s not a forgiveness card.
For laymen terms: If something bad happens to you; then you make a bunch bad decisions....
And then somebody comes along to rectify the “something”. Are you then automatically made whole for all the bad decisions you made since that “something” happened?
The complete lack of personal responsibility and excuses that people use is pathetic and disheartening to say the least. And how it effects your thought process is amazingly sad. It’s entitlement, protectionism all bound by distorted ideals with no attachment of internal ownership of who you are.
But, I’ll always try and do my part! And hope for all of you! And treat you as if you eventually will!
Here’s a financial picture:
A r/s allows a company to recap. It’s beem the same investors for years. The value of their holdings has never been effected. The portion of ownership has never been effected. Only the price per share. The arbitrator doesn’t forgive management for doing financing that provided anti-dilution rights.
Patients lives were not effected. All patients have been followed. There is no suit on behalf of people that may eventually become patients had the drug been approved sometime maybe in the future..etc.
There is absolutely zero substance to anything you said other than you will not be surprised...
Yankee, you ever heard of or saw that movie? I forget what it’s called...the theme line is “if you build it. he will come.” (With periods!)
I’ve clearly explained my position. And the objectivity of such. And the other tools I use. And where I bend math... and I’ve very clear about bending with logic.
I’ve also been an outspoken poster of why 298 is/was/will arrive sooner than the crowd (nobody has been proven right not wrong yet in this regard)
When anybody has asked; I have replied. If you need proof? I can provide.
In the past; I asked you questions(as a willing participant to your thesis) to see if line even had bait? No reply (I can provide proof.)
Can you recognize the psychology of that?
In the movie. It becomes.
Here at i hub it is in your formation of a question....that is never answered....it never becomes....
It’s ok. Talent at that level...normal...
I’m just telling you clearly.
Ps. There will be one lucky winner here. Don’t take for granted....
IE- my daughter went from balance bike to normal bike in less than a step....she said “wow! Quick learning! 1,2,3 and I was riding! (I thought to myself; so help me god. Life is not like this...but I love you! And hate balance bikes.)
Not to get to theoretical for y’all (that’s actually my hit out my txrh), but logic and memory here are sub par to 5 year olds.
Serious, cvm investors/traders/talkers need a time out. It takes my 5 year old only 10 minutes to teach her not to repeat the same mistake. Some cvm traders are making the same after 5 years.
Logic. Cvm the price falls. My kid rides a bike through a sandy patch at park....I’ve told her not good. Well, one fall and she avoids sand on the sidewalk.
Logic? How many institutions are taking a chance with cvm (with the exception of those that own the park that make you sign a waiver before entering)? ANSWER : 0
There used to be 2 replies to this post: one said “affirm”
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139262750
It says 2 replies..... Maybe I just remembered incorrectly....it’s all in my head you know
Sarcasm....which part?
When pps was going down you didn’t think so....
Now it is going up and you do....
A perfect example of why I said: Psychology is always before concept
The educators are trying to create more than one avenue to extend presence; irrelevant of outcome regarding arb and ph3.
One must never forget the large banner that says do not enter to large entities...
How can this be accomplished?
$50m MC (revolving 12 month period for limited dilution no longer in play.
How can that be accomplished? Without going over the 20% rule?
Warrants? How and which ones can effect the share structure.
IE-14.3m shares outstanding at 3.75 is $53 MC.
That would equal cvm.ws trading at .10.
What other warrants are registered?
Any exercised would increase MC, share count, allow for increased dilution within the 12 month rule, as well as increase cash for operations, and the enterprise value of company in case of buyout. The balance of this structure is what can be traded; and sometimes NOT as they seem to be “adjusted” on random basis...
I see nothing in it. I will pass on analogy somebody else passed to me:
The event and any thought to it are equivalent to:
Pulp fiction: when Samuel Jackson and travolta walk in the room and the guy fires off the guy like crazy and hits nothing.
Just miss your input. We all need oversight.
It’s hard to find gaps within ourselves....
Well you were right so far, thanks to our president mctweet.
I’ll bail on the slightest profit and double down on any flush.
The short positions will be forced to be the buyers of a massive block; of which mm has failed to cross.
Well then there were 2 of us. Lol.And you did better than I. I bought ~ 1.39 and sold ~ 1.89.
You’re not me with more discipline than I, are you?
Well then there were 2 of us. Lol.And you did better than I. I bought ~ 1.39 and sold ~ 1.89.
You’re not me with more discipline than I, are you?
I’m a bit surprised you’ve chosen to not participate in any dialogue.
The trade....not so much...the “do not enter sign” is still loud and clear; but conversation/idea/ theory?
Lets be clear. I’ve learned “some things” from others....
My basket isn’t full at aeti...I made money here....
In the past I would have traded against myself.....what one tells them self is more powerful than reality.
Psychology of money management?
Money management doesn’t even exist....when people who participate are effected by?
Side note:
I’m going to fight warren buffet till death on 1 point till death.
F the sp500, f the vagueness of his results.
He is telling everybody to ignore accountability...I say....pick at least one stock...sell it/short it/buy it...OWN IT!
It tells a truth every seconds of every day. Does that define you?
Accountability....own it.....
There is space for both to exist....
K. Line guy.since I’m sure you don’t understand anything I said regarding cvm; and more definitely won’t even ask why I have my position...as a line says All....
How much will I make on chk tomorrow? I paid a .75% premium after hours because in was busy....
There is no difference between $2 and .20 other than what your account says. Do you realize that?
Who was profiting other than me? There was no volume and a premium was being paid to cover sold shares below the 1.80 mark.
Insider info? Lol.
I met the ceo. He was such joke; I decided to take a glance at the equity.
He’s a house of cards.
Pershing could get it all back, and I mean ALL...if he makes a discreet attack.
You know I don’t rely on lines/charts....I’ll glance though.
With cvm:
So, I said a couple weeks ago, anything below 1.80 is safe (forget the exact verbiage). And trade was just beginning. Then I stated I sold my micro position and noticed a premium being paid for it.
Then I said at 1.37 that consultant shares were crossing and i took a decent position.
Well I sold a majority of that position yesterday....
It’s amazing how far basic share structure knowledge, a little tape reading on occasion, and logic amount to accuracy.
Don’t worry though; I know I needed some luck...and I’ll need more in the near future....
It just so happpens.....I make my luck
Here is trading:
Psychology, then share structure
Psychology, then management
Psychology, then fundamentals
Psychology, then a chart of “long term”
Psychology, then tape read if short term
Psychology, then logic
FYI: it’s NEVER the concept before psychology
That’s why people say stupid BS likes “it’s built in to pps”
The sign at cvm has appeared inconclusive over the last bit of time.
There was a straw taken at my safe entry point....
On another note: for any massive player who pays attention....you can easily go as large as $10m++ short on txrh within the next 6 months...I don’t / won’t play it....because I’m me....but, I’m telling those that can.
Edit: There are warrants out at 1.65...but they aren’t registered (which nobody pointed out)
What about the 1.86 warrants? Are they registered?
And finally the 1.75 warrants you are referring that will have intrinsic value at 1.75 is completely inaccurate. They actually require 25 per 1 common.
So if you purchased at a penny; you would need a pps of 2.00 before there is any potential value to you the holder. If you paid .02 then you would need 2.25 before any value going forward.
Re read my posts to you...
Imagine beyond what you imagine....
And a % of a number of another number.
And how many days in advance does one have to advise the company an intent to exercise and “have the funds”?
In addition what would that amount be? Ie you want to convert 30k warrants? $50k, eh? And how much in advance must one notify cvm of exercise?
What about the $1.86 warrants? They are registered; aren’t they?
——-
How about presentation?
I love rhetorical questions? Why did Geert invest in the summer?
It was because even though funders were in a line to get a piece of cvm; he told them to stuff it and he was going to gift himself the best round.
———
Maybe his endpoints don’t mean anything?
Maybe people don’t know statists?
10 out of 100 die / vs 11 out of 100
Wow, 10% improvement?
Somehow; some way....maybe 17 vs 10 would be a 70% improvement?
What planet is u from avatars?
Forward your low share count statement to “mick”. He will appreciate it.
If the do another 25 to 1 r/s there will only be 1m shares in a year. That sounds like it fits your ideology...
Maybe it’s the $1.65 warrants. In relation to the note due sept 2018?
Exercise the warrants. Create cash to pay off the note? In hope?? It’s due soon...
Edit: There is an off chance cvm could use preferred units , but cvm most likely won’t go the preferred unit avenue for equity because it would alienate asset distribution unfairly within the parameters Geert has stipulated
Going further...
The share structure has reached capitulation. another round or 2 could be produced for longevity to buy time for legalities. Without any catalyst it will result in wait it out cash flow then dismember cvm into #2,3,4...with a final recovery of all previous short financing rounds.
At a quick look; based on other “things” I watch....it appears consultants are being gifted shares at the current price of 1.37.
Just sayin
To add to my previous reply : https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139859248
There is almost no chance cvm is a worthy investment.
Even #1 has a strong chance of falling into #2.
Did you ever see my post about protectionism?
The
Caveat to this idea is additional partners and the arb law firm.
Accordingly, #2 becomes more pronounced and obvious.
Look at share structure. What is legally available to finance via equity? New partnerships is absolutely bogus! All data was already cut and divided.
So you have data.
You have a business failing
You multiple avenues to control and repatriate all assets except #1.
Well, let #1 die/ or kill itself....it wasn’t the “goal” anyways....and the options of 2,3,4 are controlled by the protectionist...it’s intangible...
There is the off chance that Multikine is almost a complete success across the board.
It’s low...combine new drugs that have surpassed with quick approval, the fact the study was meant to find a “find “ within...
But, again, maybe the find within is what it’s all about?
——-
In reality. I don’t know enough science to decipher if it does.
I’m confident in my logic and reasoning.
But most have none and the pps drives the thought.
Most are influenced by external noise; not thought.
There is a difference between being wrong and being persuaded.
We’ve all heard the statement; “truth is hard to swallow.”
Well, if a truth never existed in the first place....????
The real reality is almost nobody has any clue what the f they were talking about before, during or after....
Inherently leaving any chance to learn from experience lifeless.
In this particular scenario it doesn’t matter. It was done to maintain price liquidity. There was no reorganization / restructure ever embedded.
For a lol; yes it’s entertaining to see how many decimals can be created...
My layout is more descriptive of why the may go out of biz.
My point being: the r/s history has nothing more than coincidence of coincidence of them going out of business.
What’s with the hoki poki?
This site and its objectives are completely contradictory to its proclamations.
It inherently says; truth behind; if you find success do NOT share with anybody....
Yet...it shares....and gets worse from there...
I couldn’t disagree more with everything; other than an occasional accidental anecdote like the one I mentioned above.
Mortality....the timeline to fruitfulness....is also changing....
Then you get some hyped up Elon Musk saying he’s going to save the species by running away...
It all follows the same sad path...f....under this ideology ; Geert is a martry! ( and I know this not to be true)lol
Believe this or not: good things happen to good people.
Darwinism
Does not account for consciousness....
That is why people buy data; and it is simultaneously irrelevant
Read this: short story for kids. Idea....is the key word....if you find it...you will know when you have found it...
In the present: market is telling truth. And it’s acutallly the best gauge we have “at the moment”
Regarding this aspect, a clear picture, is something I’m not capable of providing.
I do most of the calculations in my head on a whim, based on glance at research data (similar to what you posted) from 2-3 sources. I’ll use logical reasons to bend static statistics.
I could see your reasoning behind your thoughts of first CRO. And it makes sense...
However, my logical guess is that randomness was not being achieved.
I believe the reason for such a large study is to ensure useful data.
You and schwagg both mention potential additional data points....imagine more than your imagining...
You said it yourself....maybe you didn’t realize it....
But what is 10% of a need number that is evolving?
Is standard of care improving at a faster rate...is Multikine still increasing survival at 10% over the improved standard of care?
Cvm stated objectives for the study, but not what cvm actually wanted...maybe cvm doesn’t even know what they want...
So, with any bad luck, there is chance the survival rates are lower. It is the first year of mortality within randomness that creates data points. However, this is most likely NOT what multikyne is aiming for within the study parameters.
Example: what if Multikine killed 10% quicker, and 90% lived longer...but it was obvious that 90% of the 10% died because (bla, bla). And that 25% of the 90% showed no signs (bla, bla)
Logic says the size and scope of study are there to increase probability of finding a success within.
Due to limited enrollment; I assume previous cro failed at randomness...
——-
I see 4 assets with cvm
1. Multikine if a success
2. Data from the study
3. The building
4. Built in financing into the ticker symbol
——-
1. If Multikine a success; a whole new analysis will have to be done on what the success is
2. Data: not sure how and if the data is shared across the multiple channels involved is every aspect of their operations. I would assume it’s protected, but even then, the odds are somebody would take it in a merger as an “in tangible” asset and we would never see the value of it.
3. Building has value, but again with non of above it’s useless. Somebody could easily buy it at auction price. There would be no leverage to demand any thing close to fair value without the above
4. Look for a “cryptocurrency” type phenomena to pick it.
Imagine I wanted to open a store that sold “old news”.
The funding is already built in if there is any success.
It could end up being the most expensive ticker symbol ever sold...one day...in the future...
I didn’t come to same conclusion as you, but took a similar approach...
I have “hope” that drives my bias towards sooner than your estimates.
My method, which may be flawed, also did not agree with an extension in conclusion would reveal any insight into the success of the study.
Are you the 1600 share short block?
I’m here again.
Am doing Just what I said I would.
It just got more interesting as Raymond James wants in...
Looks like he was calling in a friend from chicago too...
Took a chunk of shlx too
Motive? Dream? I don’t know ground zero for cvm....I’ve got a couple of guesses, but they are completely 100% irrelevant to where we are today.
From there; the puzzle isn’t so Kung fu...
Previous funders were well known and prosecuted toxic financiers (anti- dilution rights).
Sec put the shut down on such financing. (I forget the year....I want to guess 2009-10)
Also, sec implemented the revolving max dilution rate over 12 months. (Not sure of date for implementation)
Current:
What is the current pps? What is it pre split?
In the past, funding has increased MC. Thus increasing dilution capability. It’s like a funnel.
(Side note) funders can use offering to close short positions.
It’s a perennial short.
That’s why I’ve said there is a DO NOT ENTER sign for all cleary written.
But, you can’t short or take a loss on what you can’t sell.
Imagine. Zero is infinite. It can be....decimal to the 000000....and beyond
Mmcap has clearly taken the time to do the math and map it; or he gets a call when a factor of limitations from the sec is about to be broken.
Do you see a window approaching within the 12 month rule?
I don’t suppose somebody does?
And yes, Elon would take a position
The perfect example of the person sitting at a table..
Who says “I bought you out.”
With a period”.”
You’d have slim chance with the same statement if it read like this:
“I bought you out?”
Study Latin. Then go somewhere where you have to use it.
Then open up....
And you might be able to see the question inside the affirmative...
EDIT:I think I’ve laid out my theory for cvm.
For clarity; If you are insinuating “cookie crumbs” in regards to reading the tape? No. Nor do I have that time as HFT....but a (spot check) seemed to show more than coincidence; so I added that to my correspondence.
Cookie crumbs from me. I disagree.
I would never let one factor; override all other elements or instihate me to ignore other insights i have; just as I don’t believe you do or would.
If anything I would bet your map is More than just more organized than mine.
Cvm cleary operates as separate forms of institutions; your Kung fu bit is more akin to smoke screens than cookie crumbs.
How about this post https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139265030 ; and what has happened since? It’s almost as if alohorythms read my mind; or did they predict his; or did Elon speak of such ludicrously over inflated BS because he felt the need to match the pps the alogorythms had “gifted” him? It’s dropped 30% since the post.
Is it not possible to wonder; would AI invest in us?
Cvm is not Kung fu and you know it
And in MORE than just theory, there is cleary a difference in curing cancer and finding another planet because we killing ourselves!
If there is a predictive technical way to see it through your eyes I would appreciate it if you could share with me.
It’s coming. My interpretation of share structure, potential(less) capital; are both major hinge points for my “non sorted thesis”.
Data is always for sale....
Add in a 2.5% premium to purchase 300 shares after a 2 day delay....however that sight may be due to the new fed rate?
That’s a heavy premium for micro money. Could it be due to fed rate? Was my sight coincedence?
Ps. Sometimes I see double. Or mix. Or get it all wrong or all right.
I think my other one may go there within 30 days and cvm is on its way.
The trade is just beginning here now.
Foresight?
I already write them for free here.
It would depend. What can you offer in addition to payment; anything?
Royalty? Flat?
Subject?
“Who cares. “With a period”.”
I know many care.
I care.
Personally; I know you shorted.
.....
Think about that....
How do I know....
It might seem scary to you....
But it’s not; I’m just really good at what I do....
——-
In his situation...did he really say 750k? I don’t remember that.
But that’s a lot of liquidity for a short bet....I’d congratuLate him on that; assuming he’s closing it up now.
Because now, it’s too late to go short. One must not participate, go long (gamble with foresight), or own their mistakes/ truths!
The truth is hard to swallow!
Do you see what I see?
Buyout trade, sir