Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
thanks TSX, that was the guy in a newspaper article that said Urban stole his claims........Hes a lawyer too?
well there ya go Ivert! thanks much. and I see 4profit followed his post up with this
4profit
Junior Member
member is offline
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 64
Re: Rumors and everything else
« Reply #57 Today at 4:02am »
Urban's 6 Holding Companies CMKI
Registered Owner Area(2) Due Date (3) Paid Cnd USDollar
Buckshot Holdings Ltd. (50%)
Commando Holdings Ltd. (50%) 78,177 March 2 and 9, 2003 $938,124 $614,037
101010307 Saskatchewan Ltd. 70,427 May 11, 2003 $845,124 $553,165
101012190 Saskatchewan Ltd. 81,568 August 16, 2003 $978,816 $640,629
101027101 Saskatchewan Ltd. 8,320 March 20, 2004 $ 99,840 $ 65,345
From the CMKI 14C DEF filing to the SEC back in 2003
http://www.secinfo.com/d123Y7.2d.htm
« Last Edit: Today at 4:12am by 4profit »
http://tfant53.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=6915&page=6#33873
thanks TSX, I figured you of all people would know. It kind of reminded me at first, of that Orben Laliberte (sp)
who claimed Urban tried to steal some claims from him.
TSX interesting couple of posts...... Al Moen is my guess and Mark Hutchison??
whereisthekimber
New Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 7
Re: Rumors and everything else
« Reply #49 Today at 8:02pm »
Wanted to know what happened, Sept 2, 2004 we were supposed to sign amendments to our contract (2190) al.m. and mark h., we were at the Shark Club in Saskatoon, over dinner they were tipsy and bragging about the places they were going to, then they asked me if I have ever been to the Bahamas, and being a poor Indian prospector, that kind of irked me, so I said okay let's sign the amendments now, so we went into lobby, I tried to look at the amendments but he kept flipping the pages so I just yanked it out of his hand and told him I needed time to look at amendments and left. If I would have signed, I would have signed out everything! This contract I have with 2190 has Sask Gov't written all over it. They could not fool me. I started prospecting in 1994 and found something in 1997 in Green Lake then signed a deal with a major company from Australia and when you find gold, diamonds, etc, it's major excitement so I know how these guys felt.
you can read this posts here
http://tfant53.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6915&page=5
Our World Live, Inc. (OWL.tv) with CEO/founder and executive producer Michael Williams and co-founder/CFO Robert Kay, is the premiere leader in providing an online destination for music fans to experience their favorite artists performing live
Robert Kay..also of CMKM Diamonds fame
same Robert B. Kay? I should think so
http://www.stockbrokerproblems.com/pdf-awards/Poort-99-00665.pdf
thanks jarta, terrific answer..I kind of wondered too, if it was some kind of payback.
jarta, any clue as to their thinking? if it basically was ready to go after the last motion, why not file it right after Al filed his brief? last time there was a motion, the appellate commish took two months for his decision to deny the SEC.
thanks.........lol 50 questions, I turning into Derf!
derf is jail bait?
Helen Bagleys Appeal...filed Dec 2011
http://www.scribd.com/doc/76673201/Bagley-Dec-2011-Transport-Room
have a good one, chat later!
shows you how much I pay attention to that tripe.
LOL...frightening=boring.
thanks jarta, and I agree about Jerry.
no thanks.....its just redundant. rarely read it anymore and when I do, its usually not the cmki board.
once again, what is your RB name? and WHY does everything always have to be some conspiracy, ie: RB posters
absolutely...what in the world did chic ever do except call casavant names and tell jokes? I remember when I would get tossed for spam and argue with RB, what was the spam. RB doesn't care nor do they do any followup as to whether the TOS is valid.
you asked, heck I don't know. but obviously jonas chooses to do what he does, and the others decided not to come back
chic was booted in july and realitys last post was may. I got an email from chic stating he was booted and I emailed RB and asked if they would reinstate him, and they told me no...not if he violated the TOS.
as far as jonas, who knows, he probably is a computer guru
obviously, the others chose not to go get a new alias.
roilky, whats your RB name? did you ever stop to think that reality and TC where booted off of RB because of TOS reports by the goofball crew?
Chic and lilburrito were. Chic had been a member since 99 I believe.
Why did you, TheCynic, reality.bytes, baloney_cleaver, and a host of others all get afraid of RB in August? Just curious. TIA
did you email the extradition services? or call Jerald Burkin?
how does he get back to his car? I almost got ill on those mt roads
with the cliffs. hes nutz
TSX..wow. did they pre-site? lol. amazing photography, thanks
thanks TSX.
LOL..they left out, it was part of the PLAM!
maybe its time to send a little more info out to these guys?
David Rosenfeld
Associate Director, SEC's New York Regional Office
(212) 336-0153
Steven G. Rawlings
Assistant Director, SEC’s New York Regional Office
(212) 336-0149
Roger Glenn hired Meuses Pacific Stock Transfer AND did the SGGM paperwork.
By: carmelbeach Joseph Meuse news (Edwards got the SGGM shell from him)
12 Dec 2011, 06:05 PM CST
Rating: You rated it: Msg. 1051620 of 1051766
Jump to msg. #
SEC Charges "Shell Packagers"
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2011/2011-262.htm
SEC Charges "Shell Packagers" and Several Others in Penny Stock Scheme
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2011-262
Washington, D.C., Dec. 12, 2011 – The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a shell packaging firm and several others involved in a penny stock scheme to issue purportedly unrestricted shares in the public markets.
Additional Materials
SEC Complaint
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2011/comp-pr2011-262.pdf
The SEC alleges that Joseph Meuse and his firm Belmont Partners LLC – which is in the business of identifying and selling public shell companies for use in reverse mergers – fabricated and backdated documents used to convince a transfer agent and an attorney writing an opinion letter to issue free-trading shares of Alternative Green Technologies Inc. (AGTI). The SEC also charged AGTI and its CEO Mitchell Segal as well as Segal’s business partner Howard Borg and stock promoters David Ryan, Vikram Khanna, and Panascope Capital Inc. for their roles in the scheme that resulted in unknowing investors purchasing fraudulently issued AGTI shares without the protections afforded by the securities laws.
“Shell packagers who buy and sell public companies for use by fraudsters have no rightful place in our markets,†said David Rosenfeld, Associate Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office. “These shell packagers not only sold the shell company, but created the false documents necessary to cause the transfer agent to issue shares that should never have been sold to the public.â€
According to the SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Long Island, N.Y.-based AGTI and Segal, an attorney licensed to practice in New York, knowingly submitted false documents to a transfer agent and an attorney, who relied on them to conclude that free-trading shares of AGTI could legitimately be issued. Virginia-based Belmont Partners and Meuse aided and abetted AGTI’s fraud by knowingly creating and sometimes backdating the false documentation, including a sham assignment of debt and a fabricated and backdated corporate resolution and convertible note. Segal then used the stock certificates illegally issued to fund promotional campaigns promoting AGTI’s stock. The stock promoters – Ryan, Panascope Capital and its president Khanna – were charged with selling the unregistered securities.
The SEC’s complaint charges all defendants with violating Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, and AGTI and Segal with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder. Segal, Meuse and Belmont Partners are charged with aiding and abetting the fraud by AGTI. The SEC’s complaint seeks permanent injunctions and disgorgement against all defendants; a financial penalty against AGTI, Segal, Belmont Partners, Meuse, and Ryan; and officer and director and penny stock bars against Segal and Meuse. The SEC’s complaint also names several relief defendants for the purposes of recovering proceeds they received from the illicit stock sales.
Borg, Khanna and Panascope Capital have consented to the entry of a final judgment enjoining them from further violations of Section 5 of the Securities Act without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC’s complaint. Khanna and Panascope Capital agreed to pay $81,477.10 to settle the charges, and Borg agreed to pay $35,264.05 and surrender to the transfer agent for cancellation more than four million shares of AGTI stock that were illegally issued. The settlements are subject to court approval.
The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Megan Genet and Steven G. Rawlings of the SEC’s New York Regional Office. The SEC’s litigation effort will be led by Todd Brody and Megan Genet.
# # #
For more information about this enforcement action, contact:
David Rosenfeld
Associate Director, SEC's New York Regional Office
(212) 336-0153
Steven G. Rawlings
Assistant Director, SEC’s New York Regional Office
(212) 336-0149
ask Glenn...he posted it. As to being anti-Glenn, only a couple of years.
BTW, is this rumor from the CMKX Unofficial Board true?
"Company just agreed not to appeal glenyn decision and to pay glenn an amount to compensate him for allowing frizell to pursue a frivolous lawsuit against him."
No %$#@!
how many times did your first grade teacher, and those that followed, rap you on the knuckles for constantly having your hand raised?
I never knew that UC was a poster, no clue. As for Glenn, he was basically ousted from E&A and has now set up shop with his wife.
http://www.glennandglenn.com/
Is UC where? Frizzell is still with Co, but doesn't post.
http://www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/
Shareholder update 12.9.2011
To all CMKM shareholders,
The management team of CMKM has changed. The company’s statement earlier this year read as follows:
“The goal of this management is to build a company one step at a time. It is of the opinion of the company that a round table team of shareholders be assembled with approximately 7 individuals. These individuals will assist the company in their past knowledge and their ideas moving forward. It is important that these individuals have a good standing with our shareholders”
Please be advised that the company received several responses to the quest for the round table group and for the CEO position.
October 31, 2011 Tom Stevenson and Stan Polsom resigned their positions as Directors of the Company leaving Roger Summers as the sole remaining Director.
November 17, 2011, Mr. Summers signed a resolution to bring new management onboard to bring in a fresh new perspective.
November 18, 2011 Mr. Steve Kirkpatrick accepted the position as the new President and Chairman of the Board. Please join the Company in welcoming Mr. Steve Kirkpatrick. Mr. Kirkpatrick was one of the people who applied for the position of CEO earlier this year and brings with him a wealth of business contacts and experience that he will utilize in moving the Company forward.
December 6, 2011, Mr. Summers tendered his resignation as a Director of CMKM.
The Company would like to sincerely thank Mr. Tom Stevenson; Mr. Stan Polsom, and Mr. Roger Summers who unselfishly and freely gave of their time to CMKM. It is because of these Men and the Company’s management that CMKM is prepared to move forward.
The Shareholders of CMKM Diamonds will be happy to know that Mr. Kirkpatrick is motivated to continue the growth of the company, the communication between company and shareholders will be better than it has ever been using the new technologies and social media.
Mr. Kirkpatrick will be personally addressing the shareholders through an update on this website by early next week.
The Company's 2010 Tax Return can be found HERE
the lawyers UC hired were paid handsomely.
I will leave that to be answered by the person that found out. Some of his posts had facts that would only be known to him.
Here are some excerpts from the SEC Los Angeles employees that were deposed. This never made it to Court.
10 A Yeah. Well, initially, because he was the author
11 of some of the opinion letters that resulted in the issuance
12 of shares, he was naturally someone of interest to us. This
13 case really was so centered around this, you know, share
14 issuing machine, and since he was a crucial link in that
15 because of his opinion letters, we wanted to look at him. So
16 we did look carefully at him.
17 We took testimony of him and, based on the
18 attorney-client privilege issues, and then ultimately we were
19 able to accomplish a waiver, and then went back and took more
20 testimony from him to see if we could get behind some of his
21 decision-making. And, you know, at the end of the day, it
22 was still a close call. I mean, there were reasons to charge
23 him because of some questions we had about the opinion
24 letters and red flags he should have seen, but then we also
25 had faced — we had an attorney in the case, Dvorak, whose
letters result in the issuance of many more shares. He
received money beyond the fees to write those opinion letters
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
9 A Right. I do not remember if we broke off the 102e.
10 I mean, I think we were sensitive, again, to the Commission,
11 to the General Counsel's Office, to charges against lawyers
12 for being bad, basically just being — making poor judgments,
13 being sloppy lawyers. And I thought, you know, we were
14 sensitive to a recommendation against him in whatever
15 respect, you know, crashing on the rocks of that kind of
16 criticism from the Commission or the General Counsel's
17 Office, or both.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
16 Q And did you have a sense that that cut a particular
17 way once that was known, the fact that he was here?
18 A I did not. I do not think it biased anyone
19 towards — well, let me say this -- I am aware of what has
20 been alleged about him, and the fact that people think we
21 gave him a pass because of that, and I think that is
22 absolutely untrue in every respect. There is no way in the
23 world that we, because of his time at this agency, ever
24 looked less severely, strongly, at his conduct. It was just
25 a fact that we knew, and in some respects you could say it26 argues in favor of charges, because he is somebody that
27 should know better —
Diamondsrus
jarta, when I get to "one of these years" with Glenn, then you can remind me.
ps jarta, get over it and move on, like you did with ecnc and Treffry?
I realize that...but he showed up on the boards to gloat, long before anyone emailed him