Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Both domains are registered through godaddy. Both in 2018. One in January the other in October.
I don’t know if it means anything, but it doesn’t seem common for most companies to use godaddy as a registrar
Attis is moving like a rocket on that news. I hope it means a lot of extra profit for Greenshift. Maybe these investors will get interested in buying GERS as soon a we win the appeal.
Wow huge volume and a nice spike!
Just buy them on my behalf, and we split the profit LOL
If I hadn't some money invested in other more money consuming stocks, I would have added to my position a long time ago.
It might be a few months longer if I follow the flowchart Slashnuts shared recently. http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/rules-of-practice/notices/Life_of_an_Appeal_Narrative_and_flowchart.pdf
He said we where in the middle of stage 4. You might be right with the first decision, but then there still is the possibility of the rehearing I guess.
Probably, he replied to my mail.
Website problem solved!
I did send Kevin an e-mail, maybe it helped. Probably others did too. Asking polite might have done the trick (or did Christopher Wray step in LOL)
Certificate is updated and the site is showing fine again on every browser. Greenshift is reliable as always, there is a bright future ahead!
He must have known that after my post and his reply to it.
Attis Notified by Nasdaq of Delinquent First Quarter 10-Q Filing
They are current on saying they on notifying the investors that they are Notified by Nasdaq of Delinquent First Quarter 10-Q Filing.
‘He who loves to post links with his allegations’ didn’t share any links yet on what law is broken. It makes you wonder if he will send a link to the feds about what law is broken. LOL
Yep, LOL
The website isn’t down. It’s working as normally. Your browser is just giving you a warning about the expired ssl certificate. You can choose to ignore it.
The website hasn’t changed. Only the date of the certificate ran out.
But since there are no forms on the site, there is no risk. However browsers nowadays give a standard warning when that happens.
What part is so hard to understand?
“My deadline for the restoration of the company's website is one week after it went down. After that, I will file a complaint with the F.B.I. and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “
You can Save yourself the waiting and file it right away. It’s like calling the police when you’re cable tv isn’t working. But hey, do whatever pleases you.
But don’t sell bs about an expired ssl certificate being a sign of criminal behavior. Because obviously you have no knowledge about ssl certificates.
Greenshifts website is working fine. It’s just the certificate which is expired. There is no law against that. However, it is your browser generating the warning, because browsers want you to be warned about the risk. If you want to file a complaint, it should be against firefox or any other browser giving that warning.
But you can also ignore the warning and visit their perfectly well working website.
GL
Sorry but this is BIG BS!
I know a company that might help them m, even though they seem more specialized in mobile apps:
https://facebook.com/bitzioinc
If somebody says het wants to get out of GERS since they don't file.
Then why would they buy ATTIS (owning greenshift through FLUX)?
I wouldn’t hold my breath, based on the accuracy of previous statements.
What good are all these speculations about a buyout if it ain't going to happen?
Time will proof!
"The possibility of a buyout is based on the forecast of a reduced loss"
Any idea what percentage of Nasdaq companies are yearly having a reduced lost and and are bought out because of that?
To be a candidate for a buy out, there mostly first had to be a very bullish market, so that other companies that could be interested are not facing losses by themselves, and see potential to make more profit with the company they buy. Other large ethanol producing companies like REX, GPRE and ADM have had their own portion of market cap. reduction. Those companies are probably happy if they can make a profit on their own and it would be hard to believe they would be interested in buying a ethanol company that is making a loss.
Also the ethanol market at this time is still way to much volatile. which makes it hard to predict where ethanol will be going in the next couple of years. A buy out isn't something you do to make a profit on the short term. To make it successful you got to have a perspective for the long term.
For PEIX to be bought out, they need to make sure they are profitable first. That could mean closing down more plants. If they manage to show a profit for a calendar year, and they are still low on sp compared to book value and ethanol market is looking good for the years to come due to political stability, then they could be the candidate for that.
But for that to happen, there still is a lot to be changed.
ballot123, I respect you very much, but I’m just sticking to the facts. I’m a long time owner of PEIX, I still am. But I must admit that at this time I don’t see PEIX working on a comeback. IMO the odds for a RS are 90:10
I hope I’m wrong.
However I’m not going to deny that PEIX is in bad shape despite somebody thinks it helps to write about a “possible” buy out (based on nothing), a high book value (which didn’t help PEIX the past few years), a positive PR surrounding the previous results (what always happens but never seemed to end up ), insider buys (that seem part of the Stock Incentive Plan), growth estimates (which have always been way too high), price targets (which too have always been way too high).
On a public bulletin board, false projections should be discussed.
You know what numbers interest me most? The share price. And so far, despite all your beautiful perspectives, the share price is bringing the value of our investments down.
You can think what ever you want of some other stock, but at least when they drop, almost 50% you can be sure they move up the same value at least a couple of days later.
PEIX I’ve only seen dropping in value, and it got worth less and less. I don’t see them getting back towards $1.30 soon like seemed an option shortly before the last earnings, and moving way closer towards the book value, really would take a miracle.
So being that optimistic about PEIX really is laughable at this time.
Some like to bet against all odds LOL
“Based on the fact that BTZO isn't a valid ticker symbol anymore. You can't place a buy order or a sell order anymore for any shares of their stock. It doesn't exist as a publicly-traded company on any exchange.”
I know your logic, but it still is funny. So if a stock isn’t on an open market anymore it’s a scam by definition LMFAO
“Volume increasing is good but still $16k. What is that?”
Ii’s a penny stock, what do you expect? The volume will not increase by a 1000% all of a sudden, neither will the price. Unless of course there is big news involving $$$$$
So small steps, but in the right direction.
Okay, I’m just glad you didn’t start about the founding fathers of America. You where a bit of, to what I meant, but hey, it could have been worse.
I’m not talking about the history of years ago. I’m talking about the very recent history that goes a couple of years back. It’s more like a tradition. What is the quarterly reporting tradition and history for the stocks you’ve named? Is it to underperform too? Is it to be overestimated too? Is it to drop in share price too? Is it to trade far under the book value quarter over quarter and year over year too?
Yep, but PEIX has a history of its own. To merge all stock histories together, and act like that would apply to PEIX too, is ignoring PEIX’s history and what makes PEIX move. PEIX isn’t your average stock.
Nope, the best one can do is learn from history, and see that analyst estimates have almost always been off for PEIX and that PEIX is almost always overestimated by analysts.
Yes, this time or the next can be an exception, but if you needed to bet, and know that more then 9 out of 10 times estimates where to high, would you then place your bets every time on them being right?
Yep, like I said: I came to the conclusion that there was too much happening and PEIX had a mind of its own, no matter what.. so to predict what PEIX would do, was impossible. Even for the real stock analysts, so why waist the time.
If you go back to my posts in 2016 you will find a lot of posts about that. This one is only one out of many: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=121987031
However, I came to the conclusion that there was too much happening and PEIX had a mind of its own, no matter what.. so to predict what PEIX would do, was impossible. How hard it is to predict is also shown by all the misses of the annalists estimates.
So I stopped sharing most. And stopped keeping track of evrything in a spreadsheet. It just costed to much time to keep it all updated, and if the real annalists can not predict where PEIX is goin based on the real numbers, how can I. I just stick to predicting that the annalists predictions are always way to high...and you know what...that works!
Nope, with PEIX there is always news. It can be the ethanol price, the corn futures, ethanol supplies, the weather, the oil price, the politics, the macro economics.
I think you might have posted this on the wrong board, because I know another stock, that trades way less, because currently it's only hanging on one subject, a lawsuit against some alleged infringing companies, among who there is PEIX. Now to them, this lawsuit is the only thing important caused by the lack of filings for some time.
PEIX however is filing on a regular basis, so we know what is important to PEIX and what makes them move.
So far the most important moves have been due to the wrong estimates in earnings growth (https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/peix/earnings-surprise) but also the lack of a real accelerator to the ethanol market in general.
The market isn't to good now compared to other years, and PEIX has the habit of being the worst kid in class.
Oh yes, you did, did you? Sorry I didn't credit you for that. It's like, you got so many great calls, it's hard to keep up with. It's like talkin to the PEIX guru himself. I'm so glad you got the time to answer my posts about PEIX.
Yes, like you’ve said, and it’s only fair to note that you where the first to say it: “There's a lot of upside in PEIX”
So I thought it might be interesting too for those reading in here, that the upside even increased “especially because the one-year target price is $2.75/share” (again you where the first to say it out in the open here, so the credit is really to you), and the share price went down! Yeeehaaa!!!! Let’s have a toast to the upside!
Yesssss!!!! PEIX even has more upside now!
Still no proof?