Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Listen little Messiah12, I let you pumpers do the work for me. I never wanted to be quoted as saying this company in NOT a POS because it clearly is. Remember, if you get out now you will still be able to give your grandma back her money.
I offered to help you but you choose to listen to the charmers.
I'm done here unless some super charged fluff comes along.
Looking forward to that.
Really? 12K profit yesterday. You still haven't made anything. The pump has run. I'm outta here.
Good luck all!
I flipped this 4 times. You lost on the .24 run. I bot at .032 and sold at .22. You just watch your acct diminish. bwaahahahahahhahahahha
Clearly. How many fluffs will they come out with before people understand that they are hiding the results? Traders starting to bail. Yesterdays fluff not being taken seriously.
What can they do with 300K? Nothing. They did nothing when those shares were worth 40M.
Here you go:
http://www.entb.net/factsheet.html
Don't mind the spelling.
It makes sense if you enroll 10 dogs. Three is an insufficient sample size. Anyone who has taken the most elementary of statistics classes knows that.
Still no biopsy results
Or the sell off will go into high gear.
Can that "Promise" be kept lil M? The thing is flippers make money while "longs" watch their profits turn to dust. Once you can read charts to will enter and exit by signals. You don't get rich holding past peaks, you get rich selling too soon.
Interesting indeed. Are you going to buy a "lottery ticket"?
About ENTB
Yes, he is by the books. No cat study's and mystery dogs to be heard of. Though Asher is a stretch.
The dividend reflects either a serious lack of direction for the company or a desperate act to pacify shareholder dismay.
I cant imagine any of those going through at this point. Those other clinic owners must be feeling rough about their decision unless they sold right away.
Sure seems like they deliberately announced the LOI's and the initiation of the study prematurely.
The dogs could not be living without some sort of treatment. That's all there is to it.
LOI(s) status?
Refutable again:
No treatment, including time tested conventional treatments, has the same effect on every patient. Chemo, for instance, may be very effective on Patient A yet ineffective on patient B although both may have the same type and stage of cancer.
True, a larger sample size was needed. Three dogs is meaningless just using gender and age as factors degrees of freedom are too few.
Also, there are rare but verified accounts of spontaneous remission in all types of cancers.
In three animals? Three individuals in the same clinic would not experience spontaneous remission. If it were that common there would clearly be no demand for such a treatment.
I might be mistaken but I believe without an efficacy study conducted conducted under extremely controlled conditions it would be irresponsible to assume efficacy even if the dogs are thriving or lack of efficacy even if the dogs are not.
I think you are making excuses for ENTB. Those dogs may have seen no effects from surgery but there is certainly something being hidden here. There is no reason not to disclose their current status.
No its not. They could not survive more than 9 months from diagnoses without some form of treatment. It is 3 months past that point. Clearly if they are alive it would be due to the treatment. If they are dead its because the treatment does not work regardless of implantation issues.
Thanks for bringing some alternative evidence to the table. Koos can't to say much about the statements of your vet friend. It is also very, very sad news for people that he fleeced.
I was not accusing you of plagiarizing, lol. Many people only consider evidence from DD if it is presented by someone they agree with.
"ENTB announces the 7 final dogs admitted into safety study". That would be more to say about it.
Then I will feel free to say that the study is a joke. In one year they have recruited 3 dogs for a treatment that they planned on having 750 patients/ year being treated for at the very same clinic. So not only is the study a joke but so is the business plan.
Your point about the dividend is solid.
You will note he got those links from one of my posts stating the prognosis for dogs with COM. So you are welcome for doing that D for the board. I am happy to do so. Just a brief bit of reading shows that this bucket is full of holes.
Knowing whether they survived the cancer would be nice.
Right and the hole in the argument is that they have not disclosed the status of the dogs.
Come on. Then why rush out and announce you are starting the study? It is more probable that something did not work. We are three months past the high end of mortality probability (months) for dogs diagnosed with canine melanoma.
1. Clearly you realize a PR disseminates information better than hiding it in a 10-K.
2. "A spokesperson for Entest noted the Company is also currently conducting a 10 dog safety study on its immune-therapeutic cancer vaccine for dogs, having treated 3 dogs so far."
from
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Entest-BioMedical-RenovoCyte-iw-4260269610.html?x=0&l=1
3. Its three dog study, not 10.
So just acting as CRO reduces the importance so much to you that dismiss it. Well to me its still putting your company name on a product.
Correct and based on the lack of evidence for success on the first 3 I trust we won't be hearing about this again.
Right, so read what I posted and it becomes very clear that not only was the study a joke but the business plan was too.
Re: Imenvax results-
1. If there was anything of interest to report it would have been reported in a PR where it would be disseminated to a larger audience rather than 10K. What new investor would read a 10K from a company with a 99.5% decrease in pps?
2. The PR regarding CERC (Nov 2011)states 3 dogs were treated for cancer. There they said treated.
3. Untreated oral melanoma in canines results in mortality in 5-9 months. It has been a year. Wheres the data?
More info:
http://petcancercenter.org/Cancer_Types_oral_melanoma.html
http://www.petinsurance.com/healthzone/pet-articles/pet-dental-care/Canine-Oral-Melanoma.aspx
How do you know the protocol still requires 10? Have you spoken with Koos? Do you have some unpublished report? I think it would be safe to assume that it does but why post it? Clearly its not going to happen.
The CERC study was not a safety study rather a treatment. Canine osteoarthritis is supposedly very common. We have heard nothing about how the injection went with the 1 dog study.
At a clinic where they project to treat 750 dogs/ year for the same condition to generate huge revenue. So only 3 of 10 dogs this year or 3 of 750. Man every time you post it makes them look worse.
The did disclose in November there were no adverse effects from surgery. That was nine months after they announced the study. Now if they were disclosing that fact then clearly they had contact with the owners. Theymost certainly had some gauge as to whether the treatment worked.
One has to remember they said the first study would be 10 dogs, it was 3. A joke, really.
If the scientific advisory board has not dissolved what is it that they do? There are more scientists than dogs. Meanwhile Koos wears the other hats and has full control of the daily goings on.
Each time you post it provides more evidence for ENTB falling apart.
And what about the fact that the study has been going on for more than the survival period for oral melanoma and there are no reports?