Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
$300,000 JUDGMENT AGAINST QBID AND FRANK OLSEN
Complaint [NOS 454] to recover money or property: RELATED TO
BK CASE RS 02-30918: Complaint for:
1] Breach of Contract;
2]Money had and received;
3] Money lent; and
4] Fraud: Ref #RS-
000323 CHARGE TO ESTATE hearing on 09/04/2003 at 09:00 a.m.
at 3420 Twelfth Stre et, Courtroom 303, Riverside, CA 92501 RE:
Item# 1[Rescheduled]
[DISPOSED] re #20 [Default Judgment] [ORA] (Entered:
06/18/2003)
03/08/2004 20 DEFAULT JUDGMENT granted in favor of plaintiff for the amt. of
$300,000.00 damages; Costs $100.45; Atty. fees $3,536.50; Plaintiff
is awarded interest at the rate of 10% per year fromt he following date
to the date of entry of this judgement with notice of entry and cert of
mailing RE: Item# 19 [ORA] (Entered: 03/09/2004)
50+ LAWSUITS WITH OVER $5-MILLION IN JUDGMENTS AGAINST QBID AND FRANK THE FRAUD OLSEN
WE'RE DOING BUYBACKS. WE'RE DOING UPGRADES. WE'RE GOING MORE BUYBACKS. WE GOT THIS, WE GOT THAT. Q IS ON THE MOVE.
WE'RE FLOODING THE MARKET WITH SHARES TO PAY FOR THE ATTORNEY'S AND THE 50+ LAWSUITS AND ALREADY EXISTING JUDGEMENTS THAT TOTAL OVER $5-MILLION DOLLARS AGAINST THIS COMPANY.
DONT' WORRY THOUGH, SHAREHOLDERS WILL BE PAID.
TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA LTD INC Defendant AUTOMATED TELECOM VS. TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA Small Claims - Palm Springs PSS012070 10/02/2000
TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA LTD Defendant BEST SIGNS VS TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA Small Claims - Palm Springs PSS011728 08/18/2000
TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA Defendant CITY OF PALM SPRINGS VS TRIANGLE MULTI Small Claims INDIO (Over 12 per year) INS072393 02/25/2004
TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA Defendant CITY OF PALM SPRINGS VS TRIANGLE MULTI Small Claims INDIO (Over 12 per year) INS072394 02/25/2004
TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA LIMITED INC Defendant CPS VS TRIANGLE MULTI Small Claims-Palm Springs (over 12 per year) PSS019794 03/17/2003
TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA Defendant CPS VS TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA Small Claims INDIO (Over 12 per year) INS069893 06/23/2003
TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA LTDINC Defendant DIXON VS OLSON Small Claims - Palm Springs PSS014946 08/16/2001
TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA LTD Defendant KIDPIX ENT VS TRIANGEL MULTI Small Claims - Palm Springs PSS015411 10/10/2001
TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA LTD INC Defendant MISSION LINEN SUPPLY VS TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA Ltd Civil - General Civil - >$10,000.00 INC018708 08/11/2000
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant GREAT IDEAS VS OLSEN SMALL CLAIMS (USE SCP) PSS005152 05/14/1998
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant COTTON VS TRIANGLE SMALL CLAIMS (USE SCP) PSS006171 09/10/1998
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant WINMARK CONCEPTS VS TRIANGLE SMALL CLAIMS (USE SCP) PSS006209 09/15/1998
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant GOLD VS OLSEN Small Claims - Palm Springs PSS007590 03/09/1999
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant BROADCAST SUPPLY WORLDWIDE INC VS TRIANGLE BROAD Ltd Civil - General Civil - <$10,000.00 INC009709 11/13/1998
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant BROADCAST SUPPLY WORLDWIDE INC VS TRIANGLE BROAD Ltd Civil - General Civil - <$10,000.00 INC009709 11/13/1998
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant SHELDON BAY VS FRANK OLSEN ET AL Breach of Contract INC012006 04/29/1999
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant R G MILLER ASSO VS OLSEN Ltd Civil - General Civil - <$10,000.00 INC014110 09/27/1999
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant JPE VS CO MEDIA Small Claims - Palm Springs PSS017117 04/30/2002
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant HALF DAY VIDEO VS PS STUDIOS Breach of Contract INC019108 09/13/2000
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant SPOKANE TEACHERS CREDIT UNION VS OLSEN ET AL Ltd Civil - General Civil - >$10,000.00 INC024732 09/11/2001
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant BRAD NESTE;ET AL VS. FRANK OLSEN;ET AL Fraud INC027744 03/07/2002
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant FENNELY VS OLSEN Ltd Civil Unlawful Detainer <$10,000.00 INC047394 12/03/2004
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant FENNELY VS OLSEN Ltd Civil Unlawful Detainer <$10,000.00 INC047394 12/03/2004
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant WHITE BROS VS OLSEN MC Unlawful Detainer Under $10,000.00 Palm Springs PSC103781 07/09/1998
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant CURTIS VS OLSEN LC-Unlawful Detainer-Under $10,000.00 Palm Spgs PSC105020 03/08/1999
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant FENNELLY VS OLSEN LC-Unlawful Detainer-Under $10,000.00 Palm Spgs PSC112511 04/08/2003
OLSEN, FRANK Defendant FENNELLY VS. OLSEN LC-Unlawful Detainer-Under $10,000.00 Palm Spgs PSC112697 05/21/2003
JUDGEMENT ENTERED FOR FRAUD AGAINST FRANK OLSEN.
$300,000 JUDGEMENT ENTERED AGAINST FRANK THE FRAUD OLSEN PERSONALLY AND TRIANGLE MULTI-MEDIA.
CT. 1: BREACH OF CONTRACT
CT. 2: MONEY HAD AND RECIEVED
CT. 3: MONEY LENT
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 3: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 4: FRAUD
CT. 1: BREACH OF CONTRACT
CT. 2: MONEY HAD AND RECIEVED
CT. 3: MONEY LENT
CT. 4: FRAUD
03/08/2004 20 DEFAULT JUDGMENT granted in favor of plaintiff for the amt. of
$300,000.00 damages; Costs $100.45; Atty. fees $3,536.50; Plaintiff
is awarded interest at the rate of 10% per year fromt he following date
to the date of entry of this judgement with notice of entry and cert of
mailing RE: Item# 19 [ORA] (Entered: 03/09/2004)
WAY TO GO FRAUDSTER WAY TO GO! RA RA
.0017 Q IS DEFINITELY ON THE MOVE.
HERE'S YOUR LEVEL II
BID
4X.0151
3X.015
1X.0148
1X.0146
2X.014
ASK
2X.052
1X.0153
1X.0154
3X.0155
14:53:15 5000 0.0151 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:53:06 25000 0.0151 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:53:03 900000 0.0152 + OTCEQ_NBB
14:52:57 23000 0.0151 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:52:57 23000 0.0152 + OTCEQ_NBB
14:52:54 38064 0.0151 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:52:54 7336 0.0151 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:52:54 92664 0.0151 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:52:54 7336 0.0151 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:52:54 45400 0.0152 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:52:54 100000 0.0152 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:52:33 39420 0.0152 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:52:33 250000 0.0153 + OTCEQ_NBB
14:52:18 60000 0.0153 + OTCEQ_NBB
14:52:18 200000 0.0153 + OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:51 315000 0.0152 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:48 10000 0.0153 + OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:45 65555 0.0153 + OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:42 50000 0.0152 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:42 90000 0.0154 + OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:39 35000 0.0154 + OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:36 500000 0.0152 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:36 500000 0.0152 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:36 500000 0.0154 + OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:33 55000 0.0154 + OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:27 10000 0.0152 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:27 50000 0.0154 + OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:12 51948 0.0152 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:12 5000 0.0152 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:12 100000 0.0152 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:12 13000 0.0152 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:12 35716 0.0152 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:12 22716 0.0152 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:12 464284 0.0152 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:12 100000 0.0153 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:12 5000 0.0154 + OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:12 51948 0.0154 + OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:12 100000 0.0154 + OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:12 7284 0.0153 - OTCEQ_NBB
14:51:12 500000 0.0154 OTCEQ_NBB
OH,I SEE PEOPLE STILL TRYING TO PUSH THEIR MARKET CAP RELIGON ON US. TRYING TO COMPARE HOW QBID WOULD BE VALUED MORE THAN VIACOM; HOW COULD THAT BE.... GEE I WONDER.
VA Linux
Issued On 12/9/99 $30.00
Daily High $239.25 on 12/9/99
Close as of 1/16/01 $2.16
theglobe.com
Issued On 11/13/98 $9.00
Daily High $63.50 on 11/13/98
Close as of 1-16-01 $0.045
Foundry Networks
Issued On 9/28/99 $25.00
Daily High $156.25 on 9/28/99
Close as of 1-16-01 $7.98
Webmethods
Issued on 2/11/00 $35.00
Daily High $212.62 on 2/11/00
Close as of 1-16-01 $22.58
FreeMarkets
Issued on 12/10/99 $48.00
Daily High $280.00 on 12/10/99
Close as of 1-16-01 $20.00
Cobalt Networks
Issued on 11/05/99 $22.00
Daily High $128.125 on 11/05/99
acquired by Sun Microsystems in 12/00
Marketwatch.com
Issued on 1/15/99 $17.00
Daily High $97.50 on 1/15/99
Close as of 1/16/01 $4.00
Akamai Technologies
Issued on 10/29/99 $26.00
Daily High $145.1875 on 12/10/99
Close as of 1/16/01 $4.76
Cacheflow
Issued on 11/19/99 $24.00
Daily High $126.3750 on 11/19/99
Close as of 1/16/01 $2.26
Sycamore Networks
Issued on 10/22/99 $38.00
Daily High $184.75 on 10/22/99
Close as of 1/16/01 $4.83
"According to tried and tested measures, Wall Street today is more over-valued than at any time in the past 150 years. In September 1929, just before the crash, the price-earnings ratio for the S & P index (the main share index at that time) calculated on a backward moving average of earnings, reached 33. That was far higher than at the other two great market peaks of the past century, in 1901 and 1966. Until the 1990s, these three dates were the distant outliers in the history of that crucial ratio: in all threee cases the markets went on to suffer prolonged (and, in 1929, catastrophic) slumps. In January the price-earnings ratio, calculated on the same basis, soared to 44. And this week, after three months of extraordinary turbulence, it was once again at about that level" (Economist 25th March 2000)
The figures are amazing - literally gobsmacking.
------------>Microsoft is said to be worth more than Canada. What can this mean? Microsoft is a firm owned by the world's richest man, Bill Gates, and provides the standard Windows applications service to millions of personal computer users. But Canada is a country where nearly thirty million people live and work. Who knows what wealth its surface area of nearly 10 million square kilometres contains? Likewise Amazon.com is said to be worth more than Texaco,an oil company that has made pots of money for the lucky capitalists that own it. Amazon has yet to turn in a profit. We have to ask - who is Microsoft worth more than Canada for - or Amazon more than Texaco?<---------------
What is fueling the Internet stocks' bubble?
By James Brookfield
12 January 1999
The 1999 opening week on Wall Street saw skyrocketing share prices for a number of Internet-related companies. While to a certain extent this jump continued the late-1998 trend and mirrored the rise in the market as a whole following the autumn interest rate cuts, it has taken on a phenomenal character.
Last week share prices rose 10, 20, even up to 50 percent in a single day for a number of companies. It is not unusual to find Internet firms--Yahoo, the popular search Web site; and Amazon, the bookseller, for example--whose stock prices have quadrupled since September. The overall market capitalization figures have correspondingly gone through the roof. America Online, the popular online service, for example, has seen its price more than triple during this time, giving it a larger capitalization than General Motors.
Why are the prices of the Internet stocks soaring? To find out, I examined one of last week's heavily traded companies, broadcast.com, which bills itself as the "leading aggregator and broadcaster of streaming media programming on the Web." Broadcast.com held its initial public offering on the NASDAQ exchange last July. In September its stock fell from the mid-60s to the low-30s, only to skyrocket to 100 at the end of the year. Last Friday it rose from 132 to 197, a jump of 50 percent. Panicked NASDAQ officials stopped trading and tried to get an explanation from the company, which could offer none. On Monday, after the company announced a two-for-one stock split, its price climbed to 278, a 40 percent gain.
Broadcast.com is little more than a name, a company in search of a business. Its web site is limited, almost amateurish. It produces nothing itself (it relies on "content providers" in Internet lingo). It simply plays ("streams" to use the jargon again) low-quality audio and video generated by other companies (radio stations, CSPAN, etc). The most recent of its "Current Events" is a speech given by Sandy Berger, the US National Security Advisor, on December 23, i.e., more than two and a half weeks ago. Even with a high-speed modem the picture is choppy, hardly a surprise given the still limited technology of Internet video.
The company's most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission is a revealing document. "The Company has incurred significant losses since its inception and, as of September 30, 1998, had an accumulated deficit of approximately $20.2 million." In the first nine months of 1998 it had revenues of $11.4 million, a figure that, within the framework of US capitalism, puts it in the category of small- to medium-size businesses, a group encompassing tens of thousands of generally struggling firms. The company spent $23.1 million in the same period, a figure twice the size of its revenues. Nevertheless, Monday's closing price gives the company a market capitalization ($4.873 billion) larger than Wendy's ($2.831 billion), which has annual earnings of $100 million and 47,000 employees, and more than half that of Delta Airlines ($8.282 billion) which has annual earnings of nearly $1 billion and 70,000 employees.
Broadcast.com's losses, even the company admits, will continue. It's SEC filing states: "The Company expects to incur substantial operating losses for the foreseeable future." Are there plans to cut back? "The Company expanded from fewer than 10 employees on September 20, 1995, to 225 employees on October 31, 1998, and the Company expects to increase its personnel significantly in the near future." It goes on: "The Company currently intends to increase substantially its operating expenses in order to, among other things, (i) expand its distribution network capacity, (ii) fund increased sales and marketing activities, (iii) acquire additional content, (iv) develop and upgrade technology and (v) purchase equipment for its operations."
The long-term outlook is also highly questionable. "There can be no assurance that the company will ever achieve profitability or, if profitability is achieved, that it can be sustained." The SEC filing adds that the company's agreements with its program providers are nonexclusive, i.e., broadcast.com can be underbid. Most of the company's revenue is from short-term advertising on its web site and radio and TV. There is no guarantee that their site will ever be widely used. "It is not known whether businesses and other organizations will utilize the Internet to any significant degree as a means of broadcasting business and other events."
And finally there are the internal problems, including: that nearly all the senior management just joined the company, that nearly all of its equipment is in a single location with no backups maintained, that it may not be able to handle a large increase in user traffic, that it has no guarantee against being hit by the year 2000 problem, and that it carries no insurance to protect it from copyright lawsuits or the loss of key employees.
In other words, the company is a young, small startup facing immense risks and uncertainties. Its underlying fundamentals are shaky. It has few ideas and no real product. Not only its future earnings, but even the company's future existence, are dubious. The skyrocketing share price is entirely speculative.
Broadcast.com has become a magnet for drawing together vast aggregates of capital, which it does not employ for any real constructive purpose. It exemplifies the growing detachment of capital from the social productive process. Money is poured into the market, driving prices up, increasingly without regard to the underlying productive capabilities. The company's dividend from earnings plays an increasingly negligible role in the return on investment in light of the inflated prices. Prior to the 1990s bull market a price-to-earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 20:1 was considered to be at the upper end of a safe investment. In 1999, however, PE ratios of 100 to 200 are increasingly common and ratios of 400 are not unheard of.
------------>For some stocks, like broadcast.com, the PE ratio cannot even be calculated as the company has never earned money.<--------------
EXACTLY SKUNKS. NOT TRYING TO HAMMER RALPH IN ANYWAY.
I SINCERELY HOPE RALPH HAS 10 MIL SHARES AND IT HITS $20 FOR HIM.
Posted by: skunksyard
In reply to: ralph3 who wrote msg# 6160 Date:4/25/2004 12:39:34 PM
Post #of 6176
ralpha...I think what U4TSAF2 is saying is that stocks like QBID have had a history of proven runaways...and U4TSAF2 is not ruling this out...it's just another slant...doesn't make U4TSAF2 credible or not just like your counter point doesn't make you credible or not...
FOXY COULD BE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT HERE!
I'M NOT SAYING IN ANYWAY THAT IF THIS IS THE CAST BUT THE APPLICABLE PRINCIPALS COULD BE CORRECT WITH REGARD TO THE BUYBACK AND CAPITAL RAISING!
Posted by: foxy
In reply to: None Date:4/25/2004 9:59:02 AM
Post #of 6173
QBID now has $35 to $45 Million dollars in cash, to help launch our QTV Channel Network with IMO and theory only, I also beleive that a BIG cable company with Big Pockets bought the 2-Billion shares on the open market that I feel Frank did sell just a few weeks ago.
In fact I feel this company started the buy in of QBID shares on April 12 and ended on or about april 15th. look at the following volume and share prices & see for yourself that all sales where all over 2-cents to a high of 3 cents a share.
Apr 19 2004 0.02 0.02 0.02 567,554,496
Apr 16 2004 0.02 0.01 0.02 783,231,680
Apr 15 2004 0.02 0.01 0.01 1,419,247,104
Apr 14 2004 0.03 0.00 0.02 1,812,583,808
Apr 13 2004 0.01 0.01 0.01 1,545,238,272
Apr 12 2004 0.01 0.00 0.01 763,551,232
Apr 8 2004 0.00 0.00 0.00 304,171,520
What am i trying to say, IMO Frank made some kind of deal with a Cable company with Big Pockets to give QBID the $35 to $45 Million dollars frank needed to get this QTV Network channel on the air and Launch soon. by doing it this way the Big Cable company with Big Pockets not only will get all it's money back after launch, but also now owns a good 1/3 or so of the QTV Channel network.
Now that this mystery ?? Cable company has a big stake in the success of the QTV channel network, I also BET frank and this?? IMO Cable company made some kind of deal that this company can NOT sell any shares till 6-Months from the day they bought in, or starting in no sooner then OCTOBER !!!, due to the fact the QBID share price by October will be much higher then it is now. Now frank at that time has the option of buying back those shares or he just might let this Mystery company buy out all us shareholders at that time. the above is only my opinion and theory but think why Time Warner gave QTV a 10-Year contract, then think does TW help companies that they have a VESTED Interest in finanically.
well time will tell soon enough if?? I was right.
lets all have a great sunday and see you all in the morning for the Gapperrrrr $$$$
Please all read my post #243517 as well, then put Two and Two together for yourself. thanks for your time.
WELL HELLO AGAIN POPE.
GOOD TO SEE YOUR STILL IN WITH US.
MY EXIT IS BASED UPON REAL WORLD RESULTS. AKIN TO OTHER HIGH IMPACT STOCKS, MY STARTING EXIT OF $2.00 AND FULL EXIT THROUGH $4.00 IS NOT UNREASONABLE BY ANY STRETCH. QBID IS WITHOUT A DOUBT A HIGH IMPACT STOCK. IT'S A ALL GAY/LESBIAN Q-TELEVISION NETWORK ABOUT TO LAUNCH.
FOR SOME REASON, PEOPLE SEEM TO THINK THAT IT'S JUST OTHER STOCKS THAT CAN GO UP FROM .017 TO $4.00. MOST JUST BLATENTLY IGNORE WHAT THE TECH BOOM DID IN THE 1990'S. NUMEROUS STOCKS GO UP UP UP BUT FOR SOME REASON, QBID CAN'T BECAUSE OF THE NUMEROUS REASONS AND JUST READ THROUGH THE POSTS. THEY POST THIS REASON OR THAT REASON BUT REFUSE TO USE THAT SAME IDENTICAL THEORIES FOR THE PREVIOUS STOCKS I'LL CONTINUE TO BRING UP AND THEY LINE UP WITH EXCUSES ABOUT WHY THIS AND WHY THAT.
WHEN I WAS WORKING IN THE "FIELD" I RECOMMENDED AND PICKED OTOD GOING ON ABOUT 3-4 YEARS AGO AT .0074 (WHICH YOU ALREADY KNOW GOT ME FIRED) AND ALL THE SAME SONG AND DANCE ABOUT $3.00. MY HEALTHSOUTH I GOT IN AT .08 WENT UP TO OVER $5.00. CARMAXX WAS $1.00 AND I SEEN $20.00. TASER WENT FROM $700 TO $1.60 TO THE CURRENT $124 AND JUST DOWN TO $77.00. MY PICKS CAN'T DO THIS, YOU'LL BE LUCKY TO SEE .50, ETC.ETC.ETC. WELL GUESS WHAT, THEY ALL DID.
I SEE ALOT OF PEOPLE SAY THE EXACT SAME THING BUT THEY CAN NOT JUSTIFY THEIR POSITION. MY PICKS DO WHAT I SAY THEY DO. MY HISTORY PROVES THAT. BUT FOR THOSE WHO WISH TO TRY TO DISCREDIT ME, THEY SIMPLY CAN'T. THEY'LL SAY THIS OR THEY'LL SAY THAT BUT THE BOTTOM LINE IS, I OWN QBID AND I DON'T GIVE A FLYING FLIP WHAT YOU SAY ABOUT MY POSTS FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
NO. 1: YOU ALL CONTINUE TO TELL ME WHY IT CAN'T HAPPEN, WHY IT'S UNREALISTIC, WHY THIS WHY THAT OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN. I SIT AND LOOK AT MY INVESTMENTS AND WHAT THEY DO AND IT PROVES THOSE TRYING TO MAKE A POINT WRONG WRONG WRONG AND WRONG AGAIN.
I WATCH STOCKS EVERYDAY SHOOT THROUGH THE ROOF AND THE REASONS GIVEN, IF YOU APPLIED THOSE VERY SAME REASONS TO THESE OTHER STOCKS THAT GO UP TO THE STRATOSPHERE WOULD MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO DO WHAT THEY DO.
I JUST GOT DONE PLAYING AND SHORTING IPIX WHICH WENT FROM $2.00 TO $24.00 WITH A CLOSE AT $7.00+ ON FRIDAY. ACCORDING TO THESE FOLKS, THAT COULD HAVE NEVER HAPPENED. BUT AGAIN, THIS DID JUST HAPPEN, I PLAYED IT BUT FOR IT TO HAPPEN TO IPIX IS DIFFERENT FOR QBID BECAUSE....... LAST FRIDAY QBID TRADED 1.8 BILLION SHARES AND 30 MIL CASH; NOW GO ASK YOUR PROFESSIONAL BROKER ABOUT A PINK TRADING 1.8 AND 30 MIL CASH AND HE'LL LAUGH. BACK IN THE DAY I SURE WOULD HAVE BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT SCHOOLING/HIGHER EDUCATION TAUGHT ME.
IF WHAT I'VE DONE HAS WORKED. IF MY HISTORY OF STOCKS DOES EXACTLY WHAT I THINK THEY WILL AND EVERY REASONABLE REASON IN MY MIND TAKES MY PICKS AND BASICALLY SHOOTS THEM THROUGH THE ROOFS AND AT THIS SAME TIME, PEOPLE ALL TELL ME THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND YET THEY ARE WRONG; WHAT ELSE AM I SUPPOSED TO THINK?
I'VE PUT $1000 ON THE TABLE TO PROVE ME OTHERWISE AND NO-ONE, NOT A SINGLE PERSON CAN STEP UP TO THE PLATE AND COLLECT THE $1000. IF YOU EXIT AT .50 OR .75 WITH WHAT YOU HOLD IN SHARES; GREAT AND I TRULY AM HAPPY FOR YOU. I KNOW PEOPLE WHO PLAN ON HOLDING OUT TILL $15/SHARE WITH THEIR ENTRY AT .0001 AND GREAT FOR THEM. BUT TO SIT THERE AND TRY TO TELL ME THAT THIS STOCK CAN'T HIT WHAT-EVER PRICE, ESPECIALLY WHEN I PUT $1000 ON THE TABLE TO PROVE ME WRONG; WELL THEY CAN SHOVE IT UP THEIR REAR ENDS!
MY QBID EXIT STARTS AT $2.00 AND ENDS AT $4.00 OR MAYBE A BIT SOONER DEPENDING ON HOW THE STOCK IS DOING.
Posted by: POPE OF LITTLE ITALY
In reply to: dirknot who wrote msg# 6086 Date:4/24/2004 11:51:55 PM
Post #of 6133
hello u4 !!
remember me?
what happened ...got bored on the ALLSTOCKS.COM chat room!!!
by the way.....U4 never takes his CAPS off!!!!!
U4....I'm still holding all my shares, but i still have a difficult time comprehending your exit strategy?
of course everyone has their own strategy, and i like U4's exit price, but i'm a realist, and think its highly unlikely...!
$2.00 exit price...wow....if this baby hits $.75 I'm out!!
of course i would leave 200k shares and wait for that U4 $2.00 !
but i will sell the balance 1,800,000 @ $.750...who's kidding who, i would probably sell @ $.480...IMHO,NEVER GET GREEDY !
u4....BEST OF LUCK MY FRIEND !!
POPE
GOOD LINK POSTED HERE RON. THANK YOU
http://web.archive.org/web/20001204173000/www.qbid.net/press.htm
Posted by: islandboyz
In reply to: ron2w who wrote msg# 6120 Date:4/24/2004 10:50:46 PM
Post #of 6127
http://web.archive.org/web/20001204173000/www.qbid.net/press.htm
NUMEROUS COMPANIES TRADE ON THE PINKS.
YOU HAVE MANY COMPANIES THAT TRADE FROM $.0001 ALL THE WAY UP TO OVER $100/SHARE. THIS IS ANOTHER MISCONCEPTION AND TO THINK UPGRADE IS NECESSARY THAT IS WRONG.
THE FACT IS ECNC DID IN FACT JUMP FROM .03 TO $18/SHARE. THAT DID IN FACT HAPPEN. SO TO SAY THAT THE O/S OR MARKET CAP OR WHAT-EVER IS COMPLETELY WRONG; IT'S NOT ONLY WRONG IN RESPECT THAT IT'S WRONG AT FACE VALUE, BUT HERE'S A STOCK THAT DID IT AND THAT SPEAKS MORE THAN SOMEONE TRYING TO TELL US WHAT CAN AND CAN'T HAPPEN.
PLUS ALL THE NUMEROUS OTHER COMPANIES THAT DID THROUGHOUT THE 1990'S.
Posted by: dkgross
In reply to: ralph3 who wrote msg# 6113 Date:4/24/2004 8:09:52 PM
Post #of 6126
just remember, Ralph...ECNC went from .03 to $18 on emotions and BS press releases in two weeks (of course, it was a complete scam and the CEO is now in jail...)
strange things DO happen. QBID could run to the $2 range on emotion and momentum alone IF they actually get a signal up and Direct TV/Dish or someone starts offering.
but..I agree with you.... .40-.50 cents is a much more viable and realistic price point once a lot of shares are retired, and until some revenue, profits, and LEGIT SEC FILINGS start to happen. Damn..I just can't pound that point into the ground enough. As a pinkie, the Big Boy investors are NOT going to play this. OTC BB is a minimum, and at least two quarters of SEC filings MUST HAPPEN.
WE HAVE 12 HBO'S.
8 CINEMAX
4 SHOWTIMES
1 HOME SHOPPING
1 QVC.
EVERY MAJOR NETWORK NOW HAS A SHOP AT HOME.
DISNEY WORLD WASN'T ENOUGH FOR ORLANDO. LET'S PUT 8 OTHER MAJOR PARKS IN THE SAME AREA AS WELL AS 30 SMALLER PARKS.
COMPETITION ONLY ESTABLISHES THAT WE HAVE A VIABLE MARKET AND WE ARE CLOSE TO BEING THE FIRST. REMEMBER, WE HAVE OUR 10-YEAR DEAL WITH TIME WARNER TO PUT THIS SIGNAL EVERYWHERE!
YOU FOLKS HAVE NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT.
YOU HAVE QBID! :)
Posted by: WallStreetBlues
In reply to: Casprs1 who wrote msg# 6107 Date:4/24/2004 5:05:38 PM
Post #of 6124
yes i suppose u r right in that there is enough room for more than one network...however it will wreck havoc on the short term stock prices as weak hands jump in and out...and that is always a pain to go through...lets just keep our fingers crossed that Qtv launches first and on time...and with quality entertainment worthy of subscribers (and advertisers)money...when that happens i wont be worried in the least about competition...i guess its a wait and see game now...thanks for ur input
RALPH, YOU ARE 1000% WRONG. $7 ALLTIME HIGH!
RULES THAT NEVER CHANGE:
NO. 1: THE MARKET CAP CAN NOT DETERMINE HOW HIGH A STOCK CAN GO.
NO. 2: THE OUTSTANDING SHARES CAN NOT DETERMINE HOW HIGH A STOCK CAN GO.
IN INITIAL RESPONSE, WE DON'T KNOW FOR CERTAIN THE NUMBER OF OUTSTANDING SHARES QBID WHICH YOU STATE IS 15 BILLION. ADDITIONALLY, ON 07/24/1996 QBID HIT 7.00 PER SHARE WITH 7,800 TRADED ON THAT DAY.
I PUT UP A 1-SIDED BET WHICH MEANS YOU DON'T HAVE TO PUT UP ANY MONEY. YOU HAVE TO PROVE THAT QBID CAN'T HIT .10 OR .50 OR 1.00 OR 6.00 WITH THE CURRENT STOCK POSITION. I PUT UP $1000 CASH WHICH I WILL WESTERN UNION TO YOU ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD. IN ADDITION YOU HAVE TO EXPLAIN HOW ALL THOSE INTERNET COMPANIES AND TECH STOCKS FLEW OFF THE HANDLE FROM 1990-2000 AND WENT UPWARDS OF $300-$800/SHARE WHEN THE O/S AND MARKET CAP COULD NEVER JUSTIFY THAT.
I SEE THIS TIME AND TIME AGAIN AND FOR YOU NEW PEOPLE, THE OUTSTANDING SHARES OR MARKET CAP WHICH IS DETERMINED BY THE SHARE PRICE AND NUMBER OF SHARES CAN NOT, WILL NOT, NOR CAN IT EVER DETERMINE HOW HIGH A STOCK CAN GO. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE AND 1000% WRONG.
THE OUTSTANDING SHARES, FLOAT AND MARKET CAP COME INTO PLAY FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
NO. 1: A BUY OUT.
NO. 2: A UPGRADE FROM SAY PINKS TO NASDAQ.
NO. 3: A REVERSE OR FORWARD SPLIT.
NEITHER OF THE TWO WILL APPLY FOR THE MOST PART UNTIL SAY 2-3 YEARS AFTER BROADCAST WHEN IT BECOMES A MAJOR PLAYER. WE HAVE THE ADDITIONAL GUARANTEE OF A NO-REVERSE SPLIT BY FRANK OLSEN AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE REASON FOR THIS IS BECUASE FRANK OLSEN UNDERSTANDS WHAT A R/S REALLY DOES TO A STOCK.
MOST OF YOU LONGER TERM HOLDERS SAY WANT TO EXIT AT $2 OR LESS NONE OF THIS REALLY APPLIES AND IF IT DOES FOR SOME REASON, YOU WILL HAVE PLENTY OF NOTICE.
A RECENT EXAMPLE OF THIS CRAZY SHARE PRICE WHICH BLOWS THE WHOLE THEORY THAT QBID CAN'T DO SOMETHING IS TASR WHICH IS DOWN FROM $800/SHARE TO $1.60 AND NOW BACK UP TO $124 LAST WEEK AND SETTLED AT ABOUT $77 ON FRIDAY. AGAIN, THIS IS ONE EXAMPLE OF MANY.
Posted by: ralph3
In reply to: U4TSAF2 who wrote msg# 6099 Date:4/24/2004 6:46:21 PM
Post #of 6122
U4 What are you talking about??? We never hit high of $7.00 a share EVER. You say your exit is two dollars. Nice to dream but please that would mean Qbid worth 30 billion dollars!!! And as far as SIRI is concerned yes they are in billions of shares but only 2 billion not 15. If they had 15 their share price would be more along lines of 0.40-0.50 a share. That to me is more realistic high that Qbid may be able to make with momentum of a hard launch and retirement of ALOT of shares. Not trying to ruin your day but reality is with 15 billion shares Qbid will not trade in dollars. Show me a tv station trading in dollars with 15 billion shares? There is none. That said I am holding my shares till launch as I have already made my shares free and put a nice chunk of change in my pocket. I do believe Qbid will go higher with launch just not into dollar range. This message has been brought to you all IMO. Ralph3
A NEAT CHART TO GET YOU TO SMILE!
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=5y&s=TASR&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=QBID.PK
FOXY, I THINK YOUR OPTIMISTIC OUTLOOK IS A BIT LOW. :)
I'M A LITTLE MORE OPTIMISTIC THAT THE SHARE PRICE IS GOING TO GO UP A BIT FASTER THAN THIS.
BUT EITHER WAY, WE BOTH ARE RIGHT!
TO BRING UP THE COMPARISION IS APPROPRIATE AND ESPECIALLY FOR THE SHORT TERM AND SHORT TERM MEANING UNDER $5.00.
WE ARE IN THE RIGHT PLACE AT THE RIGHT TIME FOXY! ISN'T THAT NICE FOR A CHANGE.....
MARCH 3, 2006 OR SOONER
L2 QBID
4X4.00
5X3.99
7X3.98
9X3.97
RESISTANCE IS AT $4.00 AND IF WE CAN GET THROUGH THAT THE SKY'S THE LIMIT
Posted by: foxy
In reply to: U4TSAF2 who wrote msg# 6079 Date:4/24/2004 9:34:31 AM
Post #of 6100
Welcome U4TSAF2 to this Message Board & QBID. In 3 1/2 years I have own & sold, Lost money on QBID and yes just in the past two months finally made some big money with QBID. But in all this time I have always said if?? frank can ever officialy launch & air this QTV -Gay 24/7 network nationwide, it would fly like a New IPO or a new yahoo or E-Bay etc, or yes even like SIRI-(Satellite Radio) has already done, and SIRI also has Billions of shares in their float and yet it is almost $4.00 a share already.
In fact I fell SIRI(satellite radio) & our QTV-Channel have one thing in common and that is; BOTH are new pioneers in their own Fields, in other words they are the very First to try something NEW.
Finally now that NTI is now working with the QTV Channel to help it Launch soon, I feel 100% positive that this time around, frank will realize his dream of a 24/7 gay cable channel and so will all of us that have held QBID shares for many years as of now.
also Frank must hire a BIG Advertising agency to make sure every Gay and stright for that matter in the US knows about this Gay Cable channel and how to subscride to it.
and with all of the above being said, I persoanally feel the QBID shareprice just in the next 60 to 90 days if QTVis launched to the nation should be at least, .25 cents to .50 cents a share. IMO
well take care and have a great weekend, see you all on monday for the open.
FJLCISCO, ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE.
AGAIN, LOOK AT ALL THOSE INTERNET COMPANIES THAT HIT THE STRATOSPHERE IN 1990-2000.
RECENTLY LOOK AT TASR!
I DO KNOW THIS, I AM IN A STOCK THAT IS GOING TO DO SOME CRAZY STUFF WITH REGARD TO PRICE. RIGHT NOW, EVEN THOUGH WE'RE TRADING ALOT OF SHARES AND ALOT OF MONEY WHAT DO YOU THINK IS ACTUALLY GONNA HAPPEN WHEN THE BROADCAST IS FOR REAL AND THERE IS NO QUESTIONS ABOUT IT.
ZOOM!
I'M GLAD I DID IS FAR BETTER THAN I WISH I HAD!
Posted by: fjlcisco21
In reply to: None Date:4/24/2004 10:07:33 AM
Post #of 6099
Good Morning everyone!...Has anyone heard what the projection is for this stock? I have read mix target prices. One board said to expect the stock to reach between $10-$15 in 3 to 5 years. Do you guys think this is reachable? Thanks everyone for your guidance on where to sign up to buy stocks. Just opened an account with E-trade that will be funded on Monday thru a wire transfer. I hope that I can get in with you guys then and ride it out to glory!!!!
MY EXIT STRATEGY IS JUST THIS:
I START MY EXIT AT $2.00 AND I WILL FULLY EXIT AT $4.00.
QBID IS ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENT THAN ALL THOSE INTERNET BUBBLE COMPANIES FROM 1986-2000. OUTSTANDING SHARES AND MARKET CAP MEAN ABSOLUTELY NOTTA AT THIS TIME. WE ALREADY HAVE OUR GUARANTEE OF A NO-REVERSE SPLIT AND THAT IS WHY I'M SO STRONGLY PLANTED IN QBID.
PREVIOUSLY WHEN THE STOCK ALMOST BROADCAST, WE HIT .39 AND AN ALLTIME HIGH OF $7.00. WITH BROADCAST BACK IN '01 RANGE, I'M HAPPY IT DIDN'T GET OFF THE GROUND. REMEMBER 9-11? IF Q-TV WAS OPERATING THEN, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A SIGNIFICANT STRUGGLE TRYING TO COMPETE WITH 9-11. SHOOT, JUST WHAT, 3 OR SO YEARS AGO ELLEN TRIED TO BROADCAST A ELLEN SHOW AND WHAT HAPPENED; IT FLOPPED. NOW LOOK AT THE ELLEN SHOW ON OPRAH'S NETWORK OXYGEN. IT'S WORKING DUE TO THE RIGHT ENVIORNMENT.
RIGHT HERE AND NOW, LOOKIE AT EVERYTHING. ALL WE BASICALLY SEE EVERYWHERE IS WAR IN IRAQ AND GAY. TURN ON TV AND ALL THE "HOT" SHOWS ARE GAY. FROM MEDIA TO THE PRESIDENT TO CONGRESS, GAY MARRIAGE DEBATE. WE HAVE MAYOR'S BREAKING THE LAW GIVING AWAY MARRIAGE LICENSES IN SOME STATES. ROSIE IS GETTING MEDIA ATTENTION FOR HER MARRIAGE. WE COULD NOT HAVE PLANNED A BETTER TIME TO LAUNCH Q-TV.
YOU GOT REASON TO BELIEVE QBID IS A SCAM BECAUSE OF WHAT HAPPENED BEFORE. BUT I SAY TO YOU NOW, OVER 8 WEEKS WE ARE UP TO A HIGH OF 27,000%. DID YOU READ THAT RIGHT? TWENTY-SEVEN THOUSAND PERCENT. LAST FRIDAY WE TRADED 1.8 BILLION SHARES AND 30 MILLION CASH.
PEOPLE TALK ABOUT FRAUD THIS AND FRAUD THAT BUT LET ME GIVE YOU SOME HISTORY. ENRON WENT BANKRUPT AND QBID IS ABOUT TO LAUNCH!
I GOT IN AT THAT .00+/- RANGE SO EVEN ON A FRAUD STOCK AND MY EXIT AT .25 IS QUITE FINE WITH ME IF IF IF THIS WAS A FRAUD STOCK!
I'M STILL STICKING AROUND TILL $2.00 :)
I'M GLAD I DID IS FAR BETTER THAN I WISH I HAD....
Posted by: workonboats
In reply to: U4TSAF2 who wrote msg# 6084 Date:4/24/2004 7:36:41 AM
Post #of 6098
Good posts U4. Be interesting to see just how long it takes us to arrive in the $1.00 range. Do you persoanlly have an exit stratagy in mind?
To all, does anyone have any opinions or reasons to believe qbid is a scam. I have no information on the above, and firmly believe in Qbid (gay tv) ((being gay myself)) however just curious as to Franks history and previous false launches.
Thanks, glto
Steve
WORD IS MOVING AND WE'RE UP AT ABOUT 10 MIL DOLLARS TRADED ON A DAILY BASIS ON AVERAGE.
YOUR ABSOLUTELY CORRECT AND PRETTY SOON, ONCE THAT ACTUAL BROADCAST HITS, IT'S GOING TO BE A WHOLE NEW Q-TELEVISION NETWORK ALTOGETHER. DON'T BE FOOLED, MANY PEOPLE ARE WATCHING JUST TO SEE AN ACTUAL BROADCAST. ONCE THAT HAPPENS, ZOOM TO THE STRATOSPHERE.
MARCH 3, 2006 OR SOONER
L2 QBID
4X4.00
5X3.99
9X3.98
2X3.97
RESISTANCE IS AT $4.00 AND IF WE CAN GET THROUGH THAT THE SKY'S THE LIMIT
Posted by: GreatKhan
In reply to: ron2w who wrote msg# 6031 Date:4/23/2004 3:20:19 PM
Post #of 6083
if 12% or 13% of the global investors buys some shares.
yea I could see some action in the pps.
explosive even.
DO NOT EVER USE SCOTTRADE FOR PINK STOCKS.
$22 YOU HAVE TO CALL IN THE ORDER AND YOU GET HAMMERED WITH FEE'S.
FOR THOSE USING AMERITRADE, YOU SPEND 10.99 ONLY. BUDDY OF MINE USES SCOTTRADE AND SPENDS AN AVERAGE OF $50-$70 PER PINK TRANSACTION.
Posted by: ExpressMailing
In reply to: fjlcisco21 who wrote msg# 6049 Date:4/23/2004 7:08:56 PM
Post #of 6082
I think Ameritrade has a $1,000.00 minimum to open an account (that's who I use)... but I've heard scottrade.com is $500.00 minimum.
I KNOW SOMEONE GOING TO THE SHOW MAY 2-4 AND IF I CAN FIND A MOTORCYCLE I'M LOOKING FOR, I'LL BE TAKING THE TRIP UP TO MEET WITH HIM.
Posted by: dirknot
In reply to: None Date:4/23/2004 7:30:18 PM
Post #of 6081
Does anyone think QBID will have any "Investor Relations" information at the trade show? The 24,000 or so people (I read that estimate somewhere) attending the convention might be WOW'ed by QBID's intent, but may not be thinking in terms of stocks.
SOUNDS LIKE A GREAT DAY TO ME.
ALSO SOUNDS LIKE A REALISTIC FUTURE FOR YOU SOON.
WE ARE ABOUT TO LAUNCH YOU KNOW.
:)
Posted by: K
In reply to: Dodgiemtl who wrote msg# 6053 Date:4/23/2004 9:44:39 PM
Post #of 6080
You talk about this is not for the weak heart boy are you correct. Imagine going in your portfolio and seeing this
Gain: +173,596.00 (+7,469.71%)and the only thing in there is QBID.
Now that is a heart stopper
have a nice weeken also
K
Believe in the Magic of Your Dreams
SPEAKING OF THIS LITTLE MOUSE IN YOUR POST.
DO YOU RECALL HOW WALT DISNEY GOT HIS START?
BACK WAY BACK WHEN, HE DECIDED TO DO A FULL MOVIE IN CARTOON FORM. NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE, HORRIBLE TIMING AND WHO WOULD HAVE EVER THROUGHT THAT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A HIT. THIS IS BACK IN A TIME WHEN MOVIES WERE JUST GETTING SOUND.
IF THAT FIRST DISNEY MOVIE HAD FAILED, THERE WOULD BE NO MODERN DISNEY WORLD; PERIOD. WALT'S SUCCESS WAS AT A TIME WHEN IT SHOULD NOT HAVE HAD A MARKET FOR WHAT HE WAS DOING.
QBID IS IN THE MARKET WHERE THE WHOLE ATTENTION IS IRAQ AND GAY MARRIAGE. PICK UP THE PAPER AND READ, MAGAZINES, NBC, ABC, FOX AND OTHERS ALL HAVE GAY PROGRAMMING NOW.
REMEMBER WHEN ELLEN FIRST HIT THE AIRWAVES AND SHE FLOPPED? BAD TIMING. WE ARE IN THE RIGHT PLACE AT THE RIGHT TIME FOR THE RELEASE OF Q-TELEVISION!
I'M GLAD I DID IS FAR BETTER THAN I WISH I HAD.
WE HAVE WATCHED THIS STOCK FLY UP 27,000% IN 8 WEEKS.
LAST FRIDAY WE TRADED 1.8 BILLION SHARES WITH $30 MIL CASH TRADING HANDS.
I DON'T SEE US FALLNG ON OUR BUTTS. THIS ISN'T SEPT 11 2001 BROADCAST WHEN THE WORLD IS FOCUSED ON TERRORISM. THE CURRENT FOCUS IS IRAQ AND GAYS GETTING MARRIED.
HELLO, NEW TO THIS QBID THREAD.
I'M ONE OF THE LUCKY ONE'S WHO GAINED ENTRY ABOUT 8 WEEKS AGO WHEN NO ONE WAS PAYING ATTENTION. FOR THOSE OF YOU ON THIS BOARD, I AM GOING TO MAKE SOME OF YOU MAD. I POST 100% CORRECT INFO WHICH IS SO EASY TO DO.
IF I DON'T KNOW, I SAY SO. IF I KNOW, I SAY SO. IF SOMEONE COMES ON THE BOARD AND POSTS INACCURATE INFO, I'M QUITE NICE. IF THEY POST WRONG INFO, I TRY TO SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT.
IF THEY STICK TO THEIR GUNS LIKE WHAT THEY SAY IS THE ABSOLUTE WAY IT IS, I'LL HAMMER THEM TO NO END.
BACKGROUND IS STOCKS AND I WAS FIRED FOR RECOMMENDING OTOD BACK AT .0074. I PLAY PRIMAIRLY PINK SHEETS FOR THE OUTSTANDING GROWTH POTENTIAL. FOR INCOME, I SHORT STOCKS ONLY AND YES I ALREADY KNOW YOU GUYS HATE US SHORTERS.
I DO HAVE L2 AND I WILL TRY TO POST THAT FREQUENTLY FOR ALL YOU TRYING TO SELL OR BUY. IF YOU ARE NEW AND HAVE QUESTIONS, I WILL DO MY BEST TO ANSWER THEM.
WHILE MY EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE IS PROBABLY FAR GREATER THAN MOST OF THOSE WHO POST ON MESSAGE BOARDS I AM IN NO WAY BETTER OR SMARTER THAN YOU. FOR I TRULY WISH WHEN I FIRST STARTED, I HAD A QBID. BOY WOULD LIFE HAD BEEN A WHOLE LOT EASIER. SO ALOT OF YOU ARE IN THE RIGHT PLACE AT THE RIGHT TIME.
I KNOW I AM
MARCH 3, 2006
L2 QBID
4X4.00
6X3.99
9X3.98
2X3.97
RESISTANCE IS AT $4.00 AND IF WE CAN GET THROUGH THAT THE SKY'S THE LIMIT
SCOTTRADE HAMMERS YOU. NOT ONLY FOR THE $25 FOR PINKIES BUT THE .001 SURCHARGE PER SHARE. AS IF THAT WASN'T ENOUGH, YOU GOT TO CALL IN A PINK ORDER. GEEZ!!!!!!!!!!!
AMERITRADE HAS A 500 OR 1000 MINIMUM TO OPEN AND ALL TRADES ARE 10.99. THAT IS ALL TRADES, PINKS, OTCBB, NYSE; UNLIMITED SHARES, LIMIT AND STOP ORDERS.
IF YOU GOT $5,000 MINIMUM, USE HTTP://WWW.FREETRADE.COM WHICH IS NO COMMISSION FOR YOU FIRST 20 TRADES PER MONTH.
THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FREETRADE AND AMERITRADE IS THE COLOR AND FREETRADE HAS NO PHONE NUMBER TO CALL AND COMPLAIN.
I COMPLETELY, FIRMLY, 100% STAND BY THIS POST.
IT IS TRUE, ABSOLUTELY ACCURATE AND FACTUAL.
AFTER EXHAUSTIVE RESEARCH ON THIS STOCK, THIS BOARD, INVESTORS HUB (NSDM) POST IS THE MOST INACCURATE BOARD WITH INSIGHT TO NSDM STOCK. IS IS FACTUAL THAT ONLY 5% OF THE INFO CONTAINED HEREIN IS ACCURATE.
THE FINGER IS NOW AT YOU FOR EVEN ATTEMPTING TO STATE HOW THINGS WILL CHANGE AND PR WILL BE DIFFERENT OR HOW WALTER WILL BE MOSE DISCREET WITH HIS CONVERSATIONS. YOUR NOW CONFIRMING WHAT I HAVE PREVIOUSLY STATED WHILE IN THE SAME FRAME BEING POLTICALLY CORRECT AND NICELY TELLING ME NOT TO POINT A FINGER.
TAKE YOUR DOUBLE STANDARDS AND SHOVE THEM.
I NOW OWN 37.25% OF THE FLOAT AND SOON TO BE 50%-60% ONCE I GET MY DROP IN PRICE.
GOT MY FIRST LIMIT ORDER IN AT $12.00.
I AM 100% (ONE-HUNDRED PERCENT) ACCURATE TO DATE IN MY PICKS. I'M 100% (ONE-HUNDRED PERCENT) ACCURATE IN MY KNOWLEDGE OF THINGS WITHIN MY PICKS.
SO ONCE AGAIN, TO BEAT THAT DEAD HORSE, THAT PR WAS IN-PART DIRECTED EXACTLY AT THIS BOARD!
WHAT YOU ALL MISSED IN THE PR....
While we appreciate shareholders telephoning us for more information, we have had problems by some of that information being more than slightly altered and appearing on chat boards, this produces confusion to the shareholders. In the future, we will closely adhere to the information given in the press releases as the final information.
THIS STATEMENT IS A DIRECT THROW AT THIS BOARD. HE'S TALKING TO YOU, YOU AND YOU ABOUT YOUR CALLS TO WALTER AND THE POSTING OF SECOND-HAND INFO ON THIS BOARD. GEE, NOW WONDER WHY YOU CAN'T GET ANY "NEW" INFO OUT OF WALTER NOW AND HIS PHONE CALLS WILL BE VAGUE IN RESPONSES AND THEN YOU ALL WILL POST WHY WALTER IS BEING SO VAGUE AND THAT'S NOT A GOOD SIGN. I FIND IT ABSOLUTELY AMAZING HOW THIS BOARD WORKS AND WHAT I RED WHICH IS 1%-5% ACCURATE INFO ABOUT THIS STOCK AND THEN YOU ALL WONDER WHY YOU CAN'T SEEM TO FIGURE OUT WHAT NSDM IS DOING. YOU PEOPLE ARE THE PROBLEM, YOU PEOPLE ARE IN PART DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STOCK FLYING UP TO .099 ON NOTTA BUT OPINIONS AND RUMORS THEN CLAMMER AT THE FACT THAT THE STOCK DROPPED TO .05 CURRENT PRICE. THEN FURTHER SING TUNES ABOUT EVERYTHING UNDER THE SUN ABOUT WHY/HOW/WHEN/ETC. I EVEN RED A POST ON THIS BOARD STATING THAT THE PR STATED THAT THEY ARE RECEIVING FAR TOO MANY TELEPHONE CALLS ABOUT PR; WHERE IS THAT AT? YOU PEOPLE CAN'T EVEN BE ACCURATE ABOUT THE PR TELLING YOU THAT YOUR INACCURATE.
IT'S LONELY AT THE TOP BUT YOU SURE DO EAT BETTER.
THE REASON IT DROPPED FROM .90 IS......
WE DON'T KNOW! NO ONE KNOWS.
PINKS HAVE NO REPORTING SO I CAN'T LOOK AT A FINANCIAL SHEET AND TELL YOU WE SOLD 40% LESS DIAMONDS THIS QUARTER.
ALL STOCKS GO BY THE FOLLOWING:
MORE BUYERS THAN SELLERS: STOCK GOES UP
MORE SELLERS THAN BUYERS: STOCK GOES DOWN
PINKS RELY ON INFORMATION FOR THE MOST PART FOR CLIMBS/DECREASES UNLIKE A NASDAQ OR NYSE THAT RELIES MOSTLY ON FINANCIAL RESOURCES.
SO WHAT MOST PEOPLE THINK IS THAT THERE IS A PROBLEM WHEN THE COMPANY SHARE PRICE DROPS FROM .90 TO .025 WHEN IN ALL REALITY, THERE COULD BE ABSOLUTELY NO REASON FOR THE DROP. JUST LIKE IF THE STOCK GOES FROM .08/CURRENT AND SHOOTS UP TO .50 TOMORROW.
BACK DOWN TO .79/RELIEF FINALLY!
YES, I KNOW MOST OF YOU ARE THRILLED WHEN A STOCK PUMPS UP SO QUICKLY AS THIS HAS OVER THE PAST WEEK BUT IT IS NOT A GOOD THING WHEN YOU HAVE LONG HOLDERS SUCH AS I.
I STAND BY SOME INFO WAS LEAKED NOT JUST TODAY BUT THROUGHOUT THE WEEK BECAUSE THE PAST WEEK HAS SEEN A HUGE PRICE INCREASE AND TODAY IS HUGE VOLUME. ALTHOUGH SPECULATION ALONE COULD HAVE DRIVEN THE PRICE UP BECAUSE OF THE P. RELEASE AND P. CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR TODAY. KNOWING WHAT I KNOW, MOST LIKELY A LEAK OF SOME SORT.
NOW IF THAT LEAK WAS GOOD, WE'LL CONTINUE TO HOLD STEADY AND SLOWLY MOVE UP THE SCALE.
IF BAD, THE STOCK PLUMMETS AND EITHER WAY I'M THRILLED SINCE I CAN ONLY GET THAT MANY MORE SHARES (IF) IT DROPS DUE TO BAD NEWS. WE'VE HAD WAY TOO MUCH GOOD PR AND IT'S ABOUT TIME WE GOT SOME BAD NEWS EVEN THOUGH WHO-EVER READING THIS WONT LIKE TO HEAR THAT. IF WE CONTINUE TO GET 100% POSITIVE PR, I'M WORRIED ALOT.
RAINBOWS COME AFTER RAIN AND I WANT SOME RAIN ON MY PARADE RIGHT NOW.
DON'T GET SO EXCITED....
THIS STOCK HAS ABSOLUTELY FLOWN OFF THE HANDLE IN THE PAST WEEK.
NO NEWS AND ENTIRELY BASED ON SPECULATION OF THE "FINDINGS" WHICH ARE TO BE RELEASED TODAY VIA P. CONFERENCE AND AT THE SAME TIME P. RELEASE.
KEYWORD: SPECULATION
ANY GAIN ON STOCK IS FANTASTIC UNLESS YOUR SHORTING BUT THE HUGE SPIKE ONLY WORRIES ME BECAUSE OF THE GREAT INCREASE SO RAPIDLY.
I'M BEGINNING TO BELIEVE SOME INFO HAS LEAKED OUT FROM NSDM, HENCE WE HAVE A ABSOLUTELY CRAZY VOLUME SO FAR TODAY. ALMOST 3 TIMES NORMAL DAILY TRADING AND IT'S ONLY 10:00 GOING ON 11:00.
MY STOCK IS UP BUT MY NOSE STILL ITCHES!
WOW AND ABSOLUTELY AMAZING!
I'M A PUMP ARTIST, A SCAM ARTIST AND A SHILL! ALL THIS ON A STOCK THAT HAS A MARKET VALUE OF .05/SHARE AND TRADES ON AVERAGE ABOUT 4.5 MILLION SHARES A DAY. LET'S SEE HERE, .05 TIMES 4.5 MILLION EQUALS....
$225,000.00
BOY COULD I MAKE A KILLING BEHAVING LIKE A WEASEL. GOSH AND I'M THE REASON WE CAN'T GET PEOPLE TO INVEST HERE. I'M A POWERFUL PERSON TO HOLD SUCH INFLUENCE OVER A .05/STOCK ESPECIALLY WHEN I TELL PEOPLE TO HOLD FOR 1-5 YEARS. OH WHAT A PRETTY PICTURE I PAINT TO LURE PEOPLE INTO THE DUNGEON OF NSDM.
I HOPE YOU FEELED AS HONORED AS I DO REGARDING THIS REPLY SINCE YOU TOOK THE DEAR SWEET TIME TO POINT OUT ALL THE ABOVE TO ME IN THE FIRST PLACE.
I AM WHAT-EVER YOU SAY I AM, IF I WASN'T, THEN WHY WOULD I SAY I AM; WORSE YET, NO ONE LISTENS TO MY JAM.
NSDM CALENDAR...
THURSDAY FEBRUARY 5, 2004:
GOSH, THE PAST FEW WEEKS HAVE BEEN STRANGE. WE'VE GOTTEN SOME "VAGUE" PR WHICH IS STILL GOOD NEWS AND THE STOCK CONTINUES TO HANG OUT IN THE .05/RANGE.
WEDNESDAY JUNE 2, 2004
GEE, MORE DIGGING SAMPLES RESULTS COME BACK POSITIVE. .15/SHARE AND I'M REALLY HAVING A HARD TIME UNDERSTANDING HOW SUCH A GOOD STOCK WITH SUCH EXCELLENT OUTLOOK IS TRADING SO DARN LOW. THERE MUST BE SOMETHING UP THAT I'M UNAWARE ABOUT.
FRIDAY JULY 5, 2004
ALRIGHT, GOT SOME LEAKED INFO ABOUT THE UPCOMING PR AND MORE AND MORE DIAMONDS ARE BEING FOUND WHILE ONLY DRILLING SAMPLES. FINALLY WHAT WE'VE ALL BEEN WAITING FOR. PR SHOULD BE RELEASED THIS COMING TUESDAY AND OUR TIME HAS FINALLY COME.
TUESDAY JULY 9, 2004
WHAT THE HECK IS ALL THAT CRAP? THEY ARE JUST REPEATING WHAT ALL THE OTHER PR HAS TO SAY. I'M GETTING SO TIRED OF THIS AND I'M REALLY STARTING TO THINK THIS STOCK IS A GHOST GAME AND WORTHLESS.
WEDNESDAY JULY 10, 2004
OH WOW, STOCK SHOT UP TO .25/SHARE. THIS SHOULD OF HAPPENED BACK IN FEBRUARY.
MONDAY AUGUST, 1, 2004
EVERYTHING FINALLY FINALIZED FOR THE UPGRADE TO OTCBB AND FULL REPORTING. THIS IS SURE TO MAKE A HUGE DIFFERENCE. BOY, CAN'T WAIT TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS NOW!
TUESDAY AUGUST 2, 2004
WHAT THE *$^$*%! WE JUST DROPPED BACK DOWN TO .15/SHARE! WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE??? DOESN'T OTCBB UPGRADE AND REPORTING MEAN ANYTHING?
THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 15, 2004
WOW, .40/SHARE. THIS IS PROBABLY A TURNING POINT FOR NSDM. LOTS OF FRUSTRATION BUT IT SEEMS TO BE PAYING OFF. FINALLY SOME RELIEF.
FRIDAY SEPTEMBER 16, 2004
OH MY GOD! THE STOCK JUST DROPPED BACK DOWN TO .20/SHARE. THIS IS CRAP, TOTAL CRAP!
MONDAY OCTOBER 19, 2004
WOW, OUT OF THE CLEAR BLUE THIS STOCK JUST FLYS UP TO .74/SHARE. OH WOW, I'M SO HAPPY I STUCK WITH THIS STOCK THAT IS FINALLY PAYING OFF.
TUESDAY OCTOBER 20, 2004
WHAT THE CRAP, BACK DOWN TO .35/SHARE TODAY? OH SCREW THIS!
THURSDAY DECEMBER 12, 2004
MORE PR, THIS IS INTERESTING, MORE DIAMONDS FOUND IN THE SAMPLES AND WALTER THINKS THIS IS GREAT NEWS BUT THE STOCK JUST WENT UP TO .40/SHARE. WOW!
FEBRUARY 1, 2005
MORE PR, SOME VERY GOOD NEWS THAT I ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND. WE'RE IN PHASE 6 OF 12 AND DIGGING TO ACTUALLY FIND DIAMONDS. THIS IS IT. WOW, GONNA BE RICH!
APRIL 3, 2005
WHAT THE HECK IS THIS? WHAT DO THEY MEAN THEY FOUND NOTTA? I THOUGHT THIS TESTING WAS A GUARANTEE THAT DIAMONDS ARE THERE AND THE STOCK JUST DIVED TO .15/SHARE. THIS TRULY IS WORHTLESS.
APRIL 8, 2005
NO NOTTA AND THE STOCK IS UP TO $1.00/SHARE? HUM, SOMETHING'S UP HERE AND NO ONE'S TALKING.
JUNE 23, 2005
PR SAYS WE FOUND A HOLE AND ARE DIGGING BUT REALLY NOT FINDING GOOD QUALITY DIAMONDS FOR RESALE. CRAP, STOCK BACK DOWN TO .70/SHARE.
JUNE 24, 2005
STOCK GOING BACK UP AND WOW, HIT A NEW HIGH OF $1.25/SHARE. ALRIGHT!
JUNE 25, 2005
CRAP, WHY IS IT DROPPING AND CLOSED AT .90 TODAY?
SEPTEMBER 11, 2005
STOCK UP TO $1.50/SHARE. SEEMS WE'RE GOING PLACES. WAS THIS ALL WORTH IT? YEA IT WAS!
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
PR LOOKS PRETTY POSITIVE, MORE DIAMONDS OF GEM QUALITY ARE BEING FOUND IN BOTH UKRAINE AND CANADA. DIAMOND SALES ARE UP ON THE WEBSITE. ALL GOOD NEWS, THINK WE'RE ON OUR WAY HOME!
NOVEMBER 30, 2005
STOCK JUST DROPPED 30% TODAY? WHY? NO REASON FOR THIS. WHAT THE HECK!
JANUARY 3, 2006
WOW, WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT WE WOULD BE AT THE $2.00 RANGE? NEVER DID I.
FEBRUARY 2, 2006
$2.70 AND GOING STRONG. GO NSDM!
MAY 19, 2006
$4.12 AND WOW. FINALLY WHAT A RELIEF TO SEE SOME REAL RESULTS.
JUNE 5, 2006
WHAT DOES THAT PR MEAN? THAT DOENS'T LOOK GOOD. STOCK DROPPING AGAIN. WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE?
JUNE 15, 2006
OH CRAP, BACK DOWN TO $3.00. I'D BETTER SELL OUT BECAUSE THIS ISN'T GONNA GO UP.
JULY 6, 2006
LOOKS LIKE GOOD PR. DIAMOND RESERVE IS RUNNING LOW AND NSDM IS REALLY HITTING SOME ROUGH DIAMONDS. SALES ARE REALLY GOING UP AND THE NEED FOR ROUGH DIAMONDS IS FANTASTIC.
AUGUST 7, 2006
$7.00/SHARE? $7.00/SHARE! WOOOO HOOOO!
OCTOBER 4, 2006
$9.15/SHARE
DECEMBER 14, 2006
$14.90/SHARE. THINGS GOING STRONG.
FACTS IN; EXCELLENT NEWS!
MOST OF THE BOARD REALLY PLAYED UP THIS PR PRIOR TO THE RELEASE.
JUST AS WALTER PUT OUT THE PR REGARDING DR. HARVEY THORENSON <-----HOWEVER YOU SPELL IT AND ALOT HERE COMPLAINED ABOUT HOW THAT WAS MISLEADING AND THE EXACT SAME THING HAPPENED HERE REGARDING TODAY'S PR.
WHAT MOST WERE EXPECTING WAS SOMETHING TO THE EXTENT THAT SAMPLES CAME BACK AND 80% WE'RE GEM QUALITY RED DIAMONDS. THEN YOU ALL COULD EXPECT THIS STOCK TO FLY OFF THE HANDLE AND GO UP TO $5/SHARE TOMORROW, $10/THURSDAY AND $30/FRIDAY WITH DEBEERS OFFERING A BUYOUT AT $50/SHARE ON MONDAY. AND YOU ALL COULD BRAG ABOUT HOW YOU DID IT.
THE PR AND EXACTLY HOW IT READS IS EXCELLENT AND I WOULD LIKE TO SAY PHENONMINAL BUT I DON'T KNOW HOW TO SPELL THAT WORD EITHER. I'M SURE SOMEONE CAN HELP ME OUT WITH THAT WORD.
WE ARE EXPANDING/SAMPLING/DIGGING ON ADVANCED DIAMOND AREA'S. WHEN WE SAMPLE, THOSE ISSUES THAT HAVE BEEN RELEASED VIA PR, INCLUDING TODAY'S PR, IS EXCELLENT NEWS. THESE AREA'S HAVE BEEN UNDER CLOSE LOOKIES SINCE THE 1960'S. WE NOW HAVE SATELLITE TECHNOLOGY WHICH HAS GREATLY ADVANCED DISCOVERY OF NUMEROUS THINGS. SATELLITES SO ACCURATE THAT THEY CAN COUNT THE GROOVES ON A GOLFBALL.
IN A NUTSHELL, THIS PR TODAY IN PLAIN ENGLISH IS THAT WE CONTINUE TO FIND CERTAIN MINERALS. THOSE CERTAIN MINERALS ARE INDICATOR OF DIAMONDS.
HERE'S A STRESS POINT: ABER STARTED OFF ABOUT THE SAME EXACT WAY NSDM IS NOW AND IN THEIR SAMPLES, THEY HAVE FOUND LESS THAN WHAT WE ARE FINDING. HENCE ABER $30+ SHARE PRICE TO-DATE. WHEN YOU FIND ALL THE STUFF WE ARE IN SAMPLES, YOU ARE GOING TO FIND DIMAONDS. I'M NO LONGER A BROKER (FIRED FOR ABSOLUTELY HIGHLY RECOMMENDING O2-DIESEL (OTOD) AND I'M NOT CONNECTED TO NSDM IN ANYWAY OTHER THAN A SHARE HOLDER WHICH BENEFITS YOU AS A PERSPECTIVE STOCK BUYER NOTTA AND NSDM MAKES NOTTA ON YOUR STOCK BUY. SO I CAN TELL YOU HOW SERIOUS OF FINDINGS THESE ARE WITHOUT HAVING TO POST SAFE-HAVEN LAWS.
WHEN YOU PUT ALL THE PIECES OF THE PUZZLE TOGETHER, YOU HAVE SOMETHING. WHEN YOU TAKE EACH ITEM OF INFO YOU GOT REGARDING NSDM, IN AND OF THEMSELVES MEAN NOTTA BUT WHEN YOU PUT ALL THAT TOGETHER, YOU REALLY HAVE SOMETHING.
IF PINKS ARE YOUR THING AND A .30/EXIT POINT; THEN FINE. CONTINUE TO GO ON AND ON ABOUT THIS STOCK. BUT IF YOU ARE A TRUE LONG TERM HOLDER, JUST LIKE MOST OF YOU SEE .30 TO 1.00 US LONG TERMERS SEE $10+ SHARE. AND FOR THOSE REALLY GUNG-HO, $30/SHARE LONGER TERM. WHY YES THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE REALITY FOR THIS STOCK.
HERE'S A DD POINT. GO BACK AND FIND ALL YOU CAN ON ABER, MICROSOFT, CHECKERS, O2-DIESEL, CARMAXX, HEALTHSOUTH FROM THEIR BEGINNING STAGES WHEN NO-ONE KNEW WHO THE HECK THEY WERE. ALL INDICATORS POINT IN THE SAME DIRECTION AS THIS COMPANY.
NSDM IS ONLY A FEW YEARS AWAY FROM BEING A TIME-WARNER, MICROSOFT, ABER, ETC.
WE TRULY ARE A DIAMOND IN THE ROUGH!
FROM .12 TO $36.00 REALITY
ABSOLUTELY POSSIBLE. AGAIN, LOOK AT MSN, TIME-WARNER AND AOL BACK IN 1985 WHEN THE FIRST "BEGAN".
THOSE STOCKS WENT ABSOLUTELY NUTSO. $200-$300/SHARE AND ABSOLUTELY NOTHING COULD JUSTIFY THAT SHARE PRICE REGARDLESS OF CAP OR MARKET VALUE/CAP. ALL TECH STOCKS FOR THAT MATTER. WITH THE CANADA LANDS STARTING TO COME FORTH WITH GOLD/DIAMONDS/PLATINUM/ETC THIS WILL BE NO DIFFERENT THAN THE INTERNET "BOOM" AND TECH-STOCKS FROM 1986-1998.
I ALSO BELIEVE NSDM WILL FIND RESTING SPACE AROUND THE $40/MARK DOWN THE ROAD. GO HAVE A LOOKIE AT STOCK SYMBOL (ABER)
NSDM IS A AOL/MICROSOFT/TIME-WARNER
ONLY IN THE POSITION I AM BECAUSE OF PREVIOUS PICKS. THE ABSOLUTELY ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MYSELF AND OTHER "DAY" TRADERS IS THAT I TREAT THESE PINKIES AKIN TO NYSE. EVERYTHING I BUY I HOLD FOR LONG TERM IN THE AREA OF 2-5 YEARS.
SEEN THIS STOCK AND IT TRULY IS NO DIFFERENT FROM AOL/MSN/TIME-WARNER BACK IN 1985.
FOR WHAT-EVER REASON U4TSAF2MAI IS IN JAIL.
HAVING REVIEWED MY PREVIOUS POSTS AND COMING TO ABSOLUTELY NO CONCLUSION REGARDING THE "PENALTY", QUITE FRANKLY, I DON'T CARE. HOW ABOUT YOU REVIEW MY PREVIOUS POSTS AND EXPLAIN AS TO WHY I WAS PLACED IN JAIL. ADDITIONALLY, HOW YOU ASSERT KEEPING IT COOL OR LETTING IT DIE DOWN OR WHAT-EVER YOUR INTENTION IS:
WHAT-EVER! FACTS ARE FACTS AND IF YOU READ MY POST CORRECTLY, YOU WILL SEE JUST THAT.
SO IF THIS SCREEN NAME IS "JAILED" SO BE IT. JUST A MEDIATOR WHO HAS THE PROBLEM NOT I.
IF I AM "JAILED" FOR WHAT-EVER REASON, I NO LONGER POST ON THIS BOARD AT ALL. 1 LESS PERSON POSTING MEANING I LESS REVENUE GENERATOR FOR HOW-EVER THIS BOARD IS ESTABLISHED.
REALLY GOT SOME BACK AND FORTH GOING ON HERE WITH SHANDRA.
WELL I UNDERSTAND BOTH SIDES.
NOTHING CHANGES THE FACT THAT NSDM IS IDENTICAL TO AOL, MSN, TIME WARNER BACK IN 1985.
8,000,000.