Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Only 117M more shares to satisfy that note
Typical daily bid sell like clockwork around the same time with NITE/NITE bid/ask and NITE comes down to make sure closes red
At least the Bears are transparent
Yep agree 10000%. Being manipulated down
That's absolute hogwash
If someone is sitting at .09 for 5k shares and suddenly shares go off on the bid for 5k shares for .09 but that person sitting/showing doesn't get filled then someone is selling AON shares to AON bid.
Incorrect 1000% - AON trades which don't show on the bid can be traded directly too in order to fill shares directly
So anyone trying to take the stock down (manipulating for short purposes or whatever it is ) could be trading directly amongst themselves keeping the shares amongst themselves.
A and B (as cohorts)
A sells shares as AON directly to B sitting on bid AON to make sure B gets A shares. Then A sits on bid AON and B sells AON shares to A (to make sure A gets shares)
That's match/wash trading amongst themselves down.
Lmao! Yes you did! Thank you.
Thanks! ;) you just proved my point without realizing it!
Lmaooooo
WHAT!!??? BS!!! Someone can sell 7200 shares AON on the bid for someone sitting on the bid AON for 7200 shares!!
Incorrect- someone can hit the bid for AON or as a match/wash trade in a group moving it down. Most probably by a short.
And FYI there's paints for 100, 200 shares on the bid all the time making the price go down. But I guess that's nor worth discussing is it ? Lmao
Do you verifiable documentation providing manipulation Veronica
LMAO- okayyyy.
Yea whatever
Please provide links to this :
"There are many individuals on Ihub who have been contacted by their brokerage to stop such purchases or face account closure"
Have you looked at the accumulation on the chart?
Did you buy when it went up 1000%, 800%, 500% or multiple 50-100%'s?
Lmao?!! Handed over what DJ? That's the most absolute ridiculous thing I've ever heard in my life.
So when the stock is up 60% - suddenly it's SEC!!!!!! MANIPULATION !!!! Or maybe there's just realistically not any shares being sold under .20 -
But when it's red, it's attributed to the (non existent) company selling LMAO
what's more interesting for the SEC is these daily (around the same time) wash trades sold into the bid. Funny how it's about the same every day and about the same amount and always involves NITE on the offer and high bid. I mean typically, people who are retail selling at least try to come down on ask and offer shares beneath the lowest ask to maximize their sell.
Who sells shares 40-50% less? Makes absolutely no sense. That's not people actually selling sell DJ.
It's so obvious it's hilarious how transparent it is.
Where did NITE go with the 8600 shares suddenly DJ?
DJ, what happened to NITE suddenly that was sitting there at .15 with 8600 shares?
What scared NITE off (AGAIN)
Was there no inventory for a large buyer or something?
HOGWASH- placing something as a sticky doesn't make something accurate or true.
But a statement by a representative of the former OTCBB does
b) offshore non NASDAQ brokerage firms are not required to report shorting,
"A representative of OTCBB commented regarding their SHORT REPORTING. It is FLAWED. The OTCBB representative stated that a) there is no guarantee as to 100% compliance, b) offshore non NASDAQ brokerage firms are not required to report shorting, c) offshore brokerage firms permit a higher ratio of shorting stock against restricted shares and d) sophisticated shorters can circumvent reporting by getting out of their short position on the short reporting days and get back in the next day."
Veronica. This statement by a representative of the former OTCBB stands as a statement and a fact. It has absolutely zero bearing that the OTCBB is not around anymore. It doesn't change the below facts.
The words of an actual representative in this position is considered the Gospel compared to any anonymous poster here:
b) offshore non NASDAQ brokerage firms are not required to report shorting,
"A representative of OTCBB commented regarding their SHORT REPORTING. It is FLAWED. The OTCBB representative stated that a) there is no guarantee as to 100% compliance, b) offshore non NASDAQ brokerage firms are not required to report shorting, c) offshore brokerage firms permit a higher ratio of shorting stock against restricted shares and d) sophisticated shorters can circumvent reporting by getting out of their short position on the short reporting days and get back in the next day."
Ummm Veronica - wrong
Just bc the OTCBB is not around anymore doesn't change the fact of the fact that ... Saying otherwise Is HOGWASH
b) offshore non NASDAQ brokerage firms are not required to report shorting,
"A representative of OTCBB commented regarding their SHORT REPORTING. It is FLAWED. The OTCBB representative stated that a) there is no guarantee as to 100% compliance, b) offshore non NASDAQ brokerage firms are not required to report shorting, c) offshore brokerage firms permit a higher ratio of shorting stock against restricted shares and d) sophisticated shorters can circumvent reporting by getting out of their short position on the short reporting days and get back in the next day."
b) offshore non NASDAQ brokerage firms are not required to report shorting,
"A representative of OTCBB commented regarding their SHORT REPORTING. It is FLAWED. The OTCBB representative stated that
a) there is no guarantee as to 100% compliance,
b) offshore non NASDAQ brokerage firms are not required to report shorting,
c) offshore brokerage firms permit a higher ratio of shorting stock against restricted shares and
d) sophisticated shorters can circumvent reporting by getting out of their short position on the short reporting days and get back in the next day."
This is SEC Rule 203
Rule 203 – Locate and Delivery Requirements. Rule 203 incorporates Rule 10a-2 and existing SRO rules into a uniform Commission rule. It requires broker-dealers, prior to effecting short sales in all equity securities, to locate securities available for borrowing in order to be able to deliver securities on the settlement date of the transaction. It also imposes additional requirements on broker-dealers for securities in which a substantial amount of failures to deliver have occurred.
https://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/mrfaqregsho1204.htm
Ummm all dandy of a read but if Float remains the same day to day. Then means no shares being sold
That was a long post about nothin
I called the TA and the float is the same as it was nearly two months ago thus meaning that no new shares have been sold into the open market.
So stating that VNDM was a diluter for the past 2 or so months is a false statement. Stating that the company is selling shares into the open market is a false statement.
The fact that when shares are bought at .18 today for 10k shares shows that the market wanted shares at .18. The fact that NITE wanted so badly to come down on the ask and force sells as low as .10 is manipulation.
Why would anyone sell at .10 when there were bids at .18 previously?
Why weren't those shares simply sold Friday?
SMCE is being severely manipulated buy the Bears.
This is purposely being traded down Veronica Fox, the L2 movements by NITE and the hide and seek games by CDEL and the come and go of shares on the ask testing the waters to see if a buyer will take and move with fear of it being taken and taking a risk to move down to pressure the stock down
Not to mention AON wash trades like this morning.
There are 2 brokers with collective 4@ years of experiencing watching and recording every move and providing feedback saying the same thing.
This stock is being manipulated down Veronica Fox.
ME TOO!!! There is also 2 brokers with 40 years of collective experience watching this too and recording every manipulative move by the Bears.
It's so obvious it's not even funny anymore
ARE YOU WATCHING THE MANIPULATION TODAY BY THE BEARS!!???
I'm taking photos. Snapchats, instagrams, twitters, face books, VINE, MySpace, EVERYTHING!!
Every single movement is being recorded!!!
Veronica, what happened to VNDM and NITE on Friday?
Why did they suddenly stop clogging the ask and disappear.
Is it bc "something" or "someone" was looking for a large amount of shares that they couldn't fulfill and would mean a severe MOASS
If the company was selling shares wouldn't they just stay there?
And likewise prove your statements Veronica Fox
Astute traders know the truth.
Astute traders "like you said" know the truth
It's offshore
Lmaoooooo! And? For what? Bc the stock is up 110% in one day. Didn't realize that was a violation.
Umm ok DJ- thanks for the opinion.
So I'm assuming when the MM's were sitting at new lows doing impossible transactions at prices never seen before were occurring and (no company shares being sold)
That manipulation was also reported to the SEC concerning the offshore shorting?
Hey Honda- did you know that if SMCE goes up 100% in one day. It's suddenly a SEC investigation target?
Lmaooooo
Increasing? Ummm it's 3.8m and been that way for at least 1.5 months while VNDM been there acting like they diluting. But the fact is DJ- no selling is occurring.
Every single astute trader knows and sees this ;)
Game Over
SMCE Going Multidollar
It's 1000% factual DJ, saying otherwise is untrue.
VNDM can't be diluting if the float staying the same
Duh
Prove that there was manipulation on Friday. And so was the 200k share whacks also manipulation?
Astute traders witnessed all the shares on the ask disappear and buying up to as high as .2779 and closed 110% on very little dollar volume
Really DJ!?? Bc the FLOAT remains at 3.8m
So If VNDM is selling and being bought on ask. Then the float would increase day to day.
Simple math DJ
Astute traders already knew this been occurring
b) offshore non NASDAQ brokerage firms are not required to report shorting,
Yes, just making sure the truth is out there Veronica Fox- nothing funny about it whatsoever. SMCE has been a victim for least 2-3 months of this
b) offshore non NASDAQ brokerage firms are not required to report shorting,
"A representative of OTCBB commented regarding their SHORT REPORTING. It is FLAWED. The OTCBB representative stated that a) there is no guarantee as to 100% compliance, b) offshore non NASDAQ brokerage firms are not required to report shorting, c) offshore brokerage firms permit a higher ratio of shorting stock against restricted shares and d) sophisticated shorters can circumvent reporting by getting out of their short position on the short reporting days and get back in the next day."
Didn't answer my question. If VNDM has been diluting as they are being accused of. Then why is the float not changing daily.
Astute traders already know the answer to that. ;)